Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: ravenrover on March 11, 2023, 02:20:37 pm

Title: No Anderson
Post by: ravenrover on March 11, 2023, 02:20:37 pm
What's happening here then?
Injured again?
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: ravenrover on March 11, 2023, 02:31:07 pm
Just spoke to Tom in Car Park his back has flared up again
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: sedwardsdrfc on March 11, 2023, 02:39:30 pm
2.5 year deal for someone who has regular injury problems. I like the guy but it wasn’t smart to extend that long. Why not do  a year at a time!?
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: roversdude on March 11, 2023, 04:00:12 pm
It’s got to be attractive for the player. Tbh I’m still unsure if he was worth a contract
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: Padge_DRFC on March 11, 2023, 04:05:12 pm
Everyone's concern when we gave this contract. Hope it doesn't be another waste of money like Taylor.
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: glosterred on March 11, 2023, 05:54:54 pm
It’s got to be attractive for the player. Tbh I’m still unsure if he was worth a contract

Fit he’s worth it, unfit no player is worth it

COYR
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: GazLaz on March 11, 2023, 06:48:54 pm
Nelson was better in the centre of the three today. Anderson wasn’t missed at all.
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: Chris Black come back on March 11, 2023, 06:49:58 pm
I said this when it was announced, very surprising. He is a solid pro but he is getting worse, not better and we are playing at a lower level than when he was performing better. He’s a great lad but another two seasons, can anyone see Tom returning to his form of 2-3 seasons ago? Remember, this is a poor, poor level.
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: monkeytennis on March 12, 2023, 01:59:15 pm
Nelson was better in the centre of the three today. Anderson wasn’t missed at all.

This all day long.
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: TheFunk on March 12, 2023, 03:32:04 pm
Yet I'm sure we've kept more clean sheets when Anderson has played.
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: selby on March 12, 2023, 04:26:43 pm
  Wimbledon were the worst attack we have played against for a long time, and still could have got away with a draw in a game our defence should have had it very easy.
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: Usher down the wing. on March 12, 2023, 04:44:38 pm
Nelson was better in the centre of the three today. Anderson wasn’t missed at all.

Let’s keep his performance (as with the rest of the team) in perspective, we were playing against a very, VERY, poor side.

I don’t want to this post to be seen as a negative. Just keep it ‘real’.
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: Padge_DRFC on March 18, 2023, 02:15:53 pm
Missing again today a bit like the rest of the season. Plays a few misses a few. Could be another costly contract offer when we financially struggling as it is and will be more so next season with reduced ST sales
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: roversdude on March 18, 2023, 02:27:46 pm
On the pitch with Taylor going through exercises
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on March 18, 2023, 02:50:55 pm
Missing again today a bit like the rest of the season. Plays a few misses a few. Could be another costly contract offer when we financially struggling as it is and will be more so next season with reduced ST sales

Worth the risk. Centre half's of his stature aren't that easy to find and likely be more costly.
Title: Re: No Anderson
Post by: since-1969 on March 18, 2023, 04:34:32 pm
Just spoke to Tom in Car Park his back has flared up again
Well there’s nothing like signing a new contract to remind you of your injury . That’ll be the last we see of him for the duration !!