Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: ravenrover on January 04, 2024, 04:06:18 pm

Title: McGrath
Post by: ravenrover on January 04, 2024, 04:06:18 pm
Signed
Title: Re: MCgrath
Post by: nightporter on January 04, 2024, 04:07:12 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW2l1V6UFPo
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: CaptainStock on January 04, 2024, 04:24:17 pm
Very good interview, seems to have a good character and personality about him - one I think we, the supporters, can truly get behind.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Paul Simpson on January 04, 2024, 04:35:05 pm
Great news! Welcome Jay and good luck
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Scooter on January 04, 2024, 04:38:21 pm
Good interview. Good luck to him, hope he does well
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: StocksArmy on January 04, 2024, 04:45:42 pm
This means nothing but, just looking at his clips, how comfortable he is in posession and the size of him gives me belief that he will improve us. After what GM has said regarding the recruitment I just can't see this one being a disaster.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: In the box on January 04, 2024, 04:48:36 pm
Finally a signing worthy of the name ..  :scarf:
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: ncRover on January 04, 2024, 04:53:08 pm
In the same way that Faulkner is - he looks a unit for his age!

Left sided centre halves are hard to recruit for too
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Arsenal Of The North on January 04, 2024, 04:58:39 pm
Can we just use his dad’s song and change it to jay? Easy enough.

Sounds like he’s going to get plenty of opportunity
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on January 04, 2024, 05:01:03 pm
GM seems confident he can go straight into the first team squad saying he's going to get plenty of game time.

Without the bigger picture in McCanns head, it's a bit foggy where we're going but, you'd hope this is succession planning beyond Anderson, Wood and then maybe Long and Olowu.

I think we'd all like to see Faulkener get his chances very soon but, either way I hope we can find a secure combination at the back, with back up, so Bailey can be released into midfield. 

Possibly two more to come then? At least one midfield?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Upton Rover on January 04, 2024, 05:06:45 pm
Good luck to him
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: DonnyOsmond on January 04, 2024, 05:08:28 pm
An aggressive defender who will throw his body at the ball. Not bad at playing with the ball at his feet either. Think he's ready for first team football but don't break up a winning defence currently.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Bentley Bullet on January 04, 2024, 05:13:06 pm
I hope he gets more of a chance here than his Dad did! Mcgrath Senior was signed shortly before Michael McIndoe arrived, scuppering his chances as first-choice left-winger.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: keyser_soze on January 04, 2024, 05:31:11 pm
Crikey I hadn’t realised he was John McGraths kid. Making me feel old. He seemed to be here for years but never got a look in due to McIndoes surprise signing and subsequent form (and indestructibility when it came to injuries)
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Avsuptem on January 04, 2024, 05:34:28 pm
If he plays as well as he interviews we have signed a gem. Remarkable composure in one so young.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Sprotyrover on January 04, 2024, 05:40:27 pm
I hope he gets more of a chance here than his Dad did! Mcgrath Senior was signed shortly before Michael McIndoe arrived, scuppering his chances as first-choice left-winger.
I recall that Dad was totally left footed, he would not even touch the Ball with his right foot, quickly got found out!
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Bentley Bullet on January 04, 2024, 05:53:08 pm
I hope he gets more of a chance here than his Dad did! Mcgrath Senior was signed shortly before Michael McIndoe arrived, scuppering his chances as first-choice left-winger.
I recall that Dad was totally left footed, he would not even touch the Ball with his right foot, quickly got found out!
Mcindoe was about as one-footed as Heather Mills so I doubt they had anything against mono-footed players per se.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Ye-Aul-Tavern on January 04, 2024, 06:00:53 pm
A good player. Did very well for Pats when they had Joe Redmond out injured.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: keith79 on January 04, 2024, 06:13:12 pm
Honest question. Is he better than faulkner.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 04, 2024, 06:34:24 pm
Honest question. Is he better than faulkner.

I genuinely think he’s odds against to be better than Faulkner. He may be better on the ball but Faulkner will be a pretty good player I think. This lad, the jury’s out.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: bpoolrover on January 04, 2024, 06:42:24 pm
Honest question. Is he better than faulkner.

I genuinely think he’s odds against to be better than Faulkner. He may be better on the ball but Faulkner will be a pretty good player I think. This lad, the jury’s out.
i think bobby is a quality defender but most teams seem to want defenders that can play out of defence, do you think bf can improve enough on that part of his game
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Alan Southstand on January 04, 2024, 06:44:07 pm
Until we all see him play, none of us really know how good/bad he is. Just let’s wait and see.

The question I ask myself is can he possibly make our defence worse than it has been, at times, this season and the last 2 seasons?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Chris Black come back on January 04, 2024, 06:47:08 pm
Club PR today on him signing is….”knows the club”.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: mushRTID on January 04, 2024, 06:48:14 pm
We either trust Grant or we don’t.

He says he’s ready to come in and make an impact.

He’s better qualified than us.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Reg of the Rovers on January 04, 2024, 07:07:36 pm
Club PR today on his is….”knows the club”.
A fellow Exploding Heads fan?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0l3Fum29xA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0l3Fum29xA)
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: PDX_Rover on January 04, 2024, 07:14:09 pm
It’s very encouraging to have two quality young CBs. Great signing. In Grant we trust.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Alan Southstand on January 04, 2024, 07:40:18 pm
Just been thinking about something DBR wrote on the Romours section:

Quote
I'm just wondering whether we're looking ahead and relaunching a development u23 squad next season with all the young talent we have coming through.

So, I came up with this side:

Ben Bottomley. 21

Will Flint. 17.   Bobby Faulkner. 19.  Jay McGrath. 20.  James Maxwell 22

Sam Straughan-Brown.17. George Broadbent.23. Liam Ravenhill.21/Jack Degruchy.20

Tavonga Kuleya.19.  Jack Goodman18.   Kyle Hurst. 21

It does make you wonder!
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: essexrover on January 04, 2024, 07:48:42 pm
Something in the water at St.Pats at the moment.
He's the third of their FAI cup winning squad to come to England recently, after Carty & Adam Murphy joining Bristol City.
All three are under 21 internationals too, I believe.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: sedwardsdrfc on January 04, 2024, 07:56:09 pm
Just been thinking about something DBR wrote on the Romours section:

Quote
I'm just wondering whether we're looking ahead and relaunching a development u23 squad next season with all the young talent we have coming through.

So, I came up with this side:

Ben Bottomley. 21

Will Flint. 17.   Bobby Faulkner. 19.  Kay McGrath. 20.  James Maxwell 22

Sam Straughan-Brown.17. George Broadbent.23. Liam Ravenhill.21/Jack Degruchy.20

Tavonga Kuleya.19.  Jack Goodman18.   Kyle Hurst. 21

It does make you wonder!

I think it makes sense when you consider something like 3-4 over 23s can also play which will help the injured players comeback sharp. The squad numbers can be made up with the better u18s too so I don’t see it as a squad depth issue.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: drfchound on January 04, 2024, 08:30:56 pm
Also, they won’t be playing every week either.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: normal rules on January 04, 2024, 08:57:54 pm
Welcome Jay. Good luck lad.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 04, 2024, 09:42:31 pm
6’odd, left footed centre half. Had a season in one of the most scouted and watched leagues by EFL clubs. If he’s remotely half decent he would have had plenty of offers.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: dickos1 on January 04, 2024, 09:52:55 pm
6’odd, left footed centre half. Had a season in one of the most scouted and watched leagues by EFL clubs. If he’s remotely half decent he would have had plenty of offers.

He may have done
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Pancho Regan on January 04, 2024, 10:38:27 pm
6’odd, left footed centre half. Had a season in one of the most scouted and watched leagues by EFL clubs. If he’s remotely half decent he would have had plenty of offers.

Just to help me understand, do you mean Rovers must have done exceptionally well in beating off lots of other clubs to sign this lad, or do you mean he probably isn’t even remotely half decent?

Genuine question.

Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Avsuptem on January 04, 2024, 11:11:21 pm
6.3 brick shithouse young but mature left footer, likened to a Kieron Sadlier quality of signing who loves to get stuck in and is, according to our GMC,  good enough to slot straight into the team sounds like a fantastic signing to me. Just what we need.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Donny Dub on January 05, 2024, 12:55:01 am
Yes,  St Patrick’s supporters tell me that both of these young players we have signed give 100% every time they play.   They’re both great competitors (their fans said ‘fighters’
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: wilts rover on January 05, 2024, 06:56:03 am
6’odd, left footed centre half. Had a season in one of the most scouted and watched leagues by EFL clubs. If he’s remotely half decent he would have had plenty of offers.

Rovers shouldn't sign any players who want to play for Rovers.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Plumbster on January 05, 2024, 08:17:44 am
Must admit Gaz’s logic is compelling on this so slightly worried but we have to trust  GM if he thinks there is scope for improvement
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Bentley Bullet on January 05, 2024, 08:21:10 am
6’odd, left footed centre half. Had a season in one of the most scouted and watched leagues by EFL clubs. If he’s remotely half decent he would have had plenty of offers.

Rovers shouldn't sign any players who want to play for Rovers.
"I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member."

Groucho Marx
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Colin C No.3 on January 05, 2024, 09:41:01 am
Must admit Gaz’s logic is compelling on this so slightly worried but we have to trust  GM if he thinks there is scope for improvement

What bl**dy logic!

The manager has given him a two & a half year contract & has stated that he believes McGrath is ready for first team football NOW.

But hey, the oracle has stuck his negative boot in YET AGAIN on a player HE’S never seen kick a ball so clearly GM has wasted the boards money hasn’t he.

Jeez.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: pib on January 05, 2024, 09:52:17 am
Maybe we (as fans) could do this the old-fashioned way and just wait to see whether he's any good or not?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Bollinger on January 05, 2024, 09:59:11 am
Must admit Gaz’s logic is compelling on this so slightly worried but we have to trust  GM if he thinks there is scope for improvement

What? Really?

Last time I looked, Grant McC had played over 500 games as a professional footballer, had over 30 international caps, has had eight years as a manager and all the requisite coaching qualifications.

I’d trust his judgement 100% over and above some self-appointed bar room bigmouth who happens to watch a lot of football on TV.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: ncRover on January 05, 2024, 10:12:56 am
6’odd, left footed centre half. Had a season in one of the most scouted and watched leagues by EFL clubs. If he’s remotely half decent he would have had plenty of offers.

I don’t understand this comment.

Are you expecting us to fight off top 10 League One clubs to get the most desirable players?

Besides, if you watch McCann’s interview he said he did have other offers.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: RoversInSpain on January 05, 2024, 10:14:07 am
So…. Big question…does Jay start v Harrogate?, if so what’s the formation around him?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 05, 2024, 10:17:36 am
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Colin C No.3 on January 05, 2024, 10:36:25 am
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

If you’re including Long & Anderson in those 6 centre halves you’re deluded. I very much doubt either will wear a Rovers shirt again.

Plus, Owen Bailey is not ‘a natural’ centre half just a bl**dy good footballer who can adapt his game. If he’s in your 6 then it suddenly becomes 3.

Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Jonathan on January 05, 2024, 10:44:02 am
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

I don’t think we do need that many. Certainly seems McGrath has come in to compete for a starting place, though I don’t see him starting immediately. Of the rest:

Bailey - Has to start and we as a team have been more effective when he plays at the back rather than in midfield. Form says he has to be counted as a centre half and our first choice at that, so to me that only leaves one other place up for grabs.

Olowu - Very inconsistent but plenty of potential. Rumoured to have attracted interest from Wigan but patchy form probably means this isn’t the optimum time to cash in. I’d rather he stayed to develop here, but would understand if we let him go.

Anderson - I don’t think he’s quite the write off that others do, but the days of him being an automatic pick are probably gone. If we decided to offload I’m not sure where to as he’s under a decent term contract, so does that mean he stays?

Senior - The arrival of McGrath surely makes him a left back now and only emergency cover at centre half.

Wood - I really wanted this to work but thus far it clearly hasn’t. At his best he’d be a great influence on our younger players, but we haven’t seen that. Out of contract at the end of the season and I’d envisage he stays until then. Probably on decent wages.

Faulkner - I want to see him in and around the team rather than shipped out on loan. Has to be one we keep rather than try to sell.

Long - The most likely to be made available for transfer, but given his very limited game time are there likely to be takers?

So as it stands we’re stuck (for want of a better word) with more centre halves than we require. I could understand if we tried to move one or more on, and of those we have the one I’d be most keen to keep is Faulkner due to his potential. Obviously that’s on the assumption that we wouldn’t even entertain selling Bailey who is the best player at the club. Elsewhere there has to be some room for experience in the squad so surely at least one of Anderson and Wood stays.

The rumour mill has us linked with another young left sided centre half on loan. I don’t think we need this at all. 
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: DMnumber4 on January 05, 2024, 10:45:23 am
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

If you’re including Long & Anderson in those 6 centre halves you’re deluded. I very much doubt either will wear a Rovers shirt again.

Plus, Owen Bailey is not ‘a natural’ centre half just a bl**dy good footballer who can adapt his game. If he’s in your 6 then it suddenly becomes 3.



Think what Gaz meant is do we need to be paying wages to 6 centre halves?

Also, do you honestly believe that Tom Anderson will never play for the club again despite having 18 months left on his contract?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: pib on January 05, 2024, 10:59:19 am
Agree with all that Jonathan.

Stick with Bailey and Olowu for now as it seems to be working. Long and Wood will be off in the close season I'm sure.

The question marks are Anderson and Faulkner really - Anderson clearly isn't the player he was and can't be relied on to play every game, and would perhaps be let go in the summer if we hadn't extended his contract to 2025 last season.

Faulkner is now probably competing for the same position as McGrath, so not really sure where that leaves him. I don't think he's ready to be first name on the team sheet every game and made captain as some seem to think, but it seems he'll develop into a decent player if he plays enough games. Do we crowbar him in at someone else's expense? Or do we find him a loan? If it's the latter, it needs to be a good enough level to be worthwhile, but he needs to be playing every week as well. Not straight-forward I wouldn't have thought.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Jonathan on January 05, 2024, 11:09:55 am
Agree with all that Jonathan.

Stick with Bailey and Olowu for now as it seems to be working. Long and Wood will be off in the close season I'm sure.

The question marks are Anderson and Faulkner really - Anderson clearly isn't the player he was and can't be relied on to play every game, and would perhaps be let go in the summer if we hadn't extended his contract to 2025 last season.

Faulkner is now probably competing for the same position as McGrath, so not really sure where that leaves him. I don't think he's ready to be first name on the team sheet every game and made captain as some seem to think, but it seems he'll develop into a decent player if he plays enough games. Do we crowbar him in at someone else's expense? Or do we find him a loan? If it's the latter, it needs to be a good enough level to be worthwhile, but he needs to be playing every week as well. Not straight-forward I wouldn't have thought.

Only thing I’d question is whether Faulkner is competing with McGrath. I’d have had Faulkner down as challenging for the right sided centre back spot. In any case my personal preference would be that he stays and competes in the first team squad now he’s fit. He’s one that we’ve brought the youth system with genuine potential, and it’s time we felt the benefit of that. He can be a very good player at this level I’m sure.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Barmby Rover on January 05, 2024, 11:20:35 am
Maybe he and Faulkner are being planned to be the way forward for the future.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: DearneValleyRover on January 05, 2024, 11:48:08 am
I can see McGrath starting with Bailey
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Shawn_drfc on January 05, 2024, 11:50:57 am
With mcGrath coming in, will we revert to a 3 back?

Sure McCann said went to a 2 due to not having the bodies.

Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: DearneValleyRover on January 05, 2024, 11:52:10 am
I hope not with the players we have four at the back suits us better
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Silkscarf on January 05, 2024, 11:55:07 am
Now we’re playing 4 at the back we need 2 in the team and 2 back ups that are specialist centre backs and just as good. At the moment it’s Bailey and Olowu plus 2 others depending on who is available. We’ll review this in summer I guess depending on who stays.

For me Bailey is an excellent centre back. That’s his position and hopefully he’ll captain the club for a few years as we climb the leagues. He’s a backup midfielder, though I wouldn’t be surprised if he eventually turned out to be great there too. So far he’s been exactly what we needed in central defence so there he stays.

Olowu seemed good to begin with but has had some extremely poor games making horrendous howlers. But he now seems good again.

That leaves 2 spaces. Faulkner stays here and gets games. Plus one other. Presumably that’s McGrath.

Anderson could be paid off, that’s an option depending on cost. Even if he’s fit we can’t rely on him any more. I’m not sure he’s ever properly fit and that’s the main reason his form nosedives and it makes the rest of the defence nervous.

Wood is not the answer next season, injuries will always be a problem now. Better getting a younger CB. We’ve now got one.

Long I feel a bit sorry for as I’ve barely seen him play.

The full backs can fill in when needed. Spend all other funds elsewhere.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: acacia94 on January 05, 2024, 12:04:20 pm
John McGrath and a young Jay lived for a bit just behind my elderly Auntie Rona in Warmsworth. They were very nice and helped out my auntie quite a bit so hoping Jay has developed a right nasty streak in his youth and gives us some mettle at the back.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: turnbull for england on January 05, 2024, 12:14:49 pm
John McGrath and a young Jay lived for a bit just behind my elderly Auntie Rona in Warmsworth. They were very nice and helped out my auntie quite a bit so hoping Jay has developed a right nasty streak in his youth and gives us some mettle at the back.

Would you have preferred him to push your Auntie over at corners?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: acacia94 on January 05, 2024, 12:20:20 pm
Ha! No think he carried her shopping in quite a few times as did John. Very nice people.
Think John played for Daggers in the Conf final against us but as already posted very unlucky we then bought a dazzling left footed Scot.
Good luck Jay and hope he can bring something great for us at the back.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Sprotyrover on January 05, 2024, 12:34:37 pm
I hope he gets more of a chance here than his Dad did! Mcgrath Senior was signed shortly before Michael McIndoe arrived, scuppering his chances as first-choice left-winger.
I recall that Dad was totally left footed, he would not even touch the Ball with his right foot, quickly got found out!
Mcindoe was about as one-footed as Heather Mills so I doubt they had anything against mono-footed players per se.
If my mate coached him at Sprotyrover Crusaders he would have consistently made him play out on his weak side to make him use both his feet!
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Bailey Vickerage on January 05, 2024, 03:25:53 pm
Think it’s likely that he will come in and probs play along side Olowu and have Bailey just infront as the number 6.

Faulkner as the backup option atm.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: ravenrover on January 05, 2024, 03:38:51 pm
Selby probably best to answer the question right or left for Faulkener?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Bailey Vickerage on January 05, 2024, 03:45:39 pm
Selby probably best to answer the question right or left for Faulkener?
Faulkner has to be on the right hand side. Seen him a couple of times on the left and he’s looked shaky.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: selby on January 05, 2024, 04:01:10 pm
 Faulkner has played both right and left, mostly with nobody tackling in mid field in front of him whatever side he played, because that was how it was then.
 Still got a couple of goals and assists and MOM though, can't think pf many who have done that.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on January 05, 2024, 04:11:50 pm
Very good thread this looking at all the permutations.

As said above, Long is the unknown quantity really having just not had enough game time, for such a long time. Agree Wood isn't the future. He'd have to get back fit now and put in some good 90min performances to regain our confidence.

Generally, you would look to pair an experienced CB with a young un, yet we've seen Bailey, particularly in these last couple of games, be the one who organises, making the calls, keeping Olowu and others on their toes. A very calming influence beyond his years.

If we take Bailey out of defence, who are the best combinations?

Anderson and Olowu?
Olowu and Faulkener?
Olowu  and McGrath?
Anderson and McGrath?
Faulkner and McGrath?

The latter obviously more risky with less experience and game time together.

Once in a blue moon someone exceptional like Matt Mills comes along who has ability beyond their years so you wonder and hope, McCann has seen some of that in McGrath.

Faulkener, we know has the heart of a lion and will relish the physical challenges put against him, but yet we haven't seen enough of him to be sure he can sustain a disciplined and structured approach over a period of games. Can he stay calm enough for long enough? I really hope he can.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: mushRTID on January 05, 2024, 04:18:02 pm
6’odd, left footed centre half. Had a season in one of the most scouted and watched leagues by EFL clubs. If he’s remotely half decent he would have had plenty of offers.

McCann has said he had lots of offers including Championship clubs.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: selby on January 05, 2024, 04:23:19 pm
  And he came here? that is a big WOW
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Alan Southstand on January 05, 2024, 04:30:04 pm
The Championship clubs were not offering first team football. He would have been a ‘development’ signing.

Has anyone actually seen the lad play, yet? And I don’t mean clips on YouTube or a host of stats about him.

GM has seen something in him, so that’s a start, surely. Also, we have to measure these 2 signing against what is financially possible, given how many players we’ve got taking a wage and only performing on the physio’s bench!
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Cramby10 on January 05, 2024, 05:19:12 pm
Am I right in thinking that Faulkner is out of contract in the summer? I’m sure I read that. Please correct me if I’m wrong.
If he is, there’s a lot of presumption’s that he stays. The lad has been messed around by the club quite a lot. Wouldn’t surprise me if he sought opportunities elsewhere to be honest.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Bentley Bullet on January 05, 2024, 05:37:10 pm
I hope he gets more of a chance here than his Dad did! Mcgrath Senior was signed shortly before Michael McIndoe arrived, scuppering his chances as first-choice left-winger.
I recall that Dad was totally left footed, he would not even touch the Ball with his right foot, quickly got found out!
Mcindoe was about as one-footed as Heather Mills so I doubt they had anything against mono-footed players per se.
If my mate coached him at Sprotyrover Crusaders he would have consistently made him play out on his weak side to make him use both his feet!
I was exactly the same with my grandson.

I was naturally a left-footer as a kid but persevered with my right until I was just about equally as crap with either. 
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: ravenrover on January 05, 2024, 05:59:41 pm
I see McCann says in his interview a couple of Championship ss well as lower league teams were interested in McGrath
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: selby on January 05, 2024, 06:37:08 pm
  Cramby, the club have another years option on his contract, and in fairness have been good with him while injured.
  Now that is behind him he is straining at the bit to get back and fight for his place and is relishing the competition and doesn't expect anything given.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: RoversInSpain on January 05, 2024, 06:43:46 pm
Very good thread this looking at all the permutations.

As said above, Long is the unknown quantity really having just not had enough game time, for such a long time. Agree Wood isn't the future. He'd have to get back fit now and put in some good 90min performances to regain our confidence.

Generally, you would look to pair an experienced CB with a young un, yet we've seen Bailey, particularly in these last couple of games, be the one who organises, making the calls, keeping Olowu and others on their toes. A very calming influence beyond his years.

If we take Bailey out of defence, who are the best combinations?

Anderson and Olowu?
Olowu and Faulkener?
Olowu  and McGrath?
Anderson and McGrath?
Faulkner and McGrath?

The latter obviously more risky with less experience and game time together.

Once in a blue moon someone exceptional like Matt Mills comes along who has ability beyond their years so you wonder and hope, McCann has seen some of that in McGrath.

Faulkener, we know has the heart of a lion and will relish the physical challenges put against him, but yet we haven't seen enough of him to be sure he can sustain a disciplined and structured approach over a period of games. Can he stay calm enough for long enough? I really hope he can.
No idea who is the best combo but to respond to your question, my huge preference and gut feeling would be Faulkner and McGrath
I’d like to see the others move on in the not too distant future.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: sedwardsdrfc on January 05, 2024, 06:52:38 pm
Hope we don’t revert to 5 at the back just because we’ve a lot of centre half’s. Think we just need to get to 4 players we want to talk us forward in that position and then pick based on form.

For me the 4 are in no particular order Bailey, Faulkner, Olowu and McGrath. Also I think there’s potential in Bailey playing right back which he often basically was when playing the back 3.

I like Sterry but a back 4 with Bailey and Senior at full back and potentially two physically dominant 6’3 centre halves in Bobby and Jay would be interesting. I’d be trying to go that way next season if GM thinks Bobby and Jay look like the real deal.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Chris Black come back on January 05, 2024, 06:54:47 pm
It wouldn’t take a genius to realise that we are not going to be carrying all the current first team centre backs after this window.

Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Faulkner, McGrath and Long, with the lad Flint in and around the squad.

That is a huge cost we are carrying on our modest wage bill.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Lesonthewest on January 05, 2024, 06:56:17 pm
We either trust Grant or we don’t.

He says he’s ready to come in and make an impact.

He’s better qualified than us.

My thoughts entirely, if he's good enough for our manager, he's good enough for me.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 05, 2024, 08:09:15 pm
If the consensus is that Bailey has been our best centre half, would moving him out of that position be wise?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: ncRover on January 05, 2024, 08:22:05 pm
It wouldn’t take a genius to realise that we are not going to be carrying all the current first team centre backs after this window.

Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Faulkner, McGrath and Long, with the lad Flint in and around the squad.

That is a huge cost we are carrying on our modest wage bill.

Is it just me who finds the Richard Wood situation a bit strange?

It was supposed to be a minor calf strain and he’s only played 2 games since early September.

Never been injury prone his whole career.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: sedwardsdrfc on January 05, 2024, 09:00:57 pm
If the consensus is that Bailey has been our best centre half, would moving him out of that position be wise?

Probably not but it’s an option over the course of a season that might work out. Would expect it to be Bailey and one other for now
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: selby on January 05, 2024, 09:01:51 pm
  CBcb, I would be surprised if Long is in the mix now.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Cramby10 on January 05, 2024, 09:05:59 pm
  Cramby, the club have another years option on his contract, and in fairness have been good with him while injured.
  Now that is behind him he is straining at the bit to get back and fight for his place and is relishing the competition and doesn't expect anything given.
ok. Thanks for clearing that up. Great news.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Pancho Regan on January 06, 2024, 12:34:20 am
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?

Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 06, 2024, 02:02:49 am
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Alan Southstand on January 06, 2024, 07:59:51 am
That reads like you’re lumping a lot of these errors onto GM, Gaz, but he’s inherited this shambles. I don’t think you mean it that way, rather we, as a Club, have been shambolic in our planning and actions, which is fair. Trouble is, what’s the manager supposed to do - put up with it or do something about it. If he leaves it until the summer (when most will be gone), we may be back in the Conference (or whatever they call it now).
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 06, 2024, 08:07:31 am
That reads like you’re lumping a lot of these errors onto GM, Gaz, but he’s inherited this shambles. I don’t think you mean it that way, rather we, as a Club, have been shambolic in our planning and actions, which is fair. Trouble is, what’s the manager supposed to do - put up with it or do something about it. If he leaves it until the summer (when most will be gone), we may be back in the Conference (or whatever they call it now).

Obviously Grant isn’t responsible for what’s gone before, but the club is. We can’t just rely on managers to steer the ship.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on January 06, 2024, 08:31:21 am
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

Of course 7 isn't ideal, but nobody should forget we've been victims of circumstance with long term injuries which had forced the manager of the day to recruit to fill gaps.

Take Faulkner out of the equation. Then take Wood out (yes, we can debate the merit of that) and Bailey who wasn't recruited as a centre half and your left with 4, who were recruited by different managers. Four isn't unreasonable to support the team through the course of a normal season to provide competition and cover.

McCann has probably made some decisions and to get from A to B, for a short time, we have to carry more players than necessary in that department.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: DonnyOsmond on January 06, 2024, 09:03:20 am
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

Don't forget Madger.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: roversdude on January 06, 2024, 09:09:46 am
Cummings was a decent player until injury struck, Madger had a spell where he was on fire (and then looked like he’d never kicked a ball before)
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: dickos1 on January 06, 2024, 10:10:09 am
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 06, 2024, 10:21:02 am
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Alan Southstand on January 06, 2024, 10:41:30 am
I’d say the club’s ’recruitment system’ has quite a task on its hands, due to limited finances.

We seem to be working with one hand tied behind our backs, constantly. Trying to find good quality, robust players for next to nothing must be a bit of a headache, at times.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: NickDRFC on January 06, 2024, 10:53:30 am
I’d say the club’s ’recruitment system’ has quite a task on its hands, due to limited finances.

We seem to be working with one hand tied behind our backs, constantly. Trying to find good quality, robust players for next to nothing must be a bit of a headache, at times.

You could say the same about most clubs in League One & League Two. Our recruitment (amongst other things) has seen us tumble from League One play-off hopefuls to bottom half League Two in the space of two and a half years, it’s very difficult to argue that it hasn’t been shambolic in that period. The recruitment of the summer has shown more positive signs but if that’s solely down to McCann then there are still structural improvements that we need to make to ensure it doesn’t return to the shambles of before when he leaves (and these may already be in place, or being set up).
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on January 06, 2024, 12:10:12 pm
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

You're missing the context of how we've ended up in this position.

Looking at who signed, when and by whom, considering the injuries we had at the time, it's not difficult to understand there's some mitigating circumstances.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on January 06, 2024, 03:21:02 pm
When the best defender at the club is a midfielder, some really pointed questions need to be asked about our recruitment strategy.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: dickos1 on January 06, 2024, 03:24:49 pm
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

I agree
We’ve made some dreadful signings, mainly when we were shopping with no cash.
Now we’ve got some cash I don’t think it’s unreasonable to replace the poor signings we made earlier.
It’s certainly not McCanns fault, and if you or I were him you’d be doing exactly the same if you were able to do so
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 06, 2024, 05:57:12 pm
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

I agree
We’ve made some dreadful signings, mainly when we were shopping with no cash.
Now we’ve got some cash I don’t think it’s unreasonable to replace the poor signings we made earlier.
It’s certainly not McCanns fault, and if you or I were him you’d be doing exactly the same if you were able to do so

McGrath doesn’t look like the signing of a team with cash.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: dickos1 on January 06, 2024, 06:02:42 pm
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

I agree
We’ve made some dreadful signings, mainly when we were shopping with no cash.
Now we’ve got some cash I don’t think it’s unreasonable to replace the poor signings we made earlier.
It’s certainly not McCanns fault, and if you or I were him you’d be doing exactly the same if you were able to do so

McGrath doesn’t look like the signing of a team with cash.

Does it not?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 06, 2024, 06:04:22 pm
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

I agree
We’ve made some dreadful signings, mainly when we were shopping with no cash.
Now we’ve got some cash I don’t think it’s unreasonable to replace the poor signings we made earlier.
It’s certainly not McCanns fault, and if you or I were him you’d be doing exactly the same if you were able to do so

McGrath doesn’t look like the signing of a team with cash.

Does it not?

No, he will be on below average for a L2 centre half.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: dickos1 on January 06, 2024, 06:10:13 pm
If you have cash you can still sign players who are good that don’t cost a fortune.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: wilts rover on January 06, 2024, 06:18:03 pm
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

I agree
We’ve made some dreadful signings, mainly when we were shopping with no cash.
Now we’ve got some cash I don’t think it’s unreasonable to replace the poor signings we made earlier.
It’s certainly not McCanns fault, and if you or I were him you’d be doing exactly the same if you were able to do so

McGrath doesn’t look like the signing of a team with cash.

So when McCann said that the board had given him money to get the players he wanted was he lying? Or a bad judge of player? Or so poor a manager he can't see what we need?

https://www.drfc-vsc.co.uk/index.php?topic=289718.msg1279816#msg1279816
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: ncRover on January 06, 2024, 06:44:59 pm
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

I agree
We’ve made some dreadful signings, mainly when we were shopping with no cash.
Now we’ve got some cash I don’t think it’s unreasonable to replace the poor signings we made earlier.
It’s certainly not McCanns fault, and if you or I were him you’d be doing exactly the same if you were able to do so

McGrath doesn’t look like the signing of a team with cash.

Does it not?

No, he will be on below average for a L2 centre half.

He’s 20?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: In the box on January 06, 2024, 06:46:14 pm
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

I agree
We’ve made some dreadful signings, mainly when we were shopping with no cash.
Now we’ve got some cash I don’t think it’s unreasonable to replace the poor signings we made earlier.
It’s certainly not McCanns fault, and if you or I were him you’d be doing exactly the same if you were able to do so

McGrath doesn’t look like the signing of a team with cash.

So when McCann said that the board had given him money to get the players he wanted was he lying? Or a bad judge of player? Or so poor a manager he can't see what we need?

https://www.drfc-vsc.co.uk/index.php?topic=289718.msg1279816#msg1279816
He was using his head and not doing a Ferguson by publicly criticising what he has available. But I very much doubt they the budged had changed by much if at all .
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: dickos1 on January 06, 2024, 06:52:11 pm
Our wage bill must be amongst the biggest in the league. Purely on numbers, our squad is massive.
The budget isn’t the problem it’s how it’s been spent over last 3 years
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: StocksArmy on January 06, 2024, 07:01:05 pm
If the club wanted to turn the season around and I mean REALLY wanted to turn the season around in this window they would.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: knockers on January 06, 2024, 07:06:51 pm
The best thing to spend any money on in this window is to pay off the ten players that he’s never going to pick to play.
 Let’s start next year with a squad that he actually wants.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: ncRover on January 06, 2024, 07:40:49 pm
Our wage bill must be amongst the biggest in the league. Purely on numbers, our squad is massive.
The budget isn’t the problem it’s how it’s been spent over last 3 years

The budget is good this season with the size of the squad and the signings made.

But last year and especially that Wellens / McSheffrey L1 relegation squad, the budget will have been pitiful.

This team is average this year, but it would easily still beat that season’s team in a game.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: dickos1 on January 06, 2024, 08:04:33 pm
Our wage bill must be amongst the biggest in the league. Purely on numbers, our squad is massive.
The budget isn’t the problem it’s how it’s been spent over last 3 years

The budget is good this season with the size of the squad and the signings made.

But last year and especially that Wellens / McSheffrey L1 relegation squad, the budget will have been pitiful.

This team is average this year, but it would easily still beat that season’s team in a game.

I agree and that’s the point I was making earlier when people were saying we had a load of. Enter halves, and we should t sign anymore.
We need to sign more, if we already got a load who aren’t good enough then even more so
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: sedwardsdrfc on January 06, 2024, 08:34:54 pm
We must have the biggest underperformance relative to budget this season in L2. Y a long way I’d imagine.

The fact we have 7 centre halves shows we have a decent budget we’re just choosing to spend it on poor signings.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: dickos1 on January 06, 2024, 08:38:44 pm
McCann had to do this though, he needs the summer to get rid of all the players that aren’t his.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: sedwardsdrfc on January 06, 2024, 08:45:26 pm
McCann had to do this though, he needs the summer to get rid of all the players that aren’t his.


Agree. I’m not saying it’s all his fault, although we should be more consistent.

There were comments saying how we’ve poor players because of limited budget but that’s not true we’ve just wasted it and that pre dates McCann.

Hopefully next season we hire a better medical/ fitness team and allowing a smaller and better quality squad.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 06, 2024, 09:07:32 pm
McCann had to do this though, he needs the summer to get rid of all the players that aren’t his.


Getting rid of players is something we are poor at. Obvious ones will be released but we have a bad habit of giving contracts to players when we shouldn’t and struggle moving players on that are under contract.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: DearneValleyRover on January 06, 2024, 09:11:23 pm
I agree with that Gaz, we are too loyal to players, I’m unsure if the club believes this endears themselves but in reality it does little to attract the right players
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: sedwardsdrfc on January 06, 2024, 09:18:51 pm
McCann had to do this though, he needs the summer to get rid of all the players that aren’t his.


Getting rid of players is something we are poor at. Obvious ones will be released but we have a bad habit of giving contracts to players when we shouldn’t and struggle moving players on that are under contract.

The Anderson one was just bizarre. Cops was involved then because it was before McCann. Stinks of jobs for the boys or just rose tinted glasses on a player who’s been here a while.

Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Chris Black come back on January 06, 2024, 09:26:52 pm
McCann had to do this though, he needs the summer to get rid of all the players that aren’t his.


Getting rid of players is something we are poor at. Obvious ones will be released but we have a bad habit of giving contracts to players when we shouldn’t and struggle moving players on that are under contract.

The Anderson one was just bizarre. Cops was involved then because it was before McCann. Stinks of jobs for the jobs or just rose tinted glasses on a player who’s been here a while.



2.5 years for Anderson. 3 years for Taylor.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 06, 2024, 09:41:48 pm
McCann had to do this though, he needs the summer to get rid of all the players that aren’t his.


Getting rid of players is something we are poor at. Obvious ones will be released but we have a bad habit of giving contracts to players when we shouldn’t and struggle moving players on that are under contract.

The Anderson one was just bizarre. Cops was involved then because it was before McCann. Stinks of jobs for the jobs or just rose tinted glasses on a player who’s been here a while.



2.5 years for Anderson. 3 years for Taylor.

Sentimental decisions. McGrath didn’t need to be 2.5 years either. 18months with an option seems more realistic for this type of player. Helps if your dad is the managers: “head of recruitments” mate though I suppose.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: ncRover on January 07, 2024, 05:49:52 pm
Gaz is right on sentimental decisions.

But I also think there is a strange irrational fear from the club (and sometimes supporters) that if we let a player go and that player subsequently goes on to do semi-decent somewhere else then that is really bad.

As good as he’s been for us, I doubt Cambridge fans are debating whether they should have let Joe Ironside go. Because his time with them naturally came to an end and he was ready to drop a level.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 07, 2024, 05:57:46 pm
Gaz is right on sentimental decisions.

But I also think there is a strange irrational fear from the club (and sometimes supporters) that if we let a player go and that player subsequently goes on to do semi-decent somewhere else then that is really bad.

As good as he’s been for us, I doubt Cambridge fans are debating whether they should have let Joe Ironside go. Because his time with them naturally came to an end and he was ready to drop a level.

There are so many traps/ biases that you can fall into around those situations. Thats just human nature. Eliminating it would be a net long term positive for us.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Chris Black come back on January 07, 2024, 06:01:56 pm
PNE fans now fretting that Whiteman won’t sign his deal and leaves for nowt in summer.  Very bad result for us.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: mushRTID on January 13, 2024, 05:39:47 pm
Solid debut. Lovely left foot on him, big unit.
Not sure if he was at fault for the goal or not but looks an upgrade on Anderson and Olowu.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: big fat yorkshire pudding on January 13, 2024, 05:59:20 pm
Very good debut I thought, impressed me.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: vaya on January 13, 2024, 06:01:06 pm
Distribution pretty good as well.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: jmt23 on January 13, 2024, 06:10:51 pm
It was Nixon almost marking the guy that scored, but we had allowed them to cross the ball also.

Thought he looked a solid, did little wrong and got stuck in where needed, could be a good signing, let’s see.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Cramby10 on January 13, 2024, 06:19:32 pm
This kid looked the business to me. Very impressed.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: drfchound on January 13, 2024, 06:23:34 pm
He reminds me of a left foot version of Matt Mills.
Very impressed with his first showing for us.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: roversdude on January 13, 2024, 06:26:40 pm
Excellent today very vocal, heard him shout for a few headers
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: bobbymax on January 13, 2024, 06:28:17 pm
The one real positive from another forgettable afternoon.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Scooter on January 13, 2024, 06:32:06 pm
He reminds me of a left foot version of Matt Mills.
Very impressed with his first showing for us.

I said exactly the same earlier. Particularly watching him aim for the long cross field pass
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Silkscarf on January 13, 2024, 06:43:00 pm
Fits right in. Enjoyed watching him today.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Nudga on January 16, 2024, 08:48:41 pm
Has he smashed into anyone tonight? I mean like a proper tackle against any of Wigans big lads
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Jersey Rover on January 16, 2024, 09:42:49 pm
Looks like we have a very good player on our hands. Be hot property if he carries on how he’s started. Defo a league if not 2 above us.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: danumdon on January 16, 2024, 09:48:06 pm
Looks calm and in control, looks like he could of been playing there all season, slotted in well and can string a pass too.

Missing link to me is a fit and strong defender who will put their body on the line to play next to him.

Wish GM would tell us what's the score with giving Faulkner a run out. If he never plays we will never know.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: StocksArmy on January 16, 2024, 09:49:46 pm
 2 very good games. Looks a great signing.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Nudga on January 16, 2024, 09:50:29 pm
Is he a thunderbas**rd?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Filo on January 16, 2024, 09:57:14 pm
Is he a thunderbas**rd?

Cultured I would say
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Nudga on January 16, 2024, 10:10:20 pm
Is he a thunderbas**rd?

Cultured I would say

I like cultured, but we do need a thunderbas**rd
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: drfchound on January 16, 2024, 10:27:41 pm
Looks calm and in control, looks like he could of been playing there all season, slotted in well and can string a pass too.

Missing link to me is a fit and strong defender who will put their body on the line to play next to him.

Wish GM would tell us what's the score with giving Faulkner a run out. If he never plays we will never know.

Almost scored with a very good header too.
He will be a threat in the opponents box from free kicks and corners.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 16, 2024, 10:59:21 pm
Contributed to the goal being out of position and Wyke capitalised on the space he left. Olowu could have perhaps done better but he was on his own centrally and the crosser had all the time in the world to pick out Wyke. Olowu was exception in general tonight though. He gets plenty of stick but he was very good on the ball.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Ryaldinhio on January 16, 2024, 11:36:55 pm
Contributed to the goal being out of position and Wyke capitalised on the space he left. Olowu could have perhaps done better but he was on his own centrally and the crosser had all the time in the world to pick out Wyke. Olowu was exception in general tonight though. He gets plenty of stick but he was very good on the ball.

He was pulled put of position trying to cover for Rowe who had wandered, the space the crosser had was criminal.

I am firmly in Joe Olowu camp but by his own standards he wasn't great tonight.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: PDX_Rover on January 17, 2024, 02:15:29 am
Slotted straight and had looked right at home. How long’s his contract???
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: roversdude on January 17, 2024, 07:08:38 am
2.5 years
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 27, 2024, 04:51:34 pm
I’d just like to apologise to Matt Mills on behalf of the rovers fans that compared McGrath to him. Fair hair is where the similarities end.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Chris Black come back on January 27, 2024, 04:55:32 pm
Knows the club.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: KingKendrick on January 27, 2024, 04:55:46 pm
I’d just like to apologise to Matt Mills on behalf of the rovers fans that compared McGrath to him. Fair hair is where the similarities end.

Should have been screaming at Rowe to sit in all afternoon. Wasn’t helped by the fact he was abandoned by what should be an experienced pro
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Padge_DRFC on January 27, 2024, 04:58:12 pm
I’d just like to apologise to Matt Mills on behalf of the rovers fans that compared McGrath to him. Fair hair is where the similarities end.

Doesn't help he's playing next to a LB whose legs went 2 years ago and a CB with the attention span of a 2 year old
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: goalkick on January 27, 2024, 04:59:29 pm
Rowe should never be at lb.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Redroy on January 27, 2024, 05:00:05 pm
Poor today. Got dominated
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 27, 2024, 05:13:17 pm
Rowe should never be at lb.

Out of necessity isn’t it?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Filo on January 27, 2024, 05:46:22 pm
Rowe should never be at lb.

Out of necessity isn’t it?

Maxwell was on the bench, if he’s not fit he shouldn’t be on the bench, I said it last game Rowe should not play left back, goes on walkabouts too many times
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: ncRover on January 27, 2024, 05:47:39 pm
Did Maxwell not play vs Harrogate?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Padge_DRFC on January 27, 2024, 05:48:53 pm
Rowe should never be at lb.

Out of necessity isn’t it?

Maxwell was on the bench, if he’s not fit he shouldn’t be on the bench, I said it last game Rowe should not play left back, goes on walkabouts too many times

He shouldn't play at all he's gone and has done for a few years now
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: ncRover on January 27, 2024, 05:50:28 pm
Olowu was horrific today. He’s meant to have physical attributes. A player like Madden should not winning duels against him.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: dickos1 on January 27, 2024, 06:16:01 pm
McGrath has played 3 games, in 2 of them he’s played very well. I don’t understand the slagging off after a bad game.
Olowu has gone at the game, it’s no coincidence that whoever plays next to him has a v poor game.
McCann makes the full backs push on which puts massive pressure on the centre halves.
We’ve got to go back to 3 at the back for me.

                 Bailey.   Wood.   McGrath.

Nixon/sterry.                                   Maxwell

                      Close.       Craig.

Molyneux.            Ironside.           Adelekum.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: GazLaz on January 27, 2024, 06:18:57 pm
McGrath has played 3 games, in 2 of them he’s played very well. I don’t understand the slagging off after a bad game.
Olowu has gone at the game, it’s no coincidence that whoever plays next to him has a v poor game.
McCann makes the full backs push on which puts massive pressure on the centre halves.
We’ve got to go back to 3 at the back for me.

                 Bailey.   Wood.   McGrath.

Nixon/sterry.                                   Maxwell

                      Close.       Craig.

Molyneux.            Ironside.           Adelekum.

Olowu was much better that JM at Wigan and better than him today…
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Bills view on January 27, 2024, 06:46:29 pm
Midfield is still a major problem. Teams walk through us.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: dickos1 on January 27, 2024, 06:50:11 pm
McGrath has played 3 games, in 2 of them he’s played very well. I don’t understand the slagging off after a bad game.
Olowu has gone at the game, it’s no coincidence that whoever plays next to him has a v poor game.
McCann makes the full backs push on which puts massive pressure on the centre halves.
We’ve got to go back to 3 at the back for me.

                 Bailey.   Wood.   McGrath.

Nixon/sterry.                                   Maxwell

                      Close.       Craig.

Molyneux.            Ironside.           Adelekum.

Olowu was much better that JM at Wigan and better than him today…

In your opinion maybe mate, but for me McGrath was the better player on both games.
Olowu has lost all confidence, panics on the ball, and causes the rest of the side to panic.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Chris Black come back on January 27, 2024, 06:52:25 pm
Olowu is one of a number who regularly shits himself on or off the ball. You could understand if the crowd was constantly on the backs of players but given how poor we have been, it’s been remarkably supportive. Players need to stop soiling themselves and start imposing themselves on games.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Cramby10 on January 27, 2024, 06:52:57 pm
McGrath has played 3 games, in 2 of them he’s played very well. I don’t understand the slagging off after a bad game.
Olowu has gone at the game, it’s no coincidence that whoever plays next to him has a v poor game.
McCann makes the full backs push on which puts massive pressure on the centre halves.
We’ve got to go back to 3 at the back for me.

                 Bailey.   Wood.   McGrath.

Nixon/sterry.                                   Maxwell

                      Close.       Craig.

Molyneux.            Ironside.           Adelekum.

Olowu was much better that JM at Wigan and better than him today…

In your opinion maybe mate, but for me McGrath was the better player on both games.
Olowu has lost all confidence, panics on the ball, and causes the rest of the side to panic.
I was about to say the same. I think Olowu causes chaos and panic in that area of the pitch.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Filo on January 27, 2024, 06:57:04 pm
McGrath got away with two almighty b*llocks today, both occasions it resulted in a Stockport player being in on goal, both times Jones got a save in
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: drfchound on January 27, 2024, 06:58:54 pm
Rowe should never be at lb.

Out of necessity isn’t it?

Maxwell was on the bench, if he’s not fit he shouldn’t be on the bench, I said it last game Rowe should not play left back, goes on walkabouts too many times

Three of the goals today came from right wing crosses, and the two in the second half were balls played into an area vacated by Rowe which gave the winger bags of time to pick out his cross into the middle.
All five goals scored from six yards out.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: ravenrover on January 27, 2024, 08:36:57 pm
Madden gave both our CBs a spanking, gave them their milk and put them to bed. Just too experienced for them to handle
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: The Beast on January 27, 2024, 09:13:50 pm
Olowu was horrific today. He’s meant to have physical attributes. A player like Madden should not winning duels against him.
No more horrific than anyone else in red and white, last ditch tackles stopped a couple of certain goals.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: drfchound on January 27, 2024, 09:17:33 pm
Only the fifth goal was scored by a player who Olowu was responsible for.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: ncRover on January 28, 2024, 11:19:08 am
Olowu missed a crucial header just before the 2nd goal highlight starts.

And we’ve seen Mo Faal make more headed clearances from corners than Olowu this season.

Flakiest defender the club has had. And we’re stuck with him. Fed up of his “oh well” body language after conceding goals for the last 3 seasons.

Let’s not forget the Notts County attempt at putting his body on the line.

It’s not an argument for him if he has a good game as it will just be followed by a bad one.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: StocksArmy on January 28, 2024, 11:46:21 am
Pointing fingers at individuals will get us nowhere. Collectively, McCann has to come up with a plan to make us harder to beat. He won't do though because he obviously believes he should be at a higher standard than he is at and he won't want to be seen as though he is setting up that way against any League Two team. The players are so disconnected in every position and you sit and watch absolutely none of them trying to organise each other. There is a culture at this club where nobody takes any responsibility for being so appallingly sh!t and this is shown by the window being 3 weeks in and the same areas we are so blatantly crying out to be strengthened have been forgotten about. But its ok, we will sign another striker.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: StockportHatter on January 28, 2024, 03:24:17 pm
Olowu was horrific today. He’s meant to have physical attributes. A player like Madden should not winning duels against him.

Madden is an experienced centre forward with a great leap on him. He wins aerial duels against centre backs for fun.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: RoversInSpain on January 28, 2024, 03:41:01 pm
Olowu missed a crucial header just before the 2nd goal highlight starts.

And we’ve seen Mo Faal make more headed clearances from corners than Olowu this season.

Flakiest defender the club has had. And we’re stuck with him. Fed up of his “oh well” body language after conceding goals for the last 3 seasons.

Let’s not forget the Notts County attempt at putting his body on the line.

It’s not an argument for him if he has a good game as it will just be followed by a bad one.
We’ve a few players that are a problem, sadly Olowu is right up there at the top of the problem list.
He is shocking.
How he gets ahead of giving Faulkner a chance I don’t know.
I can see most of our players seem to be right out of the same mould, so similarly weak,and passive. Perhaps Faulkner doesn’t get in because he’s all blood and guts and we couldn’t possibly have that could we.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: drfchound on January 28, 2024, 03:56:14 pm
I’ve watched quite a bit of FACup football over the last few days.
Lots of goals scored from crosses into the six yard box and from free kicks and corners.
Some very good teams conceding them.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: ncRover on January 28, 2024, 04:17:03 pm
Come on Hound. Not many clubs concede 5 goals at home multiple times a season. Was it only Birmingham that have lost more than us in the last 3 years?

There are certain players who have been common denominators over the horror show of the last 3 seasons and 3 managers. So we can point the finger.

We are currently 4 places lower than last season. Let’s look at where last year’s regular players ended up.

Ro-Shaun - N. Ireland (non-league standard)
Mitchell - Harrogate 3rd choice
Barlow - Regular sub for Eastleigh in the NL
Agard - No club

How many of the current players doing up for expiry get a minimum League 2 move?
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Filo on January 28, 2024, 04:18:51 pm
Olowu missed a crucial header just before the 2nd goal highlight starts.

And we’ve seen Mo Faal make more headed clearances from corners than Olowu this season.

Flakiest defender the club has had. And we’re stuck with him. Fed up of his “oh well” body language after conceding goals for the last 3 seasons.

Let’s not forget the Notts County attempt at putting his body on the line.

It’s not an argument for him if he has a good game as it will just be followed by a bad one.
We’ve a few players that are a problem, sadly Olowu is right up there at the top of the problem list.
He is shocking.
How he gets ahead of giving Faulkner a chance I don’t know.
I can see most of our players seem to be right out of the same mould, so similarly weak,and passive. Perhaps Faulkner doesn’t get in because he’s all blood and guts and we couldn’t possibly have that could we.

Strange how you always jump on Olowu, but give others a free ride, he was probably at fault for one goal, not all five, have a look at the left back position first
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: drfchound on January 28, 2024, 04:36:23 pm
Come on Hound. Not many clubs concede 5 goals at home multiple times a season. Was it only Birmingham that have lost more than us in the last 3 years?

There are certain players who have been common denominators over the horror show of the last 3 seasons and 3 managers. So we can point the finger.

We are currently 4 places lower than last season. Let’s look at where last year’s regular players ended up.

Ro-Shaun - N. Ireland (non-league standard)
Mitchell - Harrogate 3rd choice
Barlow - Regular sub for Eastleigh in the NL
Agard - No club

How many of the current players doing up for expiry get a minimum League 2 move?

I agree that we concede plenty of times from balls into our six yard box.
So do other teams. I don’t know the actual stats because I don’t take a lot of notice of how many times they do it.
What I do know though is that we don’t defend those situations well but better teams than us are doing it on a regular basis.
People were saying how bad we were to concede that Wike goal for Wigan but then accepted the header by Bailey as a good goal when it was almost a mirror image of the Wigan one.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Colin C No.3 on January 28, 2024, 06:12:13 pm
My friend, 5 headed goals two of them from corners (set pieces) that surely the defence is drilled on time & time again on defending i.e marking ‘the big fellas’, picking up runners into the box, watching videos of the opposition on set pieces the list should go on so that you have a well drilled ‘unit’ which will give you every opportunity to clear the ball on such occasions, not every time of course, but tell me something.
When a free kick outside the box or a corner is given against us, what are you thinking as our opponent looks to deliver the ball into the box? What’s your gut feeling?

Because I for one am sh**ting myself, every time. I’ve been anxious in the past of course because obviously it is a huge opportunity to score but these days I can barely watch!

Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on January 28, 2024, 06:44:40 pm
The very worst thing about yesterday was this.

When the first goal went in, I didn't feel anything.

Not disappointment.

Not anger.

Not hope that we could turn it round.

Just a sort of, "Ah well, that was inevitable" dullness.

I go to football to feel some stronger emotion than I get in most of the week. I've very, very rarely not engaged at matches. I'm on the edge of my seat. I'm the one where, when we are 2 down with 5 minutes left, I'm thinking "If we can grab one now..."

But not this season. Week after turgid week we look clueless, passionless, disorganised and worst of all, we look as though there's no spirit or pride.

I can cope with limited players. I can cope with mistakes. What I can't cope with, is a total and utter lack of heart. The feeling, more weeks than not that getting f**ked all over by Division 4 sides is just one of them things. Not something that anyone at the club seems to care too much about.

McCann's demeanour in the post match interview summed it up. A sort of anaesthetised emptiness as though what happens, happens.

It really feels like everything needs to be gutted at this club and for us to start from scratch. Starting with players who f**king hurt like hell when they let themselves down.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: roversdude on January 28, 2024, 07:24:23 pm
First half we relied on Craig marking a player at the back post who must have been a good foot taller than him
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Filo on January 28, 2024, 07:52:57 pm
First half we relied on Craig marking a player at the back post who must have been a good foot taller than him

And it happened time and time again, but we never addressed it
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: drfchound on January 28, 2024, 07:57:58 pm
Yep, I mentioned that yesterday.
Number 11, main target for far post corners.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: StocksArmy on January 28, 2024, 08:43:58 pm
The very worst thing about yesterday was this.

When the first goal went in, I didn't feel anything.

Not disappointment.

Not anger.

Not hope that we could turn it round.

Just a sort of, "Ah well, that was inevitable" dullness.

I go to football to feel some stronger emotion than I get in most of the week. I've very, very rarely not engaged at matches. I'm on the edge of my seat. I'm the one where, when we are 2 down with 5 minutes left, I'm thinking "If we can grab one now..."

But not this season. Week after turgid week we look clueless, passionless, disorganised and worst of all, we look as though there's no spirit or pride.

I can cope with limited players. I can cope with mistakes. What I can't cope with, is a total and utter lack of heart. The feeling, more weeks than not that getting f**ked all over by Division 4 sides is just one of them things. Not something that anyone at the club seems to care too much about.

McCann's demeanour in the post match interview summed it up. A sort of anaesthetised emptiness as though what happens, happens.

It really feels like everything needs to be gutted at this club and for us to start from scratch. Starting with players who f**king hurt like hell when they let themselves down.

Word for word this is how I feel. Id love to bring my son to games when he is older but imagine going it now? If your kids are at the age where they want to start getting into football games can you imagine taking them to the eco power? My brother attempted to start taking my neice and nephew, bought them season tickets and they now point blank refuse to go. Thats how bad we are that kids who have no idea what is going on are recognising its tripe and not at all enjoyable.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: mushRTID on September 21, 2024, 09:57:13 pm
We either trust Grant or we don’t.

He says he’s ready to come in and make an impact.

He’s better qualified than us.

Pleased I trusted Grant with this one.
What a player we could have on our hands. Another good performance today, been our best player now over the last 3-4 weeks.

A bit of shithousery creeping in too.

Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: scawsby steve on September 21, 2024, 10:45:12 pm
Tremendous today. This kid's going to make us a lot of money.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Usher wide. on September 21, 2024, 11:06:26 pm
Another Matt Mills in the making.

Whichever GM decides to play as his pair of central defenders when all are fit (& yes, given Woods is team captain) you can’t leave out McGrath. I say that even though I would also say ‘Big Tom’ is back to playing the stalwart we love to see & for me was MOTM today.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: jmt23 on September 22, 2024, 07:55:28 am
He was good again, but a bit sloppy with the ball today, and at times was slowing us down holding the ball for too long, but overall very good.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: Chris Black come back on September 22, 2024, 09:12:12 am
He’s also got a shot on him.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: sf9944 on September 22, 2024, 09:41:35 am
What I like about this guy is that game to game you can see progression.  Also that he appears to have all the necessary attributes (physicality, drive, courage, intelligence, skills) and therefore his ceiling is high.

He is improving game on game but has a lot of improving left in him and his confidence also seems to grow by the game.

Be interesting to see how far he can go.
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: adamtherover on September 22, 2024, 10:36:53 am
He's not average to a bursting run into the box and unleashing a thunderbolt of a shot as well!!!
Title: Re: McGrath
Post by: RoversInSpain on September 22, 2024, 12:13:43 pm
He’s also got a shot on him.
He’s got a header on him as well, when attacking he always seems to out leap whoever is marking him. If he can get his direction tuned in we’re going to see some great headed goals from him.
Nearly got a stunner yesterday with the last touch of the game.