Viking Supporters Co-operative
Viking Chat => Off Topic => Topic started by: Filo on March 29, 2024, 10:09:56 am
-
Why can’t I view any update on that thread, I can’t even see my latest post on there
-
Me neither.
-
I thought it was just me and reported it in the forum issues, where I see filo's post.
-
And me
If you click on a post to quote it as if in a message you can dee the latest posts
-
I can see the posts if not logged in, they disappear when I login
-
It's probably a sign that Angela Is Innocent
-
It’s the deep state, the very deep state
-
The last one I can see on there is by sproty on 28th March.
-
I know…Nothing!!! It wasn’t me!
-
It's them old lucky legs
-
It's them old lucky legs
You old misogynistic t**t.
-
Hey Steve I can see you posted on the AR thread there's a few of us that can't
-
I reckon the mods have derailed the thread because we're all drooling over Angela's legs, which is detracting from the political substance of the subject.
I still reckon she flashed Boris though.
-
Hey Steve I can see you posted on the AR thread there's a few of us that can't
Yes, I posted it, Syd, but nothing happened. Is this the start of Putin's cyber attacks?
-
I'll just point out that most of those getting stuck into AR are the ones that pronounced Starmer guilty of beergate before the fact and and that johson was innocent of partygate, just saying like.
-
Hey Steve I can see you posted on the AR thread there's a few of us that can't
Yes, I posted it, Syd, but nothing happened. Is this the start of Putin's cyber attacks?
Logged out I can read the 'missing' posts
-
I'll just point out that most of those getting stuck into AR are the ones that pronounced Starmer guilty of beergate before the fact and and that johson was innocent of partygate, just saying like.
I can't recall one person on here saying that Johnson was innocent of Partygate.
-
I'll just point out that most of those getting stuck into AR are the ones that pronounced Starmer guilty of beergate before the fact and and that johson was innocent of partygate, just saying like.
I can't recall one person on here saying that Johnson was innocent of Partygate.
Ha,ha,ha,ha
I can't express enough ha,ha without filling up all the pages on the off topic on that one.
Must be an age thing SS,like your band of friends keep hilariously joking about.
-
I'll just point out that most of those getting stuck into AR are the ones that pronounced Starmer guilty of beergate before the fact and and that johson was innocent of partygate, just saying like.
I can't recall one person on here saying that Johnson was innocent of Partygate.
Ha,ha,ha,ha
I can't express enough ha,ha without filling up all the pages on the off topic on that one.
Must be an age thing SS,like your band of friends keep hilariously joking about.
Show me the evidence, and I'll hold my hand up, as I always do.
As regards having lots of friends, especially in the South Stand, that's what happens when you're a good guy.
-
You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.
There is the usual flannelling of course ............
''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.
Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''
-
You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.
There is the usual flannelling of course ............
''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.
Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''
You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.
-
Just accept that it is genuine, I don't deliberately mislead Steve unless it is just a bit of banter then of course I may give someone a poke
-
You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.
There is the usual flannelling of course ............
''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.
Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''
You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.
SS, it says much about Syd that he spent around two hours scanning 250 pages of a thread looking for something to prove your statement wrong.
If he has found something he should do what he asked me to do when accusing me of deleting a post, SHOW THE POST AS IT APPEARED ON THIS FORUM.
Just show it as a quote.
If he can do that we can see that it isn’t something else that he has made up.
-
You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.
There is the usual flannelling of course ............
''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.
Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''
You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.
With word search it takes a couple of minutes or less Steve, it's not difficult.
-
Just show the post Syd, as it appears on the forum.
If it’s easy why don’t you do it?
-
You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.
There is the usual flannelling of course ............
''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.
Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''
You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.
And ...... if you ever want to find who posted anything just copy and paste it into the word search box and voila there it is.
-
You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.
There is the usual flannelling of course ............
''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.
Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''
You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.
And ...... if you ever want to find who posted anything just copy and paste it into the word search box and voila there it is.
Slandersome Syd strikes again!
-
sue me spotty?
-
Did someone mention sue?
-
Did someone mention sue?
As I've said before, mate; Rita, Sue, and Sydney too.
-
How is Adelaide anyway.
-
Did someone mention sue?
I regret every time I read one of your comments hound, you're a full time troll
-
Did someone mention sue?
I regret every time I read one of your comments hound, you're a full time troll
Foll de roll, and I'll eat you for supper.
-
Did someone mention sue?
I regret every time I read one of your comments hound, you're a full time troll
Aawww, poor thing.
Don’t worry cobber, the feeling is mutual.
As you said to me, if you can’t take it then don’t dish it out.
-
Happy to see it struck a nerve aye?
-
Happy to see it struck a nerve aye?
Ha, no chance.
-
Happy easter little fella
-
Old lucky legs with a thread of her own and then Syd comes along.
-
Ole Papa won’t be happy, Syd being his naughty spiteful sinner self on Easter Day!
Say 10 hail Mary’s Syd and give yerself a good slap!
-
Ole Papa won’t be happy, Syd being his naughty spiteful sinner self on Easter Day!
Say 10 hail Mary’s Syd and give yerself a good slap!
Yes; a good flagellate would do him good.
-
There's some rather embarrassing,misogynistic posting going on here
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
It's like the Garrick Club on here at times,old boys old mentality! :(
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
The likes were because of Syd derailing yet another thread, Tommy.
As regards Angela's legs, she's admitted herself that it used to put Boris off. It's all just light-hearted banter.
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
It's like the Garrick Club on here at times,old boys old mentality! :(
What was it that made you so ageist? Has some big old guy given you a slapping?
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
It's like the Garrick Club on here at times,old boys old mentality! :(
What was it that made you so ageist? Has some big old guy given you a slapping?
Maybe pearly offered a necklace to the wrong fella?
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
The likes were because of Syd derailing yet another thread, Tommy.
Mine was specifically because of that.
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
The likes were because of Syd derailing yet another thread, Tommy.
As regards Angela's legs, she's admitted herself that it used to put Boris off. It's all just light-hearted banter.
Thames Water are looking for someone with your skills to handle the media if you're interested Steve
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
The likes were because of Syd derailing yet another thread, Tommy.
As regards Angela's legs, she's admitted herself that it used to put Boris off. It's all just light-hearted banter.
You will of course be supporting this with a citation from the MP herself Steve, otherwise it is just part and parcel of putting women down, misogyny if you like, no?
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
The likes were because of Syd derailing yet another thread, Tommy.
As regards Angela's legs, she's admitted herself that it used to put Boris off. It's all just light-hearted banter.
You will of course be supporting this with a citation from the MP herself Steve, otherwise it is just part and parcel of putting women down, misogyny if you like, no?
If you want to see real misogyny, Syd, go on the football forum and see some of the comments against women's football, and how I always defend the women's game vehemently.
-
I don't actually Steve but nice deflection, are you going to post proof?
Also if you are volunteering to be a shadow mod you're going to be a lot busier that you usually are as it means you'll have to 'see' all the posts you appear to conveniently miss.
-
Hey up Syd you been sorting the Riots in ‘Alice’ on behalf of Albinese last week?
-
Glad you've bought a telly spraty it will help keep you off the streets yourself
-
Why would I be on the Streets?
-
I don't actually Steve but nice deflection, are you going to post proof?
Also if you are volunteering to be a shadow mod you're going to be a lot busier that you usually are as it means you'll have to 'see' all the posts you appear to conveniently miss.
Oh I forgot, Syd, you don't go on the football forum, as you're obviously not very interested in football.
Well, it takes all kinds.
-
I don't actually Steve but nice deflection, are you going to post proof?
Also if you are volunteering to be a shadow mod you're going to be a lot busier that you usually are as it means you'll have to 'see' all the posts you appear to conveniently miss.
Oh I forgot, Syd, you don't go on the football forum, as you're obviously not very interested in football.
Well, it takes all kinds.
[/quote
So you are a champion of women on one thread but post rubbish about them on another and it's my fault, great work Steve.
-
Syd, you need to put your post outside the blue box. You really do get worse.
By the way, we beat Wrexham tonight; not that you're interested.
-
Steve maybe you should take responsibility for your own posts and check what you write the next morning too.
-
Syd, you need to put your post outside the blue box. You really do get worse.
By the way, we beat Wrexham tonight; not that you're interested.
He won’t have a clue about the game SS.
-
I always thought when I was a kid Australia must be a long way away, the test team taking days to sail there.
Now I question if it's too near, and should I be sending comfort parcels to his neighbours.
-
Comfort Parcels? They need Ear Plugs!
-
Comfort Parcels? They need Ear Plugs!
Or a big stick.
-
Comfort Parcels? They need Ear Plugs!
Or a big stick.
To hit yourself with Pearly?
-
Police investigate Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner in council house row https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68797258
Hmm Police are investigating Angela Rayners Tax affairs!
-
Wonder if she will stick to her standards (Boris obvs didn’t)
https://x.com/angelarayner/status/1485986345067634699?s=46&t=ineOQWVeqaGIc2ZoyBwTGA
-
Wonder if she will stick to her standards (Boris obvs didn’t)
https://x.com/angelarayner/status/1485986345067634699?s=46&t=ineOQWVeqaGIc2ZoyBwTGA
Boris had standards?
-
Bog standard
-
Police investigate Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner in council house row https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68797258
Hmm Police are investigating Angela Rayners Tax affairs!
Also, her breaking of electoral law.
The bloke who lived next door to the council house she sold says that her never saw he there at all in the four years he had been resident there.
-
Police investigate Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner in council house row https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68797258
Hmm Police are investigating Angela Rayners Tax affairs!
Also, her breaking of electoral law.
The bloke who lived next door to the council house she sold says that her never saw he there at all in the four years he had been resident there.
A friend of a friend said..
Now it's gospel
-
Police investigate Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner in council house row https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68797258
Hmm Police are investigating Angela Rayners Tax affairs!
Also, her breaking of electoral law.
The bloke who lived next door to the council house she sold says that her never saw he there at all in the four years he had been resident there.
A friend of a friend said..
Now it's gospel
We will see.
-
Well the Police have enough evidence to interview Rayner if they didn’t they would have told the Tory’s where to get off, clearly Andy Burnham and his Labour Bros had been putting pressure on the GMP not to get involved but when N0 10 rings You Jump to it!
-
Well the Police have enough evidence to interview Rayner if they didn’t they would have told the Tory’s where to get off, clearly Andy Burnham and his Labour Bros had been putting pressure on the GMP not to get involved but when N0 10 rings You Jump to it!
You don't need to have evidence before you interview someone, you interview someone to get evidence!
-
Well the Police have enough evidence to interview Rayner if they didn’t they would have told the Tory’s where to get off, clearly Andy Burnham and his Labour Bros had been putting pressure on the GMP not to get involved but when N0 10 rings You Jump to it!
Really? Both things the Tories/Guido Fawkes are alledging Rayner committed are time limited. Even if she did do whatever it is she is alledged she can't be prosecuted for them.
You reckon that's a good use of police time and money? If only the Daily Mail whould put every crime committed in the UK every day then they might get investigated.
-
And on the subject of 'evidence' - (ie something you have seen in the papers) here's the Daily Mail apology that it was 'mistaken' in claiming & printing something about the Clapham chemical attacker that was not true.
https://twitter.com/MailOnline/status/1778479442634920029
-
Well the Police have enough evidence to interview Rayner if they didn’t they would have told the Tory’s where to get off, clearly Andy Burnham and his Labour Bros had been putting pressure on the GMP not to get involved but when N0 10 rings You Jump to it!
Really? Both things the Tories/Guido Fawkes are alledging Rayner committed are time limited. Even if she did do whatever it is she is alledged she can't be prosecuted for them.
You reckon that's a good use of police time and money? If only the Daily Mail whould put every crime committed in the UK every day then they might get investigated.
They don't care if it's time limited it's that it happened. Given the comments she made about Boris eating sandwiches at the wrong time with wrong people she really has to be squeaky clean.
-
Didn't you call for Starmer to be investigated because he had a beer, pud?
-
Didn't you call for Starmer to be investigated because he had a beer, pud?
Didn’t you call for Boris to be sacked because he did the same though Syd.
-
Here's all those that lost their money trying to smeer Starmer, double or quits?
https://www.drfc-vsc.co.uk/index.php?topic=283693.0
-
Well the Police have enough evidence to interview Rayner if they didn’t they would have told the Tory’s where to get off, clearly Andy Burnham and his Labour Bros had been putting pressure on the GMP not to get involved but when N0 10 rings You Jump to it!
Really? Both things the Tories/Guido Fawkes are alledging Rayner committed are time limited. Even if she did do whatever it is she is alledged she can't be prosecuted for them.
You reckon that's a good use of police time and money? If only the Daily Mail whould put every crime committed in the UK every day then they might get investigated.
They don't care if it's time limited it's that it happened. Given the comments she made about Boris eating sandwiches at the wrong time with wrong people she really has to be squeaky clean.
The defence of Johnson and Co for having parties? All praise to our masters.
-
Well the Police have enough evidence to interview Rayner if they didn’t they would have told the Tory’s where to get off, clearly Andy Burnham and his Labour Bros had been putting pressure on the GMP not to get involved but when N0 10 rings You Jump to it!
You don't need to have evidence before you interview someone, you interview someone to get evidence!
Hey up Glynn, I doubt very much that GMP had any interest in looking into the affairs of an opposition MP ,regarding to such trivial matters as Dodging Capital gains Tax. Clearly some one at Downing Street has been doing some Sleuthing and GMP will have been presented with a dossier of evidence which has caused them to get involved, Rayner should have kept her ‘Estate Girl’ gob shut instead of calling names, believe me there will be enough evidence to charge an interview will merely be a formality!
-
And on the subject of 'evidence' - (ie something you have seen in the papers) here's the Daily Mail apology that it was 'mistaken' in claiming & printing something about the Clapham chemical attacker that was not true.
https://twitter.com/MailOnline/status/1778479442634920029
Good grief Wilts what has that got to do with Raynergate?
-
This is the sort of decent Tory MP that the party used to be full of.
https://x.com/richardhorton1/status/1780130294927970414
Yes, of course Rayner will have to resign if she's found to have broken the law. But the thought of her being hounded by a billionaire Tory who is a resident of Belize so he pays f**k all tax, and who has a history of chumming up to Russian kleptocrats is, frankly, disgusting.
-
It isn’t pretty, I agree bst.
However I don’t think it is out of the realms of reality for any politician to do similar if it makes life difficult for a member of another Party
-
It isn’t pretty, I agree bst.
However I don’t think it is out of the realms of reality for any politician to do similar if it makes life difficult for a member of another Party
Playground Politics, ignoring the real issues, what they were elected to do, instead trying to discredit an opponent, as Rayner has said if she is found guilty of a criminal offence she will resign
-
It isn’t pretty, I agree bst.
However I don’t think it is out of the realms of reality for any politician to do similar if it makes life difficult for a member of another Party
Playground Politics, ignoring the real issues, what they were elected to do, instead trying to discredit an opponent, as Rayner has said if she is found guilty of a criminal offence she will resign
Fuuuuuuccccckkkkkkiiiiiinnnnngggggg hell!
https://youtu.be/nKUGSlv0Bo8
-
Gobshite, subjected to the same package of slime and innuendo that she was perfectly happy to subject others to in the past decides she doesn't like it!
Nobody cares about the money!
"Playground Politics, ignoring the real issues, what they were elected to do, instead trying to discredit an opponent, as Rayner has said if she is found guilty of a criminal offence she will resign"
Pitiful.
-
Gobshite,
Pitiful
For one moment the I thought you were going to do a self portrait,you know,one of your usual random rants.
Ah you did.
-
Nick Boles, former Tory MP, in today's Times:
-
danum: ''Gobshite, subjected to the same package of slime and innuendo that she was perfectly happy to subject others to in the past decides she doesn't like it!''
tory MP struggling with the calendar ..........
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-james-daly-b2528997.html
The past decade ............ hmmm
The scum comment was in 2021 what did she say that got under your skin in the seven years previous to that dd?
-
GMP investigating multiple offences say CC Watson
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/angela-rayner-manchester-police-investigation-b2529840.html
Typical Council Estate Slapper fiddling, and some of you want the likes of her running the country?
-
Is there anyone you could ask what the difference is between an allegation and an offence?
-
GMP investigating multiple offences say CC Watson
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/angela-rayner-manchester-police-investigation-b2529840.html
Typical Council Estate Slapper fiddling, and some of you want the likes of her running the country?
Yeah, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but..........
......She's Labour.
-
Yes, bb that appears to be the offence/allegation
-
How about (this is a repost) calling for Boris to go when he was under police investigation (note not convicted or changed at the time just under investigation) but now not falling on her sword when she is??? Hypocritical doesn’t cover it.
https://x.com/angelarayner/status/1485986345067634699?s=46&t=ineOQWVeqaGIc2ZoyBwTGA
-
This is the problem Raynor is being compared to Johnson a professional liar whom only fools would trust.
-
No, the problem is she’s set a moral bar by calling for someone only under investigation to go. Who it is doesn’t matter, the principle has been set by her. Not going when she is in the same position shows her true character
-
She's a self-righteous phoney who only appeals to other self-righteous phonies.
-
How about (this is a repost) calling for Boris to go when he was under police investigation (note not convicted or changed at the time just under investigation) but now not falling on her sword when she is??? Hypocritical doesn’t cover it.
https://x.com/angelarayner/status/1485986345067634699?s=46&t=ineOQWVeqaGIc2ZoyBwTGA
-
raynor apologised, tell me when johnson ever issued a full and proper apology?
-
When did she apologise for being a hypocrite?
-
And she said she will resign if found guilty.
I hope the public purse will be offered for a defence if charges are laid
-
When did she apologise for being a hypocrite?
Is that a chargeable offence in your world?
-
And she said she will resign if found guilty.
I hope the public purse will be offered for a defence if charges are laid
But called for someone else to go just because they were under investigation? And you don’t see the hypocrisy??
-
Maybe you should put up the reasons and it can be trawled through again, the two people cannot be compared the circumstances the dates not their positions at the time.
-
When did she apologise for being a hypocrite?
Is that a chargeable offence in your world?
It's not a characteristic that would get my vote.
-
When did she apologise for being a hypocrite?
Is that a chargeable offence in your world?
It's not a characteristic that would get my vote.
Tell me when you have previously voted labour?
-
She's a self-righteous phoney who only appeals to other self-righteous phonies.
Boris is a w@nker who only appealed to other w@nkers.
-
So it seems to be accepted by some people, to lie when you are not a politician but still ok to continue the lie when you are a politician.
If it turns out that she registered her kids at the wrong address by accident then I would think that is a bit strange too.
-
So it seems to be accepted by some people, to lie when you are not a politician but still ok to continue the lie when you are a politician.
If it turns out that she registered her kids at the wrong address by accident then I would think that is a bit strange too.
I remind you of BST rule number 1
Labour = honest mistake made in good faith
Tory = string them up now!
-
She's a self-righteous phoney who only appeals to other self-righteous phonies.
Boris is a w@nker who only appealed to other w@nkers.
One simply has to admire your denial.
-
So it seems to be accepted by some people, to lie when you are not a politician but still ok to continue the lie when you are a politician.
If it turns out that she registered her kids at the wrong address by accident then I would think that is a bit strange too.
I remind you of BST rule number 1
Labour = honest mistake made in good faith
Tory = string them up now!
Goodness. Is it THAT time again?
-
So it seems to be accepted by some people, to lie when you are not a politician but still ok to continue the lie when you are a politician.
If it turns out that she registered her kids at the wrong address by accident then I would think that is a bit strange too.
I remind you of BST rule number 1
Labour = honest mistake made in good faith
Tory = string them up now!
Goodness. Is it THAT time again?
I knew you’d appreciate that
-
And she said she will resign if found guilty.
I hope the public purse will be offered for a defence if charges are laid
Of what though Syd?
-
It's fair to be critical of her given she can't practice what she preaches. It opens up questions about how you can trust what she says. When you've set yourself out as something you have to be that person and I'd question whether she is!
-
So it seems to be accepted by some people, to lie when you are not a politician but still ok to continue the lie when you are a politician.
If it turns out that she registered her kids at the wrong address by accident then I would think that is a bit strange too.
I remind you of BST rule number 1
Labour = honest mistake made in good faith
Tory = string them up now!
Goodness. Is it THAT time again?
I knew you’d appreciate that
I'd appreciate it a lot more if you knew any examples where I've said that and it's not actually been the case.
-
And she said she will resign if found guilty.
I hope the public purse will be offered for a defence if charges are laid
Of what though Syd?
Very good point, I'm sure someone will think of something, breaking ulez rules?
-
It's fair to be critical of her given she can't practice what she preaches. It opens up questions about how you can trust what she says. When you've set yourself out as something you have to be that person and I'd question whether she is!
True to a point pud, the misogyny by some is not required. Many of whom wouldn't know an apology or retraction from a bar of soap.
-
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1888789/labour-angela-rayner-house-row
I wander how long Back Stabber will hold out before he throws Rayner under a Boris bus?
-
Raynors former chief aide now claims she was not living at the house she sold.
He has allegedly given a statement to GMP which contradicts what she has said.
-
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1888789/labour-angela-rayner-house-row
I wander how long Back Stabber will hold out before he throws Rayner under a Boris bus?
''Starmer dismisses Tory attack on Rayner as 'billionaire PM smearing working-class woman'
Starmer says the Tories have been smearing a working-class woman''
And
''James Daly, the deputy chair of the Conservative party, wrote to Greater Manchester police asking them to investigate Angela Rayner and, when the force initially declined to look into it, he successfully persuaded them to think again.
But in interviews Daly has refused to say what he thinks Rayner did wrong. He did this yesterday on Politics Live, and again today on Sky News''
-
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1888789/labour-angela-rayner-house-row
I wander how long Back Stabber will hold out before he throws Rayner under a Boris bus?
''Starmer dismisses Tory attack on Rayner as 'billionaire PM smearing working-class woman'
Starmer says the Tories have been smearing a working-class woman''
And
''James Daly, the deputy chair of the Conservative party, wrote to Greater Manchester police asking them to investigate Angela Rayner and, when the force initially declined to look into it, he successfully persuaded them to think again.
But in interviews Daly has refused to say what he thinks Rayner did wrong. He did this yesterday on Politics Live, and again today on Sky News''
Why should he?
-
''A supposedly grassroots ‘tax protest’ against Labour party Deputy Leader Angela Rayner, which hit the headlines on Wednesday, was organised and conducted by Conservative party politicians, one of the organisers has admitted to Byline Times''
https://bylinetimes.com/2024/04/10/angela-rayner-tax-protest-was-staged-by-conservative-politicians-posing-as-tax-activists/
look at the photo in the link
-
One side of political divide tries to discredit the other side shock.
Come on Syd, don’t pretend to be surprised that things like this happen.
-
Or surprised that things like this happen....
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68841840
Wonder how you end up being kidnapped/blackmailed /extorted and you don't tell police.....
-
Or surprised that things like this happen....
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68841840
Wonder how you end up being kidnapped/blackmailed /extorted and you don't tell police.....
Maybe Boy George has been busy again!
-
Or surprised that things like this happen....
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68841840
Wonder how you end up being kidnapped/blackmailed /extorted and you don't tell police.....
Depressingly familiar reporting by the BBC.
That info about the MP calling a retired fund manager a 3:15 to demand £5k to pay off "bad people" was all over the media yesterday.
Until they changed the content this morning, that BBC page was just saying the MP was accused of misusing party funds.
That's what happens when you stuff senior BBC management full of ex Tory party officials and donors. They bend over backwards to give the Tories the least damaging coverage possible.
-
Or surprised that things like this happen....
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68841840
Wonder how you end up being kidnapped/blackmailed /extorted and you don't tell police.....
Depressingly familiar reporting by the BBC.
That info about the MP calling a retired fund manager a 3:15 to demand £5k to pay off "bad people" was all over the media yesterday.
Until they changed the content this morning, that BBC page was just saying the MP was accused of misusing party funds.
That's what happens when you stuff senior BBC management full of ex Tory party officials and donors. They bend over backwards to give the Tories the least damaging coverage possible.
He has been suspended by the Tories, and what are Labour doing!
-
Starmer is a lawyer, he’ll have cross examined Raynor and come to the conclusion that there is no case to answer, I think Labour ate enjoying this when for when it eventually comes out that the Tory MP has been wasting Police time
-
Starmer is a lawyer, he’ll have cross examined Raynor and come to the conclusion that there is no case to answer,
Starmer is a very poor ‘Woke’ finger wagging Nanny state Buffoon, Rayner will have denied every thing and told him he was bullying her!
He will have kacked his pants and done nothing!
The CCof GMP is a very firm but fair man if there is no case to answer that will be that, no chance of another wasted investigation into ‘Wasting PoliceTime” if there is some evidence to support a conviction there will be a conviction.
-
Starmer is a lawyer, he’ll have cross examined Raynor and come to the conclusion that there is no case to answer,
Starmer is a very poor ‘Woke’ finger wagging Nanny state Buffoon, Rayner will have denied every thing and told him he was bullying her!
He will have kacked his pants and done nothing!
The CCof GMP is a very firm but fair man if there is no case to answer that will be that, no chance of another wasted investigation into ‘Wasting PoliceTime” if there is some evidence to support a conviction there will be a conviction.
Hi Gammon AI. Could you write me a really bad Daily Heil comment piece please and don't forget to put Woke in quotation marks.
-
Or surprised that things like this happen....
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68841840
Wonder how you end up being kidnapped/blackmailed /extorted and you don't tell police.....
Depressingly familiar reporting by the BBC.
That info about the MP calling a retired fund manager a 3:15 to demand £5k to pay off "bad people" was all over the media yesterday.
Until they changed the content this morning, that BBC page was just saying the MP was accused of misusing party funds.
That's what happens when you stuff senior BBC management full of ex Tory party officials and donors. They bend over backwards to give the Tories the least damaging coverage possible.
He has been suspended by the Tories, and what are Labour doing!
waiting to see if there's any case to actually answer as I understand, following the first time where it was said there wasn't. Slightly different to a bloke with previous for male prostitutes and drug involvement having action taken after 3month after party office informed.
-
Funniest comment on Bad People Gate is Dominic Cummings saying how Westminster is full of incompetent sociopaths.
That's of course the sociopathically incompetent Dominic Cummings who used to run Westminster.
-
Starmer is a lawyer, he’ll have cross examined Raynor and come to the conclusion that there is no case to answer,
Starmer is a very poor ‘Woke’ finger wagging Nanny state Buffoon, Rayner will have denied every thing and told him he was bullying her!
He will have kacked his pants and done nothing!
The CCof GMP is a very firm but fair man if there is no case to answer that will be that, no chance of another wasted investigation into ‘Wasting PoliceTime” if there is some evidence to support a conviction there will be a conviction.
Hi Gammon AI. Could you write me a really bad Daily Heil comment piece please and don't forget to put Woke in quotation marks.
Are you really a middle school teacher ?
-
Just dawned on me, d'oh.
The reason the Tory party deputy chair has been pushing the police now of all times to open the investigation into Rayner.
They must have known that they couldn't keep a lid on Bad People Gate for much longer.
And in other news, the husband of Nicola Sturgeon has been charged with embezzlement of SNP funds.
-
If after GMP have concluded their investigation and the ginger one has nothing to answer for then all well and good.
I'm just trying to visualise the meltdown on here from certain sources if the investigation coughed up anything positive, the backtracking would be illuminating!
-
If after GMP have concluded their investigation and the ginger one has nothing to answer for then all well and good.
You obviously have a very neutral stance on this with the 'ginger one'.
That's pleasing to see.
-
If after GMP have concluded their investigation and the ginger one has nothing to answer for then all well and good.
You obviously have a very neutral stance on this with the 'ginger one'.
That's pleasing to see.
Not sure why i'm wasting my time with you.
Do you have a point? or is it just your usual post a load of guff, i don't think i've ever seen a post of any sort of relevance from you.
Are you a bit special?
-
.... https://youtu.be/ZUlZpEPuhD8
-
Oh dear!
No fewer than four Conservative MPs have declined to disclose whether they paid capital gains tax on profits made from the sale of their own taxpayer-funded second homes.
A Mirror investigation has revealed that David Tredinnick, Eleanor Laing, Shailesh Vara and Maria Miller raked in a combined £5.4 million between them from flogging houses funded by the public.
They have all declined to comment on whether they paid any tax on the profits they made
-
Oh dear!
No fewer than four Conservative MPs have declined to disclose whether they paid capital gains tax on profits made from the sale of their own taxpayer-funded second homes.
A Mirror investigation has revealed that David Tredinnick, Eleanor Laing, Shailesh Vara and Maria Miller raked in a combined £5.4 million between them from flogging houses funded by the public.
They have all declined to comment on whether they paid any tax on the profits they made
Get em investigated what’s sauce for the goose!
-
Oh dear!
No fewer than four Conservative MPs have declined to disclose whether they paid capital gains tax on profits made from the sale of their own taxpayer-funded second homes.
A Mirror investigation has revealed that David Tredinnick, Eleanor Laing, Shailesh Vara and Maria Miller raked in a combined £5.4 million between them from flogging houses funded by the public.
They have all declined to comment on whether they paid any tax on the profits they made
All 5 of them should regardless of party. They must follow the law. Also if they've followed the law and found loopholes let the public know so they can judge the morality of it.
-
Mindst you, you have to ask how big and where were these house to rake in £5.4m obviously not some Council estate in Manchester
-
Raven have decided to comment or not to!
-
Two up two down cottages in Pudsey with outside toilet at the bottom of the yard.
-
Raven have decided to comment or not to!
Please translate Sproty
If people of any party break the rules they should all be investigated..... once they have been found out
Remind me though Sproty Rayner is being nvestigated over how much?
-
It's a shame to have to keep saying it but everyone's aware of the consistent undercurrent of sleaze and corruption in our elected membership, across all political parties.
If these people spent as much time trying to produce legislation to help and support the betterment of society that they do in fiddling the system and feathering their nests for the present and when they are eventually kicked out, we may just succeed as a nation.
If any politicians have questions to answer in their financial arrangements they should be taken to task with the toughest possible censures delivered to them.
Its been going on far too long and needs eradicating, these people are given far to much capability to defraud the system and require much stronger regulation, if they don't agree with this then they should be forced out and replaced by a generation of people who have professional and technical competencies to take us forward.
We don't want or need people who's first thought is always how they can advance themselves on the public purse before even thinking about the electorate.
#allthebloodysame
-
I'll repeat. The irony of the Rayner case is that it has come back into the limelight because of a book written by a Tory billionaire whose companies are registered in Belize so that he doesn't pay UK tax.
-
Ironic or not, it still doesn't absolve any MP in the pay of the public purse from being investigated if they have questions that need clarifying.
Does anyone know why Labour when in power from 1997 to 2010 did not legislate to change the non-dom status?
-
Only those without sin should cast the first stone.
-
Kin hell, the Jehovahs have are at the door.
Someone tell them to go forth.
-
Kin hell, the Jehovahs have are at the door.
Someone tell them to go forth.
In an intelligence contest, you wouldn't come fourth, you'd come f*cking last.
-
Ha,ha.
Of course I would.
Ha,ha.
Incredibly witty SS.
Why did you choose those initials I wonder.
There goes a complete lack of any grey matter SS.
-
With supporters like Iberian Red, what could possibly go wrong for the Labour Party?
God bless the Labour Party and all who sail with it. With supporters like him, God help us all!
-
With supporters like Iberian Red, what could possibly go wrong for the Labour Party?
God bless the Labour Party and all who sail with it. With supporters like him, God help us all!
Your crystal balls aren't functioning.
I haven't voted Labour for nearly 30 years.
Unfortunately a % of the population are so dumb they will vote for PMs that have been found guilty of breaking the law.
These folk are do dumb that when shat on by the Tories say thank you or , blah,blah Diane Abbot etc
-
Raven have decided to comment or not to!
Please translate Sproty
If people of any party break the rules they should all be investigated..... once they have been found out
Remind me though Sproty Rayner is being nvestigated over how much?
Bump
-
It's funny reading through a mass of AR Critics and condemmers who are so morally bankrupt that they voted in possibly the most overt liar this country ever had as PM. Embarressing eh!
I'm undecided re AR, but BJ would be found out in an infants/first school class. There is no defence, what were you thinking, where were your heads at, where ARE your heads at?
-
It's funny reading through a mass of AR Critics and condemmers who are so morally bankrupt that they voted in possibly the most overt liar this country ever had as PM. Embarressing eh!
I'm undecided re AR, but BJ would be found out in an infants/first school class. There is no defence, what were you thinking, where were your heads at, where ARE your heads at?
Who are the people in this thread who voted for the Conservatives BRR?
-
Raven have decided to comment or not to!
Please translate Sproty
If people of any party break the rules they should all be investigated..... once they have been found out
Remind me though Sproty Rayner is being nvestigated over how much?
Doesn’t matter if it’s £5 or £50 k a person who intends putting themselves forward as Deputy Prime minister must be beyond Reproach!
-
It's funny reading through a mass of AR Critics and condemmers who are so morally bankrupt that they voted in possibly the most overt liar this country ever had as PM. Embarressing eh!
I'm undecided re AR, but BJ would be found out in an infants/first school class. There is no defence, what were you thinking, where were your heads at, where ARE your heads at?
Who are the people in this thread who voted for the Conservatives BRR?
Voted for Boris, spoke positively about him, or have since then. I don't know who they are. It would be just a tad weird that there aren't any.
-
Raven have decided to comment or not to!
Please translate Sproty
If people of any party break the rules they should all be investigated..... once they have been found out
Remind me though Sproty Rayner is being nvestigated over how much?
Doesn’t matter if it’s £5 or £50 k a person who intends putting themselves forward as Deputy Prime minister must be beyond Reproach!
And the 4 Tories?
-
Raven have decided to comment or not to!
Please translate Sproty
If people of any party break the rules they should all be investigated..... once they have been found out
Remind me though Sproty Rayner is being nvestigated over how much?
Doesn’t matter if it’s £5 or £50 k a person who intends putting themselves forward as Deputy Prime minister must be beyond Reproach!
And the 4 Tories?
Raven you asked me about Rayner !, as for the tories or Any other elected MP behaving dishonestly Prison is the best place for them, help them to focus their minds !
-
Raven have decided to comment or not to!
Please translate Sproty
If people of any party break the rules they should all be investigated..... once they have been found out
Remind me though Sproty Rayner is being nvestigated over how much?
Doesn’t matter if it’s £5 or £50 k a person who intends putting themselves forward as Deputy Prime minister must be beyond Reproach!
And the 4 Tories?
Raven you asked me about Rayner !, as for the tories or Any other elected MP behaving dishonestly Prison is the best place for them, help them to focus their minds !
What's the tariff for an MP behaving dishonestly, wouldn't happen to be 70 days would it?
-
Raven have decided to comment or not to!
Please translate Sproty
If people of any party break the rules they should all be investigated..... once they have been found out
Remind me though Sproty Rayner is being nvestigated over how much?
Doesn’t matter if it’s £5 or £50 k a person who intends putting themselves forward as Deputy Prime minister must be beyond Reproach!
And the 4 Tories?
Raven you asked me about Rayner !, as for the tories or Any other elected MP behaving dishonestly Prison is the best place for them, help them to focus their minds !
If that's your mindset,maybe you agree with 3 strikes and you're out.
Boris lied to the queen,lied to Patliamemt and lied to the British public.
Get the f@#ker on death row.
-
Seems the press are winning with some on here
(https://i.imgur.com/PLFQXJm.jpg)
-
Raven have decided to comment or not to!
Please translate Sproty
If people of any party break the rules they should all be investigated..... once they have been found out
Remind me though Sproty Rayner is being nvestigated over how much?
Doesn’t matter if it’s £5 or £50 k a person who intends putting themselves forward as Deputy Prime minister must be beyond Reproach!
And the 4 Tories?
Raven you asked me about Rayner !, as for the tories or Any other elected MP behaving dishonestly Prison is the best place for them, help them to focus their minds !
The comparison between a couple of grand as opposed to 4 or 5m
-
It's funny reading through a mass of AR Critics and condemmers who are so morally bankrupt that they voted in possibly the most overt liar this country ever had as PM. Embarressing eh!
I'm undecided re AR, but BJ would be found out in an infants/first school class. There is no defence, what were you thinking, where were your heads at, where ARE your heads at?
Who are the people in this thread who voted for the Conservatives BRR?
Voted for Boris, spoke positively about him, or have since then. I don't know who they are. It would be just a tad weird that there aren't any.
A bit odd then that you specifically mentioned people on this thread who voted in Boris.
Surely you should be able to say who you mean.
-
It's funny reading through a mass of AR Critics and condemmers who are so morally bankrupt that they voted in possibly the most overt liar this country ever had as PM. Embarressing eh!
I'm undecided re AR, but BJ would be found out in an infants/first school class. There is no defence, what were you thinking, where were your heads at, where ARE your heads at?
Who are the people in this thread who voted for the Conservatives BRR?
Voted for Boris, spoke positively about him, or have since then. I don't know who they are. It would be just a tad weird that there aren't any.
There have been plenty of different threads where posters on this one have defended and supported Boris,you really don't have to justify what you posted in this case.
Strange that it's still a who,what,where,why scenario.
You know the old saying about what makes you blind!
-
You've relentlessly defended and supported Keir Starmer on this forum but claim you haven't voted for Labour for 30 years!
-
You've relentlessly defended and supported Keir Starmer on this forum but claim you haven't voted for Labour for 30 years!
Oh dear me.
Find one post where I have relentlessly supported and defended KS. Just one please and I will bare my arse on the Keepmoat pitch next season.
You can't and won't be able to,because I haven't.
I've reletentlessly criticised the arisTOcRacY kitsons we have in power,but never once defended KS.
However you have done the complete opposite with BJ haven't you.
Go on,plenty of time on your hands and find a post.
Your are just another blind one.
-
You've relentlessly defended and supported Keir Starmer on this forum but claim you haven't voted for Labour for 30 years!
Oh dear me.
Find one post where I have relentlessly supported and defended KS. Just one please and I will bare my arse on the Keepmoat pitch next season.
You can't and won't be able to,because I haven't.
I've reletentlessly criticised the arisTOcRacY kitsons we have in power,but never once defended KS.
However you have done the complete opposite with BJ haven't you.
Go on,plenty of time on your hands and find a post.
Your are just another blind one.
Seeing as you've relentlessly supported supporters of Keir Starmer and the Labour Party on this forum it is hardly surprising that one can surmise that you're a Keir Starmer/ Labour supporter unless you're just a dedicated sheep-like follower of BST and the likes.
-
Crikey BB have you got tips from PMQs don't answer the question and repeat a pre scripted mantra
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
still watching reruns of 'the bill' then sprot?
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
Where did you grow up to be such a snot to talk down to others with a different upbringing and in this case has totally left you in her wake.
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
Where did you grow up to be such a snot to talk down to others with a different upbringing and in this case has totally left you in her wake.
But of course you call government ministers thick even though they have left you in their wake.
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
Is there anything wrong with people growing up on a social housing estate?
Have you any proof she deliberately got pregnant to access these benefits, or are you just a ten bb tory snob?
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
Where did you grow up to be such a snot to talk down to others with a different upbringing and in this case has totally left you in her wake.
But of course you call government ministers thick even though they have left you in their wake.
That’s right hound, stick up for Sprotyrover and his despicable post, just because he’s in your gang.
You’re worse than him yap yap.
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
What a w**ker you are.
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
Where did you grow up to be such a snot to talk down to others with a different upbringing and in this case has totally left you in her wake.
But of course you call government ministers thick even though they have left you in their wake.
That’s right hound, stick up for Sprotyrover and his despicable post, just because he’s in your gang.
You’re worse than him yap yap.
Come on Tommy, Wolfie tells me you are better than that.
As it happens, I’m not sticking up for Sproty, he fights his own corner.
More likely I am putting syd right after his very one sided comment.
-
Ok. So what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovets post then or will you be fence sitting as per?
-
You and others jump on my posts when I voice an opinion about something that you don’t agree with and now you are doing the same when I haven’t voiced an opinion about something.
I just can’t get it right for you can I?
Don’t forget that I am voting with you lot this time so cut me some slack eh.
There’s a good lad.
-
….and how many one sided comments does Sprotyrover make?
I don’t see you putting him right, ever.
-
I didn’t realise that I had to.
What about all the other posters who haven’t put him right.
Are you going to single all of them out for a bollocking.
-
You and others jump on my posts when I voice an opinion about something that you don’t agree with and now you are doing the same when I haven’t voiced an opinion about something.
I just can’t get it right for you can I?
Don’t forget that I am voting with you lot this time so cut me some slack eh.
There’s a good lad.
Don’t patronise me with your ‘good lad’
I jump on your posts precisely because you DONT give your opinion, you just shit stir and egg on your mates.
And you’ve done it again
Now what’s your opinion on Spritrovers post?
-
I didn’t realise that I had to.
What about all the other posters who haven’t put him right.
Are you going to single all of them out for a bollocking.
But you didn’t have to put Syd right either, but you did
-
You and others jump on my posts when I voice an opinion about something that you don’t agree with and now you are doing the same when I haven’t voiced an opinion about something.
I just can’t get it right for you can I?
Don’t forget that I am voting with you lot this time so cut me some slack eh.
There’s a good lad.
Don’t patronise me with your ‘good lad’
I jump on your posts precisely because you DONT give your opinion, you just shit stir and egg on your mates.
And you’ve done it again
Now what’s your opinion on Spritrovers post?
I patronised you because it seems to be acceptable on here.
I never see you admonishing bst when he regularly does the same so I was just testing the water.
I also regularly give my opinion on stuff which is why I get so much stick from (my new) leftie mates.
If you get time between having pops at me, have a look back through my posts.
-
I didn’t realise that I had to.
What about all the other posters who haven’t put him right.
Are you going to single all of them out for a bollocking.
But you didn’t have to put Syd right either, but you did
You didn’t have to put me right, but you did.
No difference really.
-
You and others jump on my posts when I voice an opinion about something that you don’t agree with and now you are doing the same when I haven’t voiced an opinion about something.
I just can’t get it right for you can I?
Don’t forget that I am voting with you lot this time so cut me some slack eh.
There’s a good lad.
Don’t patronise me with your ‘good lad’
I jump on your posts precisely because you DONT give your opinion, you just shit stir and egg on your mates.
And you’ve done it again
Now what’s your opinion on Spritrovers post?
I patronised you because it seems to be acceptable on here.
I never see you admonishing bst when he regularly does the same so I was just testing the water.
I also regularly give my opinion on stuff which is why I get so much stick from (my new) leftie mates.
If you get time between having pops at me, have a look back through my posts.
Voice an opinion?
Vote with you lot?
Ha,ha.
Lovely lapping up Hound.
-
Still no opinion of Sprotyrovers post then?
Thought as much.
As I said, you’re as bad as him.
Vote Reform.
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
Incredibly sexist comment,unbelievable.
What an absolutely vile individual
-
You and others jump on my posts when I voice an opinion about something that you don’t agree with and now you are doing the same when I haven’t voiced an opinion about something.
I just can’t get it right for you can I?
Don’t forget that I am voting with you lot this time so cut me some slack eh.
I have retracted the “good lad” comment Tommy seeing as we are now on the same team.
You know I won’t be voting Reform because I really do want to see what Labour can do to change things.
I know that there are dozens of ready prepared excuses for them out there but if they are so good then things will only get better.
What happens if they don’t though?
Interesting times ahead.
-
You and others jump on my posts when I voice an opinion about something that you don’t agree with and now you are doing the same when I haven’t voiced an opinion about something.
I just can’t get it right for you can I?
Don’t forget that I am voting with you lot this time so cut me some slack eh.
There’s a good lad.
Don’t patronise me with your ‘good lad’
I jump on your posts precisely because you DONT give your opinion, you just shit stir and egg on your mates.
And you’ve done it again
Now what’s your opinion on Spritrovers post?
Tommy,you keep doing your great work for the underprivileged in society.
Other f#ckers can do f#ck all and criticised those that do.
That's the society we live in unfortunately.
Good work Tommy
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
Is there anything wrong with people growing up on a social housing estate?
Have you any proof she deliberately got pregnant to access these benefits, or are you just a ten bb tory snob?
She would fit in nicely in your part of Stainy
-
We’re not on the same team hound. Never will be.
Now, what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovers post.
By the way as you requested I’ve just re read your posts on the General Election thread.
Here’s what I found…
An argument with Iberian Red.
A few posts agreeing with what others posted.
A like of Sprotyrovers post saying that BST had mental health problems.
Your post after BST’s lampooning but spot on post about the current Tory situation, which you judged as being ludicrous.
Then a spat with me.
Not an opinion in sight.
Now, what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovers post?
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
Incredibly sexist comment,unbelievable.
What an absolutely vile individual
Nice one Pearly!
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
Incredibly sexist comment,unbelievable.
What an absolutely vile individual
Nice one Pearly!
..
What a F&&king tool.
-
We’re not on the same team hound. Never will be.
Now, what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovers post.
By the way as you requested I’ve just re read your posts on the General Election thread.
Here’s what I found…
An argument with Iberian Red.
A few posts agreeing with what others posted.
A like of Sprotyrovers post saying that BST had mental health problems.
Your post after BST’s lampooning but spot on post about the current Tory situation, which you judged as being ludicrous.
Then a spat with me.
Not an opinion in sight.
Now, what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovers post?
Oh dear Tommy, so you reckon she didn’t get herself pregnant at 16 Accidents do happen especially with the likes of her!
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
Is there anything wrong with people growing up on a social housing estate?
Have you any proof she deliberately got pregnant to access these benefits, or are you just a ten bb tory snob?
Oh dear, so you reckon things like this never happen,you saddo!
-
We’re not on the same team hound. Never will be.
Now, what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovers post.
By the way as you requested I’ve just re read your posts on the General Election thread.
Here’s what I found…
An argument with Iberian Red.
A few posts agreeing with what others posted.
A like of Sprotyrovers post saying that BST had mental health problems.
Your post after BST’s lampooning but spot on post about the current Tory situation, which you judged as being ludicrous.
Then a spat with me.
Not an opinion in sight.
Now, what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovers post?
Tommy,I have to apologise here, I like certain posters in a very ironic way.
When sproty has been out with a big stick dogging, he gets a like.
When others do fu£k all for the better of society, they get a like.
However, you really do deserve a like.
Keep up that good work.
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
Is there anything wrong with people growing up on a social housing estate?
Have you any proof she deliberately got pregnant to access these benefits, or are you just a ten bb tory snob?
She would fit in nicely in your part of Stainy
Snobs like you wouldn’t survive in any part of Stainy, my part of Stainy? Which part would that be then?
-
We’re not on the same team hound. Never will be.
Now, what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovets post.
By the way as you requested I’ve just re read your posts on the General Election thread.
Here’s what I found…
An argument with Iberian Red.
A few posts agreeing with what others posted.
A like of Sprotyrovers post saying that BST had mental health problems.
Your post after BST’s lampooning but spot on post about the current Tory situation, which you judged as being ludicrous.
Then a spat with me.
Not an opinion in sight.
Now, what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovers post?
So you cherry picked through my posts to suit your agenda then.
Iberian is always arguing with people, it’s what he does best.
So the posts where I agreed with people are bad in your view then.
I thought that bst’s post was very strange and was typical of the way he responds to people he doesn’t like or agree with.
The spat with you was STARTED BY YOU in post 178.
The GE thread by the nature of its subject matter is always going to be controversial because of the content but it wouldn’t be expected to be any different would it.
Your most noteable contribution to the GE thread (reply 16) was to include a dig at me, without any provocation.
And I noticed that you haven’t mentioned all the arguments between other posters.
By the way, like it or lump it, we are on the same team at this election.
-
Thanks for the kind words IR. Much appreciated.
By the way it was the hound who liked Sprotyrovers post about BST, not you.
-
We’re not on the same team hound. Never will be.
Now, what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovets post.
By the way as you requested I’ve just re read your posts on the General Election thread.
Here’s what I found…
An argument with Iberian Red.
A few posts agreeing with what others posted.
A like of Sprotyrovers post saying that BST had mental health problems.
Your post after BST’s lampooning but spot on post about the current Tory situation, which you judged as being ludicrous.
Then a spat with me.
Not an opinion in sight.
Now, what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovers post?
So you cherry picked through my posts to suit your agenda then.
Iberian is always arguing with peopl, it’s what he dies best.
So the posts where I agreed with people are bad in your view then.
I thought that bst’s post was very strange and was typical of the way he responds to people he doesn’t like or agree with.
The spat with you was STARTED BY YOU in post 178.
The GE thread by the nature of its subject matter is always going to be controversial because of the content but it wouldn’t be expected to be any different would it.
By the way, like it or lump it, we are on the same team at
this election.
No I didn’t pick through your posts to suit my agenda.
At your request I looked for your posts and reported what was there.
You can do the same if you like.
I didn’t find a post that had any semblance of of what you were thinking ie an opinion.
You can change that now by giving your opinion of Sprotyrovers post.
-
And your posts agreeing with other people aren’t bad, just lazy and pointless.
-
We’re not on the same team hound. Never will be.
Now, what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovets post.
By the way as you requested I’ve just re read your posts on the General Election thread.
Here’s what I found…
An argument with Iberian Red.
A few posts agreeing with what others posted.
A like of Sprotyrovers post saying that BST had mental health problems.
Your post after BST’s lampooning but spot on post about the current Tory situation, which you judged as being ludicrous.
Then a spat with me.
Not an opinion in sight.
Now, what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovers post?
So you cherry picked through my posts to suit your agenda then.
Iberian is always arguing with peopl, it’s what he dies best.
So the posts where I agreed with people are bad in your view then.
I thought that bst’s post was very strange and was typical of the way he responds to people he doesn’t like or agree with.
The spat with you was STARTED BY YOU in post 178.
The GE thread by the nature of its subject matter is always going to be controversial because of the content but it wouldn’t be expected to be any different would it.
By the way, like it or lump it, we are on the same team at
this election.
No I didn’t pick through your posts to suit my agenda.
At your request I looked for your posts and reported what was there.
You can do the same if you like.
I didn’t find a post that had any semblance of of what you were thinking ie an opinion.
You can change that now by giving your opinion of Sprotyrovers post.
“I didn’t find a post that had a semblance of what you were thinking “
You forgot to add “on the one controversial thread that was chosen to cherry pick from”.
-
And your posts agreeing with other people aren’t bad, just lazy and pointless.
You see, you are doing it again, the posts I agree with people on are pointless.
Come on, that is a silly comment.
-
Sprotyrover
Lots and lots of very young girls find themselves pregnant without having an ulterior motive.
But in your mind, because she’s Angela Rayner she’s bound to have done it on purpose.
-
Sprotyrover
Lots and lots of very young girls find themselves pregnant without having an ulterior motive.
But in your mind, because she’s Angela Rayner she’s bound to have done it on purpose.
That's way over his head Tommy.
She got pregnant, young= slut.
Or it's a pity certain posters mother's didn't open the back door or swallow that fateful night.
-
And your posts agreeing with other people aren’t bad, just lazy and pointless.
You see, you are doing it again, the posts I agree with people on are pointless.
Come on, that is a silly comment.
They’re pointless, because you aren’t making a point.
The next time you do let me know.
In the meantime,which will be a while I’d guess,
what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovets despicable post?
-
Sprotyrover
Lots and lots of very young girls find themselves pregnant without having an ulterior motive.
But in your mind, because she’s Angela Rayner she’s bound to have done it on purpose.
That's way over his head Tommy.
She got pregnant, young= slut.
Or it's a pity certain posters mother's didn't open the back door or swallow that fateful night.
You know a lot aboutt ‘back doors ‘ don’t you Pearly
-
Sprotyrover
Lots and lots of very young girls find themselves pregnant without having an ulterior motive.
But in your mind, because she’s Angela Rayner she’s bound to have done it on purpose.
That's way over his head Tommy.
She got pregnant, young= slut.
Or it's a pity certain posters mother's didn't open the back door or swallow that fateful night.
Sprotyrover
Lots and lots of very young girls find themselves pregnant without having an ulterior motive.
But in your mind, because she’s Angela Rayner she’s bound to have done it on purpose.
He’s done well, he’s insulted every teenage girl from a social housing estate, every teenage girl thats from my part of Stainy (not a social housing estate) all from his ivory towers in Sprotbrough, apologies to all the good people of Sprotbrough, but you do have one individual that is a vile person living there
-
It's view Filo.
We all know it.
However one or two hiding in the closet like it.
The reason being they are vile too.
-
And your posts agreeing with other people aren’t bad, just lazy and pointless.
You see, you are doing it again, the posts I agree with people on are pointless.
Come on, that is a silly comment.
They’re pointless, because you aren’t making a point.
The next time you do let me know.
In the meantime,which will be a while I’d guess,
what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovets despicable post?
I’m sorry to disappoint you but I’m now out of this spat that you started.
I’m sure people will have had enough of it by now.
Carry on asking but I’m not getting involved until you individually ask everyone what their opinion of sprots post is.
I am at a loss as to why you singled me out when there are so many other posters on the thread.
It could be of course that you don’t care for me but I’m not really bothered if that is the case.
Happy fishing.
I’m off to The Windmill for a beer now.
-
It didn't seem too long ago (although it is of course) that girls of around 16 years of age that 'got pregnant' were kicked out of home and unofficial adoptions were the order of the day. The shame of being in that situation was carried around by many for life. For the blokes involved though it was different.
It's hard to believe it's 2024 in some small corners of Britain.
-
Bravo.
Get out clause.
-
And your posts agreeing with other people aren’t bad, just lazy and pointless.
You see, you are doing it again, the posts I agree with people on are pointless.
Come on, that is a silly comment.
They’re pointless, because you aren’t making a point.
The next time you do let me know.
In the meantime,which will be a while I’d guess,
what’s your opinion of Sprotyrovets despicable post?
I’m sorry to disappoint you but I’m now out of this spat that you started.
I’m sure people will have had enough of it by now.
Carry on asking but I’m not getting involved until you individually ask everyone what their opinion of sprots post is.
I am at a loss as to why you singled me out when there are so many other posters on the thread.
It could be of course that you don’t care for me but I’m not really bothered if that is the case.
Happy fishing.
I’m off to The Windmill for a beer now.
I sngled you out, as you put it, because you were the one who jumped in to deflect the issue onto Syd, when like others you could have kept quiet.
You won’t answer my question, so as a Labour voter as you purport to be, you should have a sense of fairness, equality and have a desire to help people who perhaps aren’t as lucky as you.
Your failure to condemn Sprotyrovers post show you have none of these traits.
So vote Reform or Tory or whatever.
Be true to yourself.
-
Sprotyrover
Lots and lots of very young girls find themselves pregnant without having an ulterior motive.
But in your mind, because she’s Angela Rayner she’s bound to have done it on purpose.
That's way over his head Tommy.
She got pregnant, young= slut.
Or it's a pity certain posters mother's didn't open the back door or swallow that fateful night.
Sprotyrover
Lots and lots of very young girls find themselves pregnant without having an ulterior motive.
But in your mind, because she’s Angela Rayner she’s bound to have done it on purpose.
He’s done well, he’s insulted every teenage girl from a social housing estate, every teenage girl thats from my part of Stainy (not a social housing estate) all from his ivory towers in Sprotbrough, apologies to all the good people of Sprotbrough, but you do have one individual that is a vile person living there
No only Tarts who get pregnant at 16 to milk the state!
-
Sprotyrover
Lots and lots of very young girls find themselves pregnant without having an ulterior motive.
But in your mind, because she’s Angela Rayner she’s bound to have done it on purpose.
That's way over his head Tommy.
She got pregnant, young= slut.
Or it's a pity certain posters mother's didn't open the back door or swallow that fateful night.
Sprotyrover
Lots and lots of very young girls find themselves pregnant without having an ulterior motive.
But in your mind, because she’s Angela Rayner she’s bound to have done it on purpose.
He’s done well, he’s insulted every teenage girl from a social housing estate, every teenage girl thats from my part of Stainy (not a social housing estate) all from his ivory towers in Sprotbrough, apologies to all the good people of Sprotbrough, but you do have one individual that is a vile person living there
by the way it absolutely amazing that a Taxi driver from Stainy has taken umbrage with this, you do school runs only matey?
-
This is how women were treated, men whom were equally to blame, many got off scot-free or were even lauded.
''Forced adoptions: Call for government apology to mothers''
Hundreds of thousands of unmarried women who were forced to give up their babies for adoption should receive a government apology, a report has said.
The inquiry, by the Joint Committee on Human Rights, was set up following a series of reports by BBC News.
It says 185,000 women in the 1950s, 60s and 70s were "shamed" and "coerced" into giving up their babies.
Judy Baker, who was 18 when she gave birth in the 1960s, said she never got to say goodbye to her baby.
Many women say they were denied pain relief during birth and were abused by social workers, nurses and other staff.
The committee's report says the women were subjected to "cruelty", "abuse" and "pressure" - all for the purpose of getting them to hand over their babies for adoption.
Many women were initially sent away to mother and baby homes, often run by churches, because their parents were so embarrassed by their pregnancy.
The women "were considered to have transgressed" and had to be punished, the report said.
Evidence was taken from around 300 people, mostly birth mothers and adopted children.
Cont ..............
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-62172101
-
No further action to be taken by Greater Manchester Police.
-
Now about the 4 Tories......... nah nothing to see here
-
Our resident misogynist will be gutted.
-
Hopefully then end of the matter but.................
"In the last couple of minutes, Greater Manchester Police said they have “concluded that no further police action will be taken” over the questions facing Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner.
But the statement goes on to say that “matters involving council tax and personal tax do not fall into the jurisdiction of policing”, adding the force has shared details of its investigation with Stockport Council and also with HMRC.
So that might - we should stress - might, not be the end of the matter.
We are now calling both of those organisations to find out if they will be looking into the allegations that Rayner may owe council or personal tax.
As ever with breaking news stories, we don’t yet know the full details. It’s worth saying Rayner insists she has done nothing wrong."
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/uk-politics-69063295
-
yep his sellby date expired long ago
-
Biggest load of total nothing imaginable.
If the Tories hadn't been trying to score political points, GMP wouldn't have just had to spend a month wasting their time on this.
-
Sorry to piss on anyone's chip but ...........
''Greater Manchester Police earlier said they had shared details of their investigation into Angela Rayner's housing arrangements with Stockport Council and HMRC - and we’ve been trying to work out whether either of these organisations would be investigating the Labour deputy leader.
A Labour source just told me Rayner had already asked HMRC to look into it and they had decided no further action will be taken (see my previous post).
Now we’ve had a statement from Stockport Council, who also say no further action will be taken.
Here's their statement in full:
Quote Message: Stockport Council has reviewed and responded to all correspondence relating to this matter, including information received from Greater Manchester Police (GMP) who have concluded that no further police action will be taken.
Stockport Council has reviewed and responded to all correspondence relating to this matter, including information received from Greater Manchester Police (GMP) who have concluded that no further police action will be taken.
Quote Message: We have also concluded that no further action will be taken on behalf of the council."
We have also concluded that no further action will be taken on behalf of the council."
bbc live.
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Well here we have it, no further action, it seems the “Estate Tart” is honest, a concept alien to you
-
Let’s hope the Tory MP’s with the same issue have to endure the same intense scrutiny that she has
It’s only fair.
-
Let's just recap the Rayner affair.
1) GMP decided there's nothing to investigate.
2) A billionaire Tory peer whose companies are based in Belize so he pays no UK tax, weirdly decides to spend his time researching the intimate details of Rayner's past.
3) Tory peer writes a book on Rayner with accusations that she was on the fiddle.
4) Daily Mail print excerpts from that book, massively amplifying the story.
5) Tory minister demands GMP investigate Rayner.
6) GMP, under political pressure, look into the case again.
7) GMP finds there's no case to answer.
8) As do HMRC.
9) As do Stockport council.
Just a thought. Do you reckon there might be one or two apologies owed to Rayner.
And, even more improbable, do you think one or two people in here might decide to keep their f**king gobs shut, next time a disgusting misogynistic ball of filth emerges from their brain?
-
What an absolute waste of money and police resources.
The Daily Heil and that dopey MP (James Daley) who kept pushing this, despite being told that it was out of police jurisdiction should be made to pay all the costs of this themselves. But of course they wont - we will as ever with the Tories.
-
Its good for Raynor that this has now been concluded and a line can be draw under it. She can now spend her time either convincing or scaring prospective voters.
I don't want to have to listen to smears and conjecture during this election and would rather they spend their time explaining to the electorate their manifesto's what they intend to do for the country. Let them stand or fall on what they intend to intact on the population.
-
She will be more worried about the recording taken of her meeting with Muslim men in Oldham broadcast today, and the total disdain showed to her while grovelling.
Not a good look for Labour or herself.
-
Its good for Raynor that this has now been concluded and a line can be draw under it. She can now spend her time either convincing or scaring prospective voters.
I don't want to have to listen to smears and conjecture during this election and would rather they spend their time explaining to the electorate their manifesto's what they intend to do for the country. Let them stand or fall on what they intend to intact on the population.
Draw a line under it after the government and a few on here have been doing the usual smeary commentary, did you push back against either dd?
-
Its good for Raynor that this has now been concluded and a line can be draw under it. She can now spend her time either convincing or scaring prospective voters.
I don't want to have to listen to smears and conjecture during this election and would rather they spend their time explaining to the electorate their manifesto's what they intend to do for the country. Let them stand or fall on what they intend to intact on the population.
Draw a line under it after the government and a few on here have been doing the usual smeary commentary, did you push back against either dd?
Its not for me to stick up for politicians. I did say let the investigation take its course and lets be done with it, people want to know what she can do for the country.
She's a big girl and can look after herself.
-
Its good for Raynor that this has now been concluded and a line can be draw under it. She can now spend her time either convincing or scaring prospective voters.
I don't want to have to listen to smears and conjecture during this election and would rather they spend their time explaining to the electorate their manifesto's what they intend to do for the country. Let them stand or fall on what they intend to intact on the population.
Draw a line under it after the government and a few on here have been doing the usual smeary commentary, did you push back against either dd?
Its not for me to stick up for politicians. I did say let the investigation take its course and lets be done with it, people want to know what she can do for the country.
She's a big girl and can look after herself.
No you don't need to stick up for politicians, so for balance you don't need to spend time bagging labour either.
And what about the abuse and bullshit from those on here?
-
She will be more worried about the recording taken of her meeting with Muslim men in Oldham broadcast today, and the total disdain showed to her while grovelling.
Not a good look for Labour or herself.
No. Thought not.
-
Its good for Raynor that this has now been concluded and a line can be draw under it. She can now spend her time either convincing or scaring prospective voters.
I don't want to have to listen to smears and conjecture during this election and would rather they spend their time explaining to the electorate their manifesto's what they intend to do for the country. Let them stand or fall on what they intend to intact on the population.
Draw a line under it after the government and a few on here have been doing the usual smeary commentary, did you push back against either dd?
Its not for me to stick up for politicians. I did say let the investigation take its course and lets be done with it, people want to know what she can do for the country.
She's a big girl and can look after herself.
No you don't need to stick up for politicians, so for balance you don't need to spend time bagging labour either.
And what about the abuse and bullshit from those on here?
You'd be better ask them?
-
Gosh you sound so much like hound, has anyone seen you both together?
-
Gosh you sound so much like hound, has anyone seen you both together?
Anyone, no, me neither
-
Gosh you sound so much like hound, has anyone seen you both together?
Anyone, no, me neither
I'll think they do
-
I'll tell you what, plenty of people will see me with Hound, and plenty of others on here who go in the South Stand. It's what happens when you're a good guy, and Hound IS a good guy, despite some of the insults against him on here in the last couple of days.
-
I'll tell you what, plenty of people will see me with Hound, and plenty of others on here who go in the South Stand. It's what happens when you're a good guy, and Hound IS a good guy, despite some of the insults against him on here in the last couple of days.
He's all yours to love and behold Steve,
-
I'll tell you what, plenty of people will see me with Hound, and plenty of others on here who go in the South Stand. It's what happens when you're a good guy, and Hound IS a good guy, despite some of the insults against him on here in the last couple of days.
He's all yours to love and behold Steve,
Exactly.
Have you ever wondered what it's like to have mates, Syd?
-
I'll tell you what, plenty of people will see me with Hound, and plenty of others on here who go in the South Stand. It's what happens when you're a good guy, and Hound IS a good guy, despite some of the insults against him on here in the last couple of days.
He's all yours to love and behold Steve,
Exactly.
Have you ever wondered what it's like to have mates, Syd?
I don't have a problem with you Steve and I don't hate hound. If you like each others company I'm happy for you.
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Well here we have it, no further action, it seems the “Estate Tart” is honest, a concept alien to you
Not in the Clear yet!
-
Its good for Raynor that this has now been concluded and a line can be draw under it. She can now spend her time either convincing or scaring prospective voters.
I don't want to have to listen to smears and conjecture during this election and would rather they spend their time explaining to the electorate their manifesto's what they intend to do for the country. Let them stand or fall on what they intend to intact on the population.
Draw a line under it after the government and a few on here have been doing the usual smeary commentary, did you push back against either dd?
Its not for me to stick up for politicians. I did say let the investigation take its course and lets be done with it, people want to know what she can do for the country.
She's a big girl and can look after herself.
No you don't need to stick up for politicians, so for balance you don't need to spend time bagging labour either.
And what about the abuse and bullshit from those on here?
Let he who is completely without sin Cast the First Stone! Aye Syd?
-
Let he who's head is made of stone cast off
-
Let he who's head is made of stone cast off
You been on the VB again Cubby!
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
Not one of the “gang” has called this out for what it is, that speaks volumes about those “gang” members
-
Well I will give it to her on the video with the Muslim men, she looked like she enhanced their thoughts on British women. to be ignored, used, and as "cheap as chicken" as their saying goes.
You can see it in their faces, which were ignoring even looking at her while she promised the earth to them selling her soul, I bet gorgeous George killed himself laughing.
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
Not one of the “gang” has called this out for what it is, that speaks volumes about those “gang” members
bump
-
Sproty and I could well have been unknowingly in the same room Syd at meet the owners and many matches unknowingly as we have not had to travel thousands of miles away from the town to try and find a friend.
Anyway thinking about it we are better off spreading sunshine and light as far and wide as we can in different places as there are enough people like yourself bringing the standard of human contact down to a new level.
-
Sproty and I could well have been unknowingly in the same room Syd at meet the owners and many matches unknowingly as we have not had to travel thousands of miles away from the town to try and find a friend.
Anyway thinking about it we are better off spreading sunshine and light as far and wide as we can in different places as there are enough people like yourself bringing the standard of human contact down to a new level.
One of the 'gang' makes misogynist comments so others attack those calling it out, brilliant.
I wonder how this all fits in with Club Doncaster's totally inclusive messages and excellent standards?
-
Keep digging Syd, you will only see what you want to see and believe, your a sad person in your own singular world, you need to see a doctor.
-
Sproty and I could well have been unknowingly in the same room Syd at meet the owners and many matches unknowingly as we have not had to travel thousands of miles away from the town to try and find a friend.
Anyway thinking about it we are better off spreading sunshine and light as far and wide as we can in different places as there are enough people like yourself bringing the standard of human contact down to a new level.
One of the 'gang' makes misogynist comments so others attack those calling it out, brilliant.
I wonder how this all fits in with Club Doncaster's totally inclusive messages and excellent standards?
bump
-
Keep digging Syd, you will only see what you want to see and believe, your a sad person in your own singular world, you need to see a doctor.
bump
-
Keep digging Syd, you will only see what you want to see and believe, your a sad person in your own singular world, you need to see a doctor.
Your a very sad old man selby
-
Keep digging Syd, you will only see what you want to see and believe, your a sad person in your own singular world, you need to see a doctor.
bump
-
Keep digging Syd, you will only see what you want to see and believe, your a sad person in your own singular world, you need to see a doctor.
Your a very sad old man selby
bump
-
Mods, please can we put and end to this tit for tat pointless bickering? I know this is off topic but this is getting tedious.
I know I get dragged into it sometimes but really try to hold my tongue figuratively speaking:
There’s a lot going on in politics and in the world at the moment which folks will quite rightly want to discuss and disagree on.
But this personal slanging, from folks who I suspect are old enough to know better, is just too much, isn’t it.??
-
Maybe you should stop using selby as a prop for your own petty feuds ldr, a real friend would guide him away from bragging about his money and his racist/misogynist comments which only make him foolish.
-
Mods, please can we put and end to this tit for tat pointless bickering? I know this is off topic but this is getting tedious.
I know I get dragged into it sometimes but really try to hold my tongue figuratively speaking:
There’s a lot going on in politics and in the world at the moment which folks will quite rightly want to discuss and disagree on.
But this personal slanging, from folks who I suspect are old enough to know better, is just too much, isn’t it.??
Fair point IDM
-
I don't think Sprotyrover is a member of any gang. This forum's only "gang" constitutes a handful of Lefties and not ONE of those condemned SydneyRover for his libellous lies on this forum about me.
The best thing to do is ignore him thus making his contributions a complete waste of time.
-
Well I will give it to her on the video with the Muslim men, she looked like she enhanced their thoughts on British women. to be ignored, used, and as "cheap as chicken" as their saying goes.
You can see it in their faces, which were ignoring even looking at her while she promised the earth to them selling her soul, I bet gorgeous George killed himself laughing.
I just googled the video. I could clearly hear one of the gentlemen in the room repeatedly saying things like "Yes, I said that" in agreement with what Rayner was saying. The rest of the attendees were listening respectfully.
For the record, I'm a Liberal Democrats member (I recently stood in the local council election in my area) so I don't have any motivation to big up Angela Rayner or her party (altough I do have a lot of respect for her as a stateswoman and a person who has worked hard to achieve despite the brickbats and prejudices lagainst her) but I will stand up and comment when I see nonsense like your interpretation of the video, Selby.
-
Well I will give it to her on the video with the Muslim men, she looked like she enhanced their thoughts on British women. to be ignored, used, and as "cheap as chicken" as their saying goes.
You can see it in their faces, which were ignoring even looking at her while she promised the earth to them selling her soul, I bet gorgeous George killed himself laughing.
I just googled the video. I could clearly hear one of the gentlemen in the room repeatedly saying things like "Yes, I said that" in agreement with what Rayner was saying. The rest of the attendees were listening respectfully.
For the record, I'm a Liberal Democrats member (I recently stood in the local council election in my area) so I don't have any motivation to big up Angela Rayner or her party (altough I do have a lot of respect for her as a stateswoman and a person who has worked hard to achieve despite the brickbats and prejudices lagainst her) but I will stand up and comment when I see nonsense like your interpretation of the video, Selby.
As Selby puts it so well himself, he only sees what he wants to see and believe.
-
Well I will give it to her on the video with the Muslim men, she looked like she enhanced their thoughts on British women. to be ignored, used, and as "cheap as chicken" as their saying goes.
You can see it in their faces, which were ignoring even looking at her while she promised the earth to them selling her soul, I bet gorgeous George killed himself laughing.
I just googled the video. I could clearly hear one of the gentlemen in the room repeatedly saying things like "Yes, I said that" in agreement with what Rayner was saying. The rest of the attendees were listening respectfully.
For the record, I'm a Liberal Democrats member (I recently stood in the local council election in my area) so I don't have any motivation to big up Angela Rayner or her party (altough I do have a lot of respect for her as a stateswoman and a person who has worked hard to achieve despite the brickbats and prejudices lagainst her) but I will stand up and comment when I see nonsense like your interpretation of the video, Selby.
Good post Mike.
I'm trying to think how Selby has watched that video and come to those conclusions.
They are literally looking at her and regularly agreeing with her when she says how little any UK Govt could do.
And Selby concludes from that that she sells her soul to a bunch of men who ignore her and want to "use" her.
The amount of bile and bitterness that produces that output is really quite scary to witness. You do wonder how our democracy is supposed to work if that's how some voters think.
-
You and others jump on my posts when I voice an opinion about something that you don’t agree with and now you are doing the same when I haven’t voiced an opinion about something.
I just can’t get it right for you can I?
Don’t forget that I am voting with you lot this time so cut me some slack eh.
There’s a good lad.
Don’t patronise me with your ‘good lad’
I jump on your posts precisely because you DONT give your opinion, you just shit stir and egg on your mates.
And you’ve done it again
Now what’s your opinion on Spritrovers post?
Ha ha you twit, read your last few posts on here your worse than a Nazi hunting Jews! Repeatedly
Trying to get people you clearly don’t like to to make a comment on my post, you are a true Saddo!
-
So sprot you've been wrong all along and post misogynist rubbish but it's everyone else's fault.
-
So sprot you've been wrong all along and post misogynist rubbish but it's everyone else's fault.
No
-
Estate tart been keeping her head down let’s see what happens later this week!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-police-general-election-b2551008.html
Just so we are all clear, could you explain your definition of an “estate tart”
Grew up in a social housing estate gets herself Pregnant at 16 to get her own drum and all of the benefits she could grab!
What a w**ker you are.
Did you drop out of Nursey? You never seem to be able to string a sentence together?
-
Sprotyrover
Lots and lots of very young girls find themselves pregnant without having an ulterior motive.
But in your mind, because she’s Angela Rayner she’s bound to have done it on purpose.
That's way over his head Tommy.
She got pregnant, young= slut.
Or it's a pity certain posters mother's didn't open the back door or swallow that fateful night.
Sprotyrover
Lots and lots of very young girls find themselves pregnant without having an ulterior motive.
But in your mind, because she’s Angela Rayner she’s bound to have done it on purpose.
He’s done well, he’s insulted every teenage girl from a social housing estate, every teenage girl thats from my part of Stainy (not a social housing estate) all from his ivory towers in Sprotbrough, apologies to all the good people of Sprotbrough, but you do have one individual that is a vile person living there
Please show me how I have managed to insult every teenage girl from a Social housing estate?
-
F**k me! I’m a Nazi for trying to get someone who reckons he’s fair minded and who others say is a nice bloke, to comment on a disgraceful mysoginistic post.
But he wouldn’t due to his misplaced duty to one of the forum Neanderthals.
-
F**k me! I’m a Nazi for trying to get someone who reckons he’s fair minded and who others say is a nice bloke, to comment on a disgraceful mysoginistic post.
But he wouldn’t due to his misplaced duty to one of the forum Neanderthals.
Trying too hard by far, and why is it necessary to bully other forum members to comment on a post they have nothing to do with Adolf?
-
F**k me! I’m a Nazi for trying to get someone who reckons he’s fair minded and who others say is a nice bloke, to comment on a disgraceful mysoginistic post.
But he wouldn’t due to his misplaced duty to one of the forum Neanderthals.
11 times you have posted demanding, bullying, chiding, trying to make DRFC Hound comment on a post that has got nothing to do with him,11 times, I think that counts as harassment, now crawl back under your stone and keep yer nose out of my business!
-
If you don't want noses in 'your business' don't go posting about it on a public forum.
-
Ah but he did have something to do with it.
If he hadn’t I wouldn’t have bothered him.
-
Harassment!
:ohmy:
-
Ok
You read Sprotyrovers comment.
Syd objected to it and rightly so.
You immediately had a go at Syd with the intention to deflect the issue on to him and away from Sprot.
The type of thing you do, a lot, which obviously gets my goat.
I see that as being involved.
That’s how I see it.
No doubt you will disagree, which is fine.
Edit
For some reason hound has deleted the post to which this post is a reply. Don’t know why.
-
Ok
You read Sprotyrovers comment.
Syd objected to it and rightly so.
You immediately had a go at Syd with the intention to deflect the issue on to him and away from Sprot.
The type of thing you do, a lot, which obviously gets my goat.
I see that as being involved.
That’s how I see it.
No doubt you will disagree, which is fine.
I think you need to wind your neck in, maybe change yer name to Tommy Tipee now you getting dementia!
-
Seems to be the new tactic of you lot, accusing people who disagree with you of having a mental illness.
-
Ok
You read Sprotyrovers comment.
Syd objected to it and rightly so.
You immediately had a go at Syd with the intention to deflect the issue on to him and away from Sprot.
The type of thing you do, a lot, which obviously gets my goat.
I see that as being involved.
That’s how I see it.
No doubt you will disagree, which is fine.
I think you need to wind your neck in, maybe change yer name to Tommy Tipee now you getting dementia!
Really???
Odious,misogynistic, xenophobic c@nt would be more appropriate for some posters on here
-
Seems to be the new tactic of you lot, accusing people who disagree with you of having a mental illness.
Somebody who continually harasses another person, like you have done has got some sort of Personality disorder! Go and get some counselling!
-
Ok
You read Sprotyrovers comment.
Syd objected to it and rightly so.
You immediately had a go at Syd with the intention to deflect the issue on to him and away from Sprot.
The type of thing you do, a lot, which obviously gets my goat.
I see that as being involved.
That’s how I see it.
No doubt you will disagree, which is fine.
I think you need to wind your neck in, maybe change yer name to Tommy Tipee now you getting dementia!
Really???
Odious,misogynistic, xenophobic c@nt would be more appropriate for some posters on here
You must be referring to yourself Pearly!
-
Ok
You read Sprotyrovers comment.
Syd objected to it and rightly so.
You immediately had a go at Syd with the intention to deflect the issue on to him and away from Sprot.
The type of thing you do, a lot, which obviously gets my goat.
I see that as being involved.
That’s how I see it.
No doubt you will disagree, which is fine.
I think you need to wind your neck in, maybe change yer name to Tommy Tipee now you getting dementia!
Really???
Odious,misogynistic, xenophobic c@nt would be more appropriate for some posters on here
You must be referring to yourself Pearly!
Is it half past dogging already?
-
Ok
You read Sprotyrovers comment.
Syd objected to it and rightly so.
You immediately had a go at Syd with the intention to deflect the issue on to him and away from Sprot.
The type of thing you do, a lot, which obviously gets my goat.
I see that as being involved.
That’s how I see it.
No doubt you will disagree, which is fine.
I think you need to wind your neck in, maybe change yer name to Tommy Tipee now you getting dementia!
Really???
Odious,misogynistic, xenophobic c@nt would be more appropriate for some posters on here
You must be referring to yourself Pearly!
Is it half past dogging already?
Why ask me you seem to be into that sort of thing Pearly!
-
Mods, please can we put and end to this tit for tat pointless bickering? I know this is off topic but this is getting tedious.
I know I get dragged into it sometimes but really try to hold my tongue figuratively speaking:
There’s a lot going on in politics and in the world at the moment which folks will quite rightly want to discuss and disagree on.
But this personal slanging, from folks who I suspect are old enough to know better, is just too much, isn’t it.??
Bump..
FFS!!
-
Seems to be the new tactic of you lot, accusing people who disagree with you of having a mental illness.
Somebody who continually harasses another person, like you have done has got some sort of Personality disorder! Go and get some counselling!
And that would apply to those continually harassing Syd. I'm sure you'd agree with yourself about that.
-
Seems to be the new tactic of you lot, accusing people who disagree with you of having a mental illness.
Somebody who continually harasses another person, like you have done has got some sort of Personality disorder! Go and get some counselling!
And that would apply to those continually harassing Syd. I'm sure you'd agree with yourself about that.
Why would Iagree with myself?
-
Seems to be the new tactic of you lot, accusing people who disagree with you of having a mental illness.
Somebody who continually harasses another person, like you have done has got some sort of Personality disorder! Go and get some counselling!
And that would apply to those continually harassing Syd. I'm sure you'd agree with yourself about that.
Why would Iagree with myself?
You don't agree with your very own words? What an odd person you are.
-
Seems to be the new tactic of you lot, accusing people who disagree with you of having a mental illness.
Somebody who continually harasses another person, like you have done has got some sort of Personality disorder! Go and get some counselling!
And that would apply to those continually harassing Syd. I'm sure you'd agree with yourself about that.
Why would Iagree with myself?
You don't agree with your very own words? What an odd person you are.
Pray do tell who has been harassing Syd?
Note his post 296 on the General election thread and explain?
-
Seems to be the new tactic of you lot, accusing people who disagree with you of having a mental illness.
Somebody who continually harasses another person, like you have done has got some sort of Personality disorder! Go and get some counselling!
And that would apply to those continually harassing Syd. I'm sure you'd agree with yourself about that.
Why would Iagree with myself?
You don't agree with your very own words? What an odd person you are.
Pray do tell who has been harassing Syd?
Note his post 296 on the General election thread and explain?
Hey snotty this is my post on #296
''So that shitty speech you made back in 2006 on the South Country was another load of twaddle forsaking your country and all that as we had gone to the dogs!
For gods sake don’t tell us they deported you back here?
Not sure what you are on about, but that's not unusual.
You appear to be the local expert on dogs and dogging, snotty
Modify message
How can I be clearer when I throw your own words back at you ffs?
-
Seems to be the new tactic of you lot, accusing people who disagree with you of having a mental illness.
Somebody who continually harasses another person, like you have done has got some sort of Personality disorder! Go and get some counselling!
And that would apply to those continually harassing Syd. I'm sure you'd agree with yourself about that.
Why would Iagree with myself?
You don't agree with your very own words? What an odd person you are.
Pray do tell who has been harassing Syd?
Note his post 296 on the General election thread and explain?
Hey snotty this is my post on #296
''So that shitty speech you made back in 2006 on the South Country was another load of twaddle forsaking your country and all that as we had gone to the dogs!
For gods sake don’t tell us they deported you back here?
Not sure what you are on about, but that's not unusual.
You appear to be the local expert on dogs and dogging, snotty
Modify message
How can I be clearer when I throw your own words back at you ffs?
Evidence please??
-
Seems to be the new tactic of you lot, accusing people who disagree with you of having a mental illness.
Somebody who continually harasses another person, like you have done has got some sort of Personality disorder! Go and get some counselling!
And that would apply to those continually harassing Syd. I'm sure you'd agree with yourself about that.
Why would Iagree with myself?
You don't agree with your very own words? What an odd person you are.
Pray do tell who has been harassing Syd?
Note his post 296 on the General election thread and explain?
Hey snotty this is my post on #296
''So that shitty speech you made back in 2006 on the South Country was another load of twaddle forsaking your country and all that as we had gone to the dogs!
For gods sake don’t tell us they deported you back here?
Not sure what you are on about, but that's not unusual.
You appear to be the local expert on dogs and dogging, snotty
Modify message
How can I be clearer when I throw your own words back at you ffs?
Evidence please??
1/ Again no idea what you are getting at
2/ You gave a rambling dissertation on going out dogging with a stick only a couple of weeks(?) ago? that make you the expert in my opinion.
-
Seems to be the new tactic of you lot, accusing people who disagree with you of having a mental illness.
Somebody who continually harasses another person, like you have done has got some sort of Personality disorder! Go and get some counselling!
And that would apply to those continually harassing Syd. I'm sure you'd agree with yourself about that.
Why would Iagree with myself?
You don't agree with your very own words? What an odd person you are.
Pray do tell who has been harassing Syd?
Note his post 296 on the General election thread and explain?
Hey snotty this is my post on #296
''So that shitty speech you made back in 2006 on the South Country was another load of twaddle forsaking your country and all that as we had gone to the dogs!
For gods sake don’t tell us they deported you back here?
Not sure what you are on about, but that's not unusual.
You appear to be the local expert on dogs and dogging, snotty
Modify message
How can I be clearer when I throw your own words back at you ffs?
Evidence please??
1/ Again no idea what you are getting at
2/ You gave a rambling dissertation on going out dogging with a stick only a couple of weeks(?) ago? that make you the expert in my opinion.
Amazing how you can Misconstrue, me taking my dog for a walk as ‘Dogging’! The big stick is to help navigate over rough ground and also I keep meeting Lurcher Pit Bull cross breeds which as you aware can be a problem, there are a lot of Deers Poachers and Hare Coursers on the Escarpment and they are quite happy to let their dogs run wild
Trying to flush out game!
-
OSHIT
-
You can flick that off the footpath with a stick as well Syd.
-
You can flick that off the footpath with a stick as well Syd.
as well as you?