Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: Ryaldinhio on May 13, 2024, 10:52:14 pm

Title: Tom Nixon
Post by: Ryaldinhio on May 13, 2024, 10:52:14 pm
From what I can find he signed a 1yr deal with Hull June 2023 when he then signed for us on loan.

If he is available on a free I would snap him up. Personally think he is a great player. Definitely an upgrade on Seaman as a back up if nothing else.

For me he would be challenging Sterry for RB. Not sure why he fell out of favour so quickly.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: Silkscarf on May 14, 2024, 06:30:51 am
I agree. Grant seemed to go off him for some reason but from what I’ve seen he’s been a solid player for us. We’ve had some average ones in recent seasons (and that’s being kind).

The cliche view is usually he doesn’t offer enough going forward (all teams need a Kyle Walker now apparently) but he’s not had much chance to show us that side of his game. I liked Maxwell straight away when he joined and he’s developed into an outstanding player.

I trust Grant though so if we upgrade then fair enough.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: roversdude on May 14, 2024, 06:36:20 am
Really like Nixon very skilful player, he always looked like he was knackered but kept going
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: philsky on May 14, 2024, 07:14:45 am
I agree. Grant seemed to go off him for some reason but from what I’ve seen he’s been a solid player for us. We’ve had some average ones in recent seasons (and that’s being kind).

The cliche view is usually he doesn’t offer enough going forward (all teams need a Kyle Walker now apparently) but he’s not had much chance to show us that side of his game. I liked Maxwell straight away when he joined and he’s developed into an outstanding player.

I trust Grant though so if we upgrade then fair enough.

I like Nixon too and I reckon Grant just fancies Sterry more - rather than him going off Nixon.

A decent back up

Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on May 14, 2024, 07:50:46 am
Nixon seems to be all energy, but when you think about it, maybe he wastes a bit of that energy by not being as experienced as Sterry, and just lacking a bit of composure at vital times but hopefully that will come in time. Let's face it Kyle Walker used his pace to great effect but has matured into a better all around footballer than just straight up and down. 
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: NickDRFC on May 14, 2024, 07:55:02 am
I agree. Grant seemed to go off him for some reason but from what I’ve seen he’s been a solid player for us. We’ve had some average ones in recent seasons (and that’s being kind).

The cliche view is usually he doesn’t offer enough going forward (all teams need a Kyle Walker now apparently) but he’s not had much chance to show us that side of his game. I liked Maxwell straight away when he joined and he’s developed into an outstanding player.

I trust Grant though so if we upgrade then fair enough.

I agree with your point generally but Kyle Walker isn’t a good example to use - he’s not great going forward!
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: Colin C No.3 on May 14, 2024, 08:40:31 am
Nixon wants to sign, he’s waiting for a sign that the club wants him to sign. I hope he signs.

A more than competent back up for Sterry.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: roversdude on May 14, 2024, 08:52:45 am
What’s that based on Colin please
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: wing commander on May 14, 2024, 09:55:10 am
  I'm not Sterrys greatest fan tbh, cant fault his commitment and attitude one bit,but for me he gets caught out of position far to much and fails to stop the crosses coming in.I'm not saying he hasn't improved but if we want to put in a title challenge I think we need better.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: Reg of the Rovers on May 14, 2024, 10:20:01 am
I agree completely WC - not a Sterry fan at all, poor delivery, poor at getting out to stop crosses, not solid enough in heading the ball / defending crosses in to the box. I'd assumed Nixon wasn't fully fit, as I much prefer him to Sterry and would have him start first every time.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: Chris Black come back on May 14, 2024, 05:47:32 pm
It would be great but I don’t think we are going to be spending money on Nixon as a back up. He’s coming from Hull so will be on decent money and would he want to step down two leagues to sit on bench?
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: sedwardsdrfc on May 14, 2024, 06:06:57 pm
He never seemed to want to cross the ball from what I remember of him. Sterry does have a good cross on him from deep. But overall I thought Nixon was better in a poor team.

Moly would have been even better with someone regularly overlapping him
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: ncRover on May 15, 2024, 07:41:39 am
He never seemed to want to cross the ball from what I remember of him. Sterry does have a good cross on him from deep. But overall I thought Nixon was better in a poor team.

Moly would have been even better with someone regularly overlapping him

Agreed. When he did put a delivery in it wasn’t great either.

The full backs are a really important creative outlet in a McCann team. 1 assist in 25 for Nixon. He’d be better suited to a defensive team I think.

I do quite like Sterry but there’s no harm in signing competition that can potentially be better than him. We want to win the league after all.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: drfcsteve on May 15, 2024, 07:47:14 am
I think Nixon will definitely turn in to a better player than Sterry. I like Sterry, but people go past him easily and often, and this is in league 2. League 1 wingers would probably have a field day against him.

Offensively he offers more than Nixon does now but Nixon could work on that. First job of a full back is to defend.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: Colin C No.3 on May 15, 2024, 08:39:30 am
What’s that based on Colin please

I asked him directly “Any chance of a permanent contract Tom?” , he replied “I hope so”.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: graingrover on May 15, 2024, 12:18:40 pm
Only Hakks has been formerly released by his club.The other three loanees are under contract to another club until 30 June and do not figure on release lists so either loan agreements or transfers would have to be negotiated .Craig , Nixon and Tim .
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: big fat yorkshire pudding on May 15, 2024, 12:23:37 pm
I'm not so sure on Nixon.  Clearly our results were much stronger with Sterry in the side and we conceded a lot from crosses.

I don't think he's a bad player but I think there's better options around.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: Colin C No.3 on May 15, 2024, 12:42:15 pm
I'm not so sure on Nixon.  Clearly our results were much stronger with Sterry in the side and we conceded a lot from crosses.

I don't think he's a bad player but I think there's better options around.

Can you name them, please.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on May 15, 2024, 12:59:34 pm
quote author=big fat yorkshire pudding link=topic=291226.msg1316488#msg1316488 date=1715772217]
I'm not so sure on Nixon.  Clearly our results were much stronger with Sterry in the side and we conceded a lot from crosses.

I don't think he's a bad player but I think there's better options around.
[/quote]

Tend to agree. I thought Senior and Nixon would have good futures but for me both Maxwell and Sterry look more assured overall. Nixon definitely has potential but do we pay for untapped potential who in McCann's eyes would be back up for Sterry?
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: big fat yorkshire pudding on May 15, 2024, 01:22:11 pm
I'm not so sure on Nixon.  Clearly our results were much stronger with Sterry in the side and we conceded a lot from crosses.

I don't think he's a bad player but I think there's better options around.

Can you name them, please.

Can you? I'd like to think the recruitment team know a lot more about players out there than I do.

I can only judge Nixon and whilst I agree he's got improvement in him, signing development players isn't going to get us promoted.  He couldn't dislodge Sterry so I'd question if he's good enough for us right now.

Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: pib on May 15, 2024, 01:32:53 pm
I'm not so sure on Nixon.  Clearly our results were much stronger with Sterry in the side and we conceded a lot from crosses.

I don't think he's a bad player but I think there's better options around.

Can you name them, please.

Can you? I'd like to think the recruitment team know a lot more about players out there than I do.

I can only judge Nixon and whilst I agree he's got improvement in him, signing development players isn't going to get us promoted.  He couldn't dislodge Sterry so I'd question if he's good enough for us right now.

Callum Johnson has been suggested, and looked decent against us. I'm sure the club have options in mind.

Agree with your original post byfp.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: streathamdave on May 15, 2024, 05:47:08 pm
I don't dislike Nixon, but think Sterry is the better player right now. Seems to me Sterry is very under rated by our fans. Apart from the loanees and Wood, I think our upturn has been a lot down to him. We do need a back up however.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: Draytonian III on May 16, 2024, 10:09:37 pm
Wasn’t Nixon injured for awhile a few months back, my mate saw him in DRI
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: steve@dcfd on May 17, 2024, 12:11:14 pm
Hull have not released there retained list yet they have to do it by tomorrow
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: DonnyEl on May 18, 2024, 08:34:07 pm
Had his contract optioned for another year at Hull
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: Chris Black come back on May 18, 2024, 11:44:43 pm
Billy available on a free though!
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: NickDRFC on May 19, 2024, 01:28:15 pm
Billy available on a free though!

Hadn’t even registered that he’d gone there. Judging by his minutes and contributions he may as well not have done.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: Chris Black come back on May 19, 2024, 01:30:48 pm
Can’t believe that bandwagon hasn’t started up yet. People slipping.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: sedwardsdrfc on May 19, 2024, 03:26:52 pm
Never going to happen but see they’ve let Greg Docherty go who played a lot for McCann when he was manager. Would be too good for this level anyway but worth an ask just in case he fancies winning a title!
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: StocksArmy on May 19, 2024, 03:47:38 pm
Injuries aside Sterry is a great right back. Surprised to see some of the comments tbh. We play him and Moly high up the pitch and when a team break on us the likelyhood is there will be a ball coming into our box. Doesn't mean Sterry is poor.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: ncRover on May 20, 2024, 08:23:54 pm
If we’re continuing the non-league gems theme, then the best attacking right back in that league  - Connor Barrett from Fylde is out of contract.

9 assists and 2 goals.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: DonnyOsmond on May 20, 2024, 09:55:08 pm
If we’re continuing the non-league gems theme, then the best attacking right back in that league  - Connor Barrett from Fylde is out of contract.

9 assists and 2 goals.

Good, direct right back. Very good age too.
Title: Re: Tom Nixon
Post by: 5minstogo on May 21, 2024, 07:12:39 am
Also Jai Rowe from Boston would be a decent back up with age on his side.