Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Off Topic => Topic started by: Sprotyrover on June 05, 2024, 11:10:47 pm

Title: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Sprotyrover on June 05, 2024, 11:10:47 pm
Seven guilty of sexually abusing two girls in care https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c72281r4wq8o
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: SydneyRover on June 06, 2024, 06:26:50 am
''Between 1970 and 2015, the Catholic Church received more than 900 complaints involving over 3,000 instances of child sexual abuse in England and Wales. Since 2016, there have been more than 100 reported allegations each year. The true scale of abuse over the last 50 years is likely to have been far higher''

https://www.iicsa.org.uk/news/inquiry-finds-catholic-church-prioritised-reputation-over-welfare-children.html#:~:text=Between%201970%20and%202015%2C%20the,to%20have%20been%20far%20higher.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: TonySoprano on June 06, 2024, 06:52:47 am
Seven guilty of sexually abusing two girls in care https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c72281r4wq8o
Usual suspects
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Herbert Anchovy on June 06, 2024, 07:21:23 am
Please. Don’t use these horrific crimes as a way to score points as part of a petty squabble.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: SydneyRover on June 06, 2024, 07:35:53 am
Just replying to dispatches from Faragistan north of the river HA
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Sprotyrover on June 06, 2024, 09:21:40 am
Syd is an apologist for grooming gangs!
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Herbert Anchovy on June 06, 2024, 09:28:39 am
These are awful crimes where the victims have suffered greatly. Using these crimes as a route to score personal points against someone on the forum is really low. There's plenty of other topics on here where we can squabble to our hearts desire, but using this subject matter leaves really bad taste in my mouth.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: IDM on June 06, 2024, 09:33:25 am
Seven guilty of sexually abusing two girls in care https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c72281r4wq8o
Usual suspects

Usual suspects.???

Because they are asian??  So Asian men are likely to be abusers, because they are “usual suspects”.??

f**k off you racist Kitson.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: IDM on June 06, 2024, 09:35:18 am
Apologies to everyone else for my rant. 

I agree with HA by the way.. 

I'm out.  I don't care if I get censured by the Admin for my remarks above.  Sometimes someone has to call folks out.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: TonySoprano on June 06, 2024, 11:19:57 am
Seven guilty of sexually abusing two girls in care https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c72281r4wq8o
Usual suspects

Usual suspects.???

Because they are asian??  So Asian men are likely to be abusers, because they are “usual suspects”.??

f**k off you racist Kitson.
You mentioned Asian, no one else. Perhaps your the racist.

Anyway, leftists like yourself have overused that phrase so much that it's lost all meaning.

I also highly doubt you would dare say it to my face.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: ChrisBx on June 06, 2024, 01:29:31 pm
Seven guilty of sexually abusing two girls in care https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c72281r4wq8o
Usual suspects

What, males?
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: ravenrover on June 06, 2024, 05:47:37 pm
Came through pasport control last night at EMA, large poster about child abuse including a photo of a child sex doll, there are some very depraved people about
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 07, 2024, 06:56:26 pm
Seven guilty of sexually abusing two girls in care https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c72281r4wq8o
Usual suspects

Usual suspects.???

Because they are asian??  So Asian men are likely to be abusers, because they are “usual suspects”.??

f**k off you racist Kitson.

I think you've got the wrong end of the stick.
I'm sure the American gangster was referring to a kid's entertainer from Leeds, or possibly an ex Tory PM.
Maybe even Garg Glitter,Max Clifford,Jonathan King,Stuart Hall,Cryil Smith,the singer from the Lost Prophets with the Doncaster connection etc.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Colin C No.3 on June 07, 2024, 11:39:35 pm
Here’s a thought, castrate the t**ts.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 07, 2024, 11:46:08 pm
Celebrities?
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: wilts rover on June 08, 2024, 11:18:54 am
'Usual suspects' post:

The evil criminals involved in the biggest-ever child sex abuse ring in the West Midlands have been jailed for more than 145 years. A total of 21 people have been convicted of sickening crimes against seven children up to the age of 12.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/paedophiles-behind-biggest-ever-child-26640341

Notice anything different about these people to the ones in sprotys' OP? Hence why he has never posted about them.

Because it's not paedophiles he is interested in is it?
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Sprotyrover on June 08, 2024, 12:03:02 pm
Wilts 1) the article is 15 months old, I seem to recall it being mentioned on here. Over a year ago!
2) the post was from the BBC news feed and operation STOVEWOOD was incepted to investigate some 1000 plus,complaints by English Heritage women who alleged that they had been groomed and Sexually abused by Pakistani Heritage men from South Yorks mainly Rotherham.

https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/what-we-do/crime-threats/operation-stovewood-rotherham-child-sexual-abuse-investigation

3) also locally this week. a Doncaster man was sentenced to 18 years imprisonment for befriending 2 underage girls on the internet and subsequently Blackmailing them into post lewd pictures of themselves performing sexual acts on each other, I applaud the sentence.

4) Moderators please note the post no 15  in the thread from Wilts he is accusing me of being a racist and I find that vey offensive!

I also note that ChrisBx and Hounslow rover have liked his very offensive post!
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 08, 2024, 01:04:49 pm
I felt a n urge to like that post too after reading your comments.
You really are walking on thin ice
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Bentley Bullet on June 08, 2024, 01:40:54 pm
Iberian Red. Have you ever thought about doing everybody a favour and f**king off?
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Padge_DRFC on June 08, 2024, 01:44:56 pm
 Considering they read a book where a 53 year old bloke marries a 6 year old I doubt they even see it as wrong.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: SydneyRover on June 08, 2024, 02:15:14 pm
where is this thread going?

How many in the uk have had consensual sex before the age of 16 of either sex?
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Sprotyrover on June 08, 2024, 02:40:27 pm
where is this thread going?

How many in the uk have had consensual sex before the age of 16 of either sex?
Syd this isn’t about 14/15 year old playing slap and Tickle! (However there are quite a few young men on the Sex offenders register because they did that) this is about mature men target vulnerable underage girls , grooming them having sex with them and then passing them around a gang of older men that’s what most of these women allege. 
Has happened to them.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: SydneyRover on June 08, 2024, 02:50:21 pm
My comment was meant to be considered with Padge's comment with is diverging is it not sprot, by the way if you continue to post comments about people from diverse backgrounds and cultures but fail to post similar those similar to your own (say white bread south stand) then you can't really complain when people take offence, aye.

eg Hexthorpe, dogging etc
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 08, 2024, 02:56:42 pm
Iberian Red. Have you ever thought about doing everybody a favour and f**king off?

Stick to your lame,pathetic jokes Bents.
Or your unwavering support of lame, pathetic,lying politicians.

Then fack off you complete and utter arsewipe
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 08, 2024, 03:14:41 pm
Iberian Red. Have you ever thought about doing everybody a favour and f**king off?

A thread about child abuse and that is your only contribution.

Sad,vile individual.

Oxygen is so valuable,yet you are wasting it.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Bentley Bullet on June 08, 2024, 03:25:45 pm
So, obviously you haven't ever thought of doing everybody a favour and f**king off. You are an undefendable, obnoxious sad sack who should keep your hate-filled, poisoned, unbalanced opinions to yourself.

You are one very disturbed individual.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 08, 2024, 03:42:41 pm
So, obviously you haven't ever thought of doing everybody a favour and f**king off. You are an undefendable, obnoxious sad sack who should keep your hate-filled, poisoned, unbalanced opinions to yourself.

You are one very disturbed individual.

Hmm.

I'm getting a bit of a hypocritical vibe coming thro here.

Nothing to say about child abuse?

Take a long,deep breath.

Then hold it.



For a week or two.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Sprotyrover on June 08, 2024, 03:46:11 pm
It’s sad to see the pathetic posts from Syd and Pearly two really sad individuals! And bestie buddies it would seem!
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Sprotyrover on June 08, 2024, 03:47:56 pm
My comment was meant to be considered with Padge's comment with is diverging is it not sprot, by the way if you continue to post comments about people from diverse backgrounds and cultures but fail to post similar those similar to your own (say white bread south stand) then you can't really complain when people take offence, aye.

eg Hexthorpe, dogging etc
See my OP idiot where did I make any comment?
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Bentley Bullet on June 08, 2024, 03:52:41 pm
So, obviously you haven't ever thought of doing everybody a favour and f**king off. You are an undefendable, obnoxious sad sack who should keep your hate-filled, poisoned, unbalanced opinions to yourself.

You are one very disturbed individual.

Hmm.

I'm getting a bit of a hypocritical vibe coming thro here.

Nothing to say about child abuse?

Take a long,deep breath.

Then hold it.



For a week or two.
I think paedo's should imprisoned and have their b*llocks removed.

I also think you should be banned from this forum thus having your b*llocks removed.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 08, 2024, 03:59:56 pm
So, obviously you haven't ever thought of doing everybody a favour and f**king off. You are an undefendable, obnoxious sad sack who should keep your hate-filled, poisoned, unbalanced opinions to yourself.

You are one very disturbed individual.

Hmm.

I'm getting a bit of a hypocritical vibe coming thro here.

Nothing to say about child abuse?

Take a long,deep breath.

Then hold it.



For a week or two.
I think paedo's should imprisoned and have their b*llocks removed.

I also think you should be banned from this forum thus having your b*llocks removed.

Why not post that in the first place,rather than just attack me.

You appear to have some very serious anger management issues.

I can sense you getting redder and redder in the face.

Be careful with that, it can't be good for your blood pressure or health.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Bentley Bullet on June 08, 2024, 04:08:34 pm
I attack you because you're an undefendable, obnoxious sad sack who should have treatment to help keep your hate-filled, poisoned, unbalanced opinions to yourself. You are one very disturbed individual who needs to be told the truth.

 No one is doing you any favours by ignoring your input when it is obvious you need professional help.

Who knows, you might thank me one day.


Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 08, 2024, 04:13:59 pm
Oh dear!

I sincerely hope you feel better after your rants.
Don't kick the dog or missus BB please.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Bentley Bullet on June 08, 2024, 04:24:20 pm
Oh dear!

I sincerely hope you feel better after your rants.
Don't kick the dog or missus BB please.
You see, that's my point. What might be a normal reaction for you is not the reaction of normal folk.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 08, 2024, 04:30:14 pm
A far more appropriate acronym for BB would be bye bye.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: redwine on June 08, 2024, 04:36:04 pm
Checking in to see who will have the last word.

 ;)
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 08, 2024, 04:42:49 pm
Checking in to see who will have the last word.

 ;)

You! :lol:
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Padge_DRFC on June 08, 2024, 04:55:07 pm
where is this thread going?

How many in the uk have had consensual sex before the age of 16 of either sex?

Not sure you've grasped what has happened. Or what the OP is about! Well hopefully anyway.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 08, 2024, 04:58:59 pm
where is this thread going?

How many in the uk have had consensual sex before the age of 16 of either sex?

Not sure you've grasped what has happened. Or what the OP is about! Well hopefully anyway.

Did you read Wilts post above?
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: SydneyRover on June 08, 2024, 05:59:32 pm
where is this thread going?

How many in the uk have had consensual sex before the age of 16 of either sex?

Not sure you've grasped what has happened. Or what the OP is about! Well hopefully anyway.

I've grasped over time that sprot spends his time picking out those with differing values to make some sort of weird point Padge and possibly and tenuously hoping that some would agree and support the far right of politics as he appears to do.

hope that answers some or all of your enquiry.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Padge_DRFC on June 08, 2024, 07:47:09 pm
where is this thread going?

How many in the uk have had consensual sex before the age of 16 of either sex?

Not sure you've grasped what has happened. Or what the OP is about! Well hopefully anyway.

I've grasped over time that sprot spends his time picking out those with differing values to make some sort of weird point Padge and possibly and tenuously hoping that some would agree and support the far right of politics as he appears to do.

hope that answers some or all of your enquiry.

Say you're a hypocrite without saying your hypocrite in one post
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: SydneyRover on June 08, 2024, 08:56:34 pm
Say what you wish Padge I'd not want to spend time with anyone that lives by the credo of religious books written a couple of thousand years ago.

If you think that your comment about it adds to the thread that's fine by me.

Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: wilts rover on June 08, 2024, 10:15:31 pm
Wilts 1) the article is 15 months old, I seem to recall it being mentioned on here. Over a year ago!
2) the post was from the BBC news feed and operation STOVEWOOD was incepted to investigate some 1000 plus,complaints by English Heritage women who alleged that they had been groomed and Sexually abused by Pakistani Heritage men from South Yorks mainly Rotherham.

https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/what-we-do/crime-threats/operation-stovewood-rotherham-child-sexual-abuse-investigation

3) also locally this week. a Doncaster man was sentenced to 18 years imprisonment for befriending 2 underage girls on the internet and subsequently Blackmailing them into post lewd pictures of themselves performing sexual acts on each other, I applaud the sentence.

4) Moderators please note the post no 15  in the thread from Wilts he is accusing me of being a racist and I find that vey offensive!

I also note that ChrisBx and Hounslow rover have liked his very offensive post!

Yes you would remember it being posted on here - I posted it then.

I read what you post sproty - so does everyone else. I also see what's in the news that you don't post - so does everyone else.

If you don't like what I post tough. Here's some dots to join....
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Sprotyrover on June 08, 2024, 11:04:52 pm
Wilts 1) the article is 15 months old, I seem to recall it being mentioned on here. Over a year ago!
2) the post was from the BBC news feed and operation STOVEWOOD was incepted to investigate some 1000 plus,complaints by English Heritage women who alleged that they had been groomed and Sexually abused by Pakistani Heritage men from South Yorks mainly Rotherham.

https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/what-we-do/crime-threats/operation-stovewood-rotherham-child-sexual-abuse-investigation

3) also locally this week. a Doncaster man was sentenced to 18 years imprisonment for befriending 2 underage girls on the internet and subsequently Blackmailing them into post lewd pictures of themselves performing sexual acts on each other, I applaud the sentence.

4) Moderators please note the post no 15  in the thread from Wilts he is accusing me of being a racist and I find that vey offensive!

I also note that ChrisBx and Hounslow rover have liked his very offensive post!

Yes you would remember it being posted on here - I posted it then.

I read what you post sproty - so does everyone else. I also see what's in the news that you don't post - so does everyone else.

If you don't like what I post tough. Here's some dots to join....
I am surprised with you Wilts I thought you were a decent person but just lately you have shown yourself up!
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Herbert Anchovy on June 09, 2024, 01:54:04 am
Please. Don’t use these horrific crimes as a way to score points as part of a petty squabble.

Bump

Lads, please. Take these arguments to another topic eh? All of us, whatever your political view point, must surely agree that these are horrendous crimes. Let’s all agree on that point and not belittle the horrors these kids have gone through with our petty squabbling.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: wilts rover on June 09, 2024, 08:24:01 am
Herbert - it is the horrific nature of crimes like these that makes it even MORE important that people who attempt to use them for political point scoring and to reinforce a particular political point of view are called out for it.

Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Bentley Bullet on June 09, 2024, 08:37:45 am
Can someone explain to me what these horrific crimes have to do with politics? Surely all political parties are repulsed by them?
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: DRFC_AjA on June 09, 2024, 11:14:55 am
Now how dare you. Despite it being proven that there was a fear of being accused of pointing out it was a certain 'group' despite it being proven that this 'group' specifically targeted white females, you're still not allowed to point that out. You damn fascist. The left will still do exactly the same, they'll point out child abuse is rife in Catholicism, comedians will still make jokes about it, but that's fine FYI....because they're scared of that 'group' and their religion
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Sprotyrover on June 09, 2024, 12:16:11 pm
Now how dare you. Despite it being proven that there was a fear of being accused of pointing out it was a certain 'group' despite it being proven that this 'group' specifically targeted white females, you're still not allowed to point that out. You damn fascist. The left will still do exactly the same, they'll point out child abuse is rife in Catholicism, comedians will still make jokes about it, but that's fine FYI....because they're scared of that 'group' and their religion
You mean like Facist Syd did on this thread ?
And worst still he is or was Catholic!
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: drfchound on June 09, 2024, 05:06:25 pm
I don’t even know why Syd felt the need to even mention the catholic thing.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: DRFC_AjA on June 09, 2024, 05:19:59 pm
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: wilts rover on June 09, 2024, 06:30:28 pm
Now how dare you. Despite it being proven that there was a fear of being accused of pointing out it was a certain 'group' despite it being proven that this 'group' specifically targeted white females, you're still not allowed to point that out. You damn fascist. The left will still do exactly the same, they'll point out child abuse is rife in Catholicism, comedians will still make jokes about it, but that's fine FYI....because they're scared of that 'group' and their religion

Yes mate, most child abusers are white men. Is that what you mean? Because some people seem to have a problem with that:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65174096

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/dec/15/child-sexual-abuse-gangs-white-men-home-office-report

https://fullfact.org/crime/what-do-we-know-about-ethnicity-people-involved-sexual-offences-against-children/

It is actually prevelent in the far-right community. A fascist from Barnsley was jailed last week for amnong other things - 900 indecent images of children. Why has no-one pubished this:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c84418eq2n2o

And why are the far-right so keen on attempting to make paedophlia a race issue. Have a search for what they also do - that might tell you what they are attempting to hide/cover up:

https://bylinetimes.com/2024/06/01/special-investigation-the-network-of-far-right-groups-exploiting-the-survivors-of-child-sexual-exploitation/

https://www.vice.com/en/article/3akvbw/why-do-neo-nazis-keep-getting-arrested-for-child-porn

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/neo-nazi-child-abuse-prison-sentence-porn-sonnenkrieg-division-a9632636.html

https://hopenothate.org.uk/2022/01/11/tommy-robinson-is-a-hypocrite-when-it-comes-to-opposing-child-sexual-exploitation/
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: wilts rover on June 09, 2024, 06:36:06 pm
By the way for avoidance of doubt I don't believe sproty is a racist. I don't ever remembering him posting anything explicitly racist (whilst other posters have).

I think he is badly advised where he gets his information from - and has not really thought through what he posts. And what he doesn't. Maybe now he will be more thoughtful in future.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Bentley Bullet on June 09, 2024, 06:54:41 pm
Wilts.

Can you explain what these horrific crimes have to do with politics? Surely all political parties are repulsed by them?
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on June 09, 2024, 07:12:11 pm
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Sprotyrover on June 09, 2024, 07:16:36 pm
By the way for avoidance of doubt I don't believe sproty is a racist. I don't ever remembering him posting anything explicitly racist (whilst other posters have).

I think he is badly advised where he gets his information from - and has not really thought through what he posts. And what he doesn't. Maybe now he will be more thoughtful in future.
Well if you can’t post an article on here off of the BBC News site what can you post? Is  Nanny Wilts alleging that the BBC is Racist?
Nanny Wilts seems to like chucking the ‘Racist ‘ allegation about when somebody posts something that doesn’t fit in nicely with their Woke agenda! Typical of the Libertine lefty posters on here!
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Sprotyrover on June 09, 2024, 07:18:11 pm
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

WIND YOUR NECKIN! When did I say usual suspects?
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 09, 2024, 07:21:48 pm
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

I did try to point that out earlier in this thread,only a have bile spewed my way the the forums resident f@ck wit,who not until pressed offered any kind of opinion on child abuse.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on June 09, 2024, 07:37:47 pm
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

WIND YOUR NECKIN! When did I say usual suspects?

Err. I MIGHT be wrong but I think it was possibly when you said "it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing."
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 09, 2024, 07:41:57 pm
By the way for avoidance of doubt I don't believe sproty is a racist. I don't ever remembering him posting anything explicitly racist (whilst other posters have).

I think he is badly advised where he gets his information from - and has not really thought through what he posts. And what he doesn't. Maybe now he will be more thoughtful in future.
Well if you can’t post an article on here off of the BBC News site what can you post? Is  Nanny Wilts alleging that the BBC is Racist?
Nanny Wilts seems to like chucking the ‘Racist ‘ allegation about when somebody posts something that doesn’t fit in nicely with their Woke agenda! Typical of the Libertine lefty posters on here!

Ah well,at least you tried Wilts.
Some people just can't help themselves even when offered help.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Sprotyrover on June 09, 2024, 07:51:28 pm
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

WIND YOUR NECKIN! When did I say usual suspects?

Err. I MIGHT be wrong but I think it was possibly when you said "it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing."
YOU ARE VERY WRONG MUPPET !
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on June 09, 2024, 07:57:33 pm
My apologies Sproty, I didn't check it was you replying. And on checking back, I was wrong. It wasn't you who said that. I apologise.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Bentley Bullet on June 09, 2024, 07:58:21 pm
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

I did try to point that out earlier in this thread,only a have bile spewed my way the the forums resident f@ck wit,who not until pressed offered any kind of opinion on child abuse.
I've been thinking, regarding my comments to you yesterday. Perhaps I was wrong to suggest you got professional help for your state of mind.

Maybe if you don't like getting professional help for your state of mind conventionally, why not try a different approach? It is often said that to become what you want to be you have to get rid of what you are now.

Have you considered a penectomy?
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Sprotyrover on June 09, 2024, 07:58:46 pm
By the way for avoidance of doubt I don't believe sproty is a racist. I don't ever remembering him posting anything explicitly racist (whilst other posters have).

I think he is badly advised where he gets his information from - and has not really thought through what he posts. And what he doesn't. Maybe now he will be more thoughtful in future.
Well if you can’t post an article on here off of the BBC News site what can you post? Is  Nanny Wilts alleging that the BBC is Racist?
Nanny Wilts seems to like chucking the ‘Racist ‘ allegation about when somebody posts something that doesn’t fit in nicely with their Woke agenda! Typical of the Libertine lefty posters on here!

Ah well,at least you tried Wilts.
Some people just can't help themselves even when offered help.
If Wilts listens to your advice he is even sadder than I thought!
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 09, 2024, 08:13:37 pm
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

I did try to point that out earlier in this thread,only a have bile spewed my way the the forums resident f@ck wit,who not until pressed offered any kind of opinion on child abuse.
I've been thinking, regarding my comments to you yesterday. Perhaps I was wrong to suggest you got professional help for your state of mind.

Maybe if you don't like getting professional help for your state of mind conventionally, why not try a different approach? It is often said that to become what you want to be you have to get rid of what you are now.

Have you considered a penectomy?

No fella,not going to try it.

Your failed attempt at your forehead surgery put me off.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Bentley Bullet on June 09, 2024, 09:22:52 pm
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

I did try to point that out earlier in this thread,only a have bile spewed my way the the forums resident f@ck wit,who not until pressed offered any kind of opinion on child abuse.
I've been thinking, regarding my comments to you yesterday. Perhaps I was wrong to suggest you got professional help for your state of mind.

Maybe if you don't like getting professional help for your state of mind conventionally, why not try a different approach? It is often said that to become what you want to be you have to get rid of what you are now.

Have you considered a penectomy?

No fella,not going to try it.

Your failed attempt at your forehead surgery put me off.
Perhaps you're right.

Maybe a sense of humour transplant would be more beneficial and encourage others to tolerate you more.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: wilts rover on June 10, 2024, 05:47:26 pm
Wilts.

Can you explain what these horrific crimes have to do with politics? Surely all political parties are repulsed by them?

Yes all political parties are repulsed by them. But an unusually high number of far-right supporters have committed them.

There are links in post #51 that look at why.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: wilts rover on June 10, 2024, 05:48:36 pm
By the way for avoidance of doubt I don't believe sproty is a racist. I don't ever remembering him posting anything explicitly racist (whilst other posters have).

I think he is badly advised where he gets his information from - and has not really thought through what he posts. And what he doesn't. Maybe now he will be more thoughtful in future.
Well if you can’t post an article on here off of the BBC News site what can you post? Is  Nanny Wilts alleging that the BBC is Racist?
Nanny Wilts seems to like chucking the ‘Racist ‘ allegation about when somebody posts something that doesn’t fit in nicely with their Woke agenda! Typical of the Libertine lefty posters on here!

Ah well,at least you tried Wilts.
Some people just can't help themselves even when offered help.

And I am afraid only confirm what I have already said about them.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Bentley Bullet on June 10, 2024, 06:39:28 pm
 
Wilts.

Can you explain what these horrific crimes have to do with politics? Surely all political parties are repulsed by them?

Yes all political parties are repulsed by them. But an unusually high number of far-right supporters have committed them.

There are links in post #51 that look at why.
Compared to who?
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: wilts rover on June 10, 2024, 07:05:01 pm
Wilts.

Can you explain what these horrific crimes have to do with politics? Surely all political parties are repulsed by them?

Yes all political parties are repulsed by them. But an unusually high number of far-right supporters have committed them.

There are links in post #51 that look at why.
Compared to who?


What does it say in post #51?
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Bentley Bullet on June 10, 2024, 07:17:33 pm
I can't see anywhere it says "an unusually high number."

Mind you, I couldn't access a couple of the links so maybe you can show me them.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 10, 2024, 07:20:50 pm
I can't see.

Mind you, I couldn't access a couple of the links so maybe you can show me them.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Sprotyrover on June 10, 2024, 07:31:30 pm
My apologies Sproty, I didn't check it was you replying. And on checking back, I was wrong. It wasn't you who said that. I apologise.
Cheers no harm done!
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Iberian Red on June 10, 2024, 07:36:23 pm
Isn't it near your bedtime, Thrush? I hope your mummy's remembered it's a school day.

Made me laugh so much.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on June 10, 2024, 07:45:51 pm
My apologies Sproty, I didn't check it was you replying. And on checking back, I was wrong. It wasn't you who said that. I apologise.
Cheers no harm done!

Thanks. I'll try and be more careful in future. No excuse for it.
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: wilts rover on June 10, 2024, 08:25:36 pm
I can't see anywhere it says "an unusually high number."

Mind you, I couldn't access a couple of the links so maybe you can show me them.

Which ones?

Here's another on Tommy Robinson and members of the EDL under him:

For all its talk of Muslim paedophiles, the EDL was a hotbed of sex offenders. Since its formation, there have been at least 20 members and supporters convicted of child sexual exploitation offences. At least 10 of these were active in the EDL while Lennon was still leading it, and we are yet to find a single condemnation from Lennon.

Each of the following cases are perpetrators who were active in the EDL while Lennon was still leader:

Perhaps the most shocking case is that of Robert Ewing, who murdered the schoolgirl Paige Chivers after developing an “inappropriate sexual interest” in her.[iii] He was later prosecuted for abusing two other children in the 1990s.[iv] It later emerged that in 2013, Ewing wrote on Facebook, “Iv taken an interest in the EDL and iv attended a couple of demo’s.”[v]

Leigh Mcmillan, a senior EDL figure during Lennon’s time as leader who was active in the Lee Rigby campaign, was sentenced to 17 years after abusing a 10 year-old schoolgirl 100 times in the mid-1990s.[vi]

In 2010, the EDL supporter Brett Moses was given a 12-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, after he plead guilty to sexual grooming.[vii]

In 2011 John Broomfield, an active EDL supporter, admitted 20 counts of making indecent images of children. After his arrest alongside six others for conspiracy to cause an explosion – charges that were later dropped – the police found 236 indecent images depicting children and babies on his computers.[viii]

Also in 2011, Michael Coates was charged with a series of sex offences, including two attempted rapes. At the time he was active in the EDL splinter group the North West Infidels (NWI). Their leader, John Shaw, confirmed he had been active in the EDL previously, writing: “He like the rest of us was edl first then NWI.”[ix]

In 2011, a gang of racists attacked Redbridge Islamic Centre. During the attack they hurled racist abuse at those inside, including repeatedly shouting “EDL”. Later it emerged that Elliot Jones, one of the attackers on that day, was convicted of trying to incite a child into sexual activity.

Mark “Archie” Sleman was an EDL supporter active in London and Exeter and was known for running the Church of the Templars, which was mainly made up of EDL members. It transpired that he had been imprisoned for nine years in 1994 for the kidnap and rape of a ten-year-old girl.[xi]

In 2012 the well-known EDL member and regular demonstration attender Matthew Woodward was charged with possession of images of children as young as ten years old, and a video recording of another child.[xii]

Michael Kinnear was active in the EDL and is known to have attended a demonstration in July 2013 at which Lennon spoke.[xiii] In 2015 he was jailed after police found images on his mobile of a primary school aged girl “performing a type of striptease” and in state of undress.[xiv]

Since Lennon left the EDL in 2013, the group continued to attract support from child abusers and sex offenders, such as Bradley Daniel Alford,[xv] Alan Boulter,[xvi] Pete Gillett,[xvii] Luke Atkinson,[xviii] Dean Chambers,[xix] Bruce Cordwell,[xx] and Paul Whiteside amongst numerous others. Again, we can find no condemnations of these offenders from Lennon.

More recently, Lennon once again found himself allied with a sex offender. In June 2017, he shared a stage with William Charlton at a rally in Sunderland at an event where the sexual abuse of children was the key theme of the speeches. Lennon praised Charlton, saying ““I wouldn’t have heard of this campaign if it wasn’t for Billy,” adding “That battle has to be fought through every avenue.”[xxi] It later transpired that Charlton was found guilty of distributing an indecent photograph of a child.[xxii]

https://hopenothate.org.uk/2022/01/11/tommy-robinson-is-a-hypocrite-when-it-comes-to-opposing-child-sexual-exploitation/
Title: Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
Post by: Bentley Bullet on June 10, 2024, 08:34:52 pm
Wilts, I asked you where the link says an unusually high number of far-right supporters have committed gang rape, and who is the unusual number being compared to?

I'm not saying you're wrong, I just can't find the link.