Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: The Dav on April 18, 2025, 05:02:16 pm

Title: Anderson
Post by: The Dav on April 18, 2025, 05:02:16 pm
Absolutely immense today !
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: grayx on April 18, 2025, 05:03:52 pm
Agree. He’s one of the few players who has played consistently well of late.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Nudga on April 18, 2025, 05:04:45 pm
My MOM today, even with Molly getting a hattrick.
Nothing got passed him and dominated the aerial battles.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: andyst79 on April 18, 2025, 05:07:24 pm
Collosus today
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: mushRTID on April 18, 2025, 05:07:52 pm
Sensational
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: PDX_Rover on April 18, 2025, 05:10:10 pm
Big Tom. A nose that can sniff round corners but what a giant.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: drfchound on April 18, 2025, 05:15:54 pm
Oh Tommy Tommy ……..
Nice to hear his name being sung (to the old Coppinger song tune).
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: redarmi66 on April 18, 2025, 05:17:38 pm
Absolutely immense today !

Again
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Goole Rover on April 18, 2025, 05:19:23 pm
I agree superb. I’m hoping all the knockers are enjoying their humble pie. As I’ve said on here before he may not look stylish but he sure does the job. Another great display Tom.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Usher wide. on April 18, 2025, 05:24:29 pm
My man of the match too.

‘Thou shalt not pass’.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: StocksArmy on April 18, 2025, 05:25:19 pm
Only today?
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Lesonthewest on April 18, 2025, 05:26:13 pm
Hardly missed a header all afternoon, outstanding performance.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Donnyjim on April 18, 2025, 05:29:40 pm
Rob Jones esq performance from big Tom today. The colossus of Rovers !
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: GazLaz on April 18, 2025, 05:33:26 pm
The back 4 all deserve a mention. All played well.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: steve@dcfd on April 18, 2025, 05:36:23 pm
For the flack that some give TSL he had a good game today did everything he needed to do. But if it hadn’t been for good saves from their keeper it could have been 5/6
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Bentley Bullet on April 18, 2025, 05:41:07 pm
Big Tom. A nose that can sniff round corners but what a giant.
A nose that can smell a Sunday roast on a Wednesday.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: andyst79 on April 18, 2025, 06:04:03 pm
The back 4 all deserve a mention. All played well.
Seniors done a great job defensively last couple of games , Sterry & Bailey have gone about business as per usual but Andersons height advantage has been crucial
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: GazLaz on April 18, 2025, 06:06:32 pm
The back 4 all deserve a mention. All played well.
Seniors done a great job defensively last couple of games , Sterry & Bailey have gone about business as per usual but Andersons height advantage has been crucial

To be fair, Senior got owned all afternoon against their right wing back. Was just feeling kind grouping him in with the other 3.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: i_ateallthepies on April 18, 2025, 06:10:14 pm
That was a vintage Anderson performance, the man is immense.  My MoM but there were a few candidates today; Street, Sterry, Bailey and without doubt, Molly.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: andyst79 on April 18, 2025, 06:10:37 pm
The back 4 all deserve a mention. All played well.
Seniors done a great job defensively last couple of games , Sterry & Bailey have gone about business as per usual but Andersons height advantage has been crucial

To be fair, Senior got owned all afternoon against their right wing back. Was just feeling kind grouping him in with the other 3.
Harsh , I thought he was good last game as the left side of a back 3
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: andyst79 on April 18, 2025, 06:12:18 pm
That was a vintage Anderson performance, the man is immense.  My MoM but there were a few candidates today; Street, Sterry, Bailey and without doubt, Molly.
Streets the one who's turned our season around in fairness proper dynamic center forward at this level
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: In the box on April 18, 2025, 06:56:45 pm
Absolutely immense today !
Not enough gratitude given to Tom Anderson he’s been a loyal player who has the right attitude and always seems to give his total commitment. Though we still to have more choice at the back , he deserves to here playing next season .
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Sprotyrover on April 18, 2025, 07:02:53 pm
Certain
Bly stood out today
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: rich1471 on April 18, 2025, 07:06:09 pm
Absolutely immense today !
Not enough gratitude given to Tom Anderson he’s been a loyal player who has the right attitude and always seems to give his total commitment. Though we still to have more choice at the back , he deserves to here playing next season .
Too right and he is only 28/29 years old
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Filo on April 18, 2025, 07:06:53 pm
That was a vintage Anderson performance, the man is immense.  My MoM but there were a few candidates today; Street, Sterry, Bailey and without doubt, Molly.
Streets the one who's turned our season around in fairness proper dynamic center forward at this level
This in spades, his mobility and speed causes defenders lots of problems
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: tommy toes on April 18, 2025, 07:25:27 pm
Tom is the Man!
Sign him up for another 2 years
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: andyst79 on April 18, 2025, 07:37:48 pm
Some performance when Moly bagged a hatrick and he's up there for MOM, not taking anything away from Tom but it helps when Baileys doing the basics at the side of him
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on April 18, 2025, 07:38:16 pm
He keeps defying the critics. He has a lot of bottle.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Sven Vath on April 18, 2025, 09:04:10 pm
Definitely worth another year.

A great servant to this club.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: roversdude on April 18, 2025, 09:29:04 pm
After Boxing Day 2023 he looked finished. He has been outstanding when called upon this season
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: GazLaz on April 18, 2025, 09:45:05 pm
He’s been good of late. Giving him a new contract would be suboptimal though.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Ian Nimmo on April 18, 2025, 09:56:57 pm
Tom was tremendous today.
He has been with us for quite a while now and remains loyal to rovers.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: dickos1 on April 18, 2025, 10:00:51 pm
He’s only 31,
Definitely worth another couple of years, been here for 7 years now and been a colossus most of that time. And was great for us in league one last time.
Wood will leave, olowu will probably leave, Anderson should be offered a deal
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Usher wide. on April 18, 2025, 10:20:03 pm
He’s been good of late. Giving him a new contract would be suboptimal though.

If we go up I too thought the next step up would be one too many for Tom however, (& hands up here) if we didn’t offer him a contract, even as a squad player in an area where we know injuries can have a massive impact on the team, who would you look to in order to give you his level of cover when we need more quality in midfield & forward positions?

So I simply ask, at the age of 31, with only McGrath, Olowu (fingers crossed) & Woody clearly now well past his sell by date the only players to have played in that back two (don’t scream Bailey, it’s not his ‘natural’ position) why would you not offer him a year with a possible years extension contract?
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: andysly on April 18, 2025, 10:42:18 pm
Bailey was great at the back today but we really need him in midfield. Tom would be a perfect back up CH, not the most cultured or easy on the eye but he does the basics of heading and kicking the ball away from our goal very well.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Jonathan on April 18, 2025, 10:45:17 pm
Bailey was great at the back today but we really need him in midfield. Tom would be a perfect back up CH, not the most cultured or easy on the eye but he does the basics of heading and kicking the ball away from our goal very well.

I feel Anderson’s ability on the ball has been generally underrated.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: drfchound on April 18, 2025, 10:46:00 pm
Bailey was great at the back today but we really need him in midfield. Tom would be a perfect back up CH, not the most cultured or easy on the eye but he does the basics of heading and kicking the ball away from our goal very well.

I feel Anderson’s ability on the ball has been generally underrated.

Agreed, his passing is good.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: andysly on April 18, 2025, 10:48:21 pm
I don't disagree, but when he's under a bit of pressure he's not one to try anything clever he'll just get rid. When he's got a bit of time and space I do like to see him carry the ball forward
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Chris Black come back on April 18, 2025, 11:01:16 pm
If we get promoted it is going to be a sizeable leap to League One level. A very hard decision about offering Tom a contract at that level.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Pancho Regan on April 18, 2025, 11:26:55 pm
I really enjoyed watching Tom today.

What a bloody hero he was. He won countless headers, intercepted the ball so many times, kept his head up when clearing his lines ….. it was a vintage performance from him.
He gave his all for the team today.

I really wouldn’t be unhappy to see Tom stay with us another couple of seasons.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: epworth red on April 18, 2025, 11:39:56 pm
Toms had another solid performance
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: HolmeRover on April 18, 2025, 11:58:32 pm
Bang on. There were a couple of occasions today where he could've made a man and ball tackle but gave a throw in or free kick away. Instead he measured the situation and steered the pressure away from our goal. Great performance.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: PDX_Rover on April 19, 2025, 12:20:27 am
I think Tom’s underrated by quite a few. He’s stuck with it and has been excellent. I’d offer him a new contract, no doubt. I don’t think L1 is beyond him. He’s played there before.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Move DRFC on April 19, 2025, 03:47:59 am
Bailey was immense. Said it before but he’s a really good centre half. Crew was good too, we can play more football with him in there.

Bailey as centre back with Crew centre mid is the play for the last few games for me. No point playing McGrath when he’s not fit either.

And yes big Tom was colossal. Need to be careful offering contracts out there though. Especially if we go up.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: andyst79 on April 19, 2025, 06:02:30 am
Bailey was immense. Said it before but he’s a really good centre half. Crew was good too, we can play more football with him in there.

Bailey as centre back with Crew centre mid is the play for the last few games for me. No point playing McGrath when he’s not fit either.

And yes big Tom was colossal. Need to be careful offering contracts out there though. Especially if we go up.
Great ball by Crew for Street to get the penalty. He did his fair share off the ball also. Thought Clifton was pretty anonymous yesterday
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: StocksArmy on April 19, 2025, 07:32:37 am
For the flack that some give TSL he had a good game today did everything he needed to do. But if it hadn’t been for good saves from their keeper it could have been 5/6


The one thing TSL does give you is really good kicking especially when under pressure. 9/10 and I hope I’m not jinxing the poor lad saying this but he connects well and it’s up the pitch or in row Z. That’s one of the main things you want from a keeper.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: GazLaz on April 19, 2025, 09:17:10 am
He’s been good of late. Giving him a new contract would be suboptimal though.

If we go up I too thought the next step up would be one too many for Tom however, (& hands up here) if we didn’t offer him a contract, even as a squad player in an area where we know injuries can have a massive impact on the team, who would you look to in order to give you his level of cover when we need more quality in midfield & forward positions?

So I simply ask, at the age of 31, with only McGrath, Olowu (fingers crossed) & Woody clearly now well past his sell by date the only players to have played in that back two (don’t scream Bailey, it’s not his ‘natural’ position) why would you not offer him a year with a possible years extension contract?

I just think his overall contribution over the last couple of years hasn’t been of L1 standard (if we are there!). He’s been good of late, but Biggins, for example, turned it on at the end of last season and whatever happened to him??!?

Honestly, Anderson has been a great servant and is a top bloke. Sentiment can’t come into decision making though. He would be very easy to upgrade from a football point of view.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Nudga on April 19, 2025, 09:22:54 am
He’s been good of late. Giving him a new contract would be suboptimal though.

If we go up I too thought the next step up would be one too many for Tom however, (& hands up here) if we didn’t offer him a contract, even as a squad player in an area where we know injuries can have a massive impact on the team, who would you look to in order to give you his level of cover when we need more quality in midfield & forward positions?

So I simply ask, at the age of 31, with only McGrath, Olowu (fingers crossed) & Woody clearly now well past his sell by date the only players to have played in that back two (don’t scream Bailey, it’s not his ‘natural’ position) why would you not offer him a year with a possible years extension contract?

I just think his overall contribution over the last couple of years hasn’t been of L1 standard (if we are there!). He’s been good of late, but Biggins, for example, turned it on at the end of last season and whatever happened to him??!?

Honestly, Anderson has been a great servant and is a top bloke. Sentiment can’t come into decision making though. He would be very easy to upgrade from a football point of view.

The problem we have now Gaz is that Wood will leave and probably Olowu, so we'd need cover at CB.
No one knows yet if Faulkner can step up LG1 level, McGrath probably can but again, who knows for sure.

So give Tom another year to fill the Richard Wood gap and bring in another LG1 ready CB.

IF we go up of course.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: GazLaz on April 19, 2025, 09:34:33 am
He’s been good of late. Giving him a new contract would be suboptimal though.

If we go up I too thought the next step up would be one too many for Tom however, (& hands up here) if we didn’t offer him a contract, even as a squad player in an area where we know injuries can have a massive impact on the team, who would you look to in order to give you his level of cover when we need more quality in midfield & forward positions?

So I simply ask, at the age of 31, with only McGrath, Olowu (fingers crossed) & Woody clearly now well past his sell by date the only players to have played in that back two (don’t scream Bailey, it’s not his ‘natural’ position) why would you not offer him a year with a possible years extension contract?

I just think his overall contribution over the last couple of years hasn’t been of L1 standard (if we are there!). He’s been good of late, but Biggins, for example, turned it on at the end of last season and whatever happened to him??!?

Honestly, Anderson has been a great servant and is a top bloke. Sentiment can’t come into decision making though. He would be very easy to upgrade from a football point of view.

The problem we have now Gaz is that Wood will leave and probably Olowu, so we'd need cover at CB.
No one knows yet if Faulkner can step up LG1 level, McGrath probably can but again, who knows for sure.

So give Tom another year to fill the Richard Wood gap and bring in another LG1 ready CB.

IF we go up of course.

For what it’s worth, I’d sign Sam Stubbs to replace him. Bradford City, been on loan at Cheltenham this season. Out of contract in the summer. Bigger, better, younger. 

I like Jack Shepherd who’s been on loan at Bradford from Barnsley. Unlikely to be able to sign him though given the dynamics.

For me, should we be promoted, in the summer we need to be building a team that can develop into a L1 top half/ playoff challenger. I don’t see Anderson at that level any more.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: andyst79 on April 19, 2025, 09:44:44 am
We offered some silly contracts last season , need to establish which division we're in first before we offer contracts to fringe players. I'd be looking to cut Sharp loose either way though, must be taking up a sizeable amount in wages.
Title: Re: Anderson
Post by: Ian Nimmo on April 19, 2025, 10:46:46 am
Still think he can do a job within our squad for L1
We would need 4 decent centre backs, and looks like we will only have Jay.
Even if Joe signs, that still going to leave us short, so will be difficult to recruit 2 or 3 of the quality we will need.

I know we Faulkner, Flint and Williams, but all 3 won’t be at L1 standard for next season. How do we know someone won’t come in for Jay!

Therefore extending Tom’s contract surely must be a viable option.
Provided he still is happy to commute between Burnley Doncaster, not easy journey these days with the traffic volume.