Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: jw2 on May 26, 2010, 08:28:16 pm

Title: Joe Garner.
Post by: jw2 on May 26, 2010, 08:28:16 pm
My source tells me Joe garner is on his way to donny and has has talks today.
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: nightporter on May 26, 2010, 08:31:38 pm
Who's joe garner?
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: Wello on May 26, 2010, 08:32:14 pm
Id rather have Ex West Indian pace legend Joel Garner, he'd do a job at the back for us, thats where we r suseptable.
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: coventryrover on May 26, 2010, 08:33:35 pm
jw2 wrote:
Quote
My source tells me Joe garner is on his way to donny and has has talks today.


Would that be Football Rumours website?

FYI Night porter  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Garner
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: DRFC MYERS on May 26, 2010, 08:34:17 pm
aint he at forest?
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: RoversAlias on May 26, 2010, 08:34:40 pm
Decent player, Forest fans seem to think he's not had much of a chance there because of all their strikers. Scored loads for Carlisle in League 1 IIRC.
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: Wello on May 26, 2010, 08:34:46 pm
Forest Forward, he's not proven.
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: jw2 on May 26, 2010, 08:36:01 pm
football rumors. (?)
(what is that)     :dry:

No i just got a phone call off a member of drfc.
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: brim1980 on May 26, 2010, 08:39:29 pm
Hmmmm Coincidence!

26 May 2010 18:53:10
My dad works at the city ground (cannot reveal his role) but this is 100% true.

Joe Garner is heading to Doncaster Rovers by early next week at the latest. He is keen to join for first team football and has already been to discuss terms with them this week. He almost went to Doncaster in the summer but Billy wanted him to play more games but things havent worked out that way. Good luck Joe.

Disapointed forest fan.
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: Chrisd_123 on May 26, 2010, 08:42:22 pm
Does your source happen a certain Football Rumours website by any chance?
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: jw2 on May 26, 2010, 08:43:11 pm
mate i dont even know what site this is on. (?)

i know a member of drfc and this is what he has told me.    :angry:
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: coventryrover on May 26, 2010, 08:50:32 pm
No worries JW2

I had just readthe he Joe Garner thing on FR prior to coming on here
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: jw2 on May 26, 2010, 08:54:56 pm
Its ok.
    :)
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: Akinfenwa on May 26, 2010, 08:56:55 pm
Good player and can score goals. He's in a very similar situation to what Sharp was in last summer.
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: jw2 on May 26, 2010, 08:58:51 pm
Worth a gamble maybe.      :ohmy:

Would command a decent fee though.     :dry:
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: Akinfenwa on May 26, 2010, 08:59:57 pm
Not a loan then?
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: donnybez on May 26, 2010, 09:08:03 pm
If we're lucky £600k
Unlucky? Over a 7 figure fee
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: donnievic on May 26, 2010, 09:17:18 pm
we be a very good signing for us and also scored a great goal against us for Carlisle at keepmoat
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: VikingJames on May 26, 2010, 09:24:02 pm
The same Joe Garner that cost Forest £1.2 million.

I'll believe it when I'm sat in it!
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: CusworthRovers on May 26, 2010, 09:37:29 pm
I likes him and he impressed me at Carlisle. He just looked lost at Forest. However one feels if he comes, then Billy may not. I prefer Billy, but if he's a no no, then the West Indian giant of a bowler will be a good addition.
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: Jonathan on May 26, 2010, 11:43:52 pm
He is someone that SO'D has spoken highly of in the past. Good player and would make an excellent alternative if we couldn't get Sharp, but I would be surprised if we made a move for a big money striker before any option of bringing in Billy is exhausted.

It's difficult not to be sceptical of JW2's sources, named four clubs that were after Ward and said he would sign for one of them within a month, he then signed for another the day after. Claimed a scoop on John Oster signing a new deal after it appeared in The Free Press. Now we have Garner after it has appeared on, er, Football Rumours.

Credit if it turns out to be true, but we'll see....
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: jw2 on May 27, 2010, 07:04:09 am
could someone post a link to this rumor site because i dont have a clue what you are talking about.  (sorrry)
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: grayx on May 27, 2010, 08:40:30 am
donnybez wrote:
Quote
If we're lucky £600k
Unlucky? Over a 7 figure fee


Sorry, we don't do 7 figure fees. (unless selling).
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: Lytham Rover on May 27, 2010, 09:20:54 am
donnybez wrote:
Quote
If we're lucky £600k
Unlucky? Over a 7 figure fee


he signed for forest in 2008 so has been there 2 years will have at most 2 years left more likely 1

if you apply the same fee principles to him that you do to BS who is in a similiar boat contract wise

then he will be £500,000 tops probably significantly less
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: jw2 on May 27, 2010, 08:40:00 pm
he has 2 years left i think.
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: RobTheRover on May 27, 2010, 10:42:25 pm
Jonathan wrote:
Quote
I would be surprised if we made a move for a big money striker before any option of bringing in Billy is exhausted.


I quite agree, Jon.  Maybe the thought of us withdrawing our interest in Billy will make SUFC reconsider our excellent offer?  Billy would like to come, believe me.
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: danny1 on May 27, 2010, 11:52:57 pm
sounds like he might be coming

http://boards.footymad.net/forum.php?tno=401&fid=192&sty=1&act=1&mid=2121454596
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: RobTheRover on May 28, 2010, 12:28:12 am
I'm quite excited by this.  I thought he was excellent at Carlisle
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: Jonathan on May 28, 2010, 01:11:30 am
RobTheRover wrote:
Quote
I'm quite excited by this.  I thought he was excellent at Carlisle


Sharp would always be my first choice, but if we absolutely couldn't get him then I would agree that Garner would be an excellent alternative. From what I remember of watching him at Carlisle he had a good allround game and has the same kind of workrate/desire as Sharp.
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: Dagenham Rover on May 28, 2010, 07:36:22 am
Jonathan wrote:
Quote
RobTheRover wrote:
Quote
I'm quite excited by this.  I thought he was excellent at Carlisle


Sharp would always be my first choice, but if we absolutely couldn't get him then I would agree that Garner would be an excellent alternative. From what I remember of watching him at Carlisle he had a good allround game and has the same kind of workrate/desire as Sharp.


Oh sod it lets just go and get both  B)
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: RobTheRover on May 28, 2010, 07:46:41 am
Be careful what you wish for....

Of sod it!  Wish away.
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: therovercc on May 28, 2010, 09:13:57 am
I was just thinking the same thing sharp and garner up top! hmmmm
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: 5minstogo on May 28, 2010, 09:56:45 am
therovercc wrote:
Quote
I was just thinking the same thing sharp and garner up top! hmmmm


Two up top?

Don't be daft. We have to play one off the main man with three supporting in a pincer movement whilst not forgetting their defensive duties by filling in at full back when the centre backs have a spell in goal after Sully has dribbled forward.

 ;)
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: bigal on May 28, 2010, 11:16:44 am
5minstogo wrote:
Quote
therovercc wrote:
Quote
I was just thinking the same thing sharp and garner up top! hmmmm


Two up top?

Don't be daft. We have to play one off the main man with three supporting in a pincer movement whilst not forgetting their defensive duties by filling in at full back when the centre backs have a spell in goal after Sully has dribbled forward.

 ;)
What about Brooker we will have to play 4-3-3 look out premier league
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: DMnumber4 on May 28, 2010, 05:33:29 pm
5minstogo wrote:
Sully has dribbled forward.

 ;)[/quote]

He's at that age now. All down his brand new kit as well  :laugh:
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: mushRTID on May 28, 2010, 07:55:07 pm
This rumours seems to have gone quiet then. Anybody know any more on Mr Garner?
Title: Re:Joe Garner.
Post by: Colin C No.3 on May 28, 2010, 09:20:56 pm
JR....please, please Billy Sharp.