White van drive man fisnbury park mosque.

[Dagenham Rover]

There is actually a difference between what would be perceived as " Terror attack" and a "Terrorist attack" early reports on London Bridge and Finsbury Park both said "Possible terrorist attacks" there was no great difference in the initial reporting

[GazLaz]

Very interesting, the response to this terrorist attack. Tells you a lot about what sort of country we're living in. What message getting that cockroach Tommy Robinson on Good Morning Britain the day after the attack sends out, I'm not so sure.

What defines it as a terrorist attack?

What terror group did he belong to?

Is it being labelled a terrorist attack to pacify the Muslim community?

I would suggest it was a hate crime based on recent events, and the target chosen because of Abu Hamza's links to it

Terrorist- "a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."

[i_ateallthepies]

Kind of proving the point there iateallthepies. Splitting hairs over the definition of terrorism doesn't happen when it's a brown bloke doing the terrorising.

The man drove a van into a prominent mosque with the sole intention of killing as many Muslims as possible. He knew it would cause chaos and terror in that community. It IS terrorism. That isn't up for debate. What caused him to do it, mental illness, hatred, etc, is.

So you're not up for debating then Mr Madness?  Seems you're in the wrong place on here.


And, while we're at it you're accusation - just because I'm challenging your frankly stupid view - that I am prejudiced against 'brown blokes'.  You could not be more wrong and THAT is not up for debate.

[MachoMadness]

Projecting a bit there fella. Never said you were prejudiced did I? In fact I pointed out in my previous post that's exactly what I wasn't doing.

Thanks for posting all the ad hominems though, just in case anyone was in any doubt that you don't have an argument.