Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 06:39:16 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Poll

Who's your man?

Balcombe
4 (4.5%)
Halliday
12 (13.5%)
Wright
0 (0%)
Butler
0 (0%)
John
3 (3.4%)
Smith
6 (6.7%)
Gomes
0 (0%)
Taylor
2 (2.2%)
Richards
20 (22.5%)
James
2 (2.2%)
Bogle
11 (12.4%)
Bostock
21 (23.6%)
Sims
1 (1.1%)
Lokilo
6 (6.7%)
Robertson
1 (1.1%)

Total Members Voted: 89

Voting closed: February 16, 2021, 04:51:51 pm

Author Topic: MOM v Sunderland  (Read 2442 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bristol Red Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 9627
MOM v Sunderland
« on February 13, 2021, 04:51:51 pm by Bristol Red Rover »
This could be tight!



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

NickDRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6233
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #1 on February 13, 2021, 04:56:18 pm by NickDRFC »
I wish Okenabirhie had played. He might have put one of those penalties away.

Padge_DRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4965
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #2 on February 13, 2021, 04:57:15 pm by Padge_DRFC »
Bostock or Lokilo. The latter surprised me when came on. Rest crap.

Bristol Red Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 9627
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #3 on February 13, 2021, 04:57:42 pm by Bristol Red Rover »
I wish Okenabirhie had played. He might have put one of those penalties away.

Ha, thanks for that!

sheffield exile1

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 996
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #4 on February 13, 2021, 05:08:39 pm by sheffield exile1 »
Can you vote for nobody!!!

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29830
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #5 on February 13, 2021, 05:10:45 pm by drfchound »
I would imagine that you just don’t vote mate.  ;)

Donnybax

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2385
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #6 on February 13, 2021, 06:25:56 pm by Donnybax »
I can see that there are votes for Halliday. I can only imagine they’re family members

scawsby steve

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7964
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #7 on February 13, 2021, 07:13:00 pm by scawsby steve »
What did I say the other day about WUMs on here?

2 votes for John and 1 for Taylor. WTF?

Campsall rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 14046
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #8 on February 13, 2021, 08:45:18 pm by Campsall rover »
I can see that there are votes for Halliday. I can only imagine they’re family members
Your opinion. He gave 100% never stopped working

EasyforDennis

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2609
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #9 on February 13, 2021, 11:44:47 pm by EasyforDennis »
What did I say the other day about WUMs on here?

2 votes for John and 1 for Taylor. WTF?

I will hold my hand up Steve and admit I voted for Taylor by mistake. My vote should have been for Richards.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 16934
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #10 on February 13, 2021, 11:55:15 pm by dickos1 »
Ha ha ha
Who on earth can possibly think John was our best player today
Crackers

RugbyRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 993
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #11 on February 14, 2021, 07:06:25 am by RugbyRover »
I can see that there are votes for Halliday. I can only imagine they’re family members
Your opinion. He gave 100% never stopped working

Never stopped working but was totally ineffective.

Cam John is rightly getting hammered for his contribution. Halliday deserves the same. All four goals came from crosses he should have stopped. McGeady turned him inside out at will. That's not an opinion, that's a fact!

Halliday is decent going forward but has trouble against quality tricky wingers, was it Danny Mayor who embarrassed him at Plymouth? Lincoln got round him over and over again. Only difference was their crosses were blocked by Big Tom.

We all have our favourites tho...... but it sometimes blinds us to what actually goes on.

How any of that back four can get put forward for MOTM is staggering.......in my opinion of course.

Donnywolf

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 20512
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #12 on February 14, 2021, 07:51:38 am by Donnywolf »
I wish Okenabirhie had played. He might have put one of those penalties away.

Only 1 ?

At least they were on target I suppose - and as the Man City Rodri one showed later - on target it has a chance - even our second might have gone in if keeper had been lying in bottom corner having already dived

big fat yorkshire pudding

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 13608
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #13 on February 14, 2021, 08:13:30 am by big fat yorkshire pudding »
I thought lokilo was excellent when he came on, he's played well recently. He just needs to find consistency and a bit more final product. But in his last 2 games he has a goal and won a penalty (granted he missed it).

eastender

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3825
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #14 on February 14, 2021, 09:27:37 am by eastender »
I can see that there are votes for Halliday. I can only imagine they’re family members
Your opinion. He gave 100% never stopped working

Never stopped working but was totally ineffective.

Cam John is rightly getting hammered for his contribution. Halliday deserves the same. All four goals came from crosses he should have stopped

How do you suggest he stops a corner coming in, just asking.

Bezza

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1019
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #15 on February 14, 2021, 09:47:01 am by Bezza »
Did Butler and Wright not fancy marking Wyke, the defending was not even schoolboy standard,

KeithMyath

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 172
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #16 on February 14, 2021, 10:20:26 am by KeithMyath »
How has Halliday got 10 votes... or is it one vote for every cross he failed to stop?

RugbyRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 993
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #17 on February 14, 2021, 11:17:17 am by RugbyRover »
I can see that there are votes for Halliday. I can only imagine they’re family members
Your opinion. He gave 100% never stopped working

Never stopped working but was totally ineffective.

Cam John is rightly getting hammered for his contribution. Halliday deserves the same. All four goals came from crosses he should have stopped

How do you suggest he stops a corner coming in, just asking.

good spot  :suicide:

Donnybax

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2385
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #18 on February 14, 2021, 12:11:56 pm by Donnybax »
I can see that there are votes for Halliday. I can only imagine they’re family members
Your opinion. He gave 100% never stopped working
Can’t fault his effort. His performance on the other hand was absolutely dreadful.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29830
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #19 on February 14, 2021, 12:20:49 pm by drfchound »
I thought that Halliday was one of our better players at Sunderland.
I agree that McGeady gave him a hard time but there should have been some help going on there.
It wouldn’t have been a surprise that Sunderland were going to get the ball to McGeady as much as possible and I thought we would have had a plan to negate that.
He is without doubt one of the best forward players in L1.
Halliday was also very good going forward and linked up well with other players, getting the ball into their box.

scawsby steve

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7964
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #20 on February 14, 2021, 07:15:54 pm by scawsby steve »
I can see that there are votes for Halliday. I can only imagine they’re family members
Your opinion. He gave 100% never stopped working

Never stopped working but was totally ineffective.

Cam John is rightly getting hammered for his contribution. Halliday deserves the same. All four goals came from crosses he should have stopped. McGeady turned him inside out at will. That's not an opinion, that's a fact!

Halliday is decent going forward but has trouble against quality tricky wingers, was it Danny Mayor who embarrassed him at Plymouth? Lincoln got round him over and over again. Only difference was their crosses were blocked by Big Tom.

We all have our favourites tho...... but it sometimes blinds us to what actually goes on.

How any of that back four can get put forward for MOTM is staggering.......in my opinion of course.

Very good point that about Brad getting skinned by Major at Plymouth, RR. I'll take it even further. In 2 consecutive away games at Plymouth and Wimbledon, all 4 goals scored were identical, with the winger skinning Brad, or whoever was covering for him, and putting a low cross in for someone to tap in.

The fact that we conceded 4 identical goals yesterday suggests to me that our players and coaching staff don't seem to learn from mistakes.

EasyforDennis

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2609
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #21 on February 14, 2021, 10:45:22 pm by EasyforDennis »
I thought that Halliday was one of our better players at Sunderland.
I agree that McGeady gave him a hard time but there should have been some help going on there.
It wouldn’t have been a surprise that Sunderland were going to get the ball to McGeady as much as possible and I thought we would have had a plan to negate that.
He is without doubt one of the best forward players in L1.
Halliday was also very good going forward and linked up well with other players, getting the ball into their box.

But you are his biggest fan so obviously you would think he had a good game.

Janso

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2052
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #22 on February 14, 2021, 11:37:19 pm by Janso »
I thought that Halliday was one of our better players at Sunderland.
I agree that McGeady gave him a hard time but there should have been some help going on there.
It wouldn’t have been a surprise that Sunderland were going to get the ball to McGeady as much as possible and I thought we would have had a plan to negate that.
He is without doubt one of the best forward players in L1.
Halliday was also very good going forward and linked up well with other players, getting the ball into their box.

But you are his biggest fan so obviously you would think he had a good game.

He could score a perfect hat trick then shag Miss World in the centre circle just after full time and you'd be saying he was shite to be fair.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29830
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #23 on February 15, 2021, 08:01:44 am by drfchound »
I thought that Halliday was one of our better players at Sunderland.
I agree that McGeady gave him a hard time but there should have been some help going on there.
It wouldn’t have been a surprise that Sunderland were going to get the ball to McGeady as much as possible and I thought we would have had a plan to negate that.
He is without doubt one of the best forward players in L1.
Halliday was also very good going forward and linked up well with other players, getting the ball into their box.

But you are his biggest fan so obviously you would think he had a good game.






I was going to respond to your words of wisdom but Janso has said it for me and added garnish.

EasyforDennis

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2609
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #24 on February 15, 2021, 10:59:59 am by EasyforDennis »
I thought that Halliday was one of our better players at Sunderland.
I agree that McGeady gave him a hard time but there should have been some help going on there.
It wouldn’t have been a surprise that Sunderland were going to get the ball to McGeady as much as possible and I thought we would have had a plan to negate that.
He is without doubt one of the best forward players in L1.
Halliday was also very good going forward and linked up well with other players, getting the ball into their box.

But you are his biggest fan so obviously you would think he had a good game.






I was going to respond to your words of wisdom but Janso has said it for me and added garnish.

I do find it strange that Cameron John gets so much criticism and people say he is a poor left back yet we concede a lot more goals from crosses on the other side of the pitch and you think we have one of the best right backs in the division. How do you explain that?

Spud

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 2111
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #25 on February 15, 2021, 11:04:00 am by Spud »
Can you find any other threads to post the exact same comment on?

EasyforDennis

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2609
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #26 on February 15, 2021, 11:05:43 am by EasyforDennis »
Can you find any other threads to post the exact same comment on?

If I got an answer I wouldn't need to would I?

Campsall rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 14046
Re: MOM v Sunderland
« Reply #27 on February 15, 2021, 07:56:33 pm by Campsall rover »
By heck this game we call football doesn’t half divide opinions.

That is one thing none of us can argue about.  :zzz:

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012