0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I am going to put something into the mix which I hope can stimulate a bit of debate and thought on here. Define best. Best as in if you have a forward thinking board, enthusiastic chairman, funds available and a promotion/moving upwards board. Put into that mix perennial low crowds (Tony Bluff/Barry Watson's book refers to low 5-6,000 crowds pre -WW2), also never equating to the crowds expected in the Doherty era, meaning low income. Moving onto the decline and fall late 50's early 60's post Doherty. Straight from Division 2 to 4 in successive seasons followed by stagnation in the 60's -90's with a selling board Kitchen/O'Callaghan through to Mike Jeffrey and the Richardson debacle of selling out to that ****. Pep Guardiola could struggle at Rochdale. So I am so glad Lawrie Mac and Super Stan in there as they did a lot with little. Even Begara wasn't a bad manager, and the frustration at Hull that day of F*ck off to Uruguay" chants were pure frustration as no-one could save us by then. So I am looking at what qualities a Rovers manager had in all circumstances, not when we had ambition and backing which didn't happen in most of my early lifetime.
Very glad to see Sammy up there. A fine manager and a finer human being. I am afraid that you do have to give McCann some serious credit. Took a side sniffing around in bottom half and in one season turned it round into an exciting, energetic, attacking side that had our best FA Cup run for years and came within a whisker of making the play off finals / got cheated at the end of that game. Probably unpopular but I’d have him on that list somewhere.
There is maybe something in that, although he did what he did for understandable reasons - problem was that he left with his close season plan half done and with all the problem that then ensued after he departed. If he had stayed then the plan to slim down the squad and add more quality may have borne fruit - COVID aside obviously.