Get Wilson In?

[big fat yorkshire pudding]

Probably get stick for this post (notice he couldn't be the scapegoat yesterday).

I think we actually could do with Wilson in.  The midfield is creating but it's not stable.  Wilson tends to add stability to midfield even if it does lower the flair a little.  But we need midfield stability.  I can't really think of anyone else in midfield who'd prevent us being so open at the moment.  Stock has struggled to protect the back 4 in recent games.

However, another option (that I'd actually prefer) is to see Mason in for Oster.  Drop Gillett back alongside Stock and get Mason in front of them bombing forward.

We really need to change something on Friday and I actually think Oster is the one who needs to drop out.

[mushRTID]

Please no.

[Wellred]

Made my night, I am rolling in the aisles. We really are at the start of the silly season.
At least you have a sense of humour bfyp.

[VikingJames]

Made my night, I am rolling in the aisles. We really are at the start of the silly season.
At least you have a sense of humour bfyp.

This.

[RedJ]

Made my night, I am rolling in the aisles. We really are at the start of the silly season.
At least you have a sense of humour bfyp.

This.

pissing myself too

[big fat yorkshire pudding]

f**k yous all then.   Maybe we should keep going all gung ho then eh and concede goal after goal?

But if you look at games where Wilson and Stock have started together we've probably played much better and been more solid.  Geez I'm not advocating Wilson as the whole answer but who's more likely to get their foot in and win the ball Wilson or Oster?

[VikingJames]

f**k yous all then.   Maybe we should keep going all gung ho then eh and concede goal after goal?

But if you look at games where Wilson and Stock have started together we've probably played much better and been more solid.  Geez I'm not advocating Wilson as the whole answer but who's more likely to get their foot in and win the ball Wilson or Oster?

That's probably more open to debate than you might think.

[mushRTID]

f**k yous all then.   Maybe we should keep going all gung ho then eh and concede goal after goal?

But if you look at games where Wilson and Stock have started together we've probably played much better and been more solid.  Geez I'm not advocating Wilson as the whole answer but who's more likely to get their foot in and win the ball Wilson or Oster?

But do we need Wilson and Gillett in a home game against another shite team we should be looking to win?

Only one of them for me and Gillett is by far the better player.

[DonnyNoel]

f**k yous all then.   Maybe we should keep going all gung ho then eh and concede goal after goal?

But if you look at games where Wilson and Stock have started together we've probably played much better and been more solid.  Geez I'm not advocating Wilson as the whole answer but who's more likely to get their foot in and win the ball Wilson or Oster?

But do we need Wilson and Gillett in a home game against another shite team we should be looking to win?

Only one of them for me and Gillett is by far the better player.

I'd agree with that but can't help notice how advanced SG has been in the last few games. Maybe pull him back more alongside Stock.