0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
With two benefactors leaving and a yearly shortfall of £5 million this model is clearly unsustainable. Its time for a long term realistic business plan to be put in place at the club. This includes marketing Doncaster Rovers the brand! Buying the stadium off the council. We have some unique selling points, lets use them. In these times of austerity, we have to at least try and balance the books. Clearly we can not do that with £9 million wage bill. We need to put an end to short termism and a sticking plaster mentality.The downside to this, is that we probably will have to get relegated first. It will mean losing a lot of the top wage earners. You have to break some eggs to make an omelette!However, every cloud has a silver lining and I think that it presents itself as and opportunity for the club to wipe the slate clean and implement a long term sustainable business plan. Peterborough Utd have a wage of £3 million and we have more going for us than they do (League table?). I fear that if the above does not happen John Ryan will leave and we will be heading back down the leagues again with spiralling debts
The McKay thing is not a good long term plan though Benaldo. Think relegation will be a good thing for us, yeah we'll lose TV revenue but we can have a total overhaul of the playing squad, we have too much dead wood and short term contracted players at the squad. We have a good spine of players who we can work the team around next season (Bennett, Baxendale, Hird, Friend, Spurr). Stock, Coppinger and Sharp HAVE TO leave if we are to balance the books, im guessing they are our top 3 earners? There is some top quality prospects in BSP/L2 who we could possibly replace the big earners with. Kee and Grabban for sharp should work out cheaper. O'kane for Stock. Good young players that we can build a strong team with for relatively small wages.
Why is that Wellred?
Quote from: \"donnyroversfc\" post=215626The McKay thing is not a good long term plan though Benaldo. Think relegation will be a good thing for us, yeah we'll lose TV revenue but we can have a total overhaul of the playing squad, we have too much dead wood and short term contracted players at the squad. We have a good spine of players who we can work the team around next season (Bennett, Baxendale, Hird, Friend, Spurr). Stock, Coppinger and Sharp HAVE TO leave if we are to balance the books, im guessing they are our top 3 earners? There is some top quality prospects in BSP/L2 who we could possibly replace the big earners with. Kee and Grabban for sharp should work out cheaper. O'kane for Stock. Good young players that we can build a strong team with for relatively small wages.Some major flaws in that though. Can you see Friend and Bennett being around, they're good prospects? Also surely their wages are not cheap at all, I'm sure Friend got a nice pay rise in his new contract.Plus will these young ambitous players see us as a club lacking any ambition.As for these BSP/L2 players. Well firstly they'll have to be good enough, secondly do you think they'll come cheap? They'll require transfer fees and why should their clubs sell them cheap if they're that good? We wouldn't expect our club to and we didn't either at that level. Also if they're coming up they'll want a decent wage given that in league 1 we'll be one of the top teams in there after potentially the Sheffield clubs, Preston and Hudds if they stay down, so they might expect a decent fee. It's not quite as easy as you make out is it?
Quote from: \"donnyroversfc\" post=215626The McKay thing is not a good long term plan though Benaldo. Think relegation will be a good thing for us, yeah we'll lose TV revenue but we can have a total overhaul of the playing squad, we have too much dead wood and short term contracted players at the squad. We have a good spine of players who we can work the team around next season (Bennett, Baxendale, Hird, Friend, Spurr). Stock, Coppinger and Sharp HAVE TO leave if we are to balance the books, im guessing they are our top 3 earners? There is some top quality prospects in BSP/L2 who we could possibly replace the big earners with. Kee and Grabban for sharp should work out cheaper. O'kane for Stock. Good young players that we can build a strong team with for relatively small wages.Some major flaws in that though. Can you see Friend and Bennett being around, they're good prospects? Also surely their wages are not cheap at all, I'm sure Friend got a nice pay rise in his new contract.As for these BSP/L2 players. Well firstly they'll have to be good enough, secondly do you think they'll come cheap? They'll require transfer fees and why should their clubs sell them cheap if they're that good? We wouldn't expect our club to and we didn't either at that level. Also if they're coming up they'll want a decent wage given that in league 1 we'll be one of the top teams in there after potentially the Sheffield clubs, Preston and Hudds if they stay down, so they might expect a decent fee. It's not quite as easy as you make out is it?
Prey tell me how that \"Frees up\" anything. Any saleable player will have a value, but to simply say XYorZ should go is ignorance personified. Any non salable player, under contract will want paying off ( or at the very least any portion of his contractual salary with DRFC with any new club ). Very few at DRFC are short term contracts, so to think simply by \"Getting rid\" of players DRFC reduce outgoings is nonsense. If wage bill is currently 9 million and all players were \"Paid off\" it would cost? ..........Yes you got it.......a minimum of 9 million for EVERY year they are contracted for.
Quote from: \"Wild Rover\" post=215653Prey tell me how that \"Frees up\" anything. Any saleable player will have a value, but to simply say XYorZ should go is ignorance personified. Any non salable player, under contract will want paying off ( or at the very least any portion of his contractual salary with DRFC with any new club ). Very few at DRFC are short term contracts, so to think simply by \"Getting rid\" of players DRFC reduce outgoings is nonsense. If wage bill is currently 9 million and all players were \"Paid off\" it would cost? ..........Yes you got it.......a minimum of 9 million for EVERY year they are contracted for.Aren't alot of our players out of contract in the summer? Also, how much would we lose in TV revenue if relegated?
I'd hate to think how much we're wasting on the wages of players such as Keegan, bouhenna and Chambers.yet you would keep chris brown who is clearly crocked
And as i said ealier Wellred, why is that?
Quote from: \"donnyroversfc\" post=215626The McKay thing is not a good long term plan though Benaldo. Think relegation will be a good thing for us, yeah we'll lose TV revenue but we can have a total overhaul of the playing squad, we have too much dead wood and short term contracted players at the squad. We have a good spine of players who we can work the team around next season (Bennett, Baxendale, Hird, Friend, Spurr). Stock, Coppinger and Sharp HAVE TO leave if we are to balance the books, im guessing they are our top 3 earners? There is some top quality prospects in BSP/L2 who we could possibly replace the big earners with. Kee and Grabban for sharp should work out cheaper. O'kane for Stock. Good young players that we can build a strong team with for relatively small wages.Your right, it's not a long term plan but if you think like this....We loan Striker A from abroad. He plays 20 games and scores 15 goals. Newcastle buy him for 5 million. Doncaster Rovers get a percentage of the fee. If this happens on just a couple of players in the next 2 years that alone would plug a portion of the 5 million gap we now have in the wage bill.Personally I think the Mckay plan in genius, for a small investment by ourselves in wages we get the opportunity to get a fee in return for the sale of the player.
Their will be clubs queing up for the likes of Coppinger, Stock and Sharp. The rest? well most of them are out of contract so it wouldn't be a problem moving them on.
With two benefactors leaving and a yearly shortfall of £5 million this model is clearly unsustainable.