0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Alickismyhero on November 10, 2013, 01:58:43 pmLook Wellred I disagree with a lot of what you say but respect your right to make those comments. You will notice that VSC has not blocked any adverse comments made about them which allows you to make adverse comments about them. Isn't that exactly what you require?The VSC board are in a very difficult position they are sitting ducks. I too have made criticism of the VSC and Filo in the past and if I was right or wrong is not important thats what this forum is about, debate.If you were to disappear to another site where everyone agrees with everyone I think you will soon come back.The VSC have done a fine job.PS it was Wellred who convinced me it was a good idea to join the VSC.You are correct Alick that the VSC has not blocked any adverse comments. I personally have been threatened that I will be banned from the forum for comments I have made however so some people on here are not quite as liberal as you may think.Maybe I am not putting across what I mean very clearly. What I am trying to say is we are going around and around. The fors are not going to change their opinion neither are the againsts. We can carry on having a go at each other all day long. It is not going to achieve anything though is it?
Look Wellred I disagree with a lot of what you say but respect your right to make those comments. You will notice that VSC has not blocked any adverse comments made about them which allows you to make adverse comments about them. Isn't that exactly what you require?The VSC board are in a very difficult position they are sitting ducks. I too have made criticism of the VSC and Filo in the past and if I was right or wrong is not important thats what this forum is about, debate.If you were to disappear to another site where everyone agrees with everyone I think you will soon come back.The VSC have done a fine job.PS it was Wellred who convinced me it was a good idea to join the VSC.
We have already been informed by Silent Majority that the VSC is not here to represent the supporters of DRFC but is a body elected to keep tabs of the club and ensure it goes the way they want it.
Quote from: Wellred on November 10, 2013, 01:41:53 pmWe have already been informed by Silent Majority that the VSC is not here to represent the supporters of DRFC but is a body elected to keep tabs of the club and ensure it goes the way they want it.That's not what I said Wellred, don't twist my words to try and prove a point.
Quote from: Boomstick on November 10, 2013, 11:45:24 amThe vsc should be ashamed of themselves, without John Ryan there would be no club. Why wouldn't you back him? The vsc have made their bed, shown their true colours. I think it's time for an alternative supporters group, or does one exist? Can I make it clear that the VSC is not a supporters group/club. We are a trust and as one we have clear aims and objectives to ensure the longevity and sustainability of our football club.We did not refuse to back John Ryan, we gave the entire DRFC board our full support to do what was best for the future of our football club. We did not ask for JRs resignation, infact (unlike another supporters group) we didn't demand the resignation of any of the board members.
The vsc should be ashamed of themselves, without John Ryan there would be no club. Why wouldn't you back him? The vsc have made their bed, shown their true colours. I think it's time for an alternative supporters group, or does one exist?
Quote from: Mr1Croft on November 10, 2013, 12:30:16 pmQuote from: Boomstick on November 10, 2013, 11:45:24 amThe vsc should be ashamed of themselves, without John Ryan there would be no club. Why wouldn't you back him? The vsc have made their bed, shown their true colours. I think it's time for an alternative supporters group, or does one exist? Can I make it clear that the VSC is not a supporters group/club. We are a trust and as one we have clear aims and objectives to ensure the longevity and sustainability of our football club.We did not refuse to back John Ryan, we gave the entire DRFC board our full support to do what was best for the future of our football club. We did not ask for JRs resignation, infact (unlike another supporters group) we didn't demand the resignation of any of the board members.I dont get it.I think that most people who pay into the VSC, are under the impression that that is what we are paying for, a Supporters Group to represent the supporters.
Bpoolrover, how many more times do supporters want the VSC 's position clarifying? 1) we are not against investment or takeover2) we are certainly not anti-JR. The bloke saved this club. How can anyone be anti-JR? We were just as shocked as anyone when he decided to tender his resignation yesterday. 3) we have a clear aim to safeguard the club for the future of supporters, borne from the events of 1997/8. 4) as a shareholder/stakeholder we asked questions surrounding SC which were not answered. Where is the money coming from? Who is behind the bid? What happens if the Rovers don't get promoted to the Premier League? What happens to the club if SC or their backers decide enough is enough? 5) we did our own investigations (as other fans did too) and found out very little of substance. 6) we were threatened by lawyers acting for SC due to comments made by fans on this site. Given the complete lack of anything to substantiate the SC bid how on earth could we support it? We never once said we didn't trust John, just that we had no hard evidence to persuade us that we should support the SC bid.
Quote from: nice one rovers on November 10, 2013, 04:03:12 pmQuote from: RobTheRover on November 10, 2013, 01:36:36 pmBpoolrover, how many more times do supporters want the VSC 's position clarifying? 1) we are not against investment or takeover2) we are certainly not anti-JR. The bloke saved this club. How can anyone be anti-JR? We were just as shocked as anyone when he decided to tender his resignation yesterday. 3) we have a clear aim to safeguard the club for the future of supporters, borne from the events of 1997/8. 4) as a shareholder/stakeholder we asked questions surrounding SC which were not answered. Where is the money coming from? Who is behind the bid? What happens if the Rovers don't get promoted to the Premier League? What happens to the club if SC or their backers decide enough is enough? 5) we did our own investigations (as other fans did too) and found out very little of substance. 6) we were threatened by lawyers acting for SC due to comments made by fans on this site. Given the complete lack of anything to substantiate the SC bid how on earth could we support it? We never once said we didn't trust John, just that we had no hard evidence to persuade us that we should support the SC bid.You couldn't have been sued for what supporters say , as it turns out that you are not a supporters group/club.Why dont the vsc put a copy of their constitution on vsc matters part of this forum,then the members can see what exactly the aims of the group are.By the way i am not a member but not against the vsc either.
Quote from: RobTheRover on November 10, 2013, 01:36:36 pmBpoolrover, how many more times do supporters want the VSC 's position clarifying? 1) we are not against investment or takeover2) we are certainly not anti-JR. The bloke saved this club. How can anyone be anti-JR? We were just as shocked as anyone when he decided to tender his resignation yesterday. 3) we have a clear aim to safeguard the club for the future of supporters, borne from the events of 1997/8. 4) as a shareholder/stakeholder we asked questions surrounding SC which were not answered. Where is the money coming from? Who is behind the bid? What happens if the Rovers don't get promoted to the Premier League? What happens to the club if SC or their backers decide enough is enough? 5) we did our own investigations (as other fans did too) and found out very little of substance. 6) we were threatened by lawyers acting for SC due to comments made by fans on this site. Given the complete lack of anything to substantiate the SC bid how on earth could we support it? We never once said we didn't trust John, just that we had no hard evidence to persuade us that we should support the SC bid.You couldn't have been sued for what supporters say , as it turns out that you are not a supporters group/club.
We have already been informed by Silent Majority that the VSC is not here to represent the supporters of DRFC but is a body elected to keep tabs of the club and ensure it goes the way they want it to.It is a shame then that we don't have a fans forum where everyone can contribute without the VSC having to influnce most of the threads.Wouldn't it be great to actually have a forum like many football clubs do, where the fans post comments about the team, management etc etc but are generally non political.Instead of being for or against John Ryan, Terry Brammall, Sequentia or Uncle Tom Cobley wouldn't it be nice to discuss other things.Maybe there should be part of this forum dedicated to VSC members only where they can discuss the saviours or pirates trying to plunder our club and leave the rest to discussion about team affairs, transfers etc etc.
Quote from: Wellred on November 10, 2013, 01:41:53 pmWe have already been informed by Silent Majority that the VSC is not here to represent the supporters of DRFC but is a body elected to keep tabs of the club and ensure it goes the way they want it to.It is a shame then that we don't have a fans forum where everyone can contribute without the VSC having to influnce most of the threads.Wouldn't it be great to actually have a forum like many football clubs do, where the fans post comments about the team, management etc etc but are generally non political.Instead of being for or against John Ryan, Terry Brammall, Sequentia or Uncle Tom Cobley wouldn't it be nice to discuss other things.Maybe there should be part of this forum dedicated to VSC members only where they can discuss the saviours or pirates trying to plunder our club and leave the rest to discussion about team affairs, transfers etc etc.Like YAURS?