0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: IDM on March 06, 2018, 08:12:15 amThat one looks great - bettert than this season's with the shoulder straps - if we want to replicate the early 70s shirt.My preference is for multiple bold hoops, like the 1982 shirt. But my favourite combo in terms of looks wasGot to agree with this being the best kit the Rovers have had recently. All of the kits from the Nike/Avec "era" were brilliant and looked really professional. Do you means Copps and Harry or the kit?
That one looks great - bettert than this season's with the shoulder straps - if we want to replicate the early 70s shirt.My preference is for multiple bold hoops, like the 1982 shirt. But my favourite combo in terms of looks was
something else to think about:whenever prompted (or even when not prompted if feeling truculent - meh) I'll always advocate keeping the hoops because they provide an instantly recognisable brand that everyone other than the terminally stupid associates with rovers - any self respecting business concern would give their right arm for something so clearly and readily associated with themselves, for marketing, promotional, merchandising and any other purpose you'd care to mention; well, that and the fact that I have an entire red and white hooped set of dining plates and mugs and stuff, which i don't want to replace...that said, the Glorious Red & White Hoops may be many things - but they are not uniqueanyone care to have a go at naming the NINE other clubs who at one time or another have played in the same strip either in the football league or during their earlier non-league days; there are eight current EPL or FL clubs and one current non-league team; and you can ignore Kingstonian and anyone else who has never played in the Football League - simply not interested in that sort of tin-pot shithousery - i'll give it a couple of days or so and then stick the list up here - on you trot...
As you may have seen recently (or not) they've dispensed with the hooped socks at the behest of the players, as they said the hooped ones are more difficult to pick out. They've worn plain white socks for the last couple of home games at least.To be honest, I prefer white shorts, then red and not keen on black. At some point I would like to see us with the late 60s early 70s twin hoops.
So did we actually wear the hat in matches? that's brilliant.
No caps or hats here 1891 .. but looks like they wore there shin pads on the outside of socks (Thats if they had socks ) .Not one of um smiling after they won the Cup , would not like to meet that lot ,in a dark alley.
Quote from: Herman Hessian on March 06, 2018, 01:13:40 pmsomething else to think about:whenever prompted (or even when not prompted if feeling truculent - meh) I'll always advocate keeping the hoops because they provide an instantly recognisable brand that everyone other than the terminally stupid associates with rovers - any self respecting business concern would give their right arm for something so clearly and readily associated with themselves, for marketing, promotional, merchandising and any other purpose you'd care to mention; well, that and the fact that I have an entire red and white hooped set of dining plates and mugs and stuff, which i don't want to replace...that said, the Glorious Red & White Hoops may be many things - but they are not uniqueanyone care to have a go at naming the NINE other clubs who at one time or another have played in the same strip either in the football league or during their earlier non-league days; there are eight current EPL or FL clubs and one current non-league team; and you can ignore Kingstonian and anyone else who has never played in the Football League - simply not interested in that sort of tin-pot shithousery - i'll give it a couple of days or so and then stick the list up here - on you trot...Bristol Rovers for starters.
People tended not to smile on photo's in those days because they invariably had rotten teeth.