Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 06:58:54 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: Sunderland (H)  (Read 2232 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bailey Vickerage

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1113
Sunderland (H)
« on November 01, 2021, 01:06:03 pm by Bailey Vickerage »
Been moved to the 27th December 12:30 kick off for sky sports.

Cambridge away now on Thursday 30th December 7:45pm

Morecambe away now on Sunday January 2nd 3pm kick off



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

roversdude

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 12865
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #1 on November 01, 2021, 01:13:06 pm by roversdude »
For once these suit me can now make the Sunderland and Morecambe games

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 30145
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #2 on November 01, 2021, 01:15:11 pm by Filo »
So yet again we’ve been denied a home game on Boxing day

mushRTID

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7588
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #3 on November 01, 2021, 01:24:27 pm by mushRTID »
SHITE!

Was really looking forward to boxing day football. Gutted.

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 30145
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #4 on November 01, 2021, 01:26:48 pm by Filo »
Another thrashing and on national TV FFS!

CJK

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 635
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #5 on November 01, 2021, 01:27:18 pm by CJK »
Why on earth has that fixture attracted the attention of Sky? Other than the obvious, that it involves Sunderland and they'll get a reasonable television audience for it. Sky ruin football.

Donnywolf

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 20512
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #6 on November 01, 2021, 01:28:42 pm by Donnywolf »
How many people will have been impacted by those moves?

I have not booked trains hotels etc but there will be some including Mackems who will have

At least Morecambe will be better on jan2 for me personally

Chris Black come back

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 14319
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #7 on November 01, 2021, 01:39:15 pm by Chris Black come back »
Why on earth has that fixture attracted the attention of Sky? Other than the obvious, that it involves Sunderland and they'll get a reasonable television audience for it. Sky ruin football.

There is only one Premier League game and two Championship games on 27 December, while huge numbers of people will be sat on their backsides at home. They need a filler and Sunderland biggest name in League One so they shoved this into the schedule.

DMnumber4

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1238
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #8 on November 01, 2021, 02:04:54 pm by DMnumber4 »
Cancel Christmas

roversdude

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 12865
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #9 on November 01, 2021, 02:06:08 pm by roversdude »
Extra income for Rovers

DD

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 243
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #10 on November 01, 2021, 02:17:33 pm by DD »
Bleedin' disgrace AGAIN
Rovers should tell them to bugger off - when was our last Boxing Day home game? Decades ago.
It is (should be / used to be) highlight of the football season.
Gutted - but get used to it being a Rovers fan - tiny little Donny

donnievic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3631
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #11 on November 01, 2021, 02:27:42 pm by donnievic »
How many people will have been impacted by those moves?

I have not booked trains hotels etc but there will be some including Mackems who will have

At least Morecambe will be better on jan2 for me personally
doubt it as there be no trains on Boxing Day

glosterred

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 8927
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #12 on November 01, 2021, 02:27:47 pm by glosterred »
Bleedin' disgrace AGAIN
Rovers should tell them to bugger off - when was our last Boxing Day home game? Decades ago.
It is (should be / used to be) highlight of the football season.
Gutted - but get used to it being a Rovers fan - tiny little Donny

Rovers cannot tell Sky to do one as they have no say over this rearrangement, this is all down to Sky. But, let’s face it, Sky do not give a shit about fans do they, they are only in it for the advertising fees and the ratings.


COYR

donnievic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3631
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #13 on November 01, 2021, 02:28:59 pm by donnievic »
Why on earth has that fixture attracted the attention of Sky? Other than the obvious, that it involves Sunderland and they'll get a reasonable television audience for it. Sky ruin football.
answered your own question there really although I would of given then even more tickets then the usual 4,000 anyway

Donnywolf

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 20512
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #14 on November 01, 2021, 03:03:59 pm by Donnywolf »
How many people will have been impacted by those moves?

I have not booked trains hotels etc but there will be some including Mackems who will have

At least Morecambe will be better on jan2 for me personally
doubt it as there be no trains on Boxing Day

... agreed but I was thinking of all 3 games and both sets of fans in each of the 3 games

sedwardsdrfc

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4632
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #15 on November 01, 2021, 03:36:11 pm by sedwardsdrfc »
Good for the extra money we'll need it in jan by all accounts. Potentially not a great advertisement for the club when the inevitable battering happens 

Padge_DRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4965
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #16 on November 01, 2021, 06:56:55 pm by Padge_DRFC »
How much money do we get? Knock about 2k off the usual crowd we'd have got due to it being on TV

donnievic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3631
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #17 on November 01, 2021, 07:35:27 pm by donnievic »
How much money do we get? Knock about 2k off the usual crowd we'd have got due to it being on TV
I don’t think we would get many more turning up way we are playing even if was ment to be Boxing Day game and sunderland will still sell their full allocation

DRCraig

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 571
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #18 on November 02, 2021, 09:59:14 am by DRCraig »
Be watching it on the telly now tbh.

DonnyBazR0ver

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 18124
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #19 on November 02, 2021, 02:48:29 pm by DonnyBazR0ver »
Think with heads not heart. Any extra revenue from TV is most welcome at a key time. I'm sure the TV revenue will more than make up for those who will take the option to watch on TV or not bother at all.

ColinDouglasHandshake

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2353
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #20 on November 02, 2021, 04:30:45 pm by ColinDouglasHandshake »
Don't get the logic of fans who would ordinarily be going to the game but now it is on tv won't go and will watch it on tv.

It is better to be at the actual game IMO.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29830
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #21 on November 02, 2021, 07:17:28 pm by drfchound »
But those are the floating fans than I have spoken about elsewhere.
Once they begin to drift away it is difficult to get them back.

Colemans Left Hook

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6232
Re: Sunderland (H)
« Reply #22 on November 03, 2021, 11:15:11 pm by Colemans Left Hook »
Some of you will know Kier Starmer's favourite phrase to attack the government is " "i see a pattern developing here""

My friend ( it wasn't Selby) just tweeted him on his views about Rovers chances at home against Sunderland

and as usual Starmer produced his evidence as to the result :-

Rotherham 5 Sunderland 1
Sheffield Wednesday 3 Sunderland 0

he pointed out it's all about "location location" and it's South Yorkshire

and the pattern shows Rovers obviously will win  1-0

 he added he still hadn't received his invite to come to the keepmoat from "silent majority"

 shame he forgot about the fact Rovers have never ever beaten them and didn't look at the bigger picture

actually CLH agrees with him & sees a 1-0 home win as well in the stars

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012