Another stonewall penalty denied!

[NigelJ]

Filo wrote:

Judge for yourself, still onside for me

How does that 'still' prove anything? The ball has already been played. At the moment the ball was played, neither Hird nor Hooper were in shot, so it is simply not possible to say whether Hooper was onside or offside.

Personally, my first gut reaction (from my position halway in the West stand, so not exactly in line), was that he was offside, so I'll stick with that!