0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
it almost a carbon copy of the old ground except at christie park the bulk of the fans were behind the goalshit though aint it?
bedale rover wrote:Quoteit almost a carbon copy of the old ground except at christie park the bulk of the fans were behind the goalshit though aint it? I thought that too. Can someone explain to me exactly what they've achieved from moving that couldn't have been done cheaper at Christie Park??? Why on earth would you decide not to build on a whole complete side of the ground? There are a number of Scottish lower league grounds that don't build behind the goals to save money, but to not build down a whole side is madness.It has to rank up there with the Deva Stadium for sheer crapness and short sightedness. For all the negatives and lack of imagination that our ground and the likes of Chesterfield/Colchester/Shrewsbury has at least they're functional, comfortable and a world better than where we/they orignally came from.
However, that side is temporary and can be developed in the future (there is actually plenty of room behind the stand. Building there in future, I believe, would also allow us to apply for grants (we couldn't apply for any this time round as we wanted terracing). Therefore, if we do progress we can adapt accordingly.
B+) = B)
The dug out situation at KM was a bi farcical.