Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 19, 2025, 05:39:12 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: Worse for pompey, good for rovers!!  (Read 1400 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DRFC JJT

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 2
Worse for pompey, good for rovers!!
« on February 23, 2012, 01:01:35 pm by DRFC JJT »



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

RoversAlias

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11889
Re: Worse for pompey, good for rovers!!
« Reply #1 on February 23, 2012, 01:45:08 pm by RoversAlias »
It really looks like they'll either go bust before the end of the season or they'll just run out of available first team players and get tanked every weekend. Doesn't mean it'll save us though, we need to get ahead of Forest and Coventry as well!

roverstillidie91

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2602
Re: Worse for pompey, good for rovers!!
« Reply #2 on February 23, 2012, 02:25:39 pm by roverstillidie91 »
Cant help but feel the victims in this avoidable mess imposed on them will be ultimately the Supporters

They have also mentioned how they are anxious they may get injuries and suspensions etc if the squad gets stretched to the limit

but havent they got something called a reserve/youth team which they can call upon players from for the cause as I am sure they will be getting a wage too

Norfolk N Chance

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3480
Re: Worse for pompey, good for rovers!!
« Reply #3 on February 23, 2012, 02:29:40 pm by Norfolk N Chance »
Bristol City would be the losers as table looks like;-

Southampton 58
Reading 54
West Ham 54
Middlesbrough 52
Birmingham 51
Blackpool 51
Cardiff 49
Hull 48
Burnley 47
Brighton 47
Leeds 45
Palace 42
Leicester 40
Barnsley 39
Derby 39
Watford 37
Peterborough 34
Ipswich 34
Bristol C 30
Millwall 28
Forest 28
Coventry 25
Rovers 24

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012