0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Personally I like Carroll, think he is good to have as a presence and a different option. He is a very good hold-up player too, and he proved tonight why it pays to put him in the starting line-up.Welbeck will continue to develop into a terrific player, of that I have no doubt especially under Ferguson, but right now I don't look at him and believe he is ready to start up front for England.
Quote from: RoversAlias on June 16, 2012, 02:48:06 amPersonally I like Carroll, think he is good to have as a presence and a different option. He is a very good hold-up player too, and he proved tonight why it pays to put him in the starting line-up.Welbeck will continue to develop into a terrific player, of that I have no doubt especially under Ferguson, but right now I don't look at him and believe he is ready to start up front for England.I agree...without Carroll tracking back and doign a hell of a lot of defensive work (some cracking headed clearances in our box) we'd have conceded more...Rooney would do jack shit in that department.Hodgson has a dilemma, if he includes Rooney (who still doesnt set the world alight in an England shirt) over Carroll against a Ukraine side who arent that competent with dealing with an aerial threat, and we fail to progress, he'll be up shit street.
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned how completely hopeless Ashley Young has been. He needs kicking out pronto. John Terry is finished as well
We were shite and only looked the part for the last 10 mins and only then because the Swedes were chucking everyone forward for an equaliser.
Quote from: Mirsad Bubalovic on June 16, 2012, 10:17:22 amWe were shite and only looked the part for the last 10 mins and only then because the Swedes were chucking everyone forward for an equaliser. By the way Mirsad your erstwhile countryman mr Ratface Ibrahimovic has got some 'SAUCE' pinching our Goalies water!!!
what did everyone think of tonights performance ??I thought Hodgson got it wrong, but got away with it.We should have had players with pace starting against a slow Sweden defence, not 2 big target men. Walcott changed the game due to his pace.Young was awful & should have been subbed by half-time.I'd like to see Rooney & Defoe start, but doubt they will.I'd also like to give Parker, Terry or Gerard a rest if we dare. Lets start with " the ox" and/or Walcott.
whats with all thiss rooney craphes a workhorse the same as carrol and you cant see it yes he brings a new dimension to the side but if you had rooney last night were would the goal like carrols have come from ? knowhere and with rooney in the side last night you wouldnt have done nowt at all cos sweden would have nullified him sobefore YOU ALL START SLATING ME (WICH YOU NO DOUBT WILL ) ITS A GAME OF OPINIONS AND WHY DIDNT HE START WALCOTT TO START WITH AND WHY DIDNT HE JUST PLAY YOUNG IN HIS NATURAL ROLE AS IF HE DOES WITH MAN UTD ??????I CANT SEE YOU GOING FAR SORRY BUT JUST MY OPINION RTIDALLTHE BEST