Bob Diamond resigns

[mjdgreg]

How far back are you going with the repatriations?

Not very far. It would be unfair to repatriate 'foreigners' that have been here a while and to all intents and purposes are now British. What I am talking about doing is sending back all the workers that have flooded into the country in recent years from EU countries, for example the Polish. Also any non EU countries that fall into the same category.

I would also put an immediate block on any foreigner of any nationality coming here to work and live. It may have escaped your notice but the country is full and we can't afford to just keep on letting people come here just because they can get a better standard of living than in their own country. There would be exceptions, but these would be few and far between. Like I say, 'British jobs for British workers.'

I take it that you are quite happy for anyone to come and stay for as long as they want. This kind of woolly minded liberalism really makes my piss boil. It's time we started putting the indigenous population first and stopped all this politically correct nonsense.

[Filo]

Given our Great land has been conquered by Vikings, Normans Romans etc, what group would you consider indigenous, pagans? 

[mjdgreg]

Given our Great land has been conquered by Vikings, Normans Romans etc, what group would you consider indigenous, pagans?

It's very simple. Anyone that has been born here or has been here for a reasonable amount of time (this could be only a few years) and has reasonable grounds for staying. However what I want is for a line to be drawn in the sand now. No more immigration and send back the people referred to in my previous post as soon as possible.

We are being taken for mugs and lefties like you seem to be happy for that to continue. Ask yourself why do people come to the UK instead of the much nearer countries to where they live. Also it is morally wrong for the best people in these countries to be 'poached' by us. Their own countries are never going to get any better if their youth keeps on jumping ship.

[wilts rover]

But not so long ago you said it is morally right for parents to do all the can to help their own children? Now when they do it - thats wrong!
And you suddenly want half our international sports people, most of the doctors and nurses, small business owners and every take-away owner to be sent to America? Are we all going to live on fish and chips? Are you going to dig the tatties?
Btw the ingineous Welsh and Irish are the true descendents of the original inhabitants of these islands. Unless your lineage goes back that far let me know when you are going, I'd like to wave you off.

[mjdgreg]

But not so long ago you said it is morally right for parents to do all the can to help their own children? Now when they do it - thats wrong!

Please explain. Where have I said that. You definitely would lose the vote for not being able to comprehend posts properly.

[mjdgreg]

And you suddenly want half our international sports people, most of the doctors and nurses, small business owners and every take-away owner to be sent to America? Are we all going to live on fish and chips? Are you going to dig the tatties?
Btw the ingineous Welsh and Irish are the true descendents of the original inhabitants of these islands. Unless your lineage goes back that far let me know when you are going, I'd like to wave you off.

Your powers of comprehension really are severely limited. How you can possibly interpret what I've said in such a ridiculous manner is a complete joke. You are obviously one of these politically correct leftie losers that thinks it's OK for anyone in the world to come to our country and live here as long as they want. You obviously couldn't care less about how hard it is for people born and bred here to find a job and the strain all these foreigners put on our public services.

[wilts rover]

But not so long ago you said it is morally right for parents to do all the can to help their own children? Now when they do it - thats wrong!

Please explain. Where have I said that. You definitely would lose the vote for not being able to comprehend posts properly.

Given our Great land has been conquered by Vikings, Normans Romans etc, what group would you
 Ask yourself why do people come to the UK .... if their youth keeps on jumping ship.

I present the evidence of the guilty partys' earlier post m'lud and therebye prove that his intellectual powers of argument are as flimsy as his fascist theories and grasp of historic reality. Guilty as charged.

[mjdgreg]

pmsl. You present no evidence whatsoever. I said nothing about parents. At first I was only going to give you a 10 year ban from voting but I'm afraid you are now getting a life-time ban.

[mjdgreg]

Now Billy's back off his 3 weeks holiday (I know 3 weeks!!! - he must have some kind of job related to the public sector), I'll be posting more evidence of why he is wrong soon.

[BillyStubbsTears]

Mick

We can add an utter inability to do simple sums to your charge sheet of incompetences.

[mjdgreg]

mjdgreg

We can add an utter inability to do simple sums to your charge sheet of incompetences.

I think you'll find that my grasp of mathematics is far superior to yours. In all your posts about the economy none of your figures add up whereas all mine make perfect sense.

[BillyStubbsTears]

So where do you get three weeks from then, dipshit.

[mjdgreg]

So where do you get three weeks from then

I refer you to a comment you made in a previous post on this thread.

Off on holiday later this week and am too busy making sure that everyone in my company knows what they are doing before I leave......

I'm off the scene for the thick end of three weeks now.

I'll be honest. I thought you were intelligent enough to be able to work out how many days made up 3 weeks, so didn't check the date you posted this comment to make sure you'd been away for 3 weeks. Seems like you've said one thing and then done another (again). 'Do as I say and not as I do' seems to be your mantra.

With hindsight (one of your favourite words) I was obviously giving you too much credit for being able to do basic maths. As time goes on I'm beginning to think that I have over-estimated your level of intelligence by quite a big margin. I won't make the same mistake again.

[BillyStubbsTears]

Mick. I know you have issues with drawing logical conclusions from simple facts, but you have surpassed yourself in assuming that my previous post meant that I was having a three week holiday.

Read it again, carefully. Then explain for the readers why you came to that conclusion.

[mjdgreg]

mjdgreg

We can add an utter inability to do simple sums to your charge sheet of incompetences.

I can add an utter inability to do basic grammar to your charge sheet of 'incompetencies'. By the way, what's with using the royal 'we' instead of 'I'? It's not the first time you've done it.

[mjdgreg]

When I wished you an enjoyable 3 week (3 weeks!!!) holiday this was your somewhat touchy reply:

Keep your opinions on what I do with my holidays, where I go and how I finance it to yourself, you stupid, arrogant prick. You haven't got the first idea.

At no point did you refute the fact that you were having a 3 week holiday.

[BillyStubbsTears]

Mick

Do you take sexual pleasure from making a public idiot of yourself?

You have incompetence (noun: lack of ability to function adequately) on several issues. Therefore you have several incompetences.

You were working on the assumption that I was using the plural of incompetency. As in pretty much every case when you drag yourself to your keyboard, your assumption was incorrect.

Tiresome in the extreme.

[BillyStubbsTears]

When I wished you an enjoyable 3 week (3 weeks!!!) holiday this was your somewhat touchy reply:

Keep your opinions on what I do with my holidays, where I go and how I finance it to yourself, you stupid, arrogant prick. You haven't got the first idea.

At no point did you refute the fact that you were having a 3 week holiday.

Mick

What does my refutation (or lack thereof) have to do with anything? YOU stated an opinion. YOU should back it up. My refutation (or lack thereof) of your opinion has no bearing on the accuracy of your opinion.

In simple terms, if you are determined to make a prick of yourself, it's not my job to save you from yourself.

[mjdgreg]

Billy

Do you take sexual pleasure from making a public idiot of yourself?

You have  (noun: lack of ability to function adequately) on several issues. Therefore you have several incompetencies.

I think you'll find that my grasp of grammar is much better than yours. There is no such word as 'incompetences'. As usual I back up everything I say. If you apologise, rest assured your apology will be accepted immediately.

http://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-plural-of/incompetence.html

[BillyStubbsTears]

Jesus f**king wept man, are you determined to make an idiot of yourself?

Word-Hippo? You back up your idiocy by choosing a random website called Word Hippo? Well at least you are being consistent. Your arguing style comprises trawling round the web for some obscure website that supports your bizarre ideas, then claiming that you have been proved correct. You really don't have the first idea of how to form an argument do you? You have no comprehension of how to go about checking whether your sources have any credibility do you?

A simple first check on the credibility of Word Hippo, for example, might be to check what it says about plurals of other common nouns.
http://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-plural-of/head.html

http://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-plural-of/idiot.html



And when you've finished doing all that, disconnect your keyboard and let us all have a day without listening to your witless witterings.

[mjdgreg]

By the way, what's with using the royal 'we' instead of 'I'? It's not the first time you've done it.

Still waiting.

[BillyStubbsTears]

Mick.

"We" as in first person plural. As in, anyone and everyone who reads this page. I'd have thought that to be self-evident but once again I find myself having to explain something very simple to you. Do you have learning problems?

Go check it out on Word Hippo and see how "we" is defined. It's a very simple word.

[mjdgreg]

Jesus f***ing wept man, are you determined to make an idiot of yourself?

It seems you are. I repeat, there is no such word as 'incompetences'. More proof.

http://www.spellcheck.co.uk/spellchecker.html

Just admit my grammar is better than yours and apologise. I will readily accept your apology and move on. I can't say fairer than that.

[mjdgreg]

mjdgreg

What does my refutation (or lack thereof) have to do with anything? YOU stated an opinion. YOU should back it up. My refutation (or lack thereof) of your opinion has no bearing on the accuracy of your opinion.

Look it's very simple. Given the fact that you were not going to post for 3 weeks and were going on holiday it was logical to assume that you were going on a 3 week holiday. If you'd only been going on a 2 week holiday you would have kept posting up to the day you went abroad. Having made this assumption I then tested out my logic by posting that you were going on a 3 week holiday which you did not refute.

I'm sure if I'd got that wrong you'd have been the first to let me know. You didn't, so I like all the other readers assumed you were going on a 3 week holiday, which is something that most of us can only dream about doing (not me of course).

[Filo]

mjdgreg

What does my refutation (or lack thereof) have to do with anything? YOU stated an opinion. YOU should back it up. My refutation (or lack thereof) of your opinion has no bearing on the accuracy of your opinion.

Look it's very simple. Given the fact that you were not going to post for 3 weeks and were going on holiday it was logical to assume that you were going on a 3 week holiday. If you'd only been going on a 2 week holiday you would have kept posting up to the day you went abroad. Having made this assumption I then tested out my logic by posting that you were going on a 3 week holiday which you did not refute.

I'm sure if I'd got that wrong you'd have been the first to let me know. You didn't, so I like all the other readers assumed you were going on a 3 week holiday, which is something that most of us can only dream about doing (not me of course).

Us Mick? why say us when you don`t include yourself?

[mjdgreg]

Us mjdgreg? why say us when you don`t include yourself?

It's very simple. You need to take note of the two words in front of 'us'. I'll remind you what they were - 'most of'. Now if I'd said 'all of us' instead of 'most of us' you'd have a point. Unfortunately you have just succeeded in making yourself look silly. As I'm in a good mood, if you remove your post I'll remove mine so that other readers don't take the piss out of you.

[Filo]

Us mjdgreg? why say us when you don`t include yourself?

It's very simple. You need to take note of the two words in front of 'us'. I'll remind you what they were - 'most of'. Now if I'd said 'all of us' instead of 'most of us' you'd have a point. Unfortunately you have just succeeded in making yourself look silly. As I'm in a good mood, if you remove your post I'll remove mine so that other readers don't take the piss out of you.

Piss off daft lad, there`s only one idiot here and it aint me!

[MachoMadness]

This proves you right about the economy how, exactly?

Mjdgreg/Marydene Rover/Mick, please stop. You're thoroughly embarrassing yourself to the point where I and probably everyone else will never take you seriously again, and resorting to arguing about the length of Billy's holiday and miniscule semantic matters is not helping at all. You're determined to be right about something, aren't you? When you log off do you sit outside shouting to the birds that they sing out of tune?

No, incompetences is not a word, but it is acceptable to coin a word in situations where everyone is fully aware what it means. For someone who claims to be always right you're fairly insecure, so this will hopefully settle you down. You were right about something, it isn't a word, no need to go making clone accounts to agree with yourself or picking internet fights with people then insisting copying swathes of text from Wikipedia is "pugnacious" of you. You have one small victory to put next to your enormous pile of failures.

I'm not going to humour you anymore, though why I did when you call experts of their fields who were proven 100% right on matters of economics "cranks" I'll never know. No doubt you'll reply to this with another strawman argument, which I'm telling you now I'm going to ignore. I also don't doubt it will end with you metaphorically sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling that you've won again, like a 5 year old would do. I won't post again in here as your extreme stupidity is actually starting to grate on me a little bit. Abandon thread. 

[mjdgreg]

Piss off daft lad, there`s only one idiot here and it aint me!

I did offer. So be it.

[BillyStubbsTears]

mjdgreg

What does my refutation (or lack thereof) have to do with anything? YOU stated an opinion. YOU should back it up. My refutation (or lack thereof) of your opinion has no bearing on the accuracy of your opinion.

Look it's very simple. Given the fact that you were not going to post for 3 weeks and were going on holiday it was logical to assume that you were going on a 3 week holiday. If you'd only been going on a 2 week holiday you would have kept posting up to the day you went abroad. Having made this assumption I then tested out my logic by posting that you were going on a 3 week holiday which you did not refute.

I'm sure if I'd got that wrong you'd have been the first to let me know. You didn't, so I like all the other readers assumed you were going on a 3 week holiday, which is something that most of us can only dream about doing (not me of course).

Mick

I've been wondering what it is that you remind me of. It's just come to me. You're a mosquito.

Utterly without redeeming features. Persistent. Parasitical. And every time one is splatter against a wall, another one of the annoying little f**kers comes back again to annoy all and sundry.

Do you really have nothing better to do on your life than this? Do you realise how f**king stupid you make yourself look by your insistence on being a living example of Darth's Law? Do you comprehend how utterly imbecilic you look when you write your f**kwitted drivel?

Take this latest one. Go and read what I said about being off the scene for the thick end of 3 weeks, about having to make sure that my employees were all fixed up while I was away, then ask yourself why you insist on making a compete tool of yourself by continuing to talk about me taking a three week holiday.

Now. We'll all sit back and wait for the NEXT f**king annoying mosquito to come pointlessly buzzing round, eh?