0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
1) Paul Keegan going off2) Bad luck3) Referee making poor decisions, and basically disrupting the natural flow of the game. 4) David Syers absent
Quote from: Bentley Bullet on February 10, 2013, 01:03:19 am1) Paul Keegan going off2) Bad luck3) Referee making poor decisions, and basically disrupting the natural flow of the game. 4) David Syers absent5) Hume's absenceDefences hate playing people like Iain Hume - we need him up front and we have missed him/are missing him.
6 Walsall were better than us
I also thought we went too attacking at 1-1. Walsall broke clear a couple of times before they scored, we didn't show them enough respect. Flynn took a gamble by throwing people forward and this time it didn't come off. Hard to be too critical though, if Cotts wonder strike goes in then we win the game. If we win on Tuesday night we are favourites to win the league IMO. Plenty to be positive about.
Quote from: bedale rover on February 10, 2013, 09:37:09 am6 Walsall were better than usEveryone is entitled to their opinion, but I think to say Walsall were 'better' is rubbish. Rovers were clearly the better side until Keegan went off, but they were made to pay for many missed chances.
They took their chances in the periods of the game when they were on top, we didn't, but to be fair i thought their keeper was in with a shout for overall MOM
We did dominate for periods, overall 67%, we just failed to capitalise.
Quote from: DonnyRTID on February 10, 2013, 12:39:59 pmWe did dominate for periods, overall 67%, we just failed to capitalise.Yep, they were a very young side who grew in confidence and played good football as we went off the boil. We'll play worse and win etc....