0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Thatchers only been in Hell three hours, and already she's closed down three furnaces.
Wasn't it labour who first started closing the pits in the 70s?
Quote from: MrFrost on April 08, 2013, 02:37:32 pmWasn't it labour who first started closing the pits in the 70s?Pits like other industries come and go. The problem with Thatcher was that it was ideologicaly rather than economically driven - and she didn't do anything to bring employment in their place thus dooming those communities, and the steelworks, and the shipyards....
Quote from: wilts rover on April 08, 2013, 06:13:32 pmQuote from: MrFrost on April 08, 2013, 02:37:32 pmWasn't it labour who first started closing the pits in the 70s?Pits like other industries come and go. The problem with Thatcher was that it was ideologicaly rather than economically driven - and she didn't do anything to bring employment in their place thus dooming those communities, and the steelworks, and the shipyards....I was under the impression that most of the pits were in fact losing money hand of fist and that is why she wanted them closed, therefore it was economically driven - but it became ideologically driven when Scargill foolishly challenged her. Lets not forget, the miners would have probably won, if Scargill had gone and got the vote from his union members instead of going into the strike without a mandate from his members.
Anyone who revels in the death of another human being, ANY human being, needs to take a long hard look at themselves.And that is all I am saying on this one.
Quote from: glosterred on April 08, 2013, 06:37:56 pmQuote from: wilts rover on April 08, 2013, 06:13:32 pmQuote from: MrFrost on April 08, 2013, 02:37:32 pmWasn't it labour who first started closing the pits in the 70s?Pits like other industries come and go. The problem with Thatcher was that it was ideologicaly rather than economically driven - and she didn't do anything to bring employment in their place thus dooming those communities, and the steelworks, and the shipyards....I was under the impression that most of the pits were in fact losing money hand of fist and that is why she wanted them closed, therefore it was economically driven - but it became ideologically driven when Scargill foolishly challenged her. Lets not forget, the miners would have probably won, if Scargill had gone and got the vote from his union members instead of going into the strike without a mandate from his members.It became idealogical when Heaths Government fell in 1974, Joe Gormly was the NUM President then, when Thatcher became Tory Leader it was her sole ambition to destroy the Trade Unions, none of it was driven by economics!
Quote from: RoversAlias on April 08, 2013, 04:00:10 pmAnyone who revels in the death of another human being, ANY human being, needs to take a long hard look at themselves.And that is all I am saying on this one.She wasn't a human being.
Quote from: Jenny on April 08, 2013, 06:59:24 pmQuote from: RoversAlias on April 08, 2013, 04:00:10 pmAnyone who revels in the death of another human being, ANY human being, needs to take a long hard look at themselves.And that is all I am saying on this one.She wasn't a human being. Don't be silly FFS. She may have been someone who fills you with hatred but yes, she was still a human being.
I can understand people having issues with celebrating someones death. I like many here saw her destructive powers first hand during the miners strike with the Army dressed as Police and police without numbers so they could get away with beating miners. The soup kitchens will stick in my mind forever but then again she didn't believe in society. Are people saying it is always inappropriate to celebrate someones death? I'm not placing Thatcher in the same league as Hitler but was it OK that people celebrated his death? Is it a sliding scale or never acceptable. Genuine question.
Quote from: streatham dave on April 08, 2013, 07:23:16 pmI can understand people having issues with celebrating someones death. I like many here saw her destructive powers first hand during the miners strike with the Army dressed as Police and police without numbers so they could get away with beating miners. The soup kitchens will stick in my mind forever but then again she didn't believe in society. Are people saying it is always inappropriate to celebrate someones death? I'm not placing Thatcher in the same league as Hitler but was it OK that people celebrated his death? Is it a sliding scale or never acceptable. Genuine question.Dave, if it is someone like Saddam or Gaddaffi where the only way they will be removed from tyrannical power is when they die, then the celebration of death is more understandable especially if it leads to the end of their dictatorial regimes.We live in a democracy and Maggie was gone from power for over 20 years, ousted by her own if you remember.
So IDM you are saying that celebrating some deaths are OK then. Gadaffi and Saddam did no harm to me or my family directly although my Brother did end up in Iraq because of our disputes with Saddam twice. Gadaffi split the people of Libya in much the same way as Thatcher did/does in UK. I have heard it suggested that both were killed due to our desire for cheap oil not for what they did to their own people. Also Gadaffi's idea of a single currency for Africa based on a gold standard had America shitting itself
Well someone on here earlier made the very pertinent point that one should always remember that he was a mother to someone. It gave me pause for thought and made me reflect on whether my instinct to celebrate her death was misplaced.Then I remembered that her son is one of the most obnoxious excuses for a human being that this country has imposed on the worldliness the last 60 years so f*** the lot of 'em.Bottoms up! Hic!
Frosty. I'm not mocking her death. I am celebrating it. Very different. As a great PM once said, just rejoice in the news.
Legacy?, c'mon Tory boy, elucidate.As far as I can see any "legacy" has been dissipated over the intervening years.....and don't bring in council house sales into it. The biggest piece of asset stripping this country has seen. IMHO
So what you are saying is that if Thatcher hadn't done what she had you'd have been, in the current political parlance, " benefits scrounger". Sorry young man, I don't buy it. I've already covered the Right to buy swindle. Standing up to the unions by using her "stormtroopers".However, I'll give you she had backbone and we shall be seeing soon won't we.Time for drinkee, nighty night boys