0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Mock all you want. Check my profile, I am not a rumour spreader. Just telling you what a friend told me. I personally would welcome Warnock in the short term. Certainly wouldn't go down.
He also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs! I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!
Quote from: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:15:09 pmHe also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs! I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker eh
Quote from: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:18:02 pmQuote from: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:15:09 pmHe also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs! I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker ehHe was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal). I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...
I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that.
Quote from: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:26:00 pmI'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. Whilst knowing nothing about the behind the scenes goings on? I'd rather go on his complete record from a number of clubs as being more representative of his abilities.
Yeah but that wouldn't support his view
Quote from: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:26:00 pmQuote from: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:18:02 pmQuote from: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:15:09 pmHe also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs! I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker ehHe was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal). I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...Have I missed something. We're Leeds a top of the table championship club before he took over? If you watched the Footballers Football show tonight you'd see NW saying he had 5-6 player lined up to come in and see Leeds challenging but couldn't sign them until the takeover was done and that took too long and he lost them. Why only focus on the last job. Is that because it supports your point more than an overall objective view.
Quote from: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:29:14 pmQuote from: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:26:00 pmQuote from: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:18:02 pmQuote from: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:15:09 pmHe also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs! I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker ehHe was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal). I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...Have I missed something. We're Leeds a top of the table championship club before he took over? If you watched the Footballers Football show tonight you'd see NW saying he had 5-6 player lined up to come in and see Leeds challenging but couldn't sign them until the takeover was done and that took too long and he lost them. Why only focus on the last job. Is that because it supports your point more than an overall objective view.No, i'd rather focus on his last job as it's most recent and it we can judge how he is now, off of that rather than 5 years or whatever, before.Neil Warnock only kept his job for so long BECAUSE of the takeover. The vast majority of his signings at Leeds have been terrible... He wanted Leeds to fork out 1.5M on wages and transfer fee's for a 34yo Clint Hill, no wonder they never trusted him with signings/money.
Quote from: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:26:00 pmQuote from: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:18:02 pmQuote from: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:15:09 pmHe also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs! I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker ehHe was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal). I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...As opposed to Paul Tisdale who got his current team relegated and finished behind the might of Port Vale, Burton, Cheltenham & Northampton in the League? Hmmmm
Quote from: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:34:19 pmQuote from: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:29:14 pmQuote from: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:26:00 pmQuote from: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:18:02 pmQuote from: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:15:09 pmHe also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs! I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker ehHe was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal). I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...Have I missed something. We're Leeds a top of the table championship club before he took over? If you watched the Footballers Football show tonight you'd see NW saying he had 5-6 player lined up to come in and see Leeds challenging but couldn't sign them until the takeover was done and that took too long and he lost them. Why only focus on the last job. Is that because it supports your point more than an overall objective view.No, i'd rather focus on his last job as it's most recent and it we can judge how he is now, off of that rather than 5 years or whatever, before.Neil Warnock only kept his job for so long BECAUSE of the takeover. The vast majority of his signings at Leeds have been terrible... He wanted Leeds to fork out 1.5M on wages and transfer fee's for a 34yo Clint Hill, no wonder they never trusted him with signings/money.You seem to know all about the back room activities at Bell end Road - would't you be better posting on WACCOE?
Quote from: wilts rover on May 02, 2013, 10:36:04 pmQuote from: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:26:00 pmQuote from: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:18:02 pmQuote from: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:15:09 pmHe also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs! I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker ehHe was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal). I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...As opposed to Paul Tisdale who got his current team relegated and finished behind the might of Port Vale, Burton, Cheltenham & Northampton in the League? HmmmmTook them up from the CONF to L1 and kept them there for 2 season's on an absolutely miniscule budget. Playing nice football aswell as putting a big focus on the clubs youth. He's done that while working well with a DoF too btw, which is a good sign if LFynn does indeed get that role.