0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: RedJ on May 18, 2013, 03:32:06 pmQuote from: Dare to dre :whistle:am! on May 18, 2013, 03:28:19 pmQuote from: dickos1 on May 18, 2013, 03:21:40 pmWhy would we accept that it's one of them?? Maybe it will be but there's no evidence it will be at the minute..The bookies don't have a clue, they proved that in January no, there is evidence to suggest it will be one of them. John Ryan saying its down to 2, they are both bookies first and second favorite, people from Yorkshire post who have contacts saying them two have been interviewed and the daily mail a national newspaper already claiming Dickov has got the job. That could all turn out to be bullshit but atm its all there is and it strongly suggests it will be one of those two. What evidence do you have that suggests it will be someone completely different?All your evidence is a bit tenuous though, isn't it?..but thats all there is and all you can go on you cant just say it wont be any of them two when theres nothing to suggest it
Quote from: Dare to dre :whistle:am! on May 18, 2013, 03:28:19 pmQuote from: dickos1 on May 18, 2013, 03:21:40 pmWhy would we accept that it's one of them?? Maybe it will be but there's no evidence it will be at the minute..The bookies don't have a clue, they proved that in January no, there is evidence to suggest it will be one of them. John Ryan saying its down to 2, they are both bookies first and second favorite, people from Yorkshire post who have contacts saying them two have been interviewed and the daily mail a national newspaper already claiming Dickov has got the job. That could all turn out to be bullshit but atm its all there is and it strongly suggests it will be one of those two. What evidence do you have that suggests it will be someone completely different?All your evidence is a bit tenuous though, isn't it?..
Quote from: dickos1 on May 18, 2013, 03:21:40 pmWhy would we accept that it's one of them?? Maybe it will be but there's no evidence it will be at the minute..The bookies don't have a clue, they proved that in January no, there is evidence to suggest it will be one of them. John Ryan saying its down to 2, they are both bookies first and second favorite, people from Yorkshire post who have contacts saying them two have been interviewed and the daily mail a national newspaper already claiming Dickov has got the job. That could all turn out to be bullshit but atm its all there is and it strongly suggests it will be one of those two. What evidence do you have that suggests it will be someone completely different?
Why would we accept that it's one of them?? Maybe it will be but there's no evidence it will be at the minute..The bookies don't have a clue, they proved that in January
Quote from: big fat yorkshire pudding on May 18, 2013, 03:26:55 pmUnless you've sat in the interviews and heard what each had to say how the hell can you judge?I still remember how many groaned when o'driscoll was appointed. I assume most of you grumbling want a name? Perhaps we should wait, see and give the guy a chance.Im just going on what i've seen and read which strongly suggests it will be one of those two. Other people are going on hope and claiming it will be someone completely different. Don't think anyone's bothered about a name tbh but at least o'driscoll had a good reputation before we got him neither Dickov or Appleton do.
Unless you've sat in the interviews and heard what each had to say how the hell can you judge?I still remember how many groaned when o'driscoll was appointed. I assume most of you grumbling want a name? Perhaps we should wait, see and give the guy a chance.
If Dickov is appointed as the new manager, I think we had better be prepared to be on suicide watch judging by how some posters on here are likely to react.......
I think its poor form to state it's down to two candidates when the interview process is not complete yet and we still have other candidates to see and hear from.My second point is that I'm glad some of you on here are not part of the interview panel with such massive overreaction based on opinion and gut feeling. This interview process is probably the first time that we haven't, or the majority of football clubs, have based a managerial appointment on sentiment or other emotional attributes.As has been made public on more than one occasion an 18 point checklist was produced which candidates had to meet, and then a very thorough job description and briefing document has been produced for all candidates.It's that type of thoroughness which is unusual in football circles, but is becoming part of the Doncaster Rovers way of doing things. What the club want and need is somebody who 'gets' what Doncaster Rovers is about and can accept the limitations of being here but also shares the ambitions of the owners and directors. That is more difficult to quantify, but I can assure you that there is a balance between success on the pitch and accepting our position in the community and the responsibility that comes with that.
Quote from: silent majority on May 18, 2013, 04:47:53 pmI think its poor form to state it's down to two candidates when the interview process is not complete yet and we still have other candidates to see and hear from.My second point is that I'm glad some of you on here are not part of the interview panel with such massive overreaction based on opinion and gut feeling. This interview process is probably the first time that we haven't, or the majority of football clubs, have based a managerial appointment on sentiment or other emotional attributes.As has been made public on more than one occasion an 18 point checklist was produced which candidates had to meet, and then a very thorough job description and briefing document has been produced for all candidates.It's that type of thoroughness which is unusual in football circles, but is becoming part of the Doncaster Rovers way of doing things. What the club want and need is somebody who 'gets' what Doncaster Rovers is about and can accept the limitations of being here but also shares the ambitions of the owners and directors. That is more difficult to quantify, but I can assure you that there is a balance between success on the pitch and accepting our position in the community and the responsibility that comes with that.So is JR incorrect in his interview stating it is down to 2?
Filo,We all know John can comment publicly when it's not appropriate, just count his FA fines!! He lets his enthusiasm get away with him, just like most football fans do.
Quote from: MrFrost on May 18, 2013, 04:52:27 pmQuote from: silent majority on May 18, 2013, 04:47:53 pmI think its poor form to state it's down to two candidates when the interview process is not complete yet and we still have other candidates to see and hear from.My second point is that I'm glad some of you on here are not part of the interview panel with such massive overreaction based on opinion and gut feeling. This interview process is probably the first time that we haven't, or the majority of football clubs, have based a managerial appointment on sentiment or other emotional attributes.As has been made public on more than one occasion an 18 point checklist was produced which candidates had to meet, and then a very thorough job description and briefing document has been produced for all candidates.It's that type of thoroughness which is unusual in football circles, but is becoming part of the Doncaster Rovers way of doing things. What the club want and need is somebody who 'gets' what Doncaster Rovers is about and can accept the limitations of being here but also shares the ambitions of the owners and directors. That is more difficult to quantify, but I can assure you that there is a balance between success on the pitch and accepting our position in the community and the responsibility that comes with that.So is JR incorrect in his interview stating it is down to 2?Its not really clear is it? Does he mean they are down to two from the three they have interviewed? Or is it one from the three they have interviewed plus Monday's interviewee? Or maybe there isn't really an interview on Monday - maybe its a second interview for the two strong ones? Or maybe they have only interviewed two so far and they are both strong candidates? Or maybe its all a smokescreen and Lee Butler has already been appointed.I haven't got a clue but see how easy it is to make things up from a vague quote.