0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So if TB now wants the deal to go ahead and he will leave the club afterwards could JR then be re appointed as chairman by SC and get what he wanted all along ?I'd be much happier about the deal going ahead if JR was still around.Wishful thinking.
Would people be more in favour of the deal if TB agreed to it?
So basically all the people defending bramhall have woken up this morning feeling a little bit silly. What a disaster.
So for all the TB lovers who have said he has the club at heart..........really its his POCKET he has had in the best interest.
TB suggesting that this is JR's deal... Nothing about it being TB's deal on his terms.
Quote from: tuffty on November 11, 2013, 09:53:45 amSo for all the TB lovers who have said he has the club at heart..........really its his POCKET he has had in the best interest.I've been saying it for 2 years and was called an idiot and that i didn't know what i was talking about by directors of this co-operative, yet my friend the source that told me was/is a board member and a shareholder of the club who will know a lot more about what is going on the Silent Majority et al because all SM hears is what they want him to hear. The VSC didn't want SC involved with the club so backed TB and certain individuals on here rediculed JR which upset him too, pity they backed a guy who's only interest was himself all along rather then the guy that eat, sleeps and eats doncaster rovers. All supporters including the VSC know what JR is about, yet they pinned their flag to the mast of a man who in truth they know very little about, rediculous!
Indeed as ever we'll look at the information, discuss and take it at its merits. If things have changed for a positive it's all good. If they haven't them clearly I'd still be concerned based on information from before.
Quote from: big fat yorkshire pudding on November 11, 2013, 10:50:51 amIndeed as ever we'll look at the information, discuss and take it at its merits. If things have changed for a positive it's all good. If they haven't them clearly I'd still be concerned based on information from before.Backtrack much? What happened to the 'we don't want a hedge fund running our club' and 'we don't want people that threatened us with legal action running our club'? The deal is no different just money up front and slightly more, it's still a hedge fund and still people that threatened your co-operative with legal action. The VSC changing it's opinion again to suit it's own agenda?