0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
FiloThe people of Gibraltar wish to remain British.It's a messy situation but it looks like a large majority in Crimea want to maintain links to Russia. That and Crimea hosts an enormous Russian military facility.
Comparing Gibraltar to Crimea is a terrible analogy.
I don't think Britain or America, or indeed most of the West, are in any position to lecture people on breaking international law.
Quote from: River Don on March 02, 2014, 03:02:44 pmFiloThe people of Gibraltar wish to remain British.It's a messy situation but it looks like a large majority in Crimea want to maintain links to Russia. That and Crimea hosts an enormous Russian military facility.So the obvious answer is to do what we are doing with Scotland and let the people of Crimea decide in a democratic way and hold a referendum, are the Russians afraid that the result won't be what they want?And while we are at it, all nations should threaten a boycott of the 2018 World cup
As ever, Paul Mason has the best strategic view. http://blogs.channel4.com/paul-mason-blog/russian-invasion-ukraine-push-west-economic-war/441
Spain believe Gibraltar is a region of Spain, but they have n't sent Spanish troops to roam the streets of Gibraltar. Like Gibraltar was ceded to the British by the signing of a treaty, Crimea was ceded to Ukraine by the signing of a treaty. Russia have now clearly violated that treaty and international law, Europe and it's allies now need to stand firm in the face of Russian aggression!
I don't know what all the fuss is about.It's very simple to sort out. Let Russia have Crimea back and let Ukraine go it's own way and become part of the EU if it wants to. Anyone that doesn't like this solution that is living in Ukraine or Crimea should be paid a resettlement sum and they can go and live in either Crimea or Ukraine (or Russia).If we don't arrange this settlement, then Russia is going to take Crimea by force anyway and this will cause other monumental problems. Far better to nip the problem in the bud before it escalates out of control.
What an American commentator makes of the UK's position regarding Ukraine. Hard to argue with it, given the spineless approach of the UK.http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/03/08/opinion/londons-laundry-business.html?smid=tw-share&_r=4&referrer=
It's obvious that the powers that be in Ukraine right now want closer ties with the West, it would really piss the Russians off if there was a Nato controlled air base in Ukraine right on their doorstep, it might make them think twice before they try to annex more of the region
Only 58% of the 'Russian speaking' population could never supply a 97% Yes vote especially when many of these younger one's in interviews felt and wanted to be Ukrainian still..........42% of the non-Russian speaking wouldn't have voted at all. The chance of getting a 50% vote would have been strange let alone a 97% vote!!!
It is a bit too simplistic to assume that only Russian speakers would vote to be with Russia and Ukrainian speakers would vote to be with the West. There's a lot more to it.If I were Ukrainian I'd much prefer to be with Russia. The only reason some of them want to be with the EU is that they think we'll give them loads of money and they'll become much more prosperous.They don't realise what a bureaucratic nightmare the EU is and that they would be much better off keeping well away.Russia is a huge market and is on their doorstep. They'd be crazy not to exploit this to it's full potential.