0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
What has De Val done wrong to be droppedWhat has Wellens shown you to justify him taking De Vals placeWhy does Steer insist on punching when catching is easier
Quote from: Filo on September 17, 2014, 09:54:45 amWhat has De Val done wrong to be droppedWhat has Wellens shown you to justify him taking De Vals placeWhy does Steer insist on punching when catching is easierI'll answer that one. He's better
Quote from: RJHeader on September 17, 2014, 10:04:11 amQuote from: Filo on September 17, 2014, 09:54:45 amWhat has De Val done wrong to be droppedWhat has Wellens shown you to justify him taking De Vals placeWhy does Steer insist on punching when catching is easierI'll answer that one. He's betterHe hasn't shown it since he discovered no other team wanted him.For me you should be picked on current form, not past reputations
Every match I've seen De Val play he's looked a very good player. Didn't he play the majority of the game when we beat Watford?
He needs to start taking responsibility as a senior pro..Those lay off last night when he should have shot were abysmal...
Quote from: bobjimwilly on September 17, 2014, 10:25:05 amEvery match I've seen De Val play he's looked a very good player. Didn't he play the majority of the game when we beat Watford?Thats my point, we looked pretty decent in midfield when De Val played, he's now been dropped for a player that is reluctantly here and isn't performing anywhere near the levels we expect from him, if I was De Val I'd be pretty pissed off. Having said that, the obvious change to make last night was to bring Keegan off, the defence didn't need that protection of a deep sitting holding player, Crawley offered nothing, De Val for Keegan would have given us more creativity
Quote from: Filo on September 17, 2014, 10:34:04 amQuote from: bobjimwilly on September 17, 2014, 10:25:05 amEvery match I've seen De Val play he's looked a very good player. Didn't he play the majority of the game when we beat Watford?Thats my point, we looked pretty decent in midfield when De Val played, he's now been dropped for a player that is reluctantly here and isn't performing anywhere near the levels we expect from him, if I was De Val I'd be pretty pissed off. Having said that, the obvious change to make last night was to bring Keegan off, the defence didn't need that protection of a deep sitting holding player, Crawley offered nothing, De Val for Keegan would have given us more creativityRefer to Gaz's point on lack of pre season. Do you think Wellens would of played in that Scunny Reserve game if he was fully 100% fit? Your insistance that Wellens is the problem with us playing poor is laughable really IMO
Quote from: RJHeader on September 17, 2014, 10:37:03 amQuote from: Filo on September 17, 2014, 10:34:04 amQuote from: bobjimwilly on September 17, 2014, 10:25:05 amEvery match I've seen De Val play he's looked a very good player. Didn't he play the majority of the game when we beat Watford?Thats my point, we looked pretty decent in midfield when De Val played, he's now been dropped for a player that is reluctantly here and isn't performing anywhere near the levels we expect from him, if I was De Val I'd be pretty pissed off. Having said that, the obvious change to make last night was to bring Keegan off, the defence didn't need that protection of a deep sitting holding player, Crawley offered nothing, De Val for Keegan would have given us more creativityRefer to Gaz's point on lack of pre season. Do you think Wellens would of played in that Scunny Reserve game if he was fully 100% fit? Your insistance that Wellens is the problem with us playing poor is laughable really IMOWhy is it laughable? It's a fact that our performances were more fluid before Wellens came back into the fold, don't get me wrong, I'm a big admirer of Wellens and what he can do, he's just not at the races at the moment, and if that is due to the lack of game time during pre season theres only one person responsible for that and that his Wellens himself for touting himself around, if he's not match ready stick him in the development squad until he is and play some one who has had a full pre season and done well so far
Keegan could have come off, Theo could have come off, a change could and should have been made, even if just to bring a pair of fresh legs on. There was literally no point in Theo being on the pitch last night, and most of us figured this out after 60 minutes.
What do the players actually do on the training ground?Do you actually give specific instructions to the players in preparation for each game, or do you just pick an XI and hope for the best?How do you always manage to find someone or something else to blame for your own shortcomings? Have you ever put your hands up and held yourself culpable for anything?What do you think you gain from spending 90 minutes each week screaming into the faces of the officials?Why does nothing you say in interviews and press conferences ever translate into what actually happens on the pitch?Why do you tell so many lies in the media?