0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So let me get this right. are you saying that the remain side haven't used scaremongering as a tactic?
I'll give you a positive take though. We are the luckiest, wealthiest, safest, best educated set of Europeans that have EVER lived on this continent. For 1700 years, competing powers in Europe, us included, have fought, argued, cheated, lied, schemed and hated. We put individual aggrandisement above the collective good and the results were catastrophic in terms of potential wasted and lives wrecked. Europe is the most wonderful place on Earth. Full of innovation and energy and diversity and resilience. What the EU has done, for all its faults, is to channel those attributes into net positives across the continent. Go back to nation states trying to get one up on their neighbours, and you'll be back into the frictions and fractures that tore Europe apart every generation from the fall of the Roman Empire to the fall of Berlin. THAT's the big picture that I see. It's a United, strong, collective Europe that I want my grandkids to grow up in. Not the fragmented and bitter one that my grandparents were born into. That's what the real issue is in a couple of weeks.
Example: we will save £10Bn a year they claim. Well whoopy do. About a gnats bite of our annual budget. It sounds a lot. Ooh a billion quid... Luvverly. But £10Bn is sod all. Go on. Check. FYI the total Govt budget this FY is £759.5Bn. So to save 1.3% of the budget we are proposing to turn our backs on security, influence and safety.
Idle nonsense in that article. The worst kind of selective journalism. It bases its argument on Remain's case being built around lying civil servants and superstars. What about NATO's heads? What about the heads of the security services? Are they lying civil set ants? We don't know the Telegraph's view because they just ignore them. What about the IFS? The NIESR? Respected and independent economic forecasters who have given clear warnings of the effects of Leaving, with detailed scenarios. What about the 90% of academic economists who believe that leaving will result in significantly worse performance in the future? The Telegraph's response is that most infantile one: Well the future is unknowable so let's just ignore people who study these things and go with our guy feel eh?It's like planning for D-Day and saying, "Phew! You can't really predict these things. Experts eh? What do they know? Let's ignore Montgomery and Eisenhower and just do this on a whim of what might make the British people feel better about themselves."Crap, immature journalism.
TRBWhat about the rest of my earlier post. Put Greece to one side. Do you agree with the rest of the argument? If not, which bits and why not?
IdlerSurely the immigration issue in Bradford revolves around Pakistani/Bangladeshi immigrants? I fail to see what that has to do with the EU.
Quote from: BobG on June 04, 2016, 05:50:13 pmExample: we will save £10Bn a year they claim. Well whoopy do. About a gnats bite of our annual budget. It sounds a lot. Ooh a billion quid... Luvverly. But £10Bn is sod all. Go on. Check. FYI the total Govt budget this FY is £759.5Bn. So to save 1.3% of the budget we are proposing to turn our backs on security, influence and safety.A very large chunk of those 'savings' will be needed to protect the borders that the Leavers say we need to tighten. And its not only at every port and airport - the new land border between Eire and Northern Ireland will cost a bit to keep secure once all the 'hordes' of EU immigrants that the Leavers keep talking about realise that they only have to go from any other EU country to Eire under Freedom Of Movement then walk across the border into the UK...but the costs of keeping them out never seem to get mentioned by the Leavers, apparently all the savings going to be magically spent on the NHS by a Tory government..!
We already do have control to stop people who we don't want coming in. And the way you say we don't need criminals littering our prisons almost suggests you think the majority of prisoners are foreign. Not being funny but all you've done is sum up the thread in one post and chuck in a load of cliches and bandwagon jumping. So you've said f**k all, really.
I had dinner tonight with a few Oxbridge types who had been down to publicly discuss the vote. Their consensus was that the result will be 51/49 or 52/48 in favour of staying in. But, and this would be immense fun, England will clearly vote to leave whilst Scotland and Wales will vote to stay in enough numbers to just tip the balance. Just imagine the froth that that would cause.........Who was it said England is a nation of shopkeepers? Wasn't wrong was he? We know the price of everything. And the value of nothing.BobG