0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The prospect of a fine is more attractive than a death sentence.
I do not condone the cyclist in any way,and would like to bet that he was on the road without a bell on his bike as well,which I think is also illegal. But,the report i heard on the radio also stated that the lady was using her phone while crossing the road,its just as bad not concentrating on the traffic.i was reading somewhere last week that Honolulu has made it illegal to use a phone when crossing the road.I cycle a lot as well on an off road, the bike the guy had does not have conventional brakes to stop the bike you use the pedals to do so and you have to be skilled to do this you do not just get one of these bikes and ride without knowing what to do.The people what use these bike are mainly couriers in London and only get paid when they complete the job so they try and complete them as quick as possible.if the guy wanted to get a kick out of riding his bike go off road and go crazy you can get some real speed and have a great time wear the right kit so when you come off you don't get hurt too bad , but buy a good bike.I think the guy did not help himself with his social media posts after the event, as I think both parties are to blame.
When I start to accept the fallacious logic that all roads are dangerous and also that all cyclists who ride on the pavement do so sensibly I might have an answer for you.
If you don't want anyone to be hurt or killed, don't you think the best way to achieve that would be to use the safest method?
The law states that bicycles are classed as motor vehicles in the sense that they are also banned from traveling on pavements.
You couldn't make it up!
You brought the law into this, not me.You brought mobility scooters into this, not me.Then when I talk about what you've brought into the conversation, I'm the one diverting things!You couldn't make it up!
Quote from: Glyn_Wigley on August 27, 2017, 01:56:51 pmYou brought the law into this, not me.You brought mobility scooters into this, not me.Then when I talk about what you've brought into the conversation, I'm the one diverting things!You couldn't make it up!You are a very argumentative individual aren't you Glyn. In the last 6 months or so you will argue with anyone about absolutely anything
You can't even quote yourself fully, how that for stereotypical?QuoteThe law states that bicycles are classed as motor vehicles in the sense that they are also banned from traveling on pavements. Which law is it that states that? And don't worry, I have just as much disdain for inconsiderate motor scooter drivers as I have for dangerous inconsiderate cyclists. However, the difference to me is that I've never come across an inconsiderate mobility scooter driver who was anything more than a nuisance, and certainly not actually a danger to my life and limb, unlike cyclists. So perhaps now YOU can stop diverting the argument, eh?