0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It’s not correct that there always has to be a victim in humour. Eric Morecambe (I think) got it right. All humour falls into one of two categories:i) logic gone awry (Why did the chicken cross the road? To get to the other side.) ii) a slipping of moral standards (why did the chicken cross the road? To escape from the pervert) If you think hard about it, every single joke you’ve ever heard sits in one of those categories. The best ones hit both. (Why did the pervert cross the road? Cos he had his knob stuck in the chicken.)There is a peculiarly nasty British take on the slipping of moral standards side which seeks to humiliate or belittle a group or individual. They are reasonable if they are aimed at someone unpleasant or powerful. If the butt of the joke is weak or unable to answer back, they are effectively just bullying. But either way, there is far more to humour than just setting someone up to have a laugh at.