0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
"So Liam, how was it working on your new blockbuster movie?" "Let me tell you how I almost carried out a racially aggravated murder on a black man..."Very, very strange. No telling how you'd react in that situation of course, but why would you share this on a press tour for some fluff action thriller?!
Quote from: MachoMadness on February 05, 2019, 12:35:48 pm"So Liam, how was it working on your new blockbuster movie?" "Let me tell you how I almost carried out a racially aggravated murder on a black man..."Very, very strange. No telling how you'd react in that situation of course, but why would you share this on a press tour for some fluff action thriller?!I'm guessing a bit of macho madness took him over. The thing is :a) is it a load of old bull to perpetuate his hard man of action movies image (he got the taken gig after tracking down Luc Besson in Singapore and telling him he was an amatuer boxer as well as an actor)?b) if it was, would anyone ever be able to prove/disprove it?c) Will he ever get work again if/when society is finished judging him? Alternate viewpoints seem to range from its brave of him to talk about anger and revenge feelings and how it can manifest itself to make people contemplate dark acts, to shoot him now (or at least hit the mute button when Aslan comes onscreen in The Chronicles of Narnia on telly next christmas).d) Should he be arrested and quizzed over intent to commit racially aggravated murder?
HoundYou're talking about your response to a specific person who had wronged you. Neeson's response was to an entire racial group. It's a troubling response to say the least.
Christ on a bike, if we're now to be condemned and reviled for our darkest houghts there won't be many in this world not needing to look over their shoulder.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on February 05, 2019, 02:40:45 pmHoundYou're talking about your response to a specific person who had wronged you. Neeson's response was to an entire racial group. It's a troubling response to say the least.Yes, my thoughts too were about burglars in general.However he didn't do anything did he.
Yes. He did. Read what he said. He went out with a cosh in his pocket hoping some "black bas**rd" would give him the excuse to kill them. That's rather more than sitting at home making fists and saying what you'd do if ...Fortunately, for Neeson, there's a vanishingly small percentage of "black bas**rds" who jump folk for no reason. That's what saved him from doing life.
So you don't see the difference between being pissed off at a specific criminal and being pissed off by "black bas**rds" in general. You don't see the difference between being angry over being wronged, and walking the streets with a cosh in your pocket hoping a random black bas**rd will jump you so you can kill him.I guess we have different outlooks.
Of course I can see that difference. But that's not what I'm talking about. It's not a binary issue between being angry at a specific thing and murdering a random person because of their membership of a specific sub-set of humanity who have nowt in common but their ethnic background. There's all sorts of steps in between. Assuming Neeson is telling the truth, he went to the last step but one. That makes it qualitatively different for all sorts of reasons from being angry against the specific man who burgled your house. Seems odd to have to point that out. I'd have thought it was bleeding obvious.