Something to be worried about

[BillyStubbsTears]

A lot.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-48630374

Anyone who follows Seth Abramson will know he's been predicting something like this for a while.

The premise is that, in addition to his Russian contacts, Trump is deeply in hock to Saudi Arabia. And the price they want is for the USA to take military action against Iran.

But Iran would be mad to provoke the USA into military action. So a pretext is necessary.

This could get very scary, very quickly.

[bpoolrover]

If us were to attack Iran there is not much they could do really, any conflict is not good and scary but I can’t see much in this to be honest

[SydneyRover]

If us were to attack Iran there is not much they could do really, any conflict is not good and scary but I can’t see much in this to be honest

fmd BP.

[silent majority]

If us were to attack Iran there is not much they could do really, any conflict is not good and scary but I can’t see much in this to be honest

Seth Abramson has been predicting something along these lines for months, and it's all playing out the way he said it would. I would be very concerned.

[wing commander]

I'm not one for conspiracy theory's normally but this one does concern me.Like all these country's who have a beef with America.They will happily sabre rattle in front of the media but have no appetite for any escalation in a conflict that they know they cant win.Not because of the USA but any military defeat will leave them vulnerable to neighbouring nation looking for a opportunity..

   The claims of a Iranian torpedo is also unlikely,to public knowledge they only have 5 subs,and 3 of those are 25 year old Russian Kilo's that rarely put to sea because of a shortage of parts and you can bet the Americans would know were any of them were if they put to sea..

   Mines are feasible but what advantage does it give them?? it's hardly going to force anybody's hand into relaxing any oil embargos in place..

  In this instance it certainly wouldn't shock me to find this was a USA fit up...

[SydneyRover]

The bit that I question WC, is why would they put the mines above the waterline?

[wing commander]

  Well if it was the American's or imo more likely to be Israel, then sinking the ship doesn't achieve anymore than just badly damaging it..The story still becomes worldwide news..With the pictures of the damage now online you don't need to be Sherlock homes to see that the holes are from a outward explosion rather than inward...

  With all these incidents the clue on the culprits is who has the most to gain from it?? And in this instance I don't think that's Iran..

[BillyStubbsTears]

WingCo.

Bang on analysis.

Iran has absolutely zero to gain by forcing a response from USA, Saudi Arabia and UAE.

Conversely, Israel, SA and UAE have a hell of a lot to gain through bringing USA into a conflict with Iran.

[Glyn_Wigley]

  Well if it was the American's or imo more likely to be Israel, then sinking the ship doesn't achieve anymore than just badly damaging it..The story still becomes worldwide news..With the pictures of the damage now online you don't need to be Sherlock homes to see that the holes are from a outward explosion rather than inward...

  With all these incidents the clue on the culprits is who has the most to gain from it?? And in this instance I don't think that's Iran..

Ships on fire make for much more dramatic news footage than an empty sea with a few bubbles surfacing!

[Boomstick]

If you want to down the rabbit hole even more, then have a think about this :-

In 2000 there were 7 countries without a rothschild owned/controlled central Bank, they were Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Lybia, Cuba, North Korea, and Iran.

In 2003, there were 5 without a rothschild controlled/owned central Bank. They were :- Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran.

We all know what happened between 2000 and 2003 don't we.

By 2011, there were 3 countries without a rothschild controlled/owned central Bank. They are Cuba, North Korea and IRAN.

Think about it.

[BillyStubbsTears]

Jesus f**king wept.

[jonnydog]

Best watch Threads again

[Glyn_Wigley]

If you want to down the rabbit hole even more, then have a think about this :-

In 2000 there were 7 countries without a rothschild owned/controlled central Bank, they were Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Lybia, Cuba, North Korea, and Iran.

In 2003, there were 5 without a rothschild controlled/owned central Bank. They were :- Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran.

We all know what happened between 2000 and 2003 don't we.

By 2011, there were 3 countries without a rothschild controlled/owned central Bank. They are Cuba, North Korea and IRAN.

Think about it.

What's the figures for countries without MacDonalds and Coca Cola?

[drfcdrfc]

If you want to down the rabbit hole even more, then have a think about this :-

In 2000 there were 7 countries without a rothschild owned/controlled central Bank, they were Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Lybia, Cuba, North Korea, and Iran.

In 2003, there were 5 without a rothschild controlled/owned central Bank. They were :- Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran.

We all know what happened between 2000 and 2003 don't we.

By 2011, there were 3 countries without a rothschild controlled/owned central Bank. They are Cuba, North Korea and IRAN.

Think about it.

What's the figures for countries without MacDonalds and Coca Cola?

I remember reading once that Cambodia told McDonalds to go f**k themselves if they wouldn't use Cambodian cattle. Thinking about it, it might have been Laos or Vietnam. South east Asia anyway.

[drfchound]

If you want to down the rabbit hole even more, then have a think about this :-

In 2000 there were 7 countries without a rothschild owned/controlled central Bank, they were Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Lybia, Cuba, North Korea, and Iran.

In 2003, there were 5 without a rothschild controlled/owned central Bank. They were :- Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran.

We all know what happened between 2000 and 2003 don't we.

By 2011, there were 3 countries without a rothschild controlled/owned central Bank. They are Cuba, North Korea and IRAN.

Think about it.

What's the figures for countries without MacDonalds and Coca Cola?

I remember reading once that Cambodia told McDonalds to go f**k themselves if they wouldn't use Cambodian cattle. Thinking about it, it might have been Laos or Vietnam. South east Asia anyway.

No bull?