0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
BFYP.Read that tweet form Robert Peston. A Senior No10 adviser (read: Cummings) has said that if Johnson loses a VONC, they will just refuse to leave Downing Street or recommend an alternative PM to the Queen. Just count down the clock for a fortnight then call an Election. So Parliament wouldn't have to chance to stop No Deal.Quite unbelievable that we're even discussing this, but that's the sort of rules that Cummings plays by. It would be a coup. Nothing less.
Quote from: glosterred on August 28, 2019, 12:33:00 pmWell done Boris, doing what the majority of the people voted for, getting this country out of The EUWell said
Well done Boris, doing what the majority of the people voted for, getting this country out of The EU
Depends who you mean DO.Johnson is just in it for Johnson. He just wants to be the Head Boy, even if the school is on fire.Cummings is the really scary one. He's decided that we need a total restructuring of the way we govern ourselves. That can only come about through a major crisis. Like...err..No Deal Brexit. And because he just KNOWS that he is the most intelligent and far-sighted person in the country, he won't listen to anyone who says that is the most dangerous thing you could do, and real people will get really hurt.By the way, if you think I'm exaggerating about Cummings being a batshit megalomaniac, you ain't heard the half of it. Go read his blog or even better, his aborted PhD thesis that used to be on line. It's a terrifying insight into a hyoer-intelligent, deranged mind. And he's now inside No10 making policy for Johnson to sell to the gullible.
Serious question without angle or agenda. Does anyone think there is any possibility whatsoever that given the scenario of a no-deal Brexit appears to be looming ever closer, that the EU may offer some last minute concessions? Is that a totally unrealistic prospect?
Well obviously the issue is the backstop and has been all along. And by concessions, something to do with the backstop is obviously what I am referring to. I get your point that it is highly unlikely that anyone's position will change on that but the EU do have history for making the very latest of late concessions don't they. I have no idea what such a concession might look like and clearly neither do the Government (still no evidence of these technological solutions etc) but would it take very much by way of a "concession" for this Government to snap it up as an 11th hour victory, get it through Parliament (when it next sits), leave the EU and then go win an election by a landslide? Or do you genuinely believe that BJ actually wants no-deal for the reasons you have already put forward rather than a compromise?
The thing is Glyn..Just who could command a majority in the house??? I'm not sure anybody could...
Glyn.How do you show it to the Queen. Traditionally, she takes advice from the PM who is assumed to be representing the will of Parliament. What do you do when the PM flatly refused to represent the will of Parliament?
TommyAgreed with most of your post.Personally, I've said all along that this was never about us leaving the EU. It was always and totally about Johnson's career.He KNOWS that the EU won't flip on the backstop. Because, however much a No Deal might hurt them, backing down on this would do FAR more damage to the EU's credibility and long term cohesion.Johnson knows all that. He knows there's zero chance of negotiating a deal when he's set such a high bar.But this isn't about a deal. It's about throwing red meat to the 30-35% of the electorate that he needs to win the election in the Autumn. So he's setting himself up as the Champion of The Will of The People against these evil bas**rds in Parliament and the EU.That's my take anyway. I can't see any other take that makes sense. Certainly, if you start from the position that Johnson is acting in good faith, you'll never make any sense out of it. He's never acted in good faith in his life.
I thought Johnson was supposed to be a student of history? Because if he knows enough about British history he will know that when leaders attempt to avoid the scrutiny of those they are governing it rarely ends well.