Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 01:07:33 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: Let's talk about the Sunderland game  (Read 11510 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

vaya

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2831
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #60 on January 24, 2020, 10:24:35 pm by vaya »
He said that in the summer also.

He’s always saying we trying to bring players in,
Your captain saying the squad is lightweight is a different matter altogether

Mind your feet everyone - goalposts  moving again.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 16795
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #61 on January 24, 2020, 10:25:31 pm by dickos1 »
Explain yourself cocker instead of trying to be clever

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19615
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #62 on January 24, 2020, 10:26:18 pm by IDM »
Do you not think that Whiteman was saying that, to illustrate how good it was with the performance tonight, despite the thin squad.?

It’s bot an issue, there isn’t a conspiracy..

Getting that result tonight, and another clean sheet, feels as good as a win..

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19615
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #63 on January 24, 2020, 10:27:57 pm by IDM »
Explain yourself cocker instead of trying to be clever

It’s fairly clear - you said there had been nothing coming from the club, and I pointed out that DM has said we need players in, and recently.

Does DM not represent the club then.?  f**k me, I only thought he is the manager.!!

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 16795
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #64 on January 24, 2020, 10:28:14 pm by dickos1 »
Not suggesting it’s a conspiracy.
And no I dont think that’s why he was saying it

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 16795
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #65 on January 24, 2020, 10:29:16 pm by dickos1 »
Explain yourself cocker instead of trying to be clever

It’s fairly clear - you said there had been nothing coming from the club, and I pointed out that DM has said we need players in, and recently.

Does DM not represent the club then.?  f**k me, I only thought he is the manager.!!

Nope
I said nobody from the club has ever said the squad is lightweight.
Saying we’re trying to bring players in isn’t the same thing

Retdon1

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3209
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #66 on January 24, 2020, 10:29:41 pm by Retdon1 »
Do you not think that Whiteman was saying that, to illustrate how good it was with the performance tonight, despite the thin squad.?

It’s bot an issue, there isn’t a conspiracy..

Getting that result tonight, and another clean sheet, feels as good as a win..

No, I think he was saying it because he’s as frustrated as most of the fans... I’m guessing a key reason for him signing a new contract was that  he thought we would be pushing for promotion. We are only a few key players away from having a real chance but for some reason we can’t get the players signed

vaya

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2831
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #67 on January 24, 2020, 10:30:22 pm by vaya »
Explain yourself cocker instead of trying to be clever

It’s fairly clear - you said there had been nothing coming from the club, and I pointed out that DM has said we need players in, and recently.

Does DM not represent the club then.?  f**k me, I only thought he is the manager.!!

Nope
I said nobody from the club has ever said the squad is lightweight.
Saying we’re trying to bring players in isn’t the same thing

Arggh!! My toes!!

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19615
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #68 on January 24, 2020, 10:31:19 pm by IDM »
Explain yourself cocker instead of trying to be clever

It’s fairly clear - you said there had been nothing coming from the club, and I pointed out that DM has said we need players in, and recently.

Does DM not represent the club then.?  f**k me, I only thought he is the manager.!!

Nope
I said nobody from the club has ever said the squad is lightweight.
Saying we’re trying to bring players in isn’t the same thing

Trying to debate with you is like a blind man, in a dark room, looking for the black cat which isn’t there.

Ok Dickos, you win. You’re always right and your arguments are always fully justified..

:facepalm:

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 16795
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #69 on January 24, 2020, 10:34:33 pm by dickos1 »
IDM
I said nobody from the club has ever admitted the squad is lightweight.
Is that correct or not?

Moore saying he’s trying to bring players in isn’t the same thing.
So no it’s not fairly clear

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19615
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #70 on January 24, 2020, 10:36:46 pm by IDM »
Yes it is the same thing, even if the words aren’t exactly the same..

Thin squad means we need new players..

Looking for new players acknowledges we have a thin squad..

Clear enough to me..

Retdon1

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3209
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #71 on January 24, 2020, 10:37:32 pm by Retdon1 »
Now Tom Anderson saying a few new additions would be welcomed with open arms

Alan Southstand

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7102
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #72 on January 24, 2020, 10:38:40 pm by Alan Southstand »
Spellchecker required.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 16795
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #73 on January 24, 2020, 10:41:26 pm by dickos1 »
Yes it is the same thing, even if the words aren’t exactly the same..

Thin squad means we need new players..

Looking for new players acknowledges we have a thin squad..

Clear enough to me..

No, not at all
The squad could be great but Moore could still come out and say he’s trying to bring players in.

Someone admitting the squad is lightweight is different

DonnyBazR0ver

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17725
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #74 on January 24, 2020, 10:43:52 pm by DonnyBazR0ver »
Thought Gomes was great first half. Probably the best player on the pitch. Not involved enough in 2nd half. Maybe should have got Copps and Blair on a little earlier but to be fair, we were riding a storm on the 60 min mark so can understand why he delayed the subs.

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19615
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #75 on January 24, 2020, 10:46:29 pm by IDM »
Thought DM got it spot on tonight, with the players at his disposal. 

Really looking forward to Tuesday after this game.!

Metalmicky

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5382
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #76 on January 24, 2020, 10:46:56 pm by Metalmicky »
30k there tonight apparently.....?

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29201
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #77 on January 24, 2020, 10:47:27 pm by drfchound »
More I think about it, it's probably a back 3 with wing backs tonight

Hoden was pretty certain it's 4-2-3-1 with James at LW.







Hoden was wrong.
We clearly played a back three and wing backs.

pib

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3229
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #78 on January 24, 2020, 10:53:18 pm by pib »
More I think about it, it's probably a back 3 with wing backs tonight

Hoden was pretty certain it's 4-2-3-1 with James at LW.







Hoden was wrong.
We clearly played a back three and wing backs.

No he wasn’t, and we didn’t.

Clear as day 4231 with John at left back and James on the left wing.

If you couldn’t see it on the TV it was certainly clear for all to see in the stand.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29201
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #79 on January 24, 2020, 10:57:27 pm by drfchound »
More I think about it, it's probably a back 3 with wing backs tonight

Hoden was pretty certain it's 4-2-3-1 with James at LW.







Hoden was wrong.
We clearly played a back three and wing backs.

No he wasn’t, and we didn’t.

Clear as day 4231 with John at left back and James on the left wing.

If you couldn’t see it on the TV it was certainly clear for all to see in the stand.






Don’t think so.

DonnyOsmond

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11135
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #80 on January 24, 2020, 11:00:29 pm by DonnyOsmond »
It was definitely 4-2-3-1.

pib

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3229
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #81 on January 24, 2020, 11:00:56 pm by pib »
More I think about it, it's probably a back 3 with wing backs tonight

Hoden was pretty certain it's 4-2-3-1 with James at LW.







Hoden was wrong.
We clearly played a back three and wing backs.

No he wasn’t, and we didn’t.

Clear as day 4231 with John at left back and James on the left wing.

If you couldn’t see it on the TV it was certainly clear for all to see in the stand.






Don’t think so.

Ok Hound. I thought I was at the Stadium of Light watching them but clearly I was wrong. Apologies.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29201
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #82 on January 24, 2020, 11:01:23 pm by drfchound »
Your welcome.

steve@dcfd

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 9358
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #83 on January 24, 2020, 11:13:50 pm by steve@dcfd »
I watched on TV it was 4231 all game.

John played LB
James played Left of the front three. It was obvious there’s no need to apologise to me.

pib

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3229
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #84 on January 24, 2020, 11:14:09 pm by pib »
It was definitely 4-2-3-1.

You may as well talk to the wall.

Cramby10

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1132
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #85 on January 24, 2020, 11:48:33 pm by Cramby10 »
James nowhere near the fullback / wingback  position tonight. I find it incredible what people see or think they see at games lately.
« Last Edit: January 24, 2020, 11:52:30 pm by Cramby10 »

Reesielad

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 415
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #86 on January 24, 2020, 11:59:39 pm by Reesielad »
It was defo 4-2-3-1, and I though Reece played well further forward.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

NewDonny

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 836
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #87 on January 25, 2020, 12:15:35 am by NewDonny »
More I think about it, it's probably a back 3 with wing backs tonight

Hoden was pretty certain it's 4-2-3-1 with James at LW.

He gave Taylor an 8 for his performance tonight which shows you how wrong he gets things lol.







Hoden was wrong.
We clearly played a back three and wing backs.

NewDonny

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 836
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #88 on January 25, 2020, 12:16:45 am by NewDonny »
It was defo 4-2-3-1, and I though Reece played well further forward.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It was 4-3-3

NewDonny

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 836
Re: Let's talk about the Sunderland game
« Reply #89 on January 25, 2020, 12:18:13 am by NewDonny »
I watched on TV it was 4231 all game.

John played LB
James played Left of the front three. It was obvious there’s no need to apologise to me.

We don't agree that often if ever Steve but you are correct it was 4-3-3, thats a fact.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012