Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 06:31:34 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: Coronavirus  (Read 929717 times)

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37307
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1560 on April 05, 2020, 02:17:54 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Bit more than a week. More like 12 days from memory.

But Spain has been bending the curve for a good while now. So have Italy, France and Germany. We really need to start seeing a sustained decrease in the rate of increase of new deaths if we are to get anywhere close to the outcomes that those countries are heading towards. Anything below 750 deaths today would be cautiously promising. Anything much over 800 would be very worrying.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37307
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1561 on April 05, 2020, 02:30:38 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
621 today if my maths is right. That's very good news.

Copps is Magic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8843
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1562 on April 05, 2020, 02:31:13 pm by Copps is Magic »
Billy, here's what you are refering to for arguments sake.  I don't see anything that supports your initial arguments, sorry, do you?

https://imgur.com/a/idrQFin

ian1980

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1389
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1563 on April 05, 2020, 02:31:23 pm by ian1980 »
621 UK deaths in last 24hrs (dropped from 708 the day before)

Figures are for hospital deaths only.

selby

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 10653
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1564 on April 05, 2020, 02:46:18 pm by selby »
  Not so good news is that Singapore  who were thought of as the country to follow track of after containing the virus in early March by a massive testing regime, have had their largest daily surge of 120 as a second wave of cases hits them.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2020, 02:55:40 pm by selby »

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37307
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1565 on April 05, 2020, 03:01:29 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Copps.

That is a log-log graph. That's designed for showing big trends but it is very difficult to pick out movements in the trends

That graph screams out to me that, pre-lockdown suppression policies, the broad trends in all the countries' rate of deaths Vs total deaths is effectively the same. That's the point I've been making. There is nothing whatsoever to support the argument that data collection, or underlying health differences from country to country have affected the initial rates of deaths. That's the first of the points I've been making.

The second point is that what is absolutely crucial is the speed at which countries break off that initial trend as they implement suppression strategies. A few days either side can lead to enormous differences in the total number of deaths. And it is very difficult to see that on a log-log graph of absolute numbers. Which is why I've been analysing that data to draw out some of that understanding. That is exactly what I've been doing in the recent graphs I've been producing. Like the one below. I'll update it later with today's data and I expect that to show a slightly better position for us.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2020, 03:03:44 pm by BillyStubbsTears »

ian1980

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1389
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1566 on April 05, 2020, 03:09:09 pm by ian1980 »
Well the Scottish Cheif Medical Officer has created a bit of a shit storm up there by going to her holiday home the last two weekends whilst telling people to stay at home.

She’s on the press briefing today and has apologised but now Nicola Sturgeon is answering every question even when directed at the CMO, basically not allowing her to speak and keeping her quiet.

Dutch Uncle

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 6775
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1567 on April 05, 2020, 03:25:38 pm by Dutch Uncle »
621 UK deaths in last 24hrs (dropped from 708 the day before)

Figures are for hospital deaths only.

May I ask where that figure is from Ian?

BBC is reporting 555 for England, 12 for Wales and 7 for Northern Ireland. Scotland has announced an incomplete figure of 2 deaths as below: 

In announcing the latest coronavirus figures, with two more deaths taking the tally of hospital deaths in Scotland to 220, Nicola Sturgeon said they should "not be taken as representative of events over this weekend".

The first minister noted that the reporting system for deaths is not fully up and running seven days a week and that she expects the figures reported today, and on Monday, to be "artificially low".

"These figures will be reconciled on Tuesday and Wednesday and I expect them to increase from the 46 deaths reported yesterday," she added.



So that gives a total for today of 576 for the UK, with the Scottish figure expected to rise next week. Were  there any caveats in your source? I agree 621 (i.e. assumption of 47 for Scotland) would be more realistic.

Edit: I also agree that the drop from 641 for England yesterday to 555 is encouraging.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2020, 03:32:11 pm by Dutch Uncle »

adamtherover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3001
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1568 on April 05, 2020, 03:49:44 pm by adamtherover »
621 UK deaths in last 24hrs (dropped from 708 the day before)

Figures are for hospital deaths only.

May I ask where that figure is from Ian?

BBC is reporting 555 for England, 12 for Wales and 7 for Northern Ireland. Scotland has announced an incomplete figure of 2 deaths as below: 

In announcing the latest coronavirus figures, with two more deaths taking the tally of hospital deaths in Scotland to 220, Nicola Sturgeon said they should "not be taken as representative of events over this weekend".

The first minister noted that the reporting system for deaths is not fully up and running seven days a week and that she expects the figures reported today, and on Monday, to be "artificially low".

"These figures will be reconciled on Tuesday and Wednesday and I expect them to increase from the 46 deaths reported yesterday," she added.



So that gives a total for today of 576 for the UK, with the Scottish figure expected to rise next week. Were  there any caveats in your source? I agree 621 (i.e. assumption of 47 for Scotland) would be more realistic.

Edit: I also agree that the drop from 641 for England yesterday to 555 is encouraging.
DU, the figure of 621 is the uk number of deaths on the worldometer website...

Dutch Uncle

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 6775
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1569 on April 05, 2020, 03:51:03 pm by Dutch Uncle »
Thanks Adam

I guess they must have made a reasonable estimate for Scotland (maybe based on 46 yesterday).

Copps is Magic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8843
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1570 on April 05, 2020, 03:54:05 pm by Copps is Magic »
The UK numbers are erratic because there appears to be backlog of deaths announced on certain days (tuesday, it seems).

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37307
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1571 on April 05, 2020, 03:59:45 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
The UK numbers are erratic because there appears to be backlog of deaths announced on certain days (tuesday, it seems).

That's fair enough, but that affects BOTH the daily rate AND the total. Which is why that is a particularly good metric to use, because it tends to deal with those irregularities. In my graph on doubling rate Vs total deaths, I then take a running average to smooth out the peaks and troughs of daily variations, and get more of a feel for how the trend in doubling time is going.

ian1980

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1389
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1572 on April 05, 2020, 04:59:20 pm by ian1980 »
621 UK deaths in last 24hrs (dropped from 708 the day before)

Figures are for hospital deaths only.

May I ask where that figure is from Ian?

BBC is reporting 555 for England, 12 for Wales and 7 for Northern Ireland. Scotland has announced an incomplete figure of 2 deaths as below: 

In announcing the latest coronavirus figures, with two more deaths taking the tally of hospital deaths in Scotland to 220, Nicola Sturgeon said they should "not be taken as representative of events over this weekend".

The first minister noted that the reporting system for deaths is not fully up and running seven days a week and that she expects the figures reported today, and on Monday, to be "artificially low".

"These figures will be reconciled on Tuesday and Wednesday and I expect them to increase from the 46 deaths reported yesterday," she added.



So that gives a total for today of 576 for the UK, with the Scottish figure expected to rise next week. Were  there any caveats in your source? I agree 621 (i.e. assumption of 47 for Scotland) would be more realistic.

Edit: I also agree that the drop from 641 for England yesterday to 555 is encouraging.

I think it’s already been answered but that’s the UK wide figure that was reported on Sky News

Dutch Uncle

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 6775
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1573 on April 05, 2020, 05:02:21 pm by Dutch Uncle »
Thanks Ian

Because I am now living in Northern Ireland I am always interested in the breakdown within the UK, so I have always gone first to the BBC.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29828
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1574 on April 05, 2020, 05:15:18 pm by drfchound »
The 621 figure was announced on the BBC Dutch.

Dutch Uncle

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 6775
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1575 on April 05, 2020, 05:23:05 pm by Dutch Uncle »
The 621 figure was announced on the BBC Dutch.

Thanks Hound.

It is now, but wasn’t when I first posted. Originally there was just the England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the incomplete Scotland figure which came to the 576 I mentioned earlier. I guess Worldometer and SKY and BBC get figures from the UK government (not the devolved ones) and an assumption for Scotland was probably already made by the Government.

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19936
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1576 on April 05, 2020, 05:32:34 pm by IDM »
Are the numbers of deaths quoted each day, figures for actual deaths which happened in that 24 hour period, or the total of those recorded during that day where the recording may have been delayed a few days.?

Apologies if the has been answered, but if the “recorded” number each day isn’t necessarily the actual figure of deaths occurring on the same day, then it makes little sense to compare today’s deaths to yesterday’s - isn’t it better to look at the numbers over a longer period of time.?

wilts rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10275
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1577 on April 05, 2020, 05:49:20 pm by wilts rover »
IDM

No the deaths quoted on any one day are the deaths recorded on that day not the actual date of death - which could be (is most likely to be) several days earlier. There is more detail here:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/04/why-what-we-think-we-know-about-the-uks-coronavirus-death-toll-is-wrong

selby

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 10653
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1578 on April 05, 2020, 07:15:38 pm by selby »
  A worrying jump in cases in South Yorkshire today, but might explain the low numbers yesterday.  The total cases went up to 1372 a rise of 14.94% or 205 new cases Doncaster rose 20 cases to 137 Sheffield 103 to 833 Rotherham 44 to 202 and Barnsley 42 to 200.

 In the boroughs of Greater London the total reached 11994 cases a rise on the day of 1227 or 10.23%
 
 There are a total of 47,806 cases in the UK Greater London boroughs  have 25.08% of all cases in the UK at the moment.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2020, 07:24:30 pm by selby »

wilts rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10275
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1579 on April 05, 2020, 07:30:24 pm by wilts rover »
Worrying. Stay safe people.

scawsby steve

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7964
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1580 on April 05, 2020, 07:41:09 pm by scawsby steve »
Still low for Donny though. Let's keep this lockdown solid.

selby

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 10653
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1581 on April 05, 2020, 08:09:38 pm by selby »
  The rise of twenty today followed a rise of only one yesterday Steve, I can only imagine as Billy has said previously the available number information per day varies as to its accuracy.

Copps is Magic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8843
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1582 on April 05, 2020, 09:38:26 pm by Copps is Magic »
Bojo admitted to hospital. He didn't look well tbh and still having a high temperature was a bad sign.

Metalmicky

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5508
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1583 on April 05, 2020, 09:53:59 pm by Metalmicky »
Bojo admitted to hospital. He didn't look well tbh and still having a high temperature was a bad sign.

I'm sure some will be happy at this news....

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37307
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1584 on April 05, 2020, 10:08:11 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Bojo admitted to hospital. He didn't look well tbh and still having a high temperature was a bad sign.

I'm sure some will be happy at this news....

And that's the first thing you can think to say?

What a society we have become.

Good luck to him. I wouldn't wish this on anyone. As ought to be bleeding obvious.

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19936
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1585 on April 05, 2020, 10:12:38 pm by IDM »
Bojo admitted to hospital. He didn't look well tbh and still having a high temperature was a bad sign.

I'm sure some will be happy at this news....

When he was tested the other week I am fairly sure I said on here I wish him no ill..

I don’t like his politics but now as a few days ago, I wish him no ill..

Metalmicky

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5508
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1586 on April 05, 2020, 10:13:44 pm by Metalmicky »
Bojo admitted to hospital. He didn't look well tbh and still having a high temperature was a bad sign.

I'm sure some will be happy at this news....

And that's the first thing you can think to say?

What a society we have become.

Good luck to him. I wouldn't wish this on anyone. As ought to be bleeding obvious.

No - not the first thing... my first thought was God bless him and I wish him well...

My second thought was, I wonder who will respond first to my post........... congratulations to me - I was right..

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37307
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1587 on April 05, 2020, 10:25:28 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Odd that you choose to go fishing on a subject like this then.

big fat yorkshire pudding

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 13608
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1588 on April 05, 2020, 10:32:34 pm by big fat yorkshire pudding »
Regardless of whether you like him or not the potential loss of the pm for a period of time is another huge loss to the stability we all desperately need.  The short term reactions now arent really about politics but keeping people alive.

Metalmicky

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5508
Re: Coronavirus
« Reply #1589 on April 05, 2020, 10:34:12 pm by Metalmicky »
Odd that you choose to go fishing on a subject like this then.
Not fishing....... just stating the obvious...

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012