0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
‘’How a decade of privatisation and cuts exposed England to coronavirus.Government reliance on private contractors follows dramatic changes to local councils and public services’’Some excerpts not all by far.https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/31/how-a-decade-of-privatisation-and-cuts-exposed-england-to-coronavirus ‘’Nottingham has had its central government support grant cut by 80% since 2013’’Anonymous spokes said “Protecting the public’s health is, and has always been, a priority for the UK government,” she said.‘’ Next month, Britain will mark an anniversary many Conservative ministers would rather forget. Shortly after 12.30pm on 22 June 2010, George Osborne stepped up to the dispatch box as chancellor of the new coalition government and announced the longest and deepest period of cuts to public service spending since the second world war’’‘’Cameron promised he would “cut the deficit, not the NHS” and Osborne ringfenced its budget. It got cash increases, but these were less than 1% a year, and failed to keep pace with growing demand from an ageing population’’‘’The government boasts that its new Test and Trace programme will mobilise an “army” of contact tracers. But in the two months leading up to 12 March, PHE’s team resembled no more than a small platoon. The Guardian has established it consisted of just 70 staff in its field services, 120 in local health protection teams, and 20 specially recruited clinical staff. In total, the contact tracing operation to manage the pandemic consisted of just 210 people’’Some before the recent election were insisting that the NHS had not been privatised and many were singing the praises of this government’s tenure or blaming labor? whether that was what they thought or just trolling is hard to know.The result 60,000 dead and as many have said it didn’t have to be like this.
To be fair maybe you should itemise the parts you don't agree with, the Guardian has listed quite a few areas where the government and the companies appointed have failed.A classic case of blaming the messenger.
Classic Guardian that, all else fails blame the private companies. Clearly some issues and points made but the rush to blame privatisation for anything is not a fair point.I'm yet to see how comments on privatisation can be a fact criticising anything. There aren't many things in the country that could run without private companies.
Sounds like you didn't read it before your first comment and now have zeroed in on a couple of things you don't agree with, If you read the 'misleading' title you will see that it talks about more than privatisation.You were ready to hang JC out to dry on the word of the sun and the mail without anything from him about the incident, this article was the work of 6 journalists on one of the most reputable newspapers in the UK.