Priti Patel

[drfchound]

The dizzy bitch strikes again....
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-55403058
 
How do these people stay in a job?

It turns out though that the dizzy bitch was speaking the truth.
Don’t you agree NNK.

I wonder how many other people wrote on social media condemning the perpetrators of the crime.

Life must be hard for you NNK.
I hope you get well soon.

[drfchound]

Hound. If you want to be pedantic, no she wasn't. They hadn't been convicted at the time so they weren't officially criminals.

But that is utterly and totally beside the point.

We have a fine tradition in this country of the judiciary and judicial proceeds being kept separate from politicians. She was utterly irresponsible wading into this and should be condemned for doing so without reservation.

I have to laugh at you sometimes BST
Your responses are so much in the vein of a politician.

[normal rules]

You would though wouldn’t you . ?

[Not Now Kato]

The dizzy bitch strikes again....
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-55403058
 
How do these people stay in a job?

It turns out though that the dizzy bitch was speaking the truth.
Don’t you agree NNK.

I wonder how many other people wrote on social media condemning the perpetrators of the crime.

Life must be hard for you NNK.
I hope you get well soon.

Life is fine here hound, just an annoying cough.  Of course, it would be a little better if people actually got the obvious point of a post without it having to be explained to them!  I mean, it was all there in the link I posted; perhaps you didn't bother to read beyond the headline?

[drfchound]

The dizzy bitch strikes again....
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-55403058
 
How do these people stay in a job?

It turns out though that the dizzy bitch was speaking the truth.
Don’t you agree NNK.

I wonder how many other people wrote on social media condemning the perpetrators of the crime.

Life must be hard for you NNK.
I hope you get well soon.

Life is fine here hound, just an annoying cough.  Of course, it would be a little better if people actually got the obvious point of a post without it having to be explained to them!  I mean, it was all there in the link I posted; perhaps you didn't bother to read beyond the headline?

Well of course i did NNK which is why i asked you the question and said that PP was telling the truth.
Dont start assuming stuff like some of our other posters.
Merry Christmas.

[BillyStubbsTears]

Hound.

I have to say I don't find it particularly funny when politicians start playing about like this.

On its own, you could brush this off as a mistake. But this comes from the same person who has berated "activist lawyers" for doing their job and taking legal action against the Home Office when the HO broke the law and tried to ram through illegal deportations. That rabble rousing came despite her being briefed by the Met that far-right thugs were planning attacks on these lawyers.

I'll be honest, politicians like that scare me. But you feel free just to laugh.

[drfchound]

Hound.

I have to say I don't find it particularly funny when politicians start playing about like this.

On its own, you could brush this off as a mistake. But this comes from the same person who has berated "activist lawyers" for doing their job and taking legal action against the Home Office when the HO broke the law and tried to ram through illegal deportations. That rabble rousing came despite her being briefed by the Met that far-right thugs were planning attacks on these lawyers.

I'll be honest, politicians like that scare me. But you feel free just to laugh.

LoL.
You just dont like stuff said or done by politicians who arent on your side.

[BillyStubbsTears]

Hound.

And THAT is the perfect example of judging someone by your own standards.

You don't EVER address issues. You just play this stupid game of assuming no one else judges things on merit.

[drfchound]

Hound.

And THAT is the perfect example of judging someone by your own standards.

You don't EVER address issues. You just play this stupid game of assuming no one else judges things on merit.

Its just that you make me laugh BST.
You always come back to me with a lecture of some kind or another.
What would Churchill have said etc.
It must be nice to be perfect.

[SydneyRover]

Hound.

And THAT is the perfect example of judging someone by your own standards.

You don't EVER address issues. You just play this stupid game of assuming no one else judges things on merit.

How can one address the issues if you don't read a lot about the subject.

[BillyStubbsTears]

Hound.

I am a long way short of perfect. But what I do, every time I give my piece, is that I try to explain the thinking behind it.

What I've never understood is why people would spend time on here basically saying "Ner, ner I don't believe you" over and over and over again while not addressing the actual substantive isdue being discussed.

[drfchound]

Hound.

I am a long way short of perfect. But what I do, every time I give my piece, is that I try to explain the thinking behind it.

What I've never understood is why people would spend time on here basically saying "Ner, ner I don't believe you" over and over and over again while not addressing the actual substantive isdue being discussed.

But i dont always say i dont beleive you.
You are moving the goalposts again here though as you often do.
All i said was that PP had told the truth,which she did, and then you have spun this out on a tangeant.
Come on. admit it, you often come back and lecture me on something, often about what napoleon or Churchill used to do.
Odd though that you pick no one else from more recent times (since the late 40s that is).

[Janso]

Hound.

I am a long way short of perfect. But what I do, every time I give my piece, is that I try to explain the thinking behind it.

What I've never understood is why people would spend time on here basically saying "Ner, ner I don't believe you" over and over and over again while not addressing the actual substantive isdue being discussed.

But i dont always say i dont beleive you.
You are moving the goalposts again here though as you often do.
All i said was that PP had told the truth,which she did, and then you have spun this out on a tangeant.
Come on. admit it, you often come back and lecture me on something, often about what napoleon or Churchill used to do.
Odd though that you pick no one else from more recent times (since the late 40s that is).

Surely you can appreciate that at best it was naive and at worst, downright irresponsible to be tweeting - as Home Secretary - about an ongoing trial, labelling people criminals?

[drfchound]

Hound.

I am a long way short of perfect. But what I do, every time I give my piece, is that I try to explain the thinking behind it.

What I've never understood is why people would spend time on here basically saying "Ner, ner I don't believe you" over and over and over again while not addressing the actual substantive isdue being discussed.

But i dont always say i dont beleive you.
You are moving the goalposts again here though as you often do.
All i said was that PP had told the truth,which she did, and then you have spun this out on a tangeant.
Come on. admit it, you often come back and lecture me on something, often about what napoleon or Churchill used to do.
Odd though that you pick no one else from more recent times (since the late 40s that is).

Surely you can appreciate that at best it was naive and at worst, downright irresponsible to be tweeting - as Home Secretary - about an ongoing trial, labelling people criminals?

I have already said that i dont condone it.
I simply passed a comment that she was telling the truth.

[SydneyRover]

PP ahead of the curve

https://cdn1.matadornetwork.com/blogs/1/2018/08/tianmen-mountain-winding-road.jpg

[DonnyOsmond]

Hound.

I am a long way short of perfect. But what I do, every time I give my piece, is that I try to explain the thinking behind it.

What I've never understood is why people would spend time on here basically saying "Ner, ner I don't believe you" over and over and over again while not addressing the actual substantive isdue being discussed.

But i dont always say i dont beleive you.
You are moving the goalposts again here though as you often do.
All i said was that PP had told the truth,which she did, and then you have spun this out on a tangeant.
Come on. admit it, you often come back and lecture me on something, often about what napoleon or Churchill used to do.
Odd though that you pick no one else from more recent times (since the late 40s that is).

Surely you can appreciate that at best it was naive and at worst, downright irresponsible to be tweeting - as Home Secretary - about an ongoing trial, labelling people criminals?

I have already said that i dont condone it.
I simply passed a comment that she was telling the truth.

It probably is the truth but it's not right of any politician, especially the home secretary to make comments that could influence court proceedings.

[drfchound]

Hound.

I am a long way short of perfect. But what I do, every time I give my piece, is that I try to explain the thinking behind it.

What I've never understood is why people would spend time on here basically saying "Ner, ner I don't believe you" over and over and over again while not addressing the actual substantive isdue being discussed.

But i dont always say i dont beleive you.
You are moving the goalposts again here though as you often do.
All i said was that PP had told the truth,which she did, and then you have spun this out on a tangeant.
Come on. admit it, you often come back and lecture me on something, often about what napoleon or Churchill used to do.
Odd though that you pick no one else from more recent times (since the late 40s that is).

Surely you can appreciate that at best it was naive and at worst, downright irresponsible to be tweeting - as Home Secretary - about an ongoing trial, labelling people criminals?

I have already said that i dont condone it.
I simply passed a comment that she was telling the truth.

It probably is the truth but it's not right of any politician, especially the home secretary to make comments that could influence court proceedings.

Agreed.

[SydneyRover]

''It probably is the truth but it's not right of any politician, especially the home secretary to make comments that could influence court proceedings''

If you'd expressed this in your original comment hound it would have shown a better understanding of the topic and saved another circular dabate.

[i_ateallthepies]

For someone who claims not to be a Tory voter, Hound bizarrely refuses to criticise anything they say or do no matter how grossly serious it may be.  Instead he tries to bait those who do care enough to comment and who go to the trouble of explaining why it matters whilst he repeatedly paints himself into a corner, as in this example.  Not very smart is it.

[drfchound]

''It probably is the truth but it's not right of any politician, especially the home secretary to make comments that could influence court proceedings''

If you'd expressed this in your original comment hound it would have shown a better understanding of the topic and saved another circular dabate.

If people hadn’t read into my original post what they wanted it to have said then perhaps they wouldn’t have jumped down my throat about what I did say.
The round in a circle happened because some posters can’t wait to have a pop at me on the political threads.

[drfchound]

For someone who claims not to be a Tory voter, Hound bizarrely refuses to criticise anything they say or do no matter how grossly serious it may be.  Instead he tries to bait those who do care enough to comment and who go to the trouble of explaining why it matters whilst he repeatedly paints himself into a corner, as in this example.  Not very smart is it.

This all began because I said that PP was telling the truth.
Even your god, BST, agrees that it was the truth.
(With the classic BST caveat of course).
Also, I have criticised some of the stuff that the government has done but not to the point that some Labour voters have done, much of it with hindsight.
As for painting myself into the corner, I don’t accept that.
I asked a question of NNK and most of the usual suspects piled in to help him out with the usual barrage of posts against anyone who doesn’t fit in with the anti government rhetoric.
Finally, I don’t claim not to have voted Tory, I DIDNT vote Tory so resent the implication that I was not being honest.

[Not Now Kato]

The dizzy bitch strikes again....
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-55403058
 
How do these people stay in a job?

It turns out though that the dizzy bitch was speaking the truth.
Don’t you agree NNK.

I wonder how many other people wrote on social media condemning the perpetrators of the crime.

Life must be hard for you NNK.
I hope you get well soon.

Life is fine here hound, just an annoying cough.  Of course, it would be a little better if people actually got the obvious point of a post without it having to be explained to them!  I mean, it was all there in the link I posted; perhaps you didn't bother to read beyond the headline?

Well of course i did NNK which is why i asked you the question and said that PP was telling the truth.
Dont start assuming stuff like some of our other posters.
Merry Christmas.

Nope, what she said only became the truth once the court session ended; prior to that it was just speculation which could have, (negatively), impacted the outcome of the trial.
 
Merry Christmas to you too Hound, hope you have a good one.

[Donnywolf]

.... AND precisiely why they usually say - well there is a criminal investigation underway / ongoing litigation / ongoing Court Case .....(and other such phrases) .... so you will appreciate I cannot comment specifically on this Case.

... AND Interviewers will say I appreciate  there is a criminal investigation underway / ongoing litigation / ongoing Court Case .....(and other such phrases) .... so whilst I appreciate you cannot comment specifically on this Case could you perhaps talk in a general way about ........
 

[drfchound]

The dizzy bitch strikes again....
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-55403058
 
How do these people stay in a job?

It turns out though that the dizzy bitch was speaking the truth.
Don’t you agree NNK.

I wonder how many other people wrote on social media condemning the perpetrators of the crime.

Life must be hard for you NNK.
I hope you get well soon.

Life is fine here hound, just an annoying cough.  Of course, it would be a little better if people actually got the obvious point of a post without it having to be explained to them!  I mean, it was all there in the link I posted; perhaps you didn't bother to read beyond the headline?

Well of course i did NNK which is why i asked you the question and said that PP was telling the truth.
Dont start assuming stuff like some of our other posters.
Merry Christmas.

Nope, what she said only became the truth once the court session ended; prior to that it was just speculation which could have, (negatively), impacted the outcome of the trial.
 
Merry Christmas to you too Hound, hope you have a good one.

NNK, point of order here.
I actually said that “it turns out she was telling the truth”.
That clearly says “it turns out” so means that after the conviction she was right.
My comment never indicated that PP was right prior to the conviction.

[sha66y]

You lot should link arms and march with banners,

all this 1980s bottled up anger

Priti is bang tidy so who cares what she does politically

[SydneyRover]

chesus shaggy on the eggnog already

[Bentley Bullet]

Sha66y may have been on the eggnog last night, but this morning he will be sober, and Priti will still be bang tidy.

[NickDRFC]

Bang tidy? She’s not bad looking but way too hefty for my liking. Still, to each their own!

[EasyforDennis]

Some of you lot must be pretty desperate if you think Patel is anywhere remotely close to decent. She looks like the biggest easter egg you have ever seen on legs.

[Bentley Bullet]

Some of you lot must be pretty desperate if you think Patel is anywhere remotely close to decent. She looks like the biggest easter egg you have ever seen on legs.

Bet you daren't say that about Diane Abbott, the handful of snowflakes would be determined that the site had a White Christmas!