0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Appears that Ofqual's algorithm caused today's A-level chaos. Ofqual chair Roger Taylor, also chairs the Centre for Data Ethics & Innovation (CDEI). Dominic Cummings' fave AI consultants - Faculty, have some juicy contracts with CDEI. And Faculty's COO Richard Sargeant is on CDEI board.https://twitter.com/MilesKing10/status/1293886007771893762
Quote from: wilts rover on August 16, 2020, 11:01:25 amAppears that Ofqual's algorithm caused today's A-level chaos. Ofqual chair Roger Taylor, also chairs the Centre for Data Ethics & Innovation (CDEI). Dominic Cummings' fave AI consultants - Faculty, have some juicy contracts with CDEI. And Faculty's COO Richard Sargeant is on CDEI board.https://twitter.com/MilesKing10/status/1293886007771893762LOLIt’s like the Kevin Bacon link game but with Dominic Cummings. Ha ha.
Quote from: belton rover on August 16, 2020, 11:22:37 amQuote from: wilts rover on August 16, 2020, 11:01:25 amAppears that Ofqual's algorithm caused today's A-level chaos. Ofqual chair Roger Taylor, also chairs the Centre for Data Ethics & Innovation (CDEI). Dominic Cummings' fave AI consultants - Faculty, have some juicy contracts with CDEI. And Faculty's COO Richard Sargeant is on CDEI board.https://twitter.com/MilesKing10/status/1293886007771893762LOLIt’s like the Kevin Bacon link game but with Dominic Cummings. Ha ha.I don't know what the Kevin Bacon link game is - but if it relates to favouratism, cronisism and giving government contracts to your mates - well yes!
Gotta love how you just trivialise anything remotely not fitting with the argument you're making, belton. Truly awestruck.
Just a by-the-way because I've been accused of being shrill in daring to consider calling the Tories class warriors.I make my judgements on evidence. Here is the single most egregious example of class warfare that I e ever seen from a Government. In 2010, after they won the Election, the Tory led Govt ended Govt funding of Child Trust Funds. These had been set up by Gordon Brown to encourage poorer people to save for their kids. To get them started, the Govt paid in £500 to a fund for every child in the country. Parents and relatives could then pay in up to £1200 per year per child and any interest would be tax free.Those Govt payments were scrapped in 2010 because in the Austerity age it would have been "deceiving people to think they could have a handout from borrowed money." So everybody lost £500 per child. Because we were all in it together,right?Except.Straight afterwards, the Govt quietly raised the amount parents could pay I to the funds without paying tax on the interest. It had been £1200 per year.It is now £9000 per year.I reckon, with reasonable growth, anyone who can save £9000 per child per year (and hey! who can't?!?) will on average save more £500 per year in tax per child.A quite breathtaking example of taxing from the poor and giving to the rich.
I find myself growing increasingly frustrated with Starmer on this issue. He's written an article in the Mail today (which I'm not linking to because f**k them), which seems to have annoyed everyone a across the political spectrum. Now he's pushing for kids to be back in school next month "no ifs, no buts". Near silence from his education secretary, too. It comes across as a complete lack of leadership on the issue, and that he's more interested in mildly scolding the government whatever they do. Whoever's advising him needs a kick up the arse. Some clarification is needed urgently.I say this as someone who voted for him and has supported him whole heartedly til now, even as he seems to be fudging every one of his election manifesto promises.
MachoFor me, your points about Starmer shows just what an impossible task any government would have during this crisis.Even the pretend government can’t get it right for the pretend people.
But if Starmer can’t do it with monopoly money and Lego, then he is either incompetent beyond belief or the real job is impossible to get right for everybody.
Quote from: belton rover on August 16, 2020, 03:53:31 pmBut if Starmer can’t do it with monopoly money and Lego, then he is either incompetent beyond belief or the real job is impossible to get right for everybody.Thing is... Starmer can't do it anyway because he isn't the Prime Minister.
Utter, utter shambles.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-53799860Sixth Form Colleges which often take some of the poorest kids have been hit particularly hard."The Sixth Form Colleges Association (SFCA) said it looked at 65,000 exam entries in 41 subjects from sixth form colleges and found that grades were 20% lower than historic performances for similar students in those colleges."So much for the algorithmic Government that Cummings is maniacally unrolling. First major challenge and it has utterly failed.And those who are saying "No problem - it'll get sorted out on appeal" are totally missing the point. Universities are already filling up their courses with students who are happy with their grades, including the I dependent school kids who we know have massively benefited from this algorithm, with A & A* grades up 11%.The elite Universities will have their courses stuffed full of these independent school kids. And this Universities have been barred from extending their course numbers this year, because that would unfairly grab market share from Universities further down the chain. So when the state school and 6th Form College disaster is sorted out, there won't be places for many of these kids at the elite Universities.
It's an impossible task and they've got a lot right, but also a number wrong, exactly what you'd expect. It's an impossible situation. I think the weighting for independent schools is questionable, but actually when you compare the rest it overly doesn't look too outrageous.The big problem is how do you treat the outliers in schools. My school was a failing school with really low grades. I'd have been screwed in this situation. What they need to do is apply a sensible appeals process and quickly for those examples. On a whole the numbers look fine, but not analysing each case is wrong in my view.