0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: DonnyBazR0ver on October 11, 2020, 06:29:01 pmI may be missing something but, the overall proposal doesn't seem that abhorrent does it?We all want rid of the parachute payments don't we? If that money is filtered down more equally then its more likely to close the gap isn't it?Reducing to 18 teams? This has been on the table for a long long time. The sceptical view is it will create more time for the big clubs to play lucrative games elsewhere rather than reduce the number of fixtures. Time will tell.I guess one of the more contentious points will be the number of teams promoted/relegated. The pyramid needs to remain fluid. In an 18 team league maybe two places plus a play off as suggested in the article might be workable.What I don't understand, is this special status for the likes of Everton etc. Does anyone else understand what that means? Two less teams in the EFL. No more EFL Cup (meaning less chance of ties like our trip to Arsenal a few seasons ago), hand-me-down money as if the Premier League own us. Less promotion opportunities into the top flight from the EFL. Potential right to decide rules that only affect EFL clubs. What elements of these are acceptable?Or the sheer fact it's as if they'll only help out EFL clubs if they can have all these extra powers. They should be helping out anyway, they already take so much of the sport's money in this country, to the extent that they're all out buying 50, 60, 70 million pound players while we're struggling to survive the pandemics impact.That's without even getting into the proposals regarding the increased voting power of the biggest clubs and right of veto over takeovers of other clubs.It is an attempt by the biggest clubs to take an even bigger slice of the cash, a blatantly selfish and greedy one. All backed by the man whose job it is supposed to be to protect the interests of clubs in the EFL, not the Premier League. It will kill the game as we know it in this country.
I may be missing something but, the overall proposal doesn't seem that abhorrent does it?We all want rid of the parachute payments don't we? If that money is filtered down more equally then its more likely to close the gap isn't it?Reducing to 18 teams? This has been on the table for a long long time. The sceptical view is it will create more time for the big clubs to play lucrative games elsewhere rather than reduce the number of fixtures. Time will tell.I guess one of the more contentious points will be the number of teams promoted/relegated. The pyramid needs to remain fluid. In an 18 team league maybe two places plus a play off as suggested in the article might be workable.What I don't understand, is this special status for the likes of Everton etc. Does anyone else understand what that means?
Depends how they propose distributing it! Will the Championship get 80% of it, for example?It should be shared equally, but I’ll bet it isn’t.
The radio news just said that a quarter of the Prem tv money would filter down to the EFL.Surely that would be a good thing!
This isn't the EPL by the way, its the top six clubs with a lot of support from the EFL. They, or rather Rick Parry, are just as much to blame.
But what if we become one of the clubs that others won’t be facing every week?
Quote from: bedale rover on October 11, 2020, 05:14:20 pmIf all EFL fans stopped buying sky sports and BT then this would (hopefully) decimate their income and their attempts at world dominationTV rights are global. It'll be worth a lot of money in the UK but they'll get far more selling it around the world
If all EFL fans stopped buying sky sports and BT then this would (hopefully) decimate their income and their attempts at world domination
Quote from: silent majority on October 12, 2020, 04:48:46 pmThis isn't the EPL by the way, its the top six clubs with a lot of support from the EFL. They, or rather Rick Parry, are just as much to blame.Based on the way everyone from the Premier League to the government has responded, it seems the entire thing is cooked up by Liverpool, Man Utd and Rick Parry pretty much on their own.They all ought to be pilloried for it.
Can’t believe that some on here are taken in by this. The top PL clubs are effectively going for a major power grab whilst the EFL is weak, aided and abetted by that scumbag Parry. Fortunately this is also the view of Oliver Dowden in an interview this morning. The PL now earns more than the next 4 European leagues combined and he considers there is more than enough in the pit to assist the EFL. He also indicated that if the PL did not do it voluntarily, it may be time for the government and the FA to strengthen governance to ensure it happens. Long overdue I’d say.
Quote from: Frankie Rennie on October 12, 2020, 08:07:14 pmCan’t believe that some on here are taken in by this. The top PL clubs are effectively going for a major power grab whilst the EFL is weak, aided and abetted by that scumbag Parry. Fortunately this is also the view of Oliver Dowden in an interview this morning. The PL now earns more than the next 4 European leagues combined and he considers there is more than enough in the pit to assist the EFL. He also indicated that if the PL did not do it voluntarily, it may be time for the government and the FA to strengthen governance to ensure it happens. Long overdue I’d say.Your own club wanted that power grab a few years ago by wanting a PL closed shop, I bet your club is not so keen now