0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
https://youtu.be/lW-14XOTKdM
Where's the cavalry?
If by "fine" you mean "5-10% poorer over the long run but with blue passports" then I couldn't agree more.
Wait until the house of cards fall after we leave
DD.In my own case, my company is working bloody hard to make a success of our future every single day. Just like it has been doing for 20 years. And I absolutely agree that all of us need to do whatever we can to make the future as successful as possible.But there is a flip side to that. Those who voted for the situation we are now in, equally have a responsibility to reflect on that, and ask themselves whether they fully understood that they were voting to make Britain significantly poorer than it otherwise would have been.Because if you don't reflect on what you have done, and take responsibility for it, you are likely to not learn and develop.Instead, we still have Leave supporters insisting that we don't know what the economic outcome will be. Given the mass of detailed economic research, all pointing in the same direction towards a very big hit on our economic performance, that attitude is wilfull ignorance and washing hands of responsibility.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on December 09, 2020, 02:59:27 pmDD.In my own case, my company is working bloody hard to make a success of our future every single day. Just like it has been doing for 20 years. And I absolutely agree that all of us need to do whatever we can to make the future as successful as possible.But there is a flip side to that. Those who voted for the situation we are now in, equally have a responsibility to reflect on that, and ask themselves whether they fully understood that they were voting to make Britain significantly poorer than it otherwise would have been.Because if you don't reflect on what you have done, and take responsibility for it, you are likely to not learn and develop.Instead, we still have Leave supporters insisting that we don't know what the economic outcome will be. Given the mass of detailed economic research, all pointing in the same direction towards a very big hit on our economic performance, that attitude is wilfull ignorance and washing hands of responsibility. would you also agree that the remainers trying to get a second referendum didn’t help? There could have been a deal with may but instead of accepting that or trying to get a better deal than that the only outcome the majority of the remainers wanted was to overturn the vote rather than find a deal?
Whilst this may not be our ultimate future where would the harm be in forming relationships like this whilst we foment trading agreements with the rump EU/USA/Asia pacific, ect.Now that we have left the EU our future policy is obviously going to different to what we had when an EU member, i would say these relationships will be developed alongside the interim arrangements we have already made with 50plus other nations.It wont be the same but it will be where our future lies, we need to make a success of it.Many influential and educated people need to except this rational, stop fighting yesterdays battles and put their efforts into making a success of our future.
I’m looking forward to Trawler Wars. Getting bored of watching repeats of Deadliest Catch
If i remember rightly, when it got to the situation where Bercow had taken over parliament and was allowing certain factions in the commons to take over proceedings it got to the stage where May's hands were tired and she had to include the wider house in discussions about a compromise and a wider deal that the whole house could agree on. It go to to the stage where a well organised cabal of opposition MP's could of taken control and the agenda to proceedThe fact that certain elements in the Labour party decided to hijack it and demand that Corbyn had to be the de facto leader meant that the Libdems could nor agree to accept this, resulting in the whole plan collapsing. what followed was parliament deciding it could not agree to anything tabled representing some some sort of a compromise. This whole charade resulting in the general election won by Johnson.What we now have is a situation created by the weasel words of vested interests in opposition parties. Politicians don't you just luv em.
Joking aside, about half of the UK’s catch quota is sold off to foreign boats already. It’s all well and good fighting for control of our waters, but we give up half of what we could catch already? Unless of course there is to be a boom in the uk fishing industry again, but this would be reliant on the Europeans buying our stock from us, with tariffs imposed. Other than the local chip shop fare or maybe tinned salmon and tuna, we are not big fish eaters are we?
Quote from: danumdon on December 09, 2020, 04:32:08 pmIf i remember rightly, when it got to the situation where Bercow had taken over parliament and was allowing certain factions in the commons to take over proceedings it got to the stage where May's hands were tired and she had to include the wider house in discussions about a compromise and a wider deal that the whole house could agree on. It go to to the stage where a well organised cabal of opposition MP's could of taken control and the agenda to proceedThe fact that certain elements in the Labour party decided to hijack it and demand that Corbyn had to be the de facto leader meant that the Libdems could nor agree to accept this, resulting in the whole plan collapsing. what followed was parliament deciding it could not agree to anything tabled representing some some sort of a compromise. This whole charade resulting in the general election won by Johnson.What we now have is a situation created by the weasel words of vested interests in opposition parties. Politicians don't you just luv em.This is a highly partial version of events and, if i may say so without being accused of being condescending, a bit of a mixed up one. You are confusing what happened in early 2019 under May, and what happened in late 2019, under Johnson.Here's a broader take on what happened.As I said, the key division occurred with the Lancaster House announcement by May in January 2017. Once she had decided to interpret the 2016 vote as meaning that we had to go for a much harder Brexit than had EVER been proposed by the Leave side in 2016 [1], she had effectively destroyed any chance of a unified approach to Brexit, carrying cross-party support (and remember, the leader of the Labour party had spent his life wanting us out of the EU and would have jumped at the chance of a Brexit that he could sell to his party). She made that decision to cement her own position in an increasingly right wing Tory party.And she forgot the first law of the jungle. if you feed the tiger, it'll only keep coming back, and when it comes back and finds you without food...So, she'd given the whip hand to the 100 or so most hardline Brexiters in the Tory party. And when she negotiated a Withdrawal Deal that was far more extreme than anything anyone had discussed in 2016, they said it wasn't hard enough and they voted her down.That is all established fact, but you have skipped over it and gone straight to September/October 2019. By this time (with May long gone by the way) we were looking at crashing out of the EU without even having a Withdrawal Agreement. That was an appalling situation, which by a long, long way, a majority of the country and a majority of MPs did not want to happen. But Johnson raised the ante by effectively stopping MPs from being able to enact the actual will of the people, when he illegally prorogued Parliament sending Rees-Mogg to lie to the Queen about the reasons). Given that disgraceful abuse of process, MPs took over control of the order book in October 2019 to make damn sure that Johnson wasn't going to crash us out then without a Withdrawal Agreement.Ignoring all of that and saying that Bercow and a faction took over is like saying America dropped an atom bomb on Japan in 1945, without discussing Pearl Harbour and the subsequent 3.5 years.[1] The Leave side called suggestions that Brexit would mean leaving the Single Market "Project Fear". A senior Tory Leave supporter in 2016 said only a madman would suggest leaving the Market. Farage repeatedly said sarcastically, "wouldn't it awful if we ended up like Norway?" Norway is in the Single Market. After the Lancaster House speech, Govt policy was to leave the Single Market. Brexit supporters frequently said after that that any hint that we would stay in the Single Market was a betrayal of the Will of the People. How they knew what the Will of the People was, when the people had never been asked that question is anyone's guess.