0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: wilts rover on December 06, 2020, 08:44:43 pmQuote from: normal rules on December 06, 2020, 08:10:31 pmMore info has come out about this incident. The Millwall Facebook page makes interesting reading. The vast majority on their support anti racism, but do not support BLM.Also worth noting is that one of the black players for Derby raised a clenched fist during the taking of the knee. This is believed to signify the “black power “ movement. These are black supremacists. Adds a different dimension to proceedings perhaps?It’s also clear now that Millwall FC were fully expecting an adverse reaction to taking the knee as their had been supporter engagement prior to the game. A supporter contingent expressly stated they supported anti racism, but not the BLM movement. The club chose to continue. Booing your own players performing an anti-racist gesture is a funny way of showing you are anti-racist if you ask me. I reckon it's the difference between what you say - and what you do.It also differs remarkabley from what the club - and players - say. As noted above.As an ex-veteran yourself you might be interested in how taking a knee has come to be used as an anti-racist gesture - so you can put people right on this.It's history goes back to Martin Luther King pausing on a civil rights march in Alabama in 1965:https://globalnews.ca/news/3769534/martin-luther-king-jr-take-a-knee-history/However Colin Kapernick got the idea of reviving it from an ex-US special forces veteran. As that is how they honour their comrades who have fallen in action:And, you know, people - in my opinions and in my experience, kneeling's never been in our history really seen as a disrespectful act. I mean, people kneel when they get knighted. You kneel to propose to your wife, and you take a knee to pray. And soldiers often take a knee in front of a fallen brother's grave to pay respects. So I thought, if anything, besides standing, that was the most respectful. But, of course, that's just my opinion.https://www.npr.org/2018/09/09/646115651/the-veteran-and-nfl-player-who-advised-kaepernick-to-take-a-knee?t=1607286437834Yep, I was aware of this. Quarterback knee I believe it was coined.It is a shame though that the act of taking the knee has been associated rightly or wrongly with the BLM movement. The movement as I am sure you are aware, is huge and will have a very wide spread of differing opinions and bias within it. Some low key, some middle ground and some downright extreme, violent and worrying.I suspect those at Millwall, reading, West Ham and Colchester protest against the extremist ideology that definitely exists within this movement. I whole heartedly support anti racism. You never heard supporters booing the wearing of armbands or shirt logos for the kick it out campaign. BLM is rapidly becoming politically motivated. There is news that a Black Lives Matter uk movement has applied for political status to be voted on , possibly next year. Although no one is admitting affiliation to this officially. The 2000 that were in the Den on Saturday would have been die hard supporters. Sth no doubt. Life long supporters. They have voiced their opinion, rightly or wrongly and are being hammered by the MSM and Millwall fc. Their club will suffer as a result, of this there is no doubt. Sponsors may pull out, players and agents may be reluctant to go their, some current players may want to leave. Youngsters may steer clear of academy teams.Other supporters at other clubs have booed. No media coverage?Millwall play at home on Tuesday night. Some of their supporters are already predicting issues. If Romeo does not play they are saying it’s because of the fans. If fans boo again then The players may leave the pitch. Some are advocating not going at all and a boycott. One thing is certain. The worlds cameras will be watching.Football at the Den will never be the same again. As one fan put it, Millwall fc has declared civil war on its own core supporter base.The question remains , was the booing instigated by the knee taking only, or was the raised fist a factor?I too look forward to Axholme Lions take on this.
Quote from: normal rules on December 06, 2020, 08:10:31 pmMore info has come out about this incident. The Millwall Facebook page makes interesting reading. The vast majority on their support anti racism, but do not support BLM.Also worth noting is that one of the black players for Derby raised a clenched fist during the taking of the knee. This is believed to signify the “black power “ movement. These are black supremacists. Adds a different dimension to proceedings perhaps?It’s also clear now that Millwall FC were fully expecting an adverse reaction to taking the knee as their had been supporter engagement prior to the game. A supporter contingent expressly stated they supported anti racism, but not the BLM movement. The club chose to continue. Booing your own players performing an anti-racist gesture is a funny way of showing you are anti-racist if you ask me. I reckon it's the difference between what you say - and what you do.It also differs remarkabley from what the club - and players - say. As noted above.As an ex-veteran yourself you might be interested in how taking a knee has come to be used as an anti-racist gesture - so you can put people right on this.It's history goes back to Martin Luther King pausing on a civil rights march in Alabama in 1965:https://globalnews.ca/news/3769534/martin-luther-king-jr-take-a-knee-history/However Colin Kapernick got the idea of reviving it from an ex-US special forces veteran. As that is how they honour their comrades who have fallen in action:And, you know, people - in my opinions and in my experience, kneeling's never been in our history really seen as a disrespectful act. I mean, people kneel when they get knighted. You kneel to propose to your wife, and you take a knee to pray. And soldiers often take a knee in front of a fallen brother's grave to pay respects. So I thought, if anything, besides standing, that was the most respectful. But, of course, that's just my opinion.https://www.npr.org/2018/09/09/646115651/the-veteran-and-nfl-player-who-advised-kaepernick-to-take-a-knee?t=1607286437834
More info has come out about this incident. The Millwall Facebook page makes interesting reading. The vast majority on their support anti racism, but do not support BLM.Also worth noting is that one of the black players for Derby raised a clenched fist during the taking of the knee. This is believed to signify the “black power “ movement. These are black supremacists. Adds a different dimension to proceedings perhaps?It’s also clear now that Millwall FC were fully expecting an adverse reaction to taking the knee as their had been supporter engagement prior to the game. A supporter contingent expressly stated they supported anti racism, but not the BLM movement. The club chose to continue.
Fans go to games to watch football, not to receive a political sermon from people who are getting paid to play football.
QuoteFans go to games to watch football, not to receive a political sermon from people who are getting paid to play football.So, no more minute silence at Remembrance Weekend matches then?
It's people making a public show of their beliefs and opinions.You either support that or you don't. Be consistent.
Unbelievable that this should be compared to Remembrance Sunday.
Unbelievable that some people thing taking the knee is wrong. No one is asking you to do it. It doesn't get in the way of the game, just as the 'group hug' or the handshaking with players who've already been with each other in the changing room doesn't. Or perhaps you think the players should just run out of the tunnel, line up and get on with the game?
How about seeing it as not "giving political opinions"?How about seeing it as expressing solidarity with a section of the population that has experienced sustained and deep discrimination for decades?
How many times does this need saying.?The use of “Black Lives matter” as a slogan in support of protests against racism such as taking the knee is NOT the same as the political entity called Black Lives Matter.. taking the knee is therefore not political.
The slogan isn't political. The far-right have tried to tie it into politics so it's easier to undermine the movement. It's the same thing they've done for decades. Why should the black civil rights movement change their approach to accommodate fragile white boomers who are already looking for any reason to ignore BLM anyway? Nobody stops talking about green eco-friendly stuff just because we have a Green party. Should Rosa Parks have decided to sit a few seats further back so it didn't upset people like you?
Quote from: MachoMadness on December 07, 2020, 03:19:52 pmThe slogan isn't political. The far-right have tried to tie it into politics so it's easier to undermine the movement. It's the same thing they've done for decades. Why should the black civil rights movement change their approach to accommodate fragile white boomers who are already looking for any reason to ignore BLM anyway? Nobody stops talking about green eco-friendly stuff just because we have a Green party. Should Rosa Parks have decided to sit a few seats further back so it didn't upset people like you?Is it too much to ask to be able to go to the match, meet your mates, watch the game and let off a bit of steam without being preached at? I am absolutely sick to death of it everywhere you go, ruining the enjoyment of what little life we are allowed to have.The club have chucked us under the bus to save themselves and the players.