Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:45:22 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: West Ham v Rovers  (Read 7905 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29526
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #120 on January 23, 2021, 04:21:12 pm by drfchound »
What the f**k was Halliday doing at that corner?








You really don’t like Brad do you.

I don't rate him at all.






Who would have thought that.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

jmt23

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1239
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #121 on January 23, 2021, 04:21:26 pm by jmt23 »
is that not a penalty? there players clearly jumped in to him, with no attempt for the ball

Bollinger

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 447
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #122 on January 23, 2021, 04:22:19 pm by Bollinger »
So according to Ekoku, Moore is putting his subs on to ‘give them a run out on this big stage’

Patronising *******

DonnyOsmond

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11170
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #123 on January 23, 2021, 04:22:31 pm by DonnyOsmond »
Lokilo concussed?

RoversAlias

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11889
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #124 on January 23, 2021, 04:24:35 pm by RoversAlias »
I know we're all feeling the sting of being well beaten but I really think the criticism of the commentary is unfair.

For one, it isn't biased. It's a neutral BBC team, Efan Ekoku used to play for Sheff Weds and Norwich, not West Ham, and as for the comments about us getting tired...it's true. The biggest difference between the teams has been the speed of movement and thought, they are fitter than us and all PL teams will be. Wright was blowing after 20 minutes because keeping up with Benrahma and Lanzini is much harder than dealing with third tier wingers.

Metalmicky

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5438
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #125 on January 23, 2021, 04:25:49 pm by Metalmicky »
Butler just took one right in the Jacob's.....

Bollinger

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 447
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #126 on January 23, 2021, 04:27:47 pm by Bollinger »
I know we're all feeling the sting of being well beaten but I really think the criticism of the commentary is unfair.

For one, it isn't biased. It's a neutral BBC team, Efan Ekoku used to play for Sheff Weds and Norwich, not West Ham, and as for the comments about us getting tired...it's true. The biggest difference between the teams has been the speed of movement and thought, they are fitter than us and all PL teams will be. Wright was blowing after 20 minutes because keeping up with Benrahma and Lanzini is much harder than dealing with third tier wingers.

I don’t think anyone has accused them of bias. It’s the patronising attitude that grates.

bigbadjack

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 717
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #127 on January 23, 2021, 04:27:59 pm by bigbadjack »
Iv had to mute the commentary and Iv got our lasses Bridgerton playing in the background

DRNaith

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3908
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #128 on January 23, 2021, 04:28:36 pm by DRNaith »
I know we're all feeling the sting of being well beaten but I really think the criticism of the commentary is unfair.

For one, it isn't biased. It's a neutral BBC team, Efan Ekoku used to play for Sheff Weds and Norwich, not West Ham, and as for the comments about us getting tired...it's true. The biggest difference between the teams has been the speed of movement and thought, they are fitter than us and all PL teams will be. Wright was blowing after 20 minutes because keeping up with Benrahma and Lanzini is much harder than dealing with third tier wingers.

I don't know if someone's had a word with them at half term, but certainly in the first half, many of the things they were saying was wrong, unfair and unnecessary

Plumbster

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 436
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #129 on January 23, 2021, 04:29:26 pm by Plumbster »
JT had to give it back to Simoes there

normal rules

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7895
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #130 on January 23, 2021, 04:34:42 pm by normal rules »
Consolation would be nice for confidence

EasyforDennis

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2584
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #131 on January 23, 2021, 04:35:11 pm by EasyforDennis »
And there we have the perfect example of everything that is wrong with the ridiculous off side interpretation by assistant referees. Fej was yards off side but he doesn't put his flag up.

normal rules

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7895
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #132 on January 23, 2021, 04:35:57 pm by normal rules »
Ffs

RoversAlias

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11889
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #133 on January 23, 2021, 04:36:18 pm by RoversAlias »
I know we're all feeling the sting of being well beaten but I really think the criticism of the commentary is unfair.

For one, it isn't biased. It's a neutral BBC team, Efan Ekoku used to play for Sheff Weds and Norwich, not West Ham, and as for the comments about us getting tired...it's true. The biggest difference between the teams has been the speed of movement and thought, they are fitter than us and all PL teams will be. Wright was blowing after 20 minutes because keeping up with Benrahma and Lanzini is much harder than dealing with third tier wingers.

I don’t think anyone has accused them of bias. It’s the patronising attitude that grates.

Someone did on a previous page. Anyway, I think it's been standard fair to be honest.

We've been better in the second half at any rate.

ian1980

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1358
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #134 on January 23, 2021, 04:36:41 pm by ian1980 »
Just as we started to put a few good pieces of play together, bang down the other end and 4-0

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29526
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #135 on January 23, 2021, 04:38:03 pm by drfchound »
Big shame that they scored there, just as we were starting to play a bit.
T-R making a difference.

DonnyOsmond

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11170
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #136 on January 23, 2021, 04:38:19 pm by DonnyOsmond »
Taylor Richards is better as a #8 than a #10. Making us tick since coming on. Just needs that consistency.

normal rules

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7895
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #137 on January 23, 2021, 04:38:48 pm by normal rules »
Speed, movement, quality.
Outdone in all three departments, in all areas of the field today.
No shame though. I can’t imagine what some of them whu players are on.

NickDRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6170
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #138 on January 23, 2021, 04:39:12 pm by NickDRFC »
Nice to see us actually play a bit this half, push into their half and threaten their goal. I’d far rather see us lose 4 nil trying to make game of it than lose 2 nil and lie down quietly.

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 29938
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #139 on January 23, 2021, 04:41:48 pm by Filo »
Nice to see us actually play a bit this half, push into their half and threaten their goal. I’d far rather see us lose 4 nil trying to make game of it than lose 2 nil and lie down quietly.

The difference is Richards, showing a bit of intent to go forward

RoversAlias

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11889
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #140 on January 23, 2021, 04:42:41 pm by RoversAlias »
I do feel pretty insulted by them bringing on a kid goalie for 10 minutes as if it's a friendly.

jmt23

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1239
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #141 on January 23, 2021, 04:43:54 pm by jmt23 »
You can now see the importance of Taylor Richards to this team - hell of a player who is at the wrong level with us.
May have been a bit more interesting with him on from the beginning, we would not have won though, WH are just too good.

anton123

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1537
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #142 on January 23, 2021, 04:43:58 pm by anton123 »
When Richards came off in the last game he was not happy and ignored Moore as he walked down tunnel, wonder if Moore left him on bench today as a result of this as it’s clear he should of started if it’s off quality alone ?

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29526
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #143 on January 23, 2021, 04:44:53 pm by drfchound »
No problem with that RA.
It gives the lad a first team debut.
That is all.

DRNaith

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3908
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #144 on January 23, 2021, 04:45:36 pm by DRNaith »
I don't think we were ever going to be able to compete, I'm just relieved that we haven't picked up any serious injuries, or red cards.

gillinghamrover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 676
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #145 on January 23, 2021, 04:46:19 pm by gillinghamrover »
I do feel pretty insulted by them bringing on a kid goalie for 10 minutes as if it's a friendly.
Did think the same

DonnyOsmond

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11170
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #146 on January 23, 2021, 04:47:03 pm by DonnyOsmond »
The keeper they've brought on has been on loan at League One so it's not a complete piss take.

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 29938
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #147 on January 23, 2021, 04:47:48 pm by Filo »
I do feel pretty insulted by them bringing on a kid goalie for 10 minutes as if it's a friendly.

Taking the piss in my opinion

bigbadjack

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 717
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #148 on January 23, 2021, 04:48:21 pm by bigbadjack »
I’d be more pissed off if they put him up front

idler

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 10733
Re: West Ham v Rovers
« Reply #149 on January 23, 2021, 04:50:11 pm by idler »
How many times do we say blood the youngsters when we are comfortable?

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012