Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 25, 2025, 11:45:59 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: Too negative  (Read 7371 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Cryax1

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
Re: Too negative
« Reply #30 on January 30, 2021, 05:54:45 pm by Cryax1 »
How can anyone be upset really they had the ball more than us today granted bit we held out and I do not think we will play a better team for the rest of this season the fact we came out on top is reason for celebration and optimism not the opposite..



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

Danmckay456

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1069
Re: Too negative
« Reply #31 on January 30, 2021, 05:56:07 pm by Danmckay456 »
You need to grind results out like this to get promoted and can’t play expansive all the time , give Moore credit we kept a clean sheet had a slice of luck and got 3 points - like my mate said at work last night could be a Mansfield away moment and hopefully so

DearneValleyRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 8019
Re: Too negative
« Reply #32 on January 30, 2021, 05:58:35 pm by DearneValleyRover »
I’ve seen us play like Lincoln have all the possession and lose 1-0 so many times but I’ve never seen us do the same until this season it’ll do for me

donnievic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3999
Re: Too negative
« Reply #33 on January 30, 2021, 05:58:55 pm by donnievic »
Wouldn’t surprise me at all if we set
Up to play like that and just hit them on the break and it worked,sum of our passing was poor again at times but we defended well as a unit even if we gave them maybe too much space out wide,but maybe that’s what moore wanted to do and just pack the middle out which apart from a few great blocks and 2 pens we wasn’t really troubled

MachoMadness

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6627
Re: Too negative
« Reply #34 on January 30, 2021, 06:00:32 pm by MachoMadness »
We let them have the ball and restricted them to long range pot shots mostly. It was clearly the game plan and it mostly worked. Some defensive slips for the penalties and they had a couple of big chances but they're top of the league, so of course they were going to create something. We largely managed the game well I thought.

But dear me, imagine seeing a win like that and coming on here moaning. You won't see another game like that this decade, if you can't enjoy that then football isn't the sport for you!

Big Fey

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 121
Re: Too negative
« Reply #35 on January 30, 2021, 06:02:56 pm by Big Fey »
Didn't arsenal win championships on the back of hard-fought 1 nil away wins?

idler

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 11496
Re: Too negative
« Reply #36 on January 30, 2021, 06:04:13 pm by idler »
If we had done that against West Ham I bet the OP would have had a different view.

Janso

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2240
Re: Too negative
« Reply #37 on January 30, 2021, 06:04:26 pm by Janso »
Let's just steady on a bit, lads and lasses.

Maybe his thread title's real purpose was to describe him and his post. Only explanation.

rich1471

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3187
Re: Too negative
« Reply #38 on January 30, 2021, 06:04:39 pm by rich1471 »
Great result and great 3 points but you can’t carry on playing like that it’s ridiculous, we got battered for 75 mins and although we won, it was wtf is going off here??? Went for a point got 3 so can’t complain but best form of defence is attack, we have the weapons to smash teams so why not do it.
glad I'm not in lockdown with you ,it must be really depressing , are you ever happy

since-1969

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 5219
Re: Too negative
« Reply #39 on January 30, 2021, 06:04:51 pm by since-1969 »
Great result and great 3 points but you can’t carry on playing like that it’s ridiculous, we got battered for 75 mins and although we won, it was wtf is going off here??? Went for a point got 3 so can’t complain but best form of defence is attack, we have the weapons to smash teams so why not do it.
When will we stop pretending  we know better than Darren Moore . A win was what we got because we defended well and stopped 2 penalties which IS defending also . The only person complaining about the win apart from YOU will be Phil Parkinson . 

Why Parkinson?
well he might be bothered !!

Campsall rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 14394
Re: Too negative
« Reply #40 on January 30, 2021, 06:18:25 pm by Campsall rover »
After we took the lead I think we played exactly as the plan would have been.
Get bodies behind the ball and frustrate them. We did exactly that.

We were never going to go all out attack and play into their hands were we.
Just play on the break when the opportunity arose.

Northants Nomad

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 938
Re: Too negative
« Reply #41 on January 30, 2021, 06:22:34 pm by Northants Nomad »
After we took the lead I think we played exactly as the plan would have been.
Get bodies behind the ball and frustrate them. We did exactly that.

We were never going to go all out attack and play into their hands were we.
Just play on the break when the opportunity arose.

I agree. With the extra spice of "hey, let's make it exciting by giving them not one, but two penalties, then block them out too".

sha66y

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3310
Re: Too negative
« Reply #42 on January 30, 2021, 06:39:16 pm by sha66y »
Very very negative if you were expecting us to dominate the team sat at the top of the league, however we played a subduing game which never looks good but works....
Look at it this way Michael.....we managed to keep out the top team for a good 75-80 minutes of sustained pressure, it doesn’t matter that we didn’t compete in an attacking manner, we didn’t have to, they did and they failed miserably ....take heart from the fact that we can score goals, and we’ve shown that we can defend mentally....

I think the team will be better for this type of game, and the goalie will be ten foot tall from now to the season end....

These are the shitty games that become real turning points in a teams fortunes, because the players will have learnt so much....

Ya right....too negative....but a real learning curve

POD

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 804
Re: Too negative
« Reply #43 on January 30, 2021, 06:41:57 pm by POD »
After we took the lead I think we played exactly as the plan would have been.
Get bodies behind the ball and frustrate them. We did exactly that.

We were never going to go all out attack and play into their hands were we.
Just play on the break when the opportunity arose.

I think that DM has a game plan for each individual game which includes a sub plan in case we go ahead (like today) or go behind (which hasn’t happened much of late).  The Opening Poster intimates that you should play the same way each game irrespective of who is the opposition, but that will probably lead to as many defeats as wins and won’t achieve promotion. 
 
The opposition will always have a lot to do with the plan and a great example of this has to be the Rochdale game last week where we played a ‘measured’ game and for the first time in ages they didn’t score.   We could have played a more attacking game and perhaps drawn 3-3 or 4-4.

Today we rode our luck and we could easily have been on the wrong end of the scoreline, but credit to DM, his initial game planning and ‘in-game’ planning seem to be working.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 34740
Re: Too negative
« Reply #44 on January 30, 2021, 06:43:48 pm by drfchound »
I think I have read or heard a stat that says we have every league game this season in which we have scored first.

roversdude

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 14009
Re: Too negative
« Reply #45 on January 30, 2021, 06:44:58 pm by roversdude »
Welcome back Michael I bet it’s killing you not having defeats to jump all over
Enjoy the moment

donnievic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3999
Re: Too negative
« Reply #46 on January 30, 2021, 06:50:49 pm by donnievic »
Only downside I would say aswell as we defended as a unit is big if I know but IF Lincoln had scored both their pens how many would be on here moaning saying that was absolute rubbish and we got murdered.But we didn’t lol

ravenrover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 11358
Re: Too negative
« Reply #47 on January 30, 2021, 07:05:30 pm by ravenrover »
My goodness how successful has this attention seeker been post after post to his nonsense. Let him post and just ignore him

Campsall rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 14394
Re: Too negative
« Reply #48 on January 30, 2021, 07:13:50 pm by Campsall rover »
Only downside I would say aswell as we defended as a unit is big if I know but IF Lincoln had scored both their pens how many would be on here moaning saying that was absolute rubbish and we got murdered.But we didn’t lol
It’s all about the result.  Yes as an attacking force we saw much less than usual but that doesn’t make it a poor performance.
I thought we were magnificent at closing down the space and denying Lincoln clear cut chances to score.
The work rate in the 2nd half from the whole team was fantastic and is a credit to the fitness levels of the team
2 or 3 people said Halliday looked tired. Well if that was a tired performance he would be Superman if he wasn’t tired. His work rate was phenomenal imo.

Campsall rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 14394
Re: Too negative
« Reply #49 on January 30, 2021, 07:16:59 pm by Campsall rover »
In response to the OP the only thing too negative is the person with initials MG.

scawsby steve

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 9779
Re: Too negative
« Reply #50 on January 30, 2021, 07:21:01 pm by scawsby steve »
Great result and great 3 points but you can’t carry on playing like that it’s ridiculous, we got battered for 75 mins and although we won, it was wtf is going off here??? Went for a point got 3 so can’t complain but best form of defence is attack, we have the weapons to smash teams so why not do it.
When will we stop pretending  we know better than Darren Moore . A win was what we got because we defended well and stopped 2 penalties which IS defending also . The only person complaining about the win apart from YOU will be Phil Parkinson . 

Why Parkinson?
well he might be bothered !!

I think Michael Appleton is more likely to be bothered.

PDX_Rover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 9653
Re: Too negative
« Reply #51 on January 30, 2021, 07:22:31 pm by PDX_Rover »
In response to the OP the only thing too negative is the person with initials MG.

michael gove?

Michael Gibson

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 280
Re: Too negative
« Reply #52 on January 30, 2021, 07:23:40 pm by Michael Gibson »
To all the idiots slagging me off, I’m just stating playing like that is a risk and yes today it paid off, but if your willing to play loosing 72 per cent possession thats not good, it’s shit to watch and teams like Lincoln would be up against it with a few attacks there nothing special

Darren

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 472
Re: Too negative
« Reply #53 on January 30, 2021, 07:25:27 pm by Darren »
To all the idiots slagging me off, I’m just stating playing like that is a risk and yes tod
ay it paid off, but if your willing to play loosing 72 per cent possession thats not good, it’s shit to watch and teams like Lincoln would be up against it with a few attacks there nothing special
You still here?

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21384
Re: Too negative
« Reply #54 on January 30, 2021, 07:29:17 pm by IDM »
Do you honestly think the team went out to give Lincoln 70%+ of the possession.?  Really.?

That was just how it happened.. Lincoln are a good side and were top for a reason.

By the way, in case you hadn’t noticed, we’ve won 8 out of the last 9 league matches.  Is that not good enough for you.?  If we don’t win 5 or 6 nowt every week it’s shit.?

If you fell into a barrel of tits you would emerge sucking your thumb.!


POD

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 804
Re: Too negative
« Reply #55 on January 30, 2021, 07:31:49 pm by POD »
Do you honestly think the team went out to give Lincoln 70%+ of the possession.?  Really.?

That was just how it happened.. Lincoln are a good side and were top for a reason.

By the way, in case you hadn’t noticed, we’ve won 8 out of the last 9 league matches.  Is that not good enough for you.?  If we don’t win 5 or 6 nowt every week it’s shit.?

If you fell into a barrel of tits you would emerge sucking your thumb.!



The one game we have lost out of 9 is the home game against Shrewsbury where they played much the same way as we played today..... and it worked for them and it worked for us today. 

RobTheRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17943
Re: Too negative
« Reply #56 on January 30, 2021, 07:35:18 pm by RobTheRover »
To win football games you need to best the opposition in both attacks and defending.

We did that today. That doesn't mean you have to attack more than them, you just have to have more success than them. Same for defending.

Nothing to moan about.

And anyone who thought today was "shit" does not know football in the slightest. I was gripped. It was pure theatre and the last 15 minutes was proper edge of seat stuff.

Branton Rover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 2332
Re: Too negative
« Reply #57 on January 30, 2021, 07:36:25 pm by Branton Rover »
Is this a joke post ? Clearly a piss take - we’ve gone there with a solid back line & 2 holding midfielders and pulled off a great result with 2 tremendous penalty saves & this clown is moaning about setting up for a point ! Call the men in the white coats

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17804
Re: Too negative
« Reply #58 on January 30, 2021, 07:41:14 pm by dickos1 »
To all the idiots slagging me off, I’m just stating playing like that is a risk and yes today it paid off, but if your willing to play loosing 72 per cent possession thats not good, it’s shit to watch and teams like Lincoln would be up against it with a few attacks there nothing special

I’d stop talking,
Embarrassing yourself

Lesonthewest

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3767
Re: Too negative
« Reply #59 on January 30, 2021, 07:45:06 pm by Lesonthewest »
I thought that was a brilliant team performance today & DM got it spot on, only criticism was we gave the ball away cheaply & our passing wasn't our usual standard, but boy did we dig in to a man. I disagree with the OP, but I respect his views even though I disagree with them. But at least I wouldn't throw insults at him for it, it's wrong & uncalled for in my opinion. Great result & top team performance, well done to the players & management.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2021, 01:38:07 am by Lesonthewest »

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012