0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: normal rules on November 16, 2021, 10:15:45 pmQuote from: sha66y on November 16, 2021, 08:42:15 pmNearly every advert on TV has a mixed race family in it, surely to god that doesn’t represent anything reasonably normal other than patronising the coloured folks! Shaggy, you were onto something with your original point. But that c word is classed as a racial slur in many parts of the world. Including the uk. Worthy of modification imho, and lesson learnt. NR , that C word is the only word available when the range is so vast within that particular spectrum, we break down the other colours like sky blue to midnight blue! Yet fear to do this with brown people ….so we call them “ BLACK.” …. Can you not see how bad that is?They are not black, they are beautiful swaths of brown!
Quote from: sha66y on November 16, 2021, 08:42:15 pmNearly every advert on TV has a mixed race family in it, surely to god that doesn’t represent anything reasonably normal other than patronising the coloured folks! Shaggy, you were onto something with your original point. But that c word is classed as a racial slur in many parts of the world. Including the uk. Worthy of modification imho, and lesson learnt.
Nearly every advert on TV has a mixed race family in it, surely to god that doesn’t represent anything reasonably normal other than patronising the coloured folks!
FOBABAR.I think the whole thing is summed up by this.Fear of being accused of being a racist. The likes of the bbc are shit scared of mis or under representing anyone these days .
Quote from: normal rules on November 18, 2021, 09:05:17 amFOBABAR.I think the whole thing is summed up by this.Fear of being accused of being a racist. The likes of the bbc are shit scared of mis or under representing anyone these days . To a degree perhaps.Eastenders for instance, is still out of date and unrepresentative of the communities found in East London today.
Quote from: belton rover on November 17, 2021, 06:38:45 pmAnd you would have described the family who moved in next door to you as ‘coloured’ if they had the same skin tone as you?And when you said ‘I think I’ll stick to calling them the “ coloured folk”, who are ‘them’? You wouldn't describe anyone as being coloured. It's meaningless.Describing someone as coloured then is shorthand for dark coloured, which is getting towards terms like 'darky' and so is discriminatory.
And you would have described the family who moved in next door to you as ‘coloured’ if they had the same skin tone as you?And when you said ‘I think I’ll stick to calling them the “ coloured folk”, who are ‘them’?
"coloured can refer to white people actually" is one of the most insane things I've ever read. My patience for this kind of disingenuous shit wore out 10 years ago, god bless anyone trying to engage this nonsense in good faith.If we're all one big happy family and everyone is "coloured" there's really no point in crying about how many "coloured" people you see in adverts is there?
It's about intent. You can use a word through ignorance or by mistake and not mean offence.Use a potentially offensive word in a message in which you're complaining that there's too many of "them" on the telly and you've got a job on arguing that you're not discriminatory.
Quote from: MachoMadness on November 17, 2021, 07:05:44 pm"coloured can refer to white people actually" is one of the most insane things I've ever read. My patience for this kind of disingenuous shit wore out 10 years ago, god bless anyone trying to engage this nonsense in good faith.If we're all one big happy family and everyone is "coloured" there's really no point in crying about how many "coloured" people you see in adverts is there?Your ignorance of the subject matter is revelationary ….I said the portrayal of mixed race families in nearly every advert is sending an incorrect message………not that there are too many coloured folk in adverts…
"coloured can refer to white people actually" is one of the most insane things I've ever read. My patience for this kind of disingenuous shit wore out 10 years ago, god bless anyone trying to engage this nonsense in good faith.If we're all one big happy family and everyone is "coloured" there's really no point in crying about how many "coloured" people you see in adverts is there?
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on November 17, 2021, 07:17:48 pmIt's about intent. You can use a word through ignorance or by mistake and not mean offence.Use a potentially offensive word in a message in which you're complaining that there's too many of "them" on the telly and you've got a job on arguing that you're not discriminatory.Wrong!…wrong…NOT TOO MANY OF THEM ON TELLY,!!If every advert depicted a coloured family in whatever environment the advertisers found best to sell their product…I wouldn’t bat an eyelid, however the majority of adverts are now showing mixed race families……and they are not in the majority in any part of the world …….
It's about intent. You can use a word through ignorance or by mistake and not mean offence.Use a potentially offensive word in a message in which you're complaining that there's too many of "them" on the telly and you've got a job on arguing that you're not discriminatory.
Yeah like they aren't trying to push an agenda much are they?! Tesco and the Santa Covid pass for example. Completely unacceptable.
Quote from: sha66y on November 18, 2021, 01:54:41 pmQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on November 17, 2021, 07:17:48 pmIt's about intent. You can use a word through ignorance or by mistake and not mean offence.Use a potentially offensive word in a message in which you're complaining that there's too many of "them" on the telly and you've got a job on arguing that you're not discriminatory.Wrong!…wrong…NOT TOO MANY OF THEM ON TELLY,!!If every advert depicted a coloured family in whatever environment the advertisers found best to sell their product…I wouldn’t bat an eyelid, however the majority of adverts are now showing mixed race families……and they are not in the majority in any part of the world …….Then blame the advertising agencies. They decide what goes into their adverts, not the broadcasting stations.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on November 17, 2021, 07:17:48 pmIt's about intent. You can use a word through ignorance or by mistake and not mean offence.Use a potentially offensive word in a message in which you're complaining that there's too many of "them" on the telly and you've got a job on arguing that you're not discriminatory.Wrong!…wrong…NOT TOO MANY OF THEM ON TELLY,!!If every advert depicted a coloured family in whatever environment the advertisers found best to sell their product…I wouldn’t bat an eyelid, however the majority of adverts are now showing mixed race families……and they are not in the majority in any part of the world …….
It's about intent. You can use a word through ignorance or by mistake and not mean offence.Use a potentially offensive word in a message in which you're complaining that there's too many of "them" on the telly and you've got a job on arguing that you're not discriminatory.
Quote from: sha66y on November 18, 2021, 01:49:07 pmQuote from: MachoMadness on November 17, 2021, 07:05:44 pm"coloured can refer to white people actually" is one of the most insane things I've ever read. My patience for this kind of disingenuous shit wore out 10 years ago, god bless anyone trying to engage this nonsense in good faith.If we're all one big happy family and everyone is "coloured" there's really no point in crying about how many "coloured" people you see in adverts is there?Your ignorance of the subject matter is revelationary ….I said the portrayal of mixed race families in nearly every advert is sending an incorrect message………not that there are too many coloured folk in adverts…What message would that be then? Buy our shit? It's an advert, designed to appeal to as many demographics as possible in a short time - ad space is expensive. That includes mixed race families. Our money spends the same way an all-white family's does, sorry that upsets you so much.Your complaint is that there are too many mixed race families. Therefore if the families shown were all white you'd have no problem. Therefore you are upset about the number of non-white people on TV! At least have the balls to own it instead of making this meaningless distinction. Unless you're arguing if all adverts showed all black people you wouldn't care, which is obvious b*llocks.
Quote from: MachoMadness on November 17, 2021, 07:05:44 pm"coloured can refer to white people actually" is one of the most insane things I've ever read. My patience for this kind of disingenuous shit wore out 10 years ago, god bless anyone trying to engage this nonsense in good faith.If we're all one big happy family and everyone is "coloured" there's really no point in crying about how many "coloured" people you see in adverts is there?Your ignorance of the subject matter is revelationary ….I said the portrayal of mixed race families in nearly every advert is sending an incorrect message………not that there are too many coloured folk in adverts…
"coloured can refer to white people actually" is one of the most insane things I've ever read. My patience for this kind of disingenuous shit wore out 10 years ago, god bless anyone trying to engage this nonsense in good faith.If we're all one big happy family and everyone is "coloured" there's really no point in crying about how many "coloured" people you see in adverts is there?
I would like to think that eastenders doesn’t represent true life in London otherwise the divorce courts would be inundated. The police domestic abuse officers would be permanently based there. Everyone would have a criminal record It’s like going back 500 years to some seedy country village where they’re all relatedNo one’s got a tv and everyone’s always in the pubThank god London isn’t like that
There are some that live in my local area that still use the word “darkies”.
Quote from: Muttley on November 16, 2021, 08:55:19 pm"coloured" Says it all,really.And the word you would use is………..?
"coloured" Says it all,really.
Sha66y. Could you at least consider using the term ‘people of colour’ rather than ‘coloured people’?Such a small ask, but so much more respectful.
Quote from: sha66y on November 17, 2021, 08:16:03 amQuote from: Muttley on November 16, 2021, 08:55:19 pm"coloured" Says it all,really.And the word you would use is………..? I don't segregate them by the colour of their skin...I just call them "people".
Quote from: Muttley on November 16, 2021, 08:55:19 pm"coloured" Says it all,really.And the word you would use is………..?
"coloured" Says it all,really.
Quote from: Glyn_Wigley on November 18, 2021, 02:26:46 pmQuote from: sha66y on November 18, 2021, 01:54:41 pmQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on November 17, 2021, 07:17:48 pmIt's about intent. You can use a word through ignorance or by mistake and not mean offence.Use a potentially offensive word in a message in which you're complaining that there's too many of "them" on the telly and you've got a job on arguing that you're not discriminatory.Wrong!…wrong…NOT TOO MANY OF THEM ON TELLY,!!If every advert depicted a coloured family in whatever environment the advertisers found best to sell their product…I wouldn’t bat an eyelid, however the majority of adverts are now showing mixed race families……and they are not in the majority in any part of the world …….Then blame the advertising agencies. They decide what goes into their adverts, not the broadcasting stations.I’m sure the broadcasters would decide if the advert was acceptable…
Quote from: KeithMyath on November 17, 2021, 09:25:53 amOddly the 2 main references for a persons skin colour is white or black, and neither of them is an actual colour. No person is entirely white and the same for black, So on that basis I am assuming, the terms of white/black are referencing the colour of skin more closely associated to, but not specifically. Having a colour grading system of every hue would be ridiculous. In my eyes the only time you need to mention someone’s skin colour is if you have been asked to describe another persons physical characteristics, which would be a pretty rare occasion. Using it as a point of reference in this day and age is outdated at best.If for example someone at work comes to you and says, 'I've been told to ask for Bill', you then point to a group of three men stood talking together and say 'He's the black fellow over there', what's wrong with that? It's like saying ask the bloke with ginger hair. I don't see the problem, it's not abusive or anything.
Oddly the 2 main references for a persons skin colour is white or black, and neither of them is an actual colour. No person is entirely white and the same for black, So on that basis I am assuming, the terms of white/black are referencing the colour of skin more closely associated to, but not specifically. Having a colour grading system of every hue would be ridiculous. In my eyes the only time you need to mention someone’s skin colour is if you have been asked to describe another persons physical characteristics, which would be a pretty rare occasion. Using it as a point of reference in this day and age is outdated at best.