0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Syd,It's difficult to getaway from Russia being a major culprit in this. First limiting gas supplies to pressure Germany and the EU. Then invading Ukraine, causing chaos in the energy markets and havoc in the food chain. Particularly with the supply grain and vegetable oil from Ukraine.
The prices increases were announced a fair bit before Russia invaded Ukraine, weren't they?
Quote from: River Don on May 11, 2022, 09:21:03 amSyd,It's difficult to getaway from Russia being a major culprit in this. First limiting gas supplies to pressure Germany and the EU. Then invading Ukraine, causing chaos in the energy markets and havoc in the food chain. Particularly with the supply grain and vegetable oil from Ukraine.This is true RD, but if the govt had taken steps much earlier to wean the UK off fossil fuels which they will need to do regarding the climate change response this mess would not be so severe for so many people. Insulating old homes a larger pool of funds for changing over to heat pumps, more offshore windfarms etc etc, after 12 years everything is at their door, there are no excuses. How long do you think the tories will need to get a grip on how to govern?Protesters are miles ahead of government thinking.
So what did the tories do from 2010 to sept last year?
Quote from: SydneyRover on May 11, 2022, 09:36:25 amSo what did the tories do from 2010 to sept last year?Have a read of the below article, which won't link but you'll find it on Google. The answer is a significant change in the picture accross all areas.UK Energy in Brief 2021 - GOV.UK
Agreed RD. Things will have to happen quickly to avoid that.Maybe everyone should lobby Putin to see if he will call the war off
Quote from: drfchound on May 11, 2022, 09:02:01 amAgreed RD. Things will have to happen quickly to avoid that.Maybe everyone should lobby Putin to see if he will call the war off Was Putin to blame for the rise in prices in 2021 too? When £90pm was taken off me and my energy bill first went up by £40pm?
This is Gove discussing the Govt response to the cost of living crisis this morning. https://mobile.twitter.com/KarlTurnerMP/status/1524284376078594048Bit early to be on the Charlie, even for him. Government by f**king buffoonery.
Quote from: Glyn_Wigley on May 11, 2022, 11:11:34 amQuote from: drfchound on May 11, 2022, 09:02:01 amAgreed RD. Things will have to happen quickly to avoid that.Maybe everyone should lobby Putin to see if he will call the war off Was Putin to blame for the rise in prices in 2021 too? When £90pm was taken off me and my energy bill first went up by £40pm?The UK fertiliser plants were shut down Sept 2021, that was because Putin had already begun restricting gas supplies into Europe.So yes, it probably was Putin to blame.
Quote from: River Don on May 11, 2022, 11:19:06 amQuote from: Glyn_Wigley on May 11, 2022, 11:11:34 amQuote from: drfchound on May 11, 2022, 09:02:01 amAgreed RD. Things will have to happen quickly to avoid that.Maybe everyone should lobby Putin to see if he will call the war off Was Putin to blame for the rise in prices in 2021 too? When £90pm was taken off me and my energy bill first went up by £40pm?The UK fertiliser plants were shut down Sept 2021, that was because Putin had already begun restricting gas supplies into Europe.So yes, it probably was Putin to blame.If it was just gas prices and everything else was running as clockwork, as it should be following 12 years of the money managers at the helm you could say ............... well ok, they got that bit wrong but overall ............But the problem is there is a whole host of shit happening with the economy and if you look back on the major decisions made it would be hard not to think the economy was in a hole by design, no?
Quote from: SydneyRover on May 11, 2022, 09:36:25 amSo what did the tories do from 2010 to sept last year?After the grandstanding from the ginger tw*t representing Sheffield tying the governments hands at every opportunity, not much between 2010 to 2015.
Would that be the economic policy that the public decided at the next election to re-elect but this time without the LD anchor rapped around it Bol***ks.The Lab strategy was left on the shelf,as usual.
Quote from: danumdon on May 11, 2022, 04:19:39 pmWould that be the economic policy that the public decided at the next election to re-elect but this time without the LD anchor rapped around it Bol***ks.The Lab strategy was left on the shelf,as usual.The fact that people voted for it [1] doesn't make it any less of a catastrophe. It's a fact that the 2010s were the worst decade for UK economic growth for 2 centuries. You'll not find a credible economists in the country that thinks Austerity wasn't principally resposinbke for that. [1] Actually 60% of votes were cast for parties that were against Austerity in 2015, including even the LDs by then who realised how badly they'd f**ked up. But there you go. That's our electoral system.
It doesn’t matter how you wrap it up bst, the Labour Party got slaughtered at the last GE.I bet you didn’t complain about our electoral system in 1997 or in 2005 when Blair only won 35% of the vote.
Quote from: drfchound on May 11, 2022, 07:08:55 pmIt doesn’t matter how you wrap it up bst, the Labour Party got slaughtered at the last GE.I bet you didn’t complain about our electoral system in 1997 or in 2005 when Blair only won 35% of the vote.The last general election was highly unusual, in that it wasn't primarily about the economy.Brexit and sovereignty had been raised to such a level that it put all else into the shade If Brexit hadn't become the monster it did, it would have been fascinating to see what the election would have focussed on .
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on May 11, 2022, 06:54:28 pmQuote from: danumdon on May 11, 2022, 04:19:39 pmWould that be the economic policy that the public decided at the next election to re-elect but this time without the LD anchor rapped around it Bol***ks.The Lab strategy was left on the shelf,as usual.The fact that people voted for it [1] doesn't make it any less of a catastrophe. It's a fact that the 2010s were the worst decade for UK economic growth for 2 centuries. You'll not find a credible economists in the country that thinks Austerity wasn't principally resposinbke for that. [1] Actually 60% of votes were cast for parties that were against Austerity in 2015, including even the LDs by then who realised how badly they'd f**ked up. But there you go. That's our electoral system. The fact that the 2010's "were the worst decade for UK economic growth for 2 centuries" might just of had a very small matter of a worldwide economic recession the likes of which had not been seen for over 80years to deal with. That and the lousy legacy left of an outward bound Labour spending everyone's money again, and not being prudent in the good times to alleviate the bad.Your second point is again moot because you know that in a first past the post system,1st is everything and all the also ran's added together makes no difference to the governance of the country.
Quote from: River Don on May 11, 2022, 07:57:54 pmQuote from: drfchound on May 11, 2022, 07:08:55 pmIt doesn’t matter how you wrap it up bst, the Labour Party got slaughtered at the last GE.I bet you didn’t complain about our electoral system in 1997 or in 2005 when Blair only won 35% of the vote.The last general election was highly unusual, in that it wasn't primarily about the economy.Brexit and sovereignty had been raised to such a level that it put all else into the shade If Brexit hadn't become the monster it did, it would have been fascinating to see what the election would have focussed on .And...no-one was talking about the 2019 election.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on May 11, 2022, 08:13:22 pmQuote from: River Don on May 11, 2022, 07:57:54 pmQuote from: drfchound on May 11, 2022, 07:08:55 pmIt doesn’t matter how you wrap it up bst, the Labour Party got slaughtered at the last GE.I bet you didn’t complain about our electoral system in 1997 or in 2005 when Blair only won 35% of the vote.The last general election was highly unusual, in that it wasn't primarily about the economy.Brexit and sovereignty had been raised to such a level that it put all else into the shade If Brexit hadn't become the monster it did, it would have been fascinating to see what the election would have focussed on .And...no-one was talking about the 2019 election.YOU though were talking about how crap our electoral system is.
Quote from: Glyn_Wigley on May 11, 2022, 11:11:34 amQuote from: drfchound on May 11, 2022, 09:02:01 amAgreed RD. Things will have to happen quickly to avoid that.Maybe everyone should lobby Putin to see if he will call the war off Was Putin to blame for the rise in prices in 2021 too? When £90pm was taken off me and my energy bill first went up by £40pm?See above post by RD.
Quote from: danumdon on May 11, 2022, 07:26:18 pmQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on May 11, 2022, 06:54:28 pmQuote from: danumdon on May 11, 2022, 04:19:39 pmWould that be the economic policy that the public decided at the next election to re-elect but this time without the LD anchor rapped around it Bol***ks.The Lab strategy was left on the shelf,as usual.The fact that people voted for it [1] doesn't make it any less of a catastrophe. It's a fact that the 2010s were the worst decade for UK economic growth for 2 centuries. You'll not find a credible economists in the country that thinks Austerity wasn't principally resposinbke for that. [1] Actually 60% of votes were cast for parties that were against Austerity in 2015, including even the LDs by then who realised how badly they'd f**ked up. But there you go. That's our electoral system. The fact that the 2010's "were the worst decade for UK economic growth for 2 centuries" might just of had a very small matter of a worldwide economic recession the likes of which had not been seen for over 80years to deal with. That and the lousy legacy left of an outward bound Labour spending everyone's money again, and not being prudent in the good times to alleviate the bad.Your second point is again moot because you know that in a first past the post system,1st is everything and all the also ran's added together makes no difference to the governance of the country.DD If you want to discuss macroeconomics I'm game.Start with this graph, which, by the way, includes the Great Depression, so that covers your "worst for 80 years" argument.See if you can have a wild guess when, on that graph, the 2010 election happened and the Tories (with Clegg's help) imposed Austerity.Go on. I dare you.As for elections, yes of course the Tories won in 2015. My point was that the country overwhelmingly voted for anti-Austerity parties. Do you disagree?
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on May 11, 2022, 06:54:28 pmQuote from: danumdon on May 11, 2022, 04:19:39 pmWould that be the economic policy that the public decided at the next election to re-elect but this time without the LD anchor rapped around it Bol***ks.The Lab strategy was left on the shelf,as usual.The fact that people voted for it [1] doesn't make it any less of a catastrophe. It's a fact that the 2010s were the worst decade for UK economic growth for 2 centuries. You'll not find a credible economists in the country that thinks Austerity wasn't principally resposinbke for that. [1] Actually 60% of votes were cast for parties that were against Austerity in 2015, including even the LDs by then who realised how badly they'd f**ked up. But there you go. That's our electoral system. The fact that the 2010's "were the worst decade for UK economic growth for 2 centuries" might just of had a very small matter of a worldwide economic recession the likes of which had not been seen for over 80years to deal with. That and the lousy legacy left of an outward bound Labour spending everyone's money again, and not being prudent in the good times to alleviate the bad.Your second point is again moot because you know that in a first past the post system,1st is everything and all the also ran's added together makes no difference to the governance of the country.