0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The rspca would be the prosecuting agency in this matter.Don’t hold your breath.
Interesting CDHI often donate petfood to the RSPCA centre in York. Would that be independently funded too?
Quote from: normal rules on February 08, 2022, 11:43:56 amThe rspca would be the prosecuting agency in this matter.Don’t hold your breath.RSPCA is a charity with a set amount of resources, therefore it has to be selective about which cases it proceeds with and what the likely outcome would be of a conviction. A conviction in this case from experience would be a ban from keeping animals (which isn't enforceable) and a fine. Funny how i tar the NHS and Police with same brush for being useless and get put right by people who have worked in the NHS or Police but yet you are doing the same thing here with the RSPCA. Having worked for the RSPCA for about 15 years and knowing some amazing people, including inspectors - this is one area where i can say that i know best. The only issue with the RSPCA, like with the NHS is bloated and poor management and wasting of resources at the top level. The animal care staff and inspectors and collection officers by and large are fantastic. Also. Most people don't know that most RSPCA shelters do not get given any funding by the RSPCA. So for example Bawtry is technically a private charity that uses the RSPCA name and therefore the RSPCA can use their facilities. The RSPCA doesn't give RSPCA Bawtry any money at all as it is branch run and therefore a separate entity. Most centres in the UK are branch run and generate all their own money without any help from HQ. I worked at HQ owned RSPCA shelter and the difference is amazing and you can tell where the money goes. In contrast, anyone who ever visited the old RSPCA Sheffield on Spring Street, one of the centres i used to work at, will see just how little money and resources they had to work with.
Quote from: ColinDouglasHandshake on February 08, 2022, 12:12:16 pmQuote from: normal rules on February 08, 2022, 11:43:56 amThe rspca would be the prosecuting agency in this matter.Don’t hold your breath.RSPCA is a charity with a set amount of resources, therefore it has to be selective about which cases it proceeds with and what the likely outcome would be of a conviction. A conviction in this case from experience would be a ban from keeping animals (which isn't enforceable) and a fine. Funny how i tar the NHS and Police with same brush for being useless and get put right by people who have worked in the NHS or Police but yet you are doing the same thing here with the RSPCA. Having worked for the RSPCA for about 15 years and knowing some amazing people, including inspectors - this is one area where i can say that i know best. The only issue with the RSPCA, like with the NHS is bloated and poor management and wasting of resources at the top level. The animal care staff and inspectors and collection officers by and large are fantastic. Also. Most people don't know that most RSPCA shelters do not get given any funding by the RSPCA. So for example Bawtry is technically a private charity that uses the RSPCA name and therefore the RSPCA can use their facilities. The RSPCA doesn't give RSPCA Bawtry any money at all as it is branch run and therefore a separate entity. Most centres in the UK are branch run and generate all their own money without any help from HQ. I worked at HQ owned RSPCA shelter and the difference is amazing and you can tell where the money goes. In contrast, anyone who ever visited the old RSPCA Sheffield on Spring Street, one of the centres i used to work at, will see just how little money and resources they had to work with. Don’t assume my comment to be a slur. I have worked on a number of joint agency jobs with the rspca, puppy farms etc, excessive pet ownership/ neglect. My comment about “don’t hold breath” is that they don’t have the resources to deal with many areas of animal cruelty, so much so, that most offences go un investigated and un detected. Puppy farms is an example in case. New laws were brought out about having have a licence yet there are many many people out there still profiting from the sale of popular fashion pets such as french bulldogs etc.
Who was filming by the way.I didn’t hear anyone protesting so they must have been happy for it to happen.
When agencies deal with victims of domestic violence, one of the questions asked about previous incidents or character of the perpetrators is any previous violence to pets or animals. There are very well documented links between cruelty to animals and violence to people.If he is happy to slap his cat around, I wonder how he treats his partner?
You only have to look at the list of celebs who own french bulldogs to see how people are influenced into thinking these are the pets to have. For many, they are nothing more than a fashion accessory. Like a bling watch or handbag.They are f**king ugly things too,
His brother who was recording plays for Dagenham.Awful. Pair of them.
£29.8 million. And he kicks his cat.I can imagine some of the chants now.