Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:11:28 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: Nam v TLOD  (Read 7363 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

glosterred

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 8894
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #90 on March 05, 2022, 04:06:22 pm by glosterred »
Rovers are making a double change to start the second half

OFF:
Josh Martin and Dan Gardner

ON:
Ethan Galbraith and Reo Griffiths

#drfc #CHEDON


COYR



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29522
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #91 on March 05, 2022, 04:07:36 pm by drfchound »
Tommy Rowe to spearhead a second half revival ..... maybe.

DonnyOsmond

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11168
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #92 on March 05, 2022, 04:09:51 pm by DonnyOsmond »
Ref is a knob stain.

glosterred

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 8894
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #93 on March 05, 2022, 04:10:13 pm by glosterred »
This ref seems a bit card happy, might not be 11 v 11 if he keeps this up


COYR

Thought so


COYR

Barmby Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4484
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #94 on March 05, 2022, 04:10:49 pm by Barmby Rover »
Clayton off, useful.

bpoolrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5932
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #95 on March 05, 2022, 04:11:02 pm by bpoolrover »
Stupid putting your arm up should no better

Redroy

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 272
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #96 on March 05, 2022, 04:11:30 pm by Redroy »
Ref is a knob stain.

4th official looked like he gave that. What a t**t. First one tho the ref gave was soft as f**k tbf

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 29933
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #97 on March 05, 2022, 04:12:13 pm by Filo »
Didn’t think there was anything in that, but we’ll get nowt from this now

bpoolrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5932
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #98 on March 05, 2022, 04:13:09 pm by bpoolrover »
Think we have to be honest we are poor, next season we need hopefully a more attack minded manager and several new players lol

Copps is Magic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8764
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #99 on March 05, 2022, 04:13:29 pm by Copps is Magic »
I'm turning off. If we score two goals and make me look like a mug so be it but I'm done.

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 29933
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #100 on March 05, 2022, 04:13:36 pm by Filo »
And what really f**ks me off is the tackle on younger last week, the player stays on and the player scores

bpoolrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5932
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #101 on March 05, 2022, 04:13:55 pm by bpoolrover »
Didn’t think there was anything in that, but we’ll get nowt from this now
his elbow caught him nothing malicious but a defo foul

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29522
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #102 on March 05, 2022, 04:15:59 pm by drfchound »
Think we have to be honest we are poor, next season we need hopefully a more attack minded manager and several new players lol

Don't forget that McSheff was the outstanding candidate.

ScillyRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3848
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #103 on March 05, 2022, 04:16:22 pm by ScillyRover »
Robbie on comms said that Cheltenham aren’t pretty but effective. Compared to us, they’re beautiful !

Redroy

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 272
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #104 on March 05, 2022, 04:17:48 pm by Redroy »
Robbie on comms said that Cheltenham aren’t pretty but effective. Compared to us, they’re beautiful !

Aye, I'd describe a team like Accrington as not pretty but effective whereas these are decent on the ball too. That Etete lad up top is good.

rich1471

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2671
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #105 on March 05, 2022, 04:18:21 pm by rich1471 »
Was a foul ,but not a yellow , it we have been poor

bpoolrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5932
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #106 on March 05, 2022, 04:19:22 pm by bpoolrover »
Was a foul ,but not a yellow , it we have been poor
to be fair very few rovers players moaned about it

colincramb

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2055
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #107 on March 05, 2022, 04:22:28 pm by colincramb »
If everyone else losses around us then we still have a chance in theory, but there’s no way this team wins enough games to get us out of the shite

Canadian Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1991
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #108 on March 05, 2022, 04:24:06 pm by Canadian Rover »
Biggest problem?

Lack of effort. Something still not right attitude wise at the club. Some of the players show the desire like Smith, Rowe & Olowu others look like they can't be arsed.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2022, 04:26:45 pm by Canadian Rover »

ScillyRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3848
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #109 on March 05, 2022, 04:25:12 pm by ScillyRover »
Biggest problem?

Lack of effort. Something still nit right attitude wise at the club. Some of the players show the desire like Smith, Rowe & Olowu others look like they can't be arsed.
A Certain loanee in particular.

bpoolrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5932
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #110 on March 05, 2022, 04:27:58 pm by bpoolrover »
Unless Martin is injured seems strange taking him off

Canadian Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1991
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #111 on March 05, 2022, 04:29:27 pm by Canadian Rover »
Unless Martin is injured seems strange taking him off
He wasn't doing anything. Next sub had to be Agard on for Mipo (who has been Cukur levels of useless today)

steve@dcfd

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 9382
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #112 on March 05, 2022, 04:30:15 pm by steve@dcfd »
Biggest problem?

Lack of effort. Something still not right attitude wise at the club. Some of the players show the desire like Smith, Rowe & Olowu others look like they can't be arsed.
They are not good enough but let’s just say they can’t be bothered

RoversAlias

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11889
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #113 on March 05, 2022, 04:34:45 pm by RoversAlias »
Fleetwood have just gone behind as well, and Gillingham had a man sent off ahead of playing us.

Wiltshire Exile

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 2912
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #114 on March 05, 2022, 04:35:04 pm by Wiltshire Exile »
Biggest problem?

…others look like they can't be arsed.

All they are ‘arsed’ about is about the size of their bank balance…win, lose or draw.

Redroy

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 272
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #115 on March 05, 2022, 04:36:11 pm by Redroy »
When do we start playing our easy games when we win them all and stay up?

ScillyRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3848
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #116 on March 05, 2022, 04:36:26 pm by ScillyRover »
Lovely goal from Alfie 3-0
We haven’t got a single forward with anything like his qualities.

Barmby Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4484
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #117 on March 05, 2022, 04:38:04 pm by Barmby Rover »
3 goals now 20 for Alfie this season I think, not bad for a player not up to this standard of football according to a lot on here.

glosterred

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 8894
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #118 on March 05, 2022, 04:38:16 pm by glosterred »
More crap defending, when will they learn


COYR

colincramb

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2055
Re: Nam v TLOD
« Reply #119 on March 05, 2022, 04:38:35 pm by colincramb »
20 goals for the season.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012