0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I've looked briefly at this case before and something about it felt wrong. It felt like one of those cases where the gutter press whip up a lynch mob and the whole of society decides a person is guilty. This expert evidence seems to throw great doubt on the safety of the conviction.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on February 04, 2025, 02:52:54 pmI've looked briefly at this case before and something about it felt wrong. It felt like one of those cases where the gutter press whip up a lynch mob and the whole of society decides a person is guilty. This expert evidence seems to throw great doubt on the safety of the conviction.Wasn't there expert witnesses who said she did do it?
Quote from: ravenrover on February 05, 2025, 09:24:50 amQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on February 04, 2025, 02:52:54 pmI've looked briefly at this case before and something about it felt wrong. It felt like one of those cases where the gutter press whip up a lynch mob and the whole of society decides a person is guilty. This expert evidence seems to throw great doubt on the safety of the conviction.Wasn't there expert witnesses who said she did do it?The original expert witnesses cited work by a Canadian world authority. He is the one who has come forward, by the sound of it saying that the expert witnesses misunderstood his research and reached the wrong conclusion.It happens.