0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
With the way we play we are always going to get caught out in those positions as Grant wants both fullbacks to push up.
I thought Sterry played well last night to be honest.
Yet another goal at back post from an un marked player while he walks back, same as last week, week before, and most of last season.Constant liability.Nixon over Sterry every day of the week for me, atleast he is a defender with work ethic.
I am not questioning Sterry as a player and what he brings overall to the team. Yes he is half decent going forward, but that shouldn't be totally to the detriment of defending. Yes GM plays attacking, but he certainly wouldn't have told Sterry not to track back.If you watch the replay back Olowu moves away from the attacker and almost passes him on to Broadbent but with no communication. First mistake. Then Broadbent doesn't commit to picking him up and seems stuck in two minds, knows he is there but doesn't position correctly. Second mistake. Sterry is facing all of this as his is on a slow jog back and makes zero effort to get back and help out. That is where my issue lies. I'm all for attacking full backs but their primary job is defending. Attacking full backs doesn't mean you have 2CBs and a cm dropping in. It means you have lads that can get up and down.This is not the first time either, the hair bobble incident for example.If someone is trying and it doesn't come off that's fine. But someone not even trying and working their arse off for the team, that I can't stand.Watch the replay back, whilst the initial errors are not from Sterry he could have been back in there in plenty of time to stop it.People labeling him a scape goat? If we keep conceding at back stick every week when he is walking back or doing his hair then it will get talked about, that doesn't make him a scape goat!
Quote from: Ryaldinhio on September 04, 2024, 03:45:33 pmI am not questioning Sterry as a player and what he brings overall to the team. Yes he is half decent going forward, but that shouldn't be totally to the detriment of defending. Yes GM plays attacking, but he certainly wouldn't have told Sterry not to track back.If you watch the replay back Olowu moves away from the attacker and almost passes him on to Broadbent but with no communication. First mistake. Then Broadbent doesn't commit to picking him up and seems stuck in two minds, knows he is there but doesn't position correctly. Second mistake. Sterry is facing all of this as his is on a slow jog back and makes zero effort to get back and help out. That is where my issue lies. I'm all for attacking full backs but their primary job is defending. Attacking full backs doesn't mean you have 2CBs and a cm dropping in. It means you have lads that can get up and down.This is not the first time either, the hair bobble incident for example.If someone is trying and it doesn't come off that's fine. But someone not even trying and working their arse off for the team, that I can't stand.Watch the replay back, whilst the initial errors are not from Sterry he could have been back in there in plenty of time to stop it.People labeling him a scape goat? If we keep conceding at back stick every week when he is walking back or doing his hair then it will get talked about, that doesn't make him a scape goat!But with no communication?You must havr very good hearing if there was no visible method
A similar situation arose at PV for their equaliser. I think it was Clifton who pressed the player in possession, in fact getting a tackle in but somehow the PV player came out with the ball. Simulatenously, both Bailey and Westbrooke were drawn towards the same player, leaving the goalscorer the space to run into behind. It really only needed one of them to go. Had either of them have held their ground then they could have covered that run. The pass was good enough to disect all of them and the player was in. Classic ball watching rather than picking up the man. It happens sometimes quicker than someone can make a shout.
Quote from: ravenrover on September 04, 2024, 06:40:01 pmQuote from: Ryaldinhio on September 04, 2024, 03:45:33 pmI am not questioning Sterry as a player and what he brings overall to the team. Yes he is half decent going forward, but that shouldn't be totally to the detriment of defending. Yes GM plays attacking, but he certainly wouldn't have told Sterry not to track back.If you watch the replay back Olowu moves away from the attacker and almost passes him on to Broadbent but with no communication. First mistake. Then Broadbent doesn't commit to picking him up and seems stuck in two minds, knows he is there but doesn't position correctly. Second mistake. Sterry is facing all of this as his is on a slow jog back and makes zero effort to get back and help out. That is where my issue lies. I'm all for attacking full backs but their primary job is defending. Attacking full backs doesn't mean you have 2CBs and a cm dropping in. It means you have lads that can get up and down.This is not the first time either, the hair bobble incident for example.If someone is trying and it doesn't come off that's fine. But someone not even trying and working their arse off for the team, that I can't stand.Watch the replay back, whilst the initial errors are not from Sterry he could have been back in there in plenty of time to stop it.People labeling him a scape goat? If we keep conceding at back stick every week when he is walking back or doing his hair then it will get talked about, that doesn't make him a scape goat!But with no communication?You must havr very good hearing if there was no visible methodCommunication isn't only verbal and in that situation would have expected a clear gesture as well as a shout, either of which you would see a reaction from Broadbent as to the man he had been passed.......quite easy to see that none of this occurred.I was simply pointing out that it wasn't only Sterry at fault for the goal, and usually with the exception of keeper error it is never just one player at fault. In truth it wasn't a Sterry error that caused it, but please watch it back and see his efforts to get back in to defend a clear risk. That is not acceptable and I expect Grant and Cliff will be talking to him about it......aswell as Broadbent.
Quote from: Ryaldinhio on September 04, 2024, 08:44:07 pmQuote from: ravenrover on September 04, 2024, 06:40:01 pmQuote from: Ryaldinhio on September 04, 2024, 03:45:33 pmI am not questioning Sterry as a player and what he brings overall to the team. Yes he is half decent going forward, but that shouldn't be totally to the detriment of defending. Yes GM plays attacking, but he certainly wouldn't have told Sterry not to track back.If you watch the replay back Olowu moves away from the attacker and almost passes him on to Broadbent but with no communication. First mistake. Then Broadbent doesn't commit to picking him up and seems stuck in two minds, knows he is there but doesn't position correctly. Second mistake. Sterry is facing all of this as his is on a slow jog back and makes zero effort to get back and help out. That is where my issue lies. I'm all for attacking full backs but their primary job is defending. Attacking full backs doesn't mean you have 2CBs and a cm dropping in. It means you have lads that can get up and down.This is not the first time either, the hair bobble incident for example.If someone is trying and it doesn't come off that's fine. But someone not even trying and working their arse off for the team, that I can't stand.Watch the replay back, whilst the initial errors are not from Sterry he could have been back in there in plenty of time to stop it.People labeling him a scape goat? If we keep conceding at back stick every week when he is walking back or doing his hair then it will get talked about, that doesn't make him a scape goat!But with no communication?You must havr very good hearing if there was no visible methodCommunication isn't only verbal and in that situation would have expected a clear gesture as well as a shout, either of which you would see a reaction from Broadbent as to the man he had been passed.......quite easy to see that none of this occurred.I was simply pointing out that it wasn't only Sterry at fault for the goal, and usually with the exception of keeper error it is never just one player at fault. In truth it wasn't a Sterry error that caused it, but please watch it back and see his efforts to get back in to defend a clear risk. That is not acceptable and I expect Grant and Cliff will be talking to him about it......aswell as Broadbent.Maybe read what I said again.Giving a verbal instruction doesn't need a visual instruction.
Sterry is a good player at this level. Yes maybe not a proper defender but he will create goals too. Question is is he better than Nixon. Personally I think Nixon is better and has a higher ceiling so should play. That said I’ve not seen him have a run of games for a while with his injury