0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I’d be rotating Gibson out next game. Very poor tonight, not entirely sold on him yet.
One weapon we seem to have lost from last season is that he direct ball to the wingers making inverted runs in behind. Too many aimless long balls.
We do miss what Haks brought us, as much as we'd all like to deny it.
Crikey. We lose a game, everything's wrong, we signed the wrong players etc. We didn't show the quality in the final third we're capable of and we got done by two sucker punches. After just 6 games there's lots little things here and there that need work. We don't need to rip everything up and start again. It's a ream game and the sum of parts needs to be better than the individuals. Maybe at the moment, we're too reliant on certain individuals provided the magic. McCann says he's given players freedom when attacking which of course there's always pros and cons. Maybe at times they're too selfish and not working as a unit. They're learning on the job as is McCann. These players so far have delivered 2 points per game average and we're still not the finished article or firing on all cylinders. There's alot to like and alot to look forward to.
Are we making too many changes game on game. Love the fact that we have such a strong squad but should we be sticking with a more settled team in general. I get it’s been a busy period but certain players are not get a proper run. Ironside, 20 odd goals last season, looks lost now, not getting enough game time. Olowu, in good form, in fact how many games has he played this season and been on the losing side. Sbarra, where’s his chance to show. Think we just need a settled period now to try work out our best 11. Not sure many could pick the team to play week on week.
It amazed me that GM has invariably started Sharp and I wondered whether this was an implicit condition of his contract. If so, it was ill-advised and seems unfair to Ironside; more than unfair really and who could blame him for wanting a transfer in January? And Sharp could well retire next April. Miller and Ironside might well have provided a better long term prospect but that’s history now too. As for Settled vs Rotation it was a widely-held view that we have enough talent to make up two competitive 11s. So perhaps it isn’t surprising GM doesn’t know which 11 is best. Hence rotation.
Quote from: ForsolongaRover on September 13, 2024, 09:24:14 pmIt amazed me that GM has invariably started Sharp and I wondered whether this was an implicit condition of his contract. If so, it was ill-advised and seems unfair to Ironside; more than unfair really and who could blame him for wanting a transfer in January? And Sharp could well retire next April. Miller and Ironside might well have provided a better long term prospect but that’s history now too. As for Settled vs Rotation it was a widely-held view that we have enough talent to make up two competitive 11s. So perhaps it isn’t surprising GM doesn’t know which 11 is best. Hence rotation.Ironside started the first two games but didn’t do much, sharp was coming off the bench and scoring goals. Doesn’t need a conspiracy theory to understand why sharp began to start games